Re: STK-SUN-Brocade switch--2032 IOdef
I had assumed this was an activation issue. Did this configuration ever work? If not I would definitely revisit your switch and port values. I would also make sure things are really plugged in, etc. It would be easier if I could see your configuration, but below is a brief example... The switch domains are 60 (X'3C') and 160 (X'A0') and the ports are fc1/5 (X'04'), fc1/9 (X'08') and fc3/2 (X'41'). CHPID,PATH=(CSS(0),01),SHARED,, * PARTITION=((A000,A100),(B000)), * SWITCH=3C,PCHID=100,TYPE=FC CNTLUNIT,CUNUMBR=D000,PATH=((CSS(0),01,02,03)), * UNITADD=((00,256)),LINK=((CSS(0),3C04,3C41,A008)), * CUADD=0,UNIT=2105 IODEVICE,ADDRESS=(1000,256),CUNUMBR=(D000),STADET=Y,UNIT=3390 Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wells Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Fw: STK-SUN-Brocade switch--2032 IOdef anyone care to share there 2032-mod 1 IOCP...having problems and wanted to compare ... (4) ficon chips to switch and (8) out bound...anything close woiuld help.. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FICON CTC
I would guess your logical addresses are not right. Can you share your IOCP? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 11:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: FICON CTC Is a FICON director required to do FICON CTC? I'm looking through a Red Book and all examples show a FICON director. I would think, that like ESCON CTC, I could just connect two FICON channels together using the appropriate cable. I defined to CHPIDs as FC created a CU on each as FCTC and added 8 devices as FCTC. I can vary on the CHPIDS, but when I vary on the devices I receive. VARY 3C00,ONLINE IEE103I UNIT 3C00 NOT BROUGHT ONLINE 615 IEE763I NAME= IECVIOPM CODE= 0004 IOS551I NO PATHS PHYSICALLY AVAILABLE IEE764I END OF IEE103IRELATED MESSAGES -- Mark Pace Mainline Information Systems -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FICON CTC
I believe this is what you want your control units to look like. CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3C00,PATH=((CSS(0),3C)),UNITADD=((00,008)), * CUADD=4,UNIT=FCTC CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=4C00,PATH=((CSS(0),4C)),UNITADD=((00,008)), * CUADD=5,UNIT=FCTC Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: FICON CTC RESOURCE PARTITION=((CSS(0),(BP,5),(IT,1),(MP,4),(PS,3),(TA,2)* )),MAXDEV=((CSS(0),65280,0)) On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Brian Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:01:14 -0500, Mark Pace wrote: I'm leaning on the connection at the moment, but here are the relevant sections from my IOCDS CHPID PATH=(CSS(0),3C),PARTITION=((MP),(=)),PCHID=132,TYPE=FC CHPID PATH=(CSS(0),4C),PARTITION=((BP),(=)),PCHID=133,TYPE=FC CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3C00,PATH=((CSS(0),3C)),UNITADD=((00,008)), * CUADD=0,UNIT=FCTC IODEVICE ADDRESS=(3C00,008),CUNUMBR=(3C00),STADET=Y,UNIT=FCTC CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=4C00,PATH=((CSS(0),4C)),UNITADD=((00,008)), * CUADD=0,UNIT=FCTC IODEVICE ADDRESS=(4C00,008),CUNUMBR=(4C00),STADET=Y,UNIT=FCTC The CUADD= parms aren't right. Please post your PARTITION statement. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- Mark Pace Mainline Information Systems -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ISPF Action Bar Menus
Your recall correctly, one way is SET, INTERFACE then Activate Action Bars Y/N. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Rowe Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 7:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF Action Bar Menus IIRC, there is an option in SPIFFY to do this. ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FICON vs ESCON CTC's
From a management perspective FICON is simpler if your configuration requires numerous pairs of ESCON channels to get around ESCON limits (i.e., implementing interesting candidate lists to avoid message CBDG089I) and not to mention allowing you the flexibility to implement a true any-to-any scheme that makes tasks such as moving systems among processors nothing like the old days. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 6:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: FICON vs ESCON CTC's Is there any advantage in migrating CTC's from ESCON to FICON? -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL -- The primary purpose of the DATA statement is to give names to constants; instead of referring to pi as 3.141592653589793 at every appearance, the variable PI can be given that value with a DATA statement and used instead of the longer form of the constant. This also simplifies modifying the program, should the value of pi change. - FORTRAN manual for Xerox computers -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Defining alternate path to a tape drive
I don't know the specifics of your tape drive. Are there two ports? If so your IOCP looks good to me. Depending on your hardware this might also be an option: CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=7100,PATH=(50,54),UNITADD=((00,016)), LINK=(87,97),CUADD=0,UNIT=3490 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(7100,016),UNITADD=00,CUNUMBR= (7100),STADET=Y,UNIT=3490 Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor Zhang Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Defining alternate path to a tape drive Hi all, I have a requirement that should define two FICON channels connecting one FICON tape drive via directors, can I define using following statements to provide maximum redundancy: CHPID PATH=(50),PARTITION=((CELVMP),(CELVMP)),SWITCH=00,TYPE=FC CHPID PATH=(54),PARTITION=((CELVMP),(CELVMP)),SWITCH=01,TYPE=FC CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=7100,PATH=(50),UNITADD=((00,016)), LINK=(87),CUADD=0,UNIT=3490 CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=7101,PATH=(54),UNITADD=((00,016)), LINK=(97),CUADD=0,UNIT=3490 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(7100,016),UNITADD=00,CUNUMBR= (7100,7101),STADET=Y,UNIT=3490 If the definition is valid, so if 50 fails,54 can take over without any human internention. So Please help check if above statements are valid. Thank you! Victor -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Using gskkyman to utilize a real CA
Double check the certificate and key data base path you are specifying. Are you able to display the certificate with gskkyman? If so, open your key data base, check what labels are already in use and try the import again. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Longnecker, Dennis Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Using gskkyman to utilize a real CA I went into gskkyman and created a new database, and a certificate request. I sent that request to verisign and received a cert. I loaded that cert into the HFS but can't get it loaded into the key ring. I get messages like: Unable to import certificate. Status 0x03353024 - Issuer certificate not found. Or Label is not unique in request and key databases. When I try the various options. I am so close, but wondering what steps I missed. Dennis -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Dynamically Disabling ISV Products
I don't believe SEA's PDSFAST has been mentioned. It's NPDSFAST. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Dynamically Disabling ISV Products Has anyone compiled a list of all the DD DUMMY ddnames used to dynamically disable various products? I want to generate a comprehensive jcl set that I can include if I want to make sure I'm running 100% IBM code when troubleshooting some problems. For instance I know that ABNLIGNR disables ABEND-AID, FCOPYOFF disables PDSMAN's fast copy. Please contribute towards this initiative. Alan Schwartz Assurant Corporate Technology z/OS Lead Systems Programmer ** This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: problem with TSO receive
It appears you are mixing TRANSMIT operands with the RECEIVE command,
but I don't believe omitting the operands will change your outcome.
Based on your error message does the output from the MVS Command D
IKJTSO,TRANSREC and JES2 Command D MASDEF,XCFGRPNM agree?
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 6:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: problem with TSO receive
Hi listers,
I have a problem with the tso receive command. I enter receive
indataset('BCSYS.JCL.CBT701.XMI') nolog pds. I get the message
INMR152I RECEIVE failed. Your node ID not recognized.
The message explanation says this:
INMR152I RECEIVE failed. Your node ID not recognized.
Explanation: The RECEIVE command failed because the CSECT INMXPARM does
not contain the node ID of the receiving system.
Your installation might not have replaced the IBM-supplied default
CSECT, the node ID might be misspelled or omitted, or INMXPARM might not
be installed correctly.
System Action: The RECEIVE command processor terminates.
User Response: Check the node ID. If it is correct and the problem
persists, notify your system programmer.
Audience: RECEIVE user
Detected by: INMRM
Which node id is meant and where do I have to define it?
Can anybody give me a hint?
Thanks in advance
--
kind regards
Franz Josef Pohlen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: problem with TSO receive
I apologize for any confusion. I didn't want to assume the CONCHAR so I prefaced it with JES2 Command instead. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: problem with TSO receive Kevin, I think you meant to stated the JES2 command is $DMASDEF,XCFGRPNM, rather than making it look like a D MASDEF,XCFGRPNM Lizette It appears you are mixing TRANSMIT operands with the RECEIVE command, but I don't believe omitting the operands will change your outcome. Based on your error message does the output from the MVS Command D IKJTSO,TRANSREC and JES2 Command D MASDEF,XCFGRPNM agree? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: TSO LOGON Issue (resend with subject)
Just a guess... Determine the variable in question then remove it via ISPEXEC VERASE. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George, William (DHS-ITSD) Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: TSO LOGON Issue (resend with subject) Anyone know of a means, via a non sysprog point of view, to clear the COMMAND field on the logon panel so he may start fresh. Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: VTAM question (***)
I don't mean to detract from Debbie's problem, but in case there is merit... Q: Does the effect you are seeing apply only when using the ISPF Productivity Toll (IPT)? A: No. No prior to OA20772 the problem could be duplicated with and without IPT. Q: APAR OA20772 applies only to users of IPT? A: Yes. IPT has its own enhanced TSO shell with an output line number option. OA20772 provided relief for the problem in the sense that it honors the specified output line number. Q: Perhaps you have better describe the effect you are experiencing in more detail. A: An example, with z/OS 1.8 as opposed to z/OS 1.6 TSO command output begins with the available space on the screen where the command was issued instead of a fresh screen. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VTAM question (***) Kevin The effect Debbie described is digital, you are implying that it is analogue. Debbie says that her user used *not* to have to deal with a panel with three asterisks in V1R4, corresponding to 0, but does in V1R7, corresponding to 1. More pronounced implies some sort of gradual change. Perhaps you have better describe the effect you are experiencing in more detail. Does the effect you are seeing apply only when using the ISPF Productivity Toll (IPT)? APAR OA20772 applies only to users of IPT? *If* there's something about Debbie's original problem I have not understood *and* you are both describing the same phenomenon, whatever change caused it would appear to have happened between V1R6 ands V1R7. Chris Mason -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: VTAM question (***)
Going from z/OS 1.6 to 1.8 I have noticed similar behavior. Is it more pronounced on terminals such as Mod 3 (32X80) versus Mod 5 (27X132)? If you use IPT I found some relief with OA20772. Otherwise I opened TSO and ISPF ETRs to no avail and still have a VTAM ETR outstanding. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie Mitchell Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VTAM question (***) On Mon, 21 May 2007 17:11:41 +0200, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't say I'd ever performed this sort of research but isn't the need to regenerate - including reassembly - customized tables one of the sorts of issues covered by the documentation a systems programmer goes through when planning a new release? As it turns out, the version of ISTINCLM in use here is not IBM's default. It was customized long before my tenure here and not documented. I will need to do some checking with other people here to see what they remember about the reason it was customized as well as what changes were made. Since no one is really complaining (at least not very loudly) about it, it won't be a priority. And, since posting my original question, I have noticed that the behavior is not consistent -- which leads me to believe that it is, indeed, related to changing screen sizes. Thank you all for your help. Debbie Mitchell Utica National Insurance Group -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IPLINFO Question
You could look at the user directory for the primary address space size, but this can change-#CP DEFINE STORAGE size. From the guest representing your system #CP QUERY VIRTUAL STORAGE or from another guest #CP INDICATE USER userid. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kopischke, David G. Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:06 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IPLINFO Question Sorry to clutter the list with this, but it might be useful for others: We just got through with a DR test. During this test, management wanted to emulate as close as possible the resources we would have available at the DR hotsite based on the current contract with a DR service provider. To do this, the service provider was to limit CPU available to our z/OS image. It looked like they did this, but when we execute Mark Zelden's fine freeware IPLINFO EXEC, the results appear to be for the entire complex and not just for our image under VM. Is this correct ??? Is there a better way to get a MIPS or MSU calculation from just our single z/OS image ??? -- This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion, monitor, review, retain and/or disclose the content of all email communications. == -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Shared ICP between 2 SYSPLEXES
If you have peer mode capable links you could certainly do what you propose, but it would not be adhering to high availability connectivity design. It really depends on you comfort level, your CF structures, if you're exploiting system-managed CF structure duplexing, etc., but you might be able to achieve higher availability with just a third link containing one CF from each sysplex. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cwi Jeret Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Shared ICP between 2 SYSPLEXES Hello, I have the following question : We have the following configuration : 2 CPC's , on each one 2 LPARS, one CF and One MEMBER of SYSPLEX1. both CF's are connected to the members of the sysplex of the other CPC with a pair of ICP connections . My question is : Is it possible to add a second SYSPLEX, sharing the same physical ICP connections like sharing CTC connections between LPARs , like this: If the answer is positive, where can I find documentation describing the definitions for it . Cwi jeret, Bank Hapoalim T.A. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 359S vs 3590 (HCD)
This is not anything I have ever seen in HCD. I am not familiar with a true 3590, but it sounds more like the setup of the drives themselves to me. For example I know an STK 9840 drive can be setup to emulate a 3490E, 3590, etc. Does the DEVSERV QTAPE command display anything interesting? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: 359S vs 3590 (HCD) I have defined two stand-alone drives 3590 model E. When I display the drives using D U,,,ccuu command I get '359S' as device type. The 'S' mean cartridge stack loader. (BTW: 'L' would mean library drive). However my drives don't have the loader. I reviewed HCD panels looking for some device feature or another kind of device - no effect. Q: How to define them as 3590 *without* the 'S' ? Regards -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland P.S. I believe I already sent this message, but I couldn't find it in IBM-MAIN archives, so I considered it's lost. That's why I'm resending it now. -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2007 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA (w całości opłacony) wynosi 118.064.140 zł. W związku z realizacją warunkowego podwyższenia kapitału zakładowego, na podstawie uchwał XVI WZ z dnia 21.05.2003 r., kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA może ulec podwyższeniu do kwoty 118.760.528 zł. Akcje w podwyższonym kapitale zakładowym będą w całości opłacone. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Deleting console UCB's
Offhand all I can think of is IEARELCN, but that does not sound like your problem. What is the specific message? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 9:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Deleting console UCB's I am trying to delete some old console UCB's and running into the 'device pinned' error message. I thought I read about a way to unpin these devices so they could be dynamically deleted without an IPL. I am at z/os 1.4 and 1.7. My archive search results were not successful. Thanks NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ISPF not productive
I don't know if this is much news, but WebSphere Host On-Demand Version 10 has Mouse wheel support for Java 2 JVM 1.4 and higher clients... http://www-304.ibm.com/jct03002c/software/webservers/hostondemand/featur esv10.html Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric N. Bielefeld Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF not productive I still think that what you learned first and grew up on determines what editor you like best. I worked with VM for about 15 years at PH Mining until they retired VM. I never liked XEDIT as well as ISPF. I know that some of the best people at PH liked XEDIT better, but they learned it before ISPF. I know that there are a few things that XEDIT does that can't be done in ISPF, but I can't remember what they are now. Its funny how things work out when you've been away from ISPF for a while. When I would edit something at Lands End on the mainframe, I would keep grabbing the mouse and try to scroll forward using the scroll wheel. I wish I could do that in ISPF. I guess you can if you use the GUI, but I've never seen that work. Eric Bielefeld Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer Milwaukee, Wisconsin 414-475-7434 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Removing unused 3286 from IODF
I'm not certain about z890/z990 and beyond, but if the device does not support dynamic capability it certainly appears a power-on reset will be necessary. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Dynamically Activate additional CUs on Shark
Except for older CF stuff like TYPE=CFR, adding/deleting partitions and devices not defined with the dynamic feature I don't recall having to perform many PORs... Paths to the control unit should be unique. See CUADD, etc. What do your CNTLUNIT and IODEVICE statements look like? What is the total disk capacity (ADDRESSes) you desire? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Sipusic Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Dynamically Activate additional CUs on Shark Until now my Shark has been defined as two control units attached to four channels. After adding additional disk capacity it will appear to be four control units on those four channels. I would like to dynamically activate the two new control units and associated I/O devices. When I tried to do this, it failed to activate. It seemed that the channels had to be offline, but the existing Shark DASD has to be online; so we took an outage and did a POR. Was the POR unavoidable? I ask because now I have to change the definitions of the new CUs, giving them different LCUs, and I fear that we'll have to do another POR unless one of you can show me how I can do a dynamic activation here. Tom Sipusic -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Setting Slip Traps with MSGID
If you have multiple systems, was the SLIP SET issued on the appropriate system(s)? Regards Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 5:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Setting Slip Traps with MSGID Later the IOS050I message occurred but the slip trap did not go off. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: HCD EDT's Generics
I don't believe generics are that flexible. As already mentioned I believe you want to use esoterics. For example, I use two esoterics to differentiate between my Sun StorageTek 9840 A and B drives which are all part of my 3590-1 generic device group. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 2:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: HCD EDT's Generics I would like to break out the 3390 generic into 2 groups; 3390-3 and 3390-9. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: All Boxed Up
...varied with various forms of vary... Including VARY device(s),ONLINE,UNCOND? Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: LOOKAT
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: LOOKAT I'm having a bad hair day. What is the URL. When in doubt. PANIC!! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: HCD problem with CFR-CFS pair
I don't know what hardware you have available... If you have peer mode capability you need to use ICP for the channel path type otherwise for compatibility mode if I recall correctly you need to use ICR/ICS. Unless you want to override the values the control unit and device numbers are suggested for you when perform the connect to CF channel path. This is not a physical connection, but do give up two channel paths. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of munif sadek Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: HCD problem with CFR-CFS pair I have defined CFR(Dedicated) and CFS(Shared) channels for my Production CPC and when I am connecting them, its failing with following HCD message: Processor X cannot be connected via different control units to the coupling facility - partition CF01 of processor X. I am afraid I have/can not define CU attached to CFR/CFS channels. all helps are much appreciated. regards, Munif. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help With 2074
I do not understand the differences between your IOCDS and IODF. Could you build the IOCP input data set (HCD 2.3) for the 2064-215 in question and resubmit the pertinent parts? Otherwise in reviewing just the aspects of device 398 it appears the following should be MODEL=X: TUBE380 IODEVICE UNIT=3278,ADDRESS=(380,25),MODEL=2, CUNUMBR=(D381) Or based on the following your missing the CNTLUNIT that coincides with CUNUMBR=(0380): TUBE388 IODEVICE UNIT=3270,ADDRESS=(388,19),MODEL=X,STADET=N, FEATURE=(DOCHAR,EBKY3277,KB78KEY),CUNUMBR=(0380) The DEVMAP for 398 looks good to me. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parsons Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Help With 2074 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: GTF Woes
It looks good to me. Perhaps there is something wrong with your SYS1.GTFTRACE. Do you get the same results allocating a new data set? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: GTF Woes Hi, All, Given the following proc (z/OS 1.5): //GTF PROC MEMBER=GTFVTAM //* //IEFPROC EXEC PGM=AHLGTF,PARM='MODE=EXT,DEBUG=NO,TIME=YES', // REGION=8M,TIME=1440 //IEFRDER DD DSNAME=SYS1.GTFTRACE,DISP=OLD //SYSLIB DD DSNAME=SYS1.PARMLIB(MEMBER),DISP=SHR ... with PARMLIB member GTFVTAM containing: TRACE=USR,RNIO /* Why do I get these messages: AHL084I NO DD STATEMENT WAS FOUND FOR A GTF OUTPUT DATA SET. AHL016I GTF INITIALIZATION UNSUCCESSFUL ??? TIA, -jc- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Console Names
...except for the system console. From MVS Initialization and Tuning Reference (SA22-7592-10): Summary of changes for SA22-7592-06 z/OS Version 1 Release 4 as updated December 2003 CONSOLxx is changed to reflect the requirement that all consoles be named, except for the system console. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Console Names Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think names are required after v1.4. Craig -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O
I believe the I/O configuration display command mentioned should be D IOS,CONFIG(HSA). Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O It depends on the processor type you have and whether you have FICON, or not. The z/990 tends towards a GIG for HSA, and you need at least a 50% cushion. But, I would plan for twice as much as you are currently using. You can display the memory usage through the HMC (I forget how). Or, you can figure it out by how much you have installed vs how much you have allocated to LPARs. D IOS,HSA Only displays the number of devices defined, NOT memory (at least the last time I looked). - -teD O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS! Let's PLAY! BALL! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O
It really depends on how big the IOCDS is, how much is being reserved for dynamic expansion, etc. The Processor Resource/Systems Manager Planning Guide and Support Element Operations Guide have good information on this. As mentioned previously the support element has an HSA Estimation Tool. As an absolute guess, baring FICON, as a place to start I would figure about 512MB. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Micucci Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O Ted, We have NO storage available for this. I will have to steal some from a test LPAR. So I'm looking for the minimal amount needed. We're running a z890. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) vs. RACF DSMON Report
In regards to ... not listed in the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00)... Are you sure you're looking at the appropriate PROGxx member(s) of parmlib as specified by the PROG parameter in IEASYSxx and/or are you sure you're looking at the entire parmlib concatenation as specified by the PARMLIB statement(s) in LOADxx? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doc Farmer Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 9:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) vs. RACF DSMON Report Greetings! Odd question. Is it possible to have APF/LNKLST libraries reported or locatable by the RACF DSMON (Data Security Monitor) report, but not listed in the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) member? I ran a comparison between the two and found three libraries on DSMON that weren't in the PROG00, and 16 LNKLST libraries in PROG00 that were not found on the DSMON report. The system is IPL'd daily, so I'm not sure if there is a separate mechanism to activate APF or LNKLST libraries outside the SYS1.PARMLIB process. I'm also unsure of the security implications regarding such a mis-match. I'm cross-posting this over at RACF-L, but I just wanted to see what the sysprogs here have to say on the subject. Many thanks. Doc Farmer -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Securing consoles
Additionally, depending on the current authority of the console in question have you taken a look at the other possibilities of the AUTH parameter within the CONSOLE statement? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R. Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Securing consoles Hi Tim. Good questions/comments. I would actually want them logging on to do their work. The area management is planning on moving the consoles to is (as far as I'm concerned) an unsecured area. People come into and out of this area on a regular basis with nobody seeing them. The idea mgmt has is that the operator will always be there so it will be secure, but we have 1 operator per shift and the printers and tape drives (not robotic) are located in the computer room so the operator will often be away from the console. As far as the operator issuing meaningless commands once in a while, that's OK because that means they're at the console. My biggest concern is when they're away from them that somebody could come in and cause considerable damage while they're unattended. That's why I am asking about the auto-logoff. I am OK with them even using a single ID for everybody. Rex -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help : FTP A PDS
Something like this should get you started: //INPUTDD * ip address user password cd etc. ascii etc. mput 'xxx.yyy.zzz(*)' quit /* Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Help : FTP A PDS G'Day I am a new member to your board and I have heard great things about it. Can anybody please tell me if and how I can FTP a whole PDS/PDSE? I have this pds with about 39 members. I would like to FTP them to my hard drive. Thanks mates. John - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals: It's free to check out our great singles! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Adding LPARs without POR
I believe what you're referring to, adding LPARs dynamically, began with the z890/z990 and z/OS 1.6. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Adding LPARs without POR Did I read somewhere that z/os 1.7 or perhaps one of the new boxes support adding LPAR's without a POR? The business mission is a kilo boat load of Linux images, not real z/os images. My knee jerk plan is to shrink a z/os image, and redistribute the resources across a large number of small Linux images. Or was that just a nice dream? Be gentle; I am just learning how to spell IFL ;-) Thanks!! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: LOADxx IEASYM parms
I would have to try it to be sure, but I don't believe it matters in regards to your concern for totally messing things up. If IEASYMXY is specified in LOADxx, but not present in parmlib I would expect the following: IEA013E ERROR DETECTED PROCESSING IEASYMxx:... IEA011A RESPECIFY ENTIRE IEASYMXX SUFFIX LIST OR U TO BYPASS If specified in LOADxx and merely present in parmlib with comments I would expect the following without any further problems: IEA009I SYMBOLIC DEFINITIONS WILL BE READ FROM:... I would create a new LOADxx member for trying this out. Note in LOADxx IEASYM suffixes are read from left to right where duplicate definitions override previous definitions. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 4:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: LOADxx IEASYM parms What happens if the IEASYM parm in LOADxx specifies an used sufix; that is, specifies (00,XY) but IEASYMXY does not exist? Is there just an error message? A WTOR? Something worse? What if IEASYMXY exists but is empty or contains just comments? I've just asked for a new IEASYMxx member, and am trying to determine what damage I might do if I screw up. Thanks. Pat O'Keefe -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Assigning Device Numbers to an Esoteric
It can be done when the devices are added if the esoteric(s) is(are) defined. Following the addition on the Define Device to Operating System Configuration panel select the appropriate Config. On the Actions on selected operating systems popup Select (connect, change). Go past the Define Device Parameters / Features panel and update the Assign/Unassign Device to Esoteric panel accordingly. Otherwise it's not much different doing it after devices are added. From the Assign/Unassign Devices to Esoteric panel just update Assigned, Starting Number and Number of Devices accordingly. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Noal Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 12:51 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Assigning Device Numbers to an Esoteric Dear List: On my z/OS 1.6 system I am trying to create a new esoteric name using the HCD. On the Assign/Unassign Devices to Esoteric HCD panel, I am given a list of devices by device groups. Is there any way to have this HCD panel display only single device numbers similar to the I/O Device List HCD panel allowing me to select specific device numbers for the esoteric? Is there a better way of doing this, say, during device definition? I really do not want to select the esoteric by adding the devices one at a time. TIA. HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS Raymond E. Noal Lab Manager, San Diego Facility Office: (858) 537 - 3268 Cell: (858) 248 - 1172 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DASD Only Plex
If the CHPIDs are shared, except for CTC CUs and Devices, why add new CUs and Devices? Via the HCD panels you should be able to get by with the following: Define, modify, or view configuration data, Processors, Work with partitions, Add, Enter Partition name, etc. and Update CHPID Access and Candidate Lists. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Wagner Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DASD Only Plex The configuration we are using is Couple Datasets, no coupling facility, hence DASD only. The CTC's are SCTC's. We have gone over the CTC definitions and are about to again. The CHP's used are all from the original sysplex definition. New controllers and devices were added for the new LPAR. The new devices seem to be fine on 5 of the original 6 LPARs (as diplayed with a D M=CHP(xx) command). The HCD definitions for the new devices were copied from an existing device / controller. Any help would be appreciated. Jimmy -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DASD Only Plex
I do not really understand the question, but it sounds like the new system should have identical access to the channels, etc. I would research the Channel Path Access/Candidate Lists for any problems. You should be able to obtain a Channel Path Summary Report by selecting the following from the HCD panels: Print or compare configuration data, Print configuration reports, CSS report and CSS summary reports. Be aware devices can also have Candidate Lists. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Wagner Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 12:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DASD Only Plex We have a 6 LPAR DASD only sysplex. We need to add a new LPAR to the configuration. Using existing CHP's, control units and devices were added for the new LPAR. A working unit was used as a model. The new devices connect to 5 of the 6 LPARs, 1 LPAR comes up as Path not operational. Does anyone have some insight as to what I need to look at? Thanks in advance. Jimmy -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IODF and IOCDS out of sync
Regarding what's different about the IPL process... Nothing if you still had the IODF that corresponds to the IOCDS. To make a change the hardware and software need to be in sync. The active IODF per D IOS,CONFIG is what you are running with. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Systems Programmer Levels Justification
This might be a worthwhile visit: http://www.bls.gov/oco/home.htm. Specifically: http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos110.htm. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Desi de la Garza Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Systems Programmer Levels Justification MVS Listers, We are in the process of justifying the requirement of having multiple levels of SysProg job titles depending on experience and knowledge. At the same time provide management with information as to why SysProgs are higher salaried than application programmers. They are at a loss as to why that is. Weird that they do not question why a network tech makes more than the applications also. Can someone guide me to where I may be able to locate such info? Thanks, Desi de la Garza Systems Programmer Bexar County Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Problem copying VM volumes under z/OS
Should your COPY have PURGE? At this time I don't have access to any DASD to try what you're doing, but the following using tape works for me: //SYSINDD * DUMP TRKS(0,0,3338,14) - INDDNAME(DISKIN) - OUTDDNAME(TAPEOUT) - CPVOL - ADMIN //SYSINDD * RESTORE TRACKS(0,0,3338,14) - INDDNAME(TAPEIN) - OUTDDNAME(DISKOUT) - PURGE - CPVOL - ADMIN Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oswaldo Ferreira de Matos Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 5:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Problem copying VM volumes under z/OS I'm trying to use DFDSS under z/OS 1.4 to copy my z/VM 51 volumes and I am getting the following error message for every volume: ADR307E (001)-OPNCL(11), UNABLE TO OPEN VOLUME HI8801, 16 From message guide : 16 The VM-formatted volume does not have an OS-compatible VTOC beginning on track zero, record five. I try to format from z/OS, but without success with the copy, but when I format the output volumes under z/VM (ICKDSF CPVOLUME) its is OK. I am using the sysin : COPYTRACKS(0,0,3338,14) COPYVOLID - ADMINISTRATOR PURGE - CPVOLUME - INDDNAME(ENTRADA) - OUTDDNAME(SAIDA) Is it the only way to copy the volumes : 1) Format the volume from z/VM 2) Copy using DFDSS from z/OS or maybe I can format by z/OS ? Thanks. Oswaldo -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 64-bit question
Regarding an accidental CPC deactivate... If you deactivate a CPC with active systems you should be receiving a warning message identifying active systems by name along with a message stating the action being performed is disruptive before you can proceed. Regarding accidental object selection... Each object has the capability of being locked for disruptive tasks. Before you can proceed with an IPL, deactivate, etc. you must unlock the object. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Need help with msg IEE114I
Attached transaction programs. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CF usage at DR location
Though not recovering in the exact manner you are planning your PREFLIST proposal looks good to me. With a PREFLIST consisting of ICFXXA, ICFXXB and ICFXXD here are some syslog messages for your review. ICFXXD does not exist at home. At home: IXC517I SYSTEM ABLE TO USE COUPLING FACILITY NAMED ICFXXB IXC517I SYSTEM ABLE TO USE COUPLING FACILITY NAMED ICFXXA IXC518I SYSTEM NOT USING COUPLING FACILITY NAMED ICFXXD REASON: NOT CONNECTED TO SYSTEM. REASON FLAG: 1332. Away from home: IXC517I SYSTEM ABLE TO USE COUPLING FACILITY NAMED ICFXXD IXC518I SYSTEM NOT USING COUPLING FACILITY NAMED ICFXXA REASON: NOT CONNECTED TO SYSTEM. REASON FLAG: 1331. IXC518I SYSTEM NOT USING COUPLING FACILITY NAMED ICFXXB REASON: NOT CONNECTED TO SYSTEM. REASON FLAG: 1333. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE Question
By PTF. For example, APAR PQ92344 for FMID EDU1H01 is UQ91568. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SMPE Question I'm looking for the following APARS in the SMP Global zone. PQ92344 OA14861 Can I find these by doing a cross zone query or do I need to first do a search for the associated PTF numbers on say IBMLINK? Thanks. - Yahoo! Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Changing an IODF in batch
Is it possible for you to create another LOADxx member for use at disaster recovery and IPL accordingly? If you're recovering under z/VM I don't believe dynamic i/o changes will be permitted. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 9:22 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Changing an IODF in batch OK, I know how to change a work IODF using the ISPF HCD dialogs. Is there a way to use batch? What I want to do is create a batch job to make specific changes to a work IODF in order to change LIBRARY IDs when we go to disaster recovery. It's not a big deal to document how to use HCD, but I would prefer a more batch oriented way, just so that I don't need to assume HCD knowledge in a disaster scenario. Oh, we don't have any money for a product, so IBM and/or OEM vendor products to do this is not an option. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Defining CFP in HCD
I've included them in mine without any problems. The only downside I can think of offhand would be if you were adding another ICF to CPUH as only one ICF per CFP is allowed in the access list. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Kraus Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Defining CFP in HCD I have two CPUs. CPUH and CPUG. Each CPU has two mvs partitions and one ICF. In my example, CPUH has LPAR1, LPAR2, and COUPLE0H. When defining the CFP chpid on CPUH ( which will be used to communicate with CPUG), should COUPLE0H be in the partition access list. Or should it be defined like a CFS with only the MVS partitions in the access list. Disclaimer: This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. This e-mail expresses views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to Rite Aid Corporation and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
