Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
I would however suggest that we avoid the
legal details where possible and try to just describe in plain english
what the problem is.
Well - in plain English there is no problem. The questions I am asking
arise from the legal construct! There is no core non-legal question
there; I would not have dreamt of asking these questions had I not read
the ODbL draft.
If you want to rework the text back to core non-legal questions then you
might as well delete it ;-)
And about the ianal but: Any lawyer or person with access to a lawyer
is welcome to answer the questions (or explain why they are not relevant
which would be just as welcome). Until then, these are open questions
for the lawyer and non-lawyer alike, and they do not lose their
importance just because they have been formulated by a normal thinking
person. Our users, when asked to relicense their contributions, will
want to have answers to these questions, and they're not lawyers either ;-)
Bye
Frederik
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk