[gmx-users] Lipids and virtual site in 4.6.1

2013-04-08 Thread Bastien Loubet
Dear GROMACS user,

Last week I was watching the GTC talk from Eric Lindahl, and I noticed his
insistence on virtual site to accelerate simulation (up to 5ps time step).

As a matter of fact our group recently tried to use virtual site on CHARMM36
POPC bilayer and the result where less than stellar.

We first did a simulation of a POPC bilayer comparing area per lipid with
and without virtual site using GROMACS 4.5.5.
We obtained an area per lipid around 0.62 nm^2 per lipid with no virtual
site but with virtual site we obtained an area per lipid of more than 0.7
nm^2.
After that we found that there was a bug report for the virial calculation
with virtual site in version 4.5: http://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/908

The issue being marked as resolved for 4.6 and we tried our hand at both the
beta3 and 4.6.1 version of it. The result where better but not perfect: we
get 0.65~0.66 nm^2 per lipid.

The problem here is that in order to increase the time step we need all
hydrogen to be virtual sites, so this include the lipids hydrogen and not
just the protein. However if the area per lipid is wrong the stress profile
is likely to be changed, which will affect transmembrane proteins. So we do
not feel confident about using virtual sites in our lipid simulation.

I signal it here because there is a possibility that this is still a bug, If
somebody could confirm/infirm that it would be nice.

Best,

Bastien



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Lipids-and-virtual-site-in-4-6-1-tp5007063.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Lipids and virtual site in 4.6.1

2013-04-08 Thread David van der Spoel

On 2013-04-08 11:34, Bastien Loubet wrote:

Dear GROMACS user,

Last week I was watching the GTC talk from Eric Lindahl, and I noticed his
insistence on virtual site to accelerate simulation (up to 5ps time step).

As a matter of fact our group recently tried to use virtual site on CHARMM36
POPC bilayer and the result where less than stellar.

We first did a simulation of a POPC bilayer comparing area per lipid with
and without virtual site using GROMACS 4.5.5.
We obtained an area per lipid around 0.62 nm^2 per lipid with no virtual
site but with virtual site we obtained an area per lipid of more than 0.7
nm^2.
After that we found that there was a bug report for the virial calculation
with virtual site in version 4.5: http://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/908

The issue being marked as resolved for 4.6 and we tried our hand at both the
beta3 and 4.6.1 version of it. The result where better but not perfect: we
get 0.65~0.66 nm^2 per lipid.

The problem here is that in order to increase the time step we need all
hydrogen to be virtual sites, so this include the lipids hydrogen and not
just the protein. However if the area per lipid is wrong the stress profile
is likely to be changed, which will affect transmembrane proteins. So we do
not feel confident about using virtual sites in our lipid simulation.

I signal it here because there is a possibility that this is still a bug, If
somebody could confirm/infirm that it would be nice.


Did you also try to use vsites without increasing the time step, in 
order to rule out that this is a time step effect rather than a vsite 
effect?




Best,

Bastien



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Lipids-and-virtual-site-in-4-6-1-tp5007063.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205.
sp...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Lipids and virtual site in 4.6.1

2013-04-08 Thread David van der Spoel

On 2013-04-08 11:52, David van der Spoel wrote:

On 2013-04-08 11:34, Bastien Loubet wrote:

Dear GROMACS user,

Last week I was watching the GTC talk from Eric Lindahl, and I noticed
his
insistence on virtual site to accelerate simulation (up to 5ps time
step).

As a matter of fact our group recently tried to use virtual site on
CHARMM36
POPC bilayer and the result where less than stellar.

We first did a simulation of a POPC bilayer comparing area per lipid with
and without virtual site using GROMACS 4.5.5.
We obtained an area per lipid around 0.62 nm^2 per lipid with no virtual
site but with virtual site we obtained an area per lipid of more than 0.7
nm^2.
After that we found that there was a bug report for the virial
calculation
with virtual site in version 4.5: http://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/908

The issue being marked as resolved for 4.6 and we tried our hand at
both the
beta3 and 4.6.1 version of it. The result where better but not
perfect: we
get 0.65~0.66 nm^2 per lipid.

The problem here is that in order to increase the time step we need all
hydrogen to be virtual sites, so this include the lipids hydrogen and not
just the protein. However if the area per lipid is wrong the stress
profile
is likely to be changed, which will affect transmembrane proteins. So
we do
not feel confident about using virtual sites in our lipid simulation.

I signal it here because there is a possibility that this is still a
bug, If
somebody could confirm/infirm that it would be nice.


Did you also try to use vsites without increasing the time step, in
order to rule out that this is a time step effect rather than a vsite
effect?


And by the way, you are welcome to reopen the redmine issue and upload 
file demonstrating the problem.




Best,

Bastien



--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Lipids-and-virtual-site-in-4-6-1-tp5007063.html

Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.







--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205.
sp...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists