LL:INFO:Thorne VS Northern TAFE

1999-05-23 Thread Alison Thorne


The case of Alison Thorne versus Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE has
been adjourned until Monday 21 June when the hearing will recommence for a
further five days.

The case is being heard by tribunal member, Ms Fran Millane, from the
Anti-Discrimination Panel of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals
Tribunal.

At the end of the first four days of hearings, the presentation of the
complainant's [Alison] case alleging unlawful discrimination on the grounds
of industrial activity is almost complete.

Left Linkers can support the case in numerous ways:

[1] Show your interest by attending court. Hearing commence at 10 am from 21
- 25 June on the 6th floor of 55 King Street.

[2] Help publicise the case. If you have any offers or leads please contact
the campaign publicity coordinator Peter Murray on 9386-5065 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[3] Help with fund raising. The No More Intimidation of Teacher Unionists
Campaign has just launched a "guessing competition". If you'd like to sell
tickets @ $2 each or 3 for $5 please e-mail requesting tickets. 

There are great prizes for the SELLERS as well as the buyers of winning
tickets!

[4] Send a donation! Make cheques payable to NMIT Unionists Campaign
Committee.

The NMIT Unionists Campaign is also supporting the case of Barbara Morgan,
the former AEU sub-branch secretary whose contract was not renewed in the
middle of an industrial dispute. Barbara's hearing is currently scheduled to
commence on Tuesday 1 June.

No More Intimidation of Teacher Unionists Campaign Committee
PO Box 266 West Brunswick Vic 3055

LL.VF

  Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsub: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink




LL:ART: Tassie to debate risks of genetic engineering

1999-05-23 Thread Trudy Bray

The Sunday Tasmanian
http://www.news.com.au/headlines/

Tassie to debate risks of genetic engineering
  By LIBBY SUTHERLAND

  23may99

  WIDESPREAD debate on the controversial issue of genetic
  engineering is set to erupt in Tasmania. 

  In an effort to enlighten the State's population on the rapidly
  growing science, its applications and implications, the Tasmanian
  Environment Centre will hold a forum in Hobart on June 5. 

  Dubbed "Genetic Engineering - Opening the Debate", the forum at
  The Friends' School Meeting House will be followed by two scientific
  symposiums this year organised by the Royal Society in
  conjunction with the CSIRO and the University of Tasmania. 

  Environment centre co-ordinator Margaret Steadman said the
  forum - coinciding with World Environment Day and supported by
  the local United Nations Association - was needed to promote
  knowledge and information instead of hysteria. 

  "There is a lot of diffuse anxiety about genetic engineering and it
  needs to be aired," she said. "I think it is happening to a much
  larger degree than we are aware. 

  "There has been very little discussion about it in Tasmania. 

  "There are some really big questions to be asked. We need
  evidence and facts and knowledge. We should be making decisions
  based on knowledge." 

  Geneticist and CSIRO researcher Stan Robert agreed. 

  "I think that this term 'genetic engineering' is very broad," he said. 

  "There is not one type of risk that will apply to everything. 

  "A lot of the health risks and environmental risks have been blown
  out of proportion. 

  "It is unfortunate the debate is so polarised. A balanced type of
  debate is needed." 

  Guest speaker at the Hobart forum will be Bob Phelps, director of
  the Melbourne-based GeneEthics Network and perhaps the nation's
  most vocal opponent of "mutant food". 

  This month Mr Phelps accused the Australia New Zealand Food
  Authority, health ministers and the food industry of betraying
  public trust on the issue of genetically modified food. 

  New laws that took effect on May 13 require companies to seek
  safety assessments for GM foods and label those which are
  substantially different from their traditional counterparts. 

  But companies were so slow to lodge assessments that Australian
  and New Zealand health ministers decided to permit foods with
  modified ingredients to remain on supermarket shelves while tests
  were conducted, provided applications were lodged by April 30. 

  Mr Phelps accused the authorities of effectively giving GM food
  producers a regulation-free year. 

  In Hobart, he will discuss the contentious area of food labelling,
  crop and food modification, ethical issues, environmental impact,
  plus the health and medical benefits and risks. 

  Ms Steadman said many of the questions raised would be passed
  on to scientific experts at the Royal Society's events, to be held on
  September 7 and October 5 at the university's Stanley Burbury
  Theatre. 

  Symposium organising committee member and CSIRO marine
  biochemist Shirley Jeffrey said the first event would focus on
  genetically modified plants and animals for use in food. The second
  symposium will discuss medical aspects and bioethics. 

  "There is a lot of jargon associated with the development of the
  science," Dr Jeffrey said. 

  "We are aiming to introduce all the facts so people can decide for
  themselves." 


*
This posting is provided to the individual members of this  group without
permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment,
scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of the Federal
copyright laws and it may not be distributed further without permission of
the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

  Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink







LL:ART:Feed back from Union Members Required

1999-05-23 Thread Highlander

SMH
Unions gun for labour hire ring-ins
Date: 22/05/99


By HELEN TRINCA

The Australian Services Union is trying to strike agreements with 
labour hire firms for members it doesn't yet have.  

It is an alternative approach forced on unions in an age when they 
are struggling to recruit members from an increasingly fragmented 
labour market.  

"We're trying to organise, but you strike problems in this area for 
obvious reasons," Mr Brian Sullivan, the union's national executive 
president, said yesterday. "People are scattered all over the city 
and there is no consolidated workplace. For some unions it goes 
against the grain dealing with the employer ahead of the employees, 
but we believe we have to do it."  

The union is trying to recruit members in one of the fastest growing 
areas of labour hire - the phone call centres - where about 30 per 
cent of workers are employed via labour hire firms.  

The Recruitment and Consulting Services Association, which has 300 
member companies in NSW, has been unmoved by the pressure. Instead, 
the association wants the union to negotiate directly with the hire 
companies.  

Labour hire companies estimate they employ fewer than 2 per cent of 
Australian workers but the sector has been growing at 16 per cent 
each year since 1980.  

The number of agency workers doubled in Australia between 1990 and 
1995.  


The labour hire firms now cover the so-called blue, white, pink and 
gold collar workers - everything from manufacturing workers in blue 
to to managing directors in gold class. Pink is for the clerical area 
dominated by women and white covers professionals like information 
technology workers. The industry has an annual turnover nationally of 
$4.5 billion with about 40 per cent of that in NSW. The big unions, 
such as the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union, are 
dismissive of the "body hire companies" and the CFMEU is pushing for 
clauses in enterprise agreements to limit the use of these workers. 
Mr John Buchanan, a researcher with Sydney University's Australian 
Centre for Industrial Relations Research and Training, says the 
labour market is being reconfigured by outsourcing. Between 1990 and 
1995, 35 per cent of employers had outsourced at least one function.  

In the early 1980s, about two-thirds of workers were in companies of 
100 workers or more, whereas a decade later this had dropped to about 
50 per cent. The NSW Labor Council is campaigning to regulate 
contractors and is behind a push to change laws so the State 
Industrial Commission sets minimum rates for contractors and to 
ensure that labour hire firms do not undercut other site workers. The 
ideas are in a discussion paper from the NSW Industrial Relations 
Department. The Premier, Mr Carr, dumped on the paper after it was 
leaked to the Herald but this week, his office said he was ruling 
nothing in or out. He just wants normal consultation to be followed.  

The Labor Council secretary, Mr Michael Costa, says: "We're concerned 
at the undermining of the notion of full-time employment. All of the 
statistics show very clearly that full-time employment is declining 
and one of the reasons is the artificial contracting to avoid the 
employer-employee relationship." The NSW Employers Federation accused 
the council of trying to turn back the clock but the labour hire 
companies say they have no problem with paying the same money paid to 
unionists on site, arguing they sometimes pay more already. The real 
issue in this style of work is not so much money but job security.  

But the trend is likely to be hard to break. Mr Jim Dingwall, a 
management consultant with PA Consulting Group, said the European 
experience showed that forcing labour hire firms to maintain parity 
with site wages did not dampen the enthusiasm for outsourcing. 
Employers were using contract workers for flexibility and to 
implement cultural change in the workplace, not as a way of cutting 
wages, he said.  


This posting is provided to the individual members of this  group 
without permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of 
criticism, comment, scholarship and research under the "fair use" 
provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be 
distributed further without permission of the copyright owner, except 
for "fair use."  

   Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink