[PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com --- v2: - No change arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \ - (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1) + (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E) #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \ (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \ | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK) -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? Alex On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote: Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com --- v2: - No change arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \ - (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1) + (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E) #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \ (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \ | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK) -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
-Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. -Bharat Alex On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote: Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com --- v2: - No change arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \ - (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1) + (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E) #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \ (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \ | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK) -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
On 18.07.2013, at 17:12, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: -Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. Please add that to the patch description. Also explain what the bit means. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
-Original Message- From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:50 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 On 18.07.2013, at 17:12, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: -Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. Please add that to the patch description. Also explain what the bit means. Ok :) -Bharat Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
On 07/18/2013 10:12:30 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: -Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. FWIW, it'd probably be safe to let the guest control the G bit as well. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com --- v2: - No change arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \ - (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1) + (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E) #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \ (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \ | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK) -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? Alex On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote: Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com --- v2: - No change arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \ - (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1) + (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E) #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \ (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \ | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK) -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
On 18.07.2013, at 17:12, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: -Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. Please add that to the patch description. Also explain what the bit means. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
-Original Message- From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:50 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 On 18.07.2013, at 17:12, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: -Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. Please add that to the patch description. Also explain what the bit means. Ok :) -Bharat Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
On 07/18/2013 10:12:30 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: -Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2 This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E? What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so allow him. FWIW, it'd probably be safe to let the guest control the G bit as well. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
