Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing KDE 3.5.9 --SOLVED--
- Mail Original - De: alain didierjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] À: gentoo-user gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Envoyé: Dimanche 2 Novembre 2008 11:26:29 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: [gentoo-user] Problems installing KDE 3.5.9 Some packages from KDE won't install: kde-base/kdenetwork-3.5.9 kde-base/kdeartwork-3.5.9 kde-base/kdeutils-3.5.9-r1 kde-base/kdeadmin kde-base/kdegraphics kde-base/kdeaddons The error message is always the same: * The die message: * econf failed Thanks to Alan Mc Kinnon's advice, I dug a little further in errors messages and found this: qt lib must be the same that was used to compile kdelibs. So a recompile of kdelibs did the trick. Hope it may help... -- ~adj~
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing KDE 3.5.9
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2008 11:26:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Some packages from KDE won't install: kde-base/kdenetwork-3.5.9 kde-base/kdeartwork-3.5.9 kde-base/kdeutils-3.5.9-r1 kde-base/kdeadmin kde-base/kdegraphics kde-base/kdeaddons The error message is always the same: * The die message: * econf failed What did I miss ? The lines above this message (the last lines from configure). Why did econf fail? Bye... Dirk
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing KDE 3.5.9
- Mail Original - De: Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] À: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Envoyé: Dimanche 2 Novembre 2008 11:48:45 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing KDE 3.5.9 Am Sonntag, 2. November 2008 11:26:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Some packages from KDE won't install: kde-base/kdenetwork-3.5.9 kde-base/kdeartwork-3.5.9 kde-base/kdeutils-3.5.9-r1 kde-base/kdeadmin kde-base/kdegraphics kde-base/kdeaddons The error message is always the same: * The die message: * econf failed What did I miss ? The lines above this message (the last lines from configure). Why did econf fail? Here come the full message for kdenetwork: ERROR: kde-base/kdenetwork-3.5.9 failed. * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile * environment, line 4153: Called kde_src_compile * environment, line 2960: Called kde_src_compile 'src_compile' * environment, line 3085: Called kde_src_compile 'src_compile' 'all' 'myconf' * environment, line 3073: Called econf 'configure' 'make' '--with-libidn' '--disable-sametime-plugin' '--disable-slp' '--without-wifi' '--disable-jingle' '--without-xmms' '--without-external-libgadu' '--with-x' '--enable-mitshm' '--without-xinerama' '--with-qt-dir=/usr/qt/3' '--enable-mt' '--with-qt-libraries=/usr/qt/3/lib64' '--disable-dependency-tracking' '--disable-debug' '--without-debug' '--disable-final' '--with-arts' '--prefix=/usr/kde/3.5' '--mandir=/usr/kde/3.5/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/kde/3.5/share/info' '--datadir=/usr/kde/3.5/share' * ebuild.sh, line 519: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die econf failed * The die message: * econf failed
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing KDE 3.5.9
On Sunday 02 November 2008 21:42:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here come the full message for kdenetwork: ERROR: kde-base/kdenetwork-3.5.9 failed. * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile * environment, line 4153: Called kde_src_compile * environment, line 2960: Called kde_src_compile 'src_compile' * environment, line 3085: Called kde_src_compile 'src_compile' 'all' 'myconf' * environment, line 3073: Called econf 'configure' 'make' '--with-libidn' '--disable-sametime-plugin' '--disable-slp' '--without-wifi' '--disable-jingle' '--without-xmms' '--without-external-libgadu' '--with-x' '--enable-mitshm' '--without-xinerama' '--with-qt-dir=/usr/qt/3' '--enable-mt' '--with-qt-libraries=/usr/qt/3/lib64' '--disable-dependency-tracking' '--disable-debug' '--without-debug' '--disable-final' '--with-arts' '--prefix=/usr/kde/3.5' '--mandir=/usr/kde/3.5/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/kde/3.5/share/info' '--datadir=/usr/kde/3.5/share' * ebuild.sh, line 519: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die econf failed * The die message: * econf failed That's the wrong bit output, it's nothing more than an error alert. What is needed to help you in any way is the output *before* this, as far back as the *first* error message. This means you will have to look at the output and figure some stuff out. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
By the way, this might help. I put some files online, that you might wanna check: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/~saffi/eee/ * grub.conf * fstab * make.conf * Kernel config Best regards, Saffi -- Ricardo Saffi Marques http://www.rsaffi.com == Laboratório de Administração e Segurança de Sistemas - LAS Instituto de Computação - IC Caixa Postal: 6176 Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP 13083-852, Campinas, SP, Brasil ==
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: By the way, this might help. I put some files online, that you might wanna check: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/~saffi/eee/ * grub.conf * fstab * make.conf * Kernel config Cheers! Daniel Veiga had the same issue and contacted me with the solution. My kernel was perfectly right. The solution is to add: rootwait rootdelay=10 in the kernel line. Gentoo is now running flawlessly! I intend to post here my mad ideas about compiling and installing the rest of the packages (mainly graphical stuff). Best regards, Saffi -- Ricardo Saffi Marques http://www.rsaffi.com == Laboratório de Administração e Segurança de Sistemas - LAS Instituto de Computação - IC Caixa Postal: 6176 Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP 13083-852, Campinas, SP, Brasil ==
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: Hello folks. I have an Asus EeePC 701 (4GB) and I'm having problems installing Gentoo on it, so I wrote this giant e-mail to help you understand what is going on and what I have done and can't do. I have been using Gentoo for a while, so I am pretty comfortable on installing it and configuring it. snip Please don't hijack threads. Please write a new email to the list if you wish to start a new thread. Here's a google search with lots of good resources on hijacking threads. http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=thread+hijackingbtnG=Google+Search thanks! -- Eric Martin Key fingerprint = D1C4 086E DBB5 C18E 6FDA B215 6A25 7174 A941 3B9F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
Eric Martin wrote: Please don't hijack threads. Please write a new email to the list if you wish to start a new thread. Here's a google search with lots of good resources on hijacking threads. You don't have to explain to me what thread hijacking means. I moderate a Brazilian e-group of 2900 people and am always saying that to members. Tell me what made you think I did that, because it sure ain't clear for me. Jeez, wake up. I wrote that e-mail from scratch. Regards, Saffi -- Ricardo Saffi Marques http://www.rsaffi.com == Laboratory of System Administration and Security - LAS Institute of Computing - IC P.O. Box: 6176 University of Campinas - UNICAMP 13083-852, Campinas, SP, Brazil ==
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
On AD 2008 August 08 Friday 03:08:17 PM -0300, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: You don't have to explain to me what thread hijacking means. I moderate a Brazilian e-group of 2900 people and am always saying that to members. Tell me what made you think I did that, because it sure ain't clear for me. Jeez, wake up. I wrote that e-mail from scratch. Your set of posts showed up as part of another thread in my client. Justin
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: Eric Martin wrote: Please don't hijack threads. Please write a new email to the list if you wish to start a new thread. Here's a google search with lots of good resources on hijacking threads. You don't have to explain to me what thread hijacking means. I moderate a Brazilian e-group of 2900 people and am always saying that to members. No need to get upset, I was politely asking you not to thread hijack and pointing you towards references Tell me what made you think I did that, because it sure ain't clear for me. It shows up under the Adding a gentoo workstation to Active Directory Network thread in thunderbird. Looking at the headers, your message has an In-Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which means it was in reply to a message. Jeez, wake up. I wrote that e-mail from scratch. Regards, Saffi -- Eric Martin Key fingerprint = D1C4 086E DBB5 C18E 6FDA B215 6A25 7174 A941 3B9F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
Justin Findlay wrote: Your set of posts showed up as part of another thread in my client. Well, not in mine. I wrote that from scratch, I insist. Anyways, I won't discuss about that here on the list. I disencourage thread hijacking and never did that. Sorry for any inconvenience if something weird and out of my control happened. Best regards and let's keep up the good work. Saffi -- Ricardo Saffi Marques http://www.rsaffi.com == Laboratory of System Administration and Security - LAS Institute of Computing - IC P.O. Box: 6176 University of Campinas - UNICAMP 13083-852, Campinas, SP, Brazil ==
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Gentoo on an Asus EeePC 701
On Friday 08 August 2008, Eric Martin wrote: Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: Eric Martin wrote: Please don't hijack threads. Please write a new email to the list if you wish to start a new thread. Here's a google search with lots of good resources on hijacking threads. You don't have to explain to me what thread hijacking means. I moderate a Brazilian e-group of 2900 people and am always saying that to members. No need to get upset, I was politely asking you not to thread hijack and pointing you towards references Tell me what made you think I did that, because it sure ain't clear for me. It shows up under the Adding a gentoo workstation to Active Directory Network thread in thunderbird. Looking at the headers, your message has an In-Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which means it was in reply to a message. Jeez, wake up. I wrote that e-mail from scratch. Same here, it shows as a hi-jack. I remember raising this on a previous occasion and was told that something is wrong with my client (or wasn't it?!). Either way, please tell us how your installation on EeePC comes along. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing on Thinkpad X41 Tablet
On 10/5/06, Henk Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I go into the shell, I can see that /dev/sdb1 and /newroot both exist, and manually running mount /dev/sdb1 /newroot/ (with and without -t vfat) gives the same error message: mount: Mounting /dev/sdb1 on /newroot/ failed: Invalid argument Hmm, I haven't booted of a minimal CD in awhile, so I'm not sure whether the included kernel includes all the right drivers for the USB media and filesystems. Does /sys/block/sda/dev exist? (you might need to mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys if /sys isn't mounted at this point) Does /proc/filesystems contain vfat? (Again, might need mount -t proc proc /proc) -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing on Thinkpad X41 Tablet
On 06/10/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I haven't booted of a minimal CD in awhile, so I'm not sure whether the included kernel includes all the right drivers for the USB media and filesystems. Does /sys/block/sda/dev exist? (you might need to mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys if /sys isn't mounted at this point) Yes, after using that mount command both /sys/block/sda/dev and /sys/block/sdb/dev exist. Does /proc/filesystems contain vfat? (Again, might need mount -t proc proc /proc) Yes. It does not have the word nodev before it though, in case that makes a difference. Thanks, Henk Boom -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Opera 8.54
Martin Larsson wrote: I tried upgrading my Opera 8.52 to 8.54. That gave me severa ACCESS DENIED errors, as well as a ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY and stop in emerge even though more packages were ready to install. Here's what I got (Ikke tilgang means No access): Unpacking opera-8.54-20060330.1-static-qt.i386-en.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/work Source unpacked. Test phase [not enabled]: www-client/opera-8.54 Install opera-8.54 into /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/image/ category www-client System wide configuration files: /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/image//etc//opera6rc /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/image//etc//opera6rc.fixed would be ignored if installed with the prefix /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/image//opt/opera. Do you want to install them in /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/image//etc/ [ y,n | yes,no ] ? Shortcut icons will be ignored if installed with the prefix /var/tmp/portage/opera- 8.54/image//opt/opera. Do you want to (try to) install them in default locations [ y,n | yes,no ] ? ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/opera.png cp: cannot create regular file «/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/opera.png»: Ikke tilgang ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/opera.png cp: cannot create regular file «/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/opera.png»: Ikke tilgang ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/opera.png cp: cannot create regular file «/usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/opera.png»: Ikke tilgang Could not find shortcut installation directory, desktop entry not installed. man: strip: i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip --strip-unneeded /opt/opera/lib/opera/8.54-20060330.1/spellcheck.so /opt/opera/lib/opera/8.54-20060330.1/opera /opt/opera/lib/opera/8.54-20060330.1/works /opt/opera/lib/opera/8.54-20060330.1/missingsyms.so /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins/libnpp.so /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins/operaplugincleaner /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-1 /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-2 /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-3 Completed installing opera-8.54 into /var/tmp/portage/opera-8.54/image/ --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY --- LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-www-client_-_opera- 8.54-11280.log open_wr: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/opera.png open_wr: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/opera.png open_wr: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/opera.png Hi, Try disabling the sandbox FEATURE in /etc/make.conf. Run: 'FEATURE=-sandbox emerge www-client/opera -a' Never used 'opera' so can't say more. HTH.Rumen smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Opera 8.54
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Martin Larsson wrote: I tried upgrading my Opera 8.52 to 8.54. That gave me severa ACCESS DENIED errors, as well as a ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY and stop in emerge even though more packages were ready to install. Try synching again. I had this problem yesterday but this morning it seemed to be solved. Jan pgpO8tEBV4mvh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Opera 8.54
Rumen Yotov a écrit : Hi, Try disabling the sandbox FEATURE in /etc/make.conf. Run: 'FEATURE=-sandbox emerge www-client/opera -a' Never used 'opera' so can't say more. HTH.Rumen Hi, Disabling sandbox is probably a bad idea. Bug #134368 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Opera 8.54
I tried upgrading my Opera 8.52 to 8.54. That gave me severa ACCESS DENIED errors, as well as a ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY and stop in emerge even though more packages were ready to install. As a workaround you may temporarily mask opera-8.54. I have same problem and syncing didn't help so far. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing Opera 8.54
On 5/28/06, Alexander Kirillov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried upgrading my Opera 8.52 to 8.54. That gave me severa ACCESS DENIED errors, as well as a ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY and stop in emerge even though more packages were ready to install.As a workaround you may temporarily mask opera-8.54.I have same problem and syncing didn't help so far. I had the same problem, and sync was no help, so I just dropped =www-client/opera-8.54 into /etc/portage/package.mask, so that the current version won't get emerged. Hopefully, a new version will go stable soon, and it will be emerged in the normal course of things. ++ kevin -- Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
Zac Medico wrote: Hi Zac Thanks for the help this fixed it. It's now up and running. With recent versions of genkernel you should do ls /boot/kernel* /boot/initramfs* instead. Note that the initramfs or initrd is not required if your kernel has sufficient drivers built in. Zac -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
Hi Nothing I guess but as this is my first fling with Gentoo , the first time I've used this method to install a distro and it's a trial on my second system I thought it was better to follow the instructions. If I stick with Gentoo, when put it on my main system I'll look at all the options available. Stewart Chris Cox wrote: Whats wrong with compiling a kernel the normal way ? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
Well, if you use genkernel, it should automatically place the initrd and the kernel image at your /boot (at least it does for me). Maybe check your genkernel command to compile the kernel. On 8/4/05, Stewart Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I've been trying to install Gentoo. I want to see if Gentoo is for me so I've kept it simple. My first attempt I tried a stage1 install, as this failed the second time I tried a stage3 install, if it failed less time wasted. Both times I opted for a genkernel install, everything seemed OK, no error messages and all stages completed. However both times when I get to 7.d ls /boot/kernel* /boot/initrd* I get the same result both times: /boot/initrd*:no such file or directory /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.12-genkernel-r6 Taking the entry in the grub configure example as a guide I've searched for any initrd files just in case it's somewhere else the only entries are a couple of .gz files in /usr/man/man4 nothing else. I could use some help to sort this out as I have no idea what to do. TIA Stewart -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Daniel da Veiga Computer Operator - RS - Brazil -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
Stewart Taylor wrote: Hi all I've been trying to install Gentoo. I want to see if Gentoo is for me so I've kept it simple. My first attempt I tried a stage1 install, as this failed the second time I tried a stage3 install, if it failed less time wasted. Both times I opted for a genkernel install, everything seemed OK, no error messages and all stages completed. However both times when I get to 7.d ls /boot/kernel* /boot/initrd* I get the same result both times: /boot/initrd*:no such file or directory /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.12-genkernel-r6 Taking the entry in the grub configure example as a guide I've searched for any initrd files just in case it's somewhere else the only entries are a couple of .gz files in /usr/man/man4 nothing else. I could use some help to sort this out as I have no idea what to do. TIA Stewart With recent versions of genkernel you should do ls /boot/kernel* /boot/initramfs* instead. Note that the initramfs or initrd is not required if your kernel has sufficient drivers built in. Zac -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
On Thursday 04 August 2005 04:41 pm, Daniel da Veiga wrote: Well, if you use genkernel, it should automatically place the initrd and the kernel image at your /boot (at least it does for me). Maybe check your genkernel command to compile the kernel. Whats wrong with compiling a kernel the normal way ? emerge gentoo-sources (or whatever flavor you prefer) cd /usr/src/linux zcat /proc/config.gz .config make oldconfig make menuconfig * tweak it to your liking make install modules modules_install update your boot loader umount /boot exit chroot reboot Isn't that covered in the Install guide ? -- Chris Linux 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 17:02:36 up 1 day, 22:09, 6 users, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.09 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
Chris Cox wrote: On Thursday 04 August 2005 04:41 pm, Daniel da Veiga wrote: Well, if you use genkernel, it should automatically place the initrd and the kernel image at your /boot (at least it does for me). Maybe check your genkernel command to compile the kernel. Whats wrong with compiling a kernel the normal way ? emerge gentoo-sources (or whatever flavor you prefer) cd /usr/src/linux zcat /proc/config.gz .config make oldconfig make menuconfig * tweak it to your liking make install modules modules_install update your boot loader umount /boot exit chroot reboot Isn't that covered in the Install guide ? No on said anything was wrong with with doing it the normal way. ;-) In fact, genkernel is not really different from the normal way. It runs basically the same commands that you would run by hand. Personally, I use it to generate my initramfs. I'm fully awary that genkernel can be a needless complication for n00bs. Zac -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, I don't believe I can actually answer this one. I'm a noob to Gentoo! Stewart Taylor wrote: Hi all I've been trying to install Gentoo. I want to see if Gentoo is for me so I've kept it simple. My first attempt I tried a stage1 install, as this failed the second time I tried a stage3 install, if it failed less time wasted. Both times I opted for a genkernel install, everything seemed OK, no error messages and all stages completed. However both times when I get to 7.d ls /boot/kernel* /boot/initrd* I get the same result both times: /boot/initrd*:no such file or directory /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.12-genkernel-r6 If you used genkernel to install, you kernel is as you stated above, but your initrd file isn't what's stated in the Handbook. The correct initrd file is: initramfs-genkernel-x86-2.6.12-gentoo-r6 I had trouble with this on first install too! :-) Regards, Colleen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC8pkzBEKKz3fpe6IRAhjZAJsEHU32/uaNGq698icalyJrc6xXIQCfZIwN jx5lf0/IBbkSQwhEJsPnGys= =AZnk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
