Re: [gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/14/14 23:29, Guido Budack wrote: Good proposition but why? It works... Never change a running system :-/ Sorry failed to parse that. btw i'm on the list. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTJA+TAAoJEK64IL1uI2haO94H/0ulGlgMIBOKEQ4jSx56jvGq OY0yQTzEsF6qNPoVwmql+z6EiDIKwnV2IY2zV+gKYaNnYfSLw1q0axb3qUpJ/8DA JYxie+z1mpjitKZYO4cyLNJdaIMdbyWZ3sHwnlEovrizH6m0Q1BTmzxM9tqPRyKi 9MADrKN8SmcIbvJvJ6ra8liPID8ap4eVe9cx2n59kMpyut539rRBeL0hP8LlYM6z XghDjEs0VngYaBASgaEsQefovgX7QT32JZEpNPrh5As6zm6o+VY70NweSuzErGVp xtYTyBLYYilLfDKvJfJKUWxgVu5Xzlkp/XM4cjHUW06uGOiJtYkVzIr0tTPE3Uc= =dE7+ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re:[gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
On Fri, March 14, 2014 20:29, Guido Budack wrote: Good proposition but why? It works... Never change a running system :-/ For the sake of communication, please do NOT strip out the part of the conversation you are replying to. Also, do NOT restart the thread every time. Thank you -- Joost
Re:[gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
copy...
Re:[gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
On Sat, March 15, 2014 11:50, Guido Budack wrote: copy... Last attempt: - Do NOT strip previous conversations from the email you are replying to - Do NOT CC people into the email, we are ALL subscribed to the list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 01:42:51 William Kenworthy wrote: On 15/03/14 03:29, Guido Budack wrote: Good proposition but why? It works... Never change a running system :-/ ahh ... its running, but its NOT running correctly! (if you are referring to what I think you are) check if you have caching/buffering between you and the file (i.e., is it over NFS, cephfs etc) - e.g., this used to happen sometimes when trying to md5sum cdrom's whilst in a cd drive. The cd hash will never be the same with the iso image saved on a disk which was used to burn it with, because the cd includes data at the end of the image, the 'lead out' section which closes the session. If you dd the correct number of bytes and pipe these to md5sum then the hash should be the same. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re:[gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
Buisness as usual... Look... I don't like things or words like 'last attempt' or 'for the sake of' ''what kind of shit so ever'... I prefer words or expressions including the words 'please' or 'can you be so kind' or for dumb freaks like me sometimes something more intrusive like 'hey you, don't you get it?'... Your chosen words imply a threat. Think about which words you use in conversations and don't underestimate the stupidity of your surrounding punk...! :-/ I am not an english-men and even if I speak a couple of languages more or less good I am sometimes still a little bit slow... I will un-subscribe now because my mailbox is anyway overfilled with post of the many newsletters I am subscribed for Get the picture? So, thanks to Mick and all the friendly peoplez in here... I get that running alone... Take care folks...
Re: [gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:43:37 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: By the way and like I mentioned, the file-sizes are correct! Where did you get the file sizes? The mirror only shows approximate sizes and the only reported size I recall seeing in this thread was from du, which is not file size. FYI % ls -l livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 nelz users 4198498304 Jan 16 2013 livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso % md5sum -c livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso.DIGESTS 2/dev/null livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso: OK livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso.CONTENTS: FAILED open or read livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso.CONTENTS-squashfs.gz: FAILED open or read livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso.CREDITS: FAILED open or read livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso.PACKAGES: FAILED open or read % head -n 2 livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso.DIGESTS # MD5 HASH e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 46: Found missing signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re:[gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
dev/null... grmpf... :-/ No, the filesize is and was the same... I'm really astonished... Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to discuss. I'll repeat the whole procedure when I'm back in Europe at the end of the month and report to the community It doesn't make much sense to hold an endless discussion now. I just can say that the filesize is the same and as reported already before and that my hashing wasn't successful in contrast to on other files. I was just curious if probably someone has similar problems AND I saw it as some sort of a duty to report it to the community. However, if someone feels annoyed or bothered or however you call it in english... wasn't intentionally... I come back to you soon. Thanks for your consideration. Gee
Re: [gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/14/14 18:01, Guido Budack wrote: dev/null... grmpf... :-/ No, the filesize is and was the same... I'm really astonished... Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to discuss. I'll repeat the whole procedure when I'm back in Europe at the end of the month and report to the community It doesn't make much sense to hold an endless discussion now. I just can say that the filesize is the same and as reported already before and that my hashing wasn't successful in contrast to on other files. I was just curious if probably someone has similar problems AND I saw it as some sort of a duty to report it to the community. However, if someone feels annoyed or bothered or however you call it in english... wasn't intentionally... How about using another md5sum executable/building it/using openssl? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTIw5pAAoJEK64IL1uI2haCZAH/0DyiBuoY+wl1ZKbe0CYgUxQ 8Z0GGHwYrpSZrYm1Pr22z7lBWeTGNCD64H/Pgvw0NhQx86mekYnooDLnsoiA4H8r mj0DeRwoqGtQdXBZqBNzLDQ/xmtKZXlb6cXqR/3Ugdstx8UeymmahcoVhN+Oy74c MG/SM45i93Y0ZD15If1Afq34OxRwYPDGxpRKIxS7u+SjDFhsi86o/oMsVahBpcRr PffiQXOqfvfB1IpOBgb3xznBEtVPGsTSXckoMykkruwOzGe3Z2UuoUETzSxJFyxG 0Gqk3pn8jm2BgfgB5F3rrBVgRgvkhY2WpBsa9dvtNpiDassTflnmX+h7PxvVm3g= =fJC5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:01:09 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: dev/null... grmpf... :-/ It was 2/dev/null, to get rid of all the irrelevant complaints about missing files. Have you actually tried running md5sum -c on the DIGESTS file instead of the ISO? I just can say that the filesize is the same and as reported already before and that my hashing wasn't successful in contrast to on other files. I was just curious if probably someone has similar problems AND I saw it as some sort of a duty to report it to the community. It seems to be only you that is affected. I wonder if it could be to do with your use of --continue? Even a single bit changed at the point of a restart would cause what you are seeing. Have you tried another mirror? -- Neil Bothwick WINDOWS: Will Install Needless Data On Whole System signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re:[gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
Good proposition but why? It works... Never change a running system :-/
Re: [gentoo-user] Re:MD5SUM
On 15/03/14 03:29, Guido Budack wrote: Good proposition but why? It works... Never change a running system :-/ ahh ... its running, but its NOT running correctly! (if you are referring to what I think you are) check if you have caching/buffering between you and the file (i.e., is it over NFS, cephfs etc) - e.g., this used to happen sometimes when trying to md5sum cdrom's whilst in a cd drive. Also, have you checked multiple mirrors and multiple digests? (I don't think I've seen that you have) BillK
