[liberationtech] NSA Spy Scandal's Impact on US-EU Relations on April 15

2014-03-26 Thread Yosem Companys
From: FSI Events snel...@stanford.edu

The Europe Center and the Freeman Spogli Institute invite you to attend:

Assessing the Impact of the NSA Spy Scandal
on American-European Relations

with

Ulrich Wilhelm
Director General of Bavarian Broadcasting (BR)

TUESDAY, APRIL 15th
12:00PM - 1:30PM
Oksenberg Conference Room, Encina Hall (3nd floor)

Please RSVP by April 11 at:  
http://europe.stanford.edu/events/registration/8118/
A light lunch will be provided

The Europe Center
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and
The Stanford Global Studies Division
http://europe.stanford.edu
-- 
Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.


[liberationtech] Wanted: arkOS Volunteer Associate Program Director

2014-03-26 Thread Jacob Cook
The CitizenWeb Project (developer of self-hosted server and data sharing
platform arkOS) is looking for a volunteer Associate Program Director to
help start a team! If you are in Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa or New York
City, check it out:

https://citizenweb.is/news/2014/03/assistant-program-director/

Please share far and wide if you know someone who might be interested.


Thanks!

-- 
Jacob Cook ja...@peakwinter.net
https://peakwinter.net
-- 
Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.


[liberationtech] How to make Whonix really user friendly? Looking for your suggestions!

2014-03-26 Thread Patrick Schleizer
TLDR:

Future Directions - Where Whonix wants to be in 2 or 5 years?

Do we want Whonix to be for average users or just for those with unix
knowledge?

Whonix is a useful tool for some already, got many fans. How can we make
Whonix really user friendly to allow mass adaption by regular people who
need anonymity most?

Long:

It seems, Whonix limits itself by its two machines design. [1] It's not
exactly simple and user friendly to say you first need to get
VirtualBox, then import these two VMs, then start Whonix-Gateway, then
start Whonix-Workstation or use physical isolation [2]. How could that
be improved while keeping Whonix's design?

In the last days many had great ideas. One was to create a hardware
appliance. Whonix running as physically isolated gateway running on
devices such as Raspberry PI or OpenWRT or creating a Tor WiFi Hotspot
(a WiFi hotspot once using it, torifying the whole connection). The
issue is, having a route everything through Tor approach alone doesn't
make it anymore nowadays. If someone would run their usual applications,
such as their Firefox or Internet Explorer browser they used for
non-anonymous stuff beforehand over Tor, they wouldn't be anonymous at
all due to (flash) cookies, browser fingerpriting [3] and so forth.
Saying plug this hardware appliance between your router and your
computer AND install this client package also doesn't sound exactly simple.

Another idea was to create a Whonix Live DVD. But even if we managed to
create one, it would still be clumsy to say you have to burn this iso
to DVD, then boot it, then start Whonix-Gateway, then start
Whonix-Workstation.

Jason Ayala suggested to create an Whonix USB installer [4]. It would
still be clumsy (as above), but installing Whonix would get simpler and
more encouraging to use a non-Windows, separate operating system. We
then would have to support lots of different hardware, but additional
support by funding [5] this would be possible. Users still would have to
figure out how to boot from USB, which is not entirely trivial due to
different BIOS implementations. Also secure boot [6] won't make this
simpler.

Cerberus raised the idea to make Whonix fully managed. Perhaps he meant
to enable automatic updates [7] for the host, Whonix-Gateway and
Whonix-Workstation. Whonix-Gateway could then be fully managed and
hidden from non-advanced users. However, there are some settings that
need to be set up on Whonix-Gateway, such as settings for Tor bridges
[8]. Maybe a Whonix-Host operating system could ssh into Whonix-Gateway
to manage it.

Or maybe while we're at discussing a Whonix-Host operating system, we
should revive the OneVM [9] concept? In essence, we're shipping
Whonix-Gateway as VM package, because it is a simpler and more robust
implementation to support a variety of different host operating systems
and configurations. As long as Whonix doesn't provide a host operating
system, the two VM solution is more robust. But if Whonix is enters the
next stage of evolution, i.e. by shipping a host operating system, the
OneVM concept may work better.

The idea to add Whonix to the usual app stores, such as Windows / Mac
app store as well as “sudo apt-get install whonix” has been raised as
well. This wouldn’t make Whonix less clumsy (still two VMs), but it
would make installation simpler and more secure.

In summary, we're not sure yet where the journey should go to. We'd
appreciate the input of the community. Please share ideas on how Whonix
could become really usable while not sacrificing security.

Footnotes:

[1] https://www.whonix.org/w/images/9/90/Whonix.jpg
[2] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/Build_Documentation/Physical_Isolation
[3] https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/
[4] https://www.whonix.org/forum/index.php/topic,205.0.html
[5] https://www.whonix.org/forum/index.php/topic,201.0.html
[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Secure_boot_criticism
[7] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/Automatic_Updates
[8] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Bridges
[9] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/OneVM
-- 
Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Re: [liberationtech] How to make Whonix really user friendly? Looking for your suggestions!

2014-03-26 Thread Natanael
As I suggested once in the past for another project, you could bundle up
all the software in one package, and either run it on dedicated hardware
*and VNC into it* to use it's secure browser, or run it locally in which
case you interact directly with the VM (and it can still have multiple VMs
if a script or other software makes the process entirely automatic). A
dedicated box should support multiple simultaneous VNC users.

- Sent from my phone
Den 26 mar 2014 20:26 skrev Patrick Schleizer adrela...@riseup.net:

 TLDR:

 Future Directions - Where Whonix wants to be in 2 or 5 years?

 Do we want Whonix to be for average users or just for those with unix
 knowledge?

 Whonix is a useful tool for some already, got many fans. How can we make
 Whonix really user friendly to allow mass adaption by regular people who
 need anonymity most?

 Long:

 It seems, Whonix limits itself by its two machines design. [1] It's not
 exactly simple and user friendly to say you first need to get
 VirtualBox, then import these two VMs, then start Whonix-Gateway, then
 start Whonix-Workstation or use physical isolation [2]. How could that
 be improved while keeping Whonix's design?

 In the last days many had great ideas. One was to create a hardware
 appliance. Whonix running as physically isolated gateway running on
 devices such as Raspberry PI or OpenWRT or creating a Tor WiFi Hotspot
 (a WiFi hotspot once using it, torifying the whole connection). The
 issue is, having a route everything through Tor approach alone doesn't
 make it anymore nowadays. If someone would run their usual applications,
 such as their Firefox or Internet Explorer browser they used for
 non-anonymous stuff beforehand over Tor, they wouldn't be anonymous at
 all due to (flash) cookies, browser fingerpriting [3] and so forth.
 Saying plug this hardware appliance between your router and your
 computer AND install this client package also doesn't sound exactly
 simple.

 Another idea was to create a Whonix Live DVD. But even if we managed to
 create one, it would still be clumsy to say you have to burn this iso
 to DVD, then boot it, then start Whonix-Gateway, then start
 Whonix-Workstation.

 Jason Ayala suggested to create an Whonix USB installer [4]. It would
 still be clumsy (as above), but installing Whonix would get simpler and
 more encouraging to use a non-Windows, separate operating system. We
 then would have to support lots of different hardware, but additional
 support by funding [5] this would be possible. Users still would have to
 figure out how to boot from USB, which is not entirely trivial due to
 different BIOS implementations. Also secure boot [6] won't make this
 simpler.

 Cerberus raised the idea to make Whonix fully managed. Perhaps he meant
 to enable automatic updates [7] for the host, Whonix-Gateway and
 Whonix-Workstation. Whonix-Gateway could then be fully managed and
 hidden from non-advanced users. However, there are some settings that
 need to be set up on Whonix-Gateway, such as settings for Tor bridges
 [8]. Maybe a Whonix-Host operating system could ssh into Whonix-Gateway
 to manage it.

 Or maybe while we're at discussing a Whonix-Host operating system, we
 should revive the OneVM [9] concept? In essence, we're shipping
 Whonix-Gateway as VM package, because it is a simpler and more robust
 implementation to support a variety of different host operating systems
 and configurations. As long as Whonix doesn't provide a host operating
 system, the two VM solution is more robust. But if Whonix is enters the
 next stage of evolution, i.e. by shipping a host operating system, the
 OneVM concept may work better.

 The idea to add Whonix to the usual app stores, such as Windows / Mac
 app store as well as “sudo apt-get install whonix” has been raised as
 well. This wouldn’t make Whonix less clumsy (still two VMs), but it
 would make installation simpler and more secure.

 In summary, we're not sure yet where the journey should go to. We'd
 appreciate the input of the community. Please share ideas on how Whonix
 could become really usable while not sacrificing security.

 Footnotes:

 [1] https://www.whonix.org/w/images/9/90/Whonix.jpg
 [2] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/Build_Documentation/Physical_Isolation
 [3] https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/
 [4] https://www.whonix.org/forum/index.php/topic,205.0.html
 [5] https://www.whonix.org/forum/index.php/topic,201.0.html
 [6]

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Secure_boot_criticism
 [7] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/Automatic_Updates
 [8] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Bridges
 [9] https://www.whonix.org/wiki/OneVM
 --
 Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations
 of list guidelines will get you moderated:
 https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
 Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
 compa...@stanford.edu.
-- 
Liberationtech is public  

Re: [liberationtech] [tor-talk] How to make Whonix really user friendly? Looking for your suggestions!

2014-03-26 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 3/27/14, Patrick Schleizer adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
 TLDR:
 Future Directions - Where Whonix wants to be in 2 or 5 years?

 Do we want Whonix to be for average users or just for those with unix
 knowledge?

 Whonix is a useful tool for some already, got many fans. How can we make
 Whonix really user friendly to allow mass adaption by regular people who
 need anonymity most?

I haven't yet read about how whonix works, but this has been on my mind:

Have a VM creator driven by debootstrap or similar type script that
depends on debootstrap to do early install.

I believe that a lot of developers and even some non-developers have
local or local-partial mirrors, and so debootstrap is in these cases
very quick.

Also, for those who have a (partial) local mirror, building an image
may well be quicker than downloading an image.

There are also those of us (like me) who live in rural areas and
mostly only have access to slow high-latency and low bandwidth (1GiB
per month) links to the internet - but I do sync a local debian mirror
every week or two.

So for me with a local mirror, if there were a small debootstrap like
package for creating a whonix image, that is certainly what I'd use.

That script or program could also be used to create a Linux
lightweight container too, rather than a full VM (breathes more life
into older hardware).

Now if that script is driven by a YAML configuration file (or .INI or
whatever you guys have chosen already, but I don't like XML), then it
should be easy to build a GUI on top of this Whonix-creator script for
customization of your new image (ie customization of the config file,
before the script is run).


This might be considered 'advanced install' only, but I do believe
that by facilitating the so-called advanced or power users, or
developers, you actually build a far higher loyalty to your project
much more quickly than you would otherwise. You see, we are the ones
who would build such images and install them for our friends and
acquaintances. We are the ones who advocate a particular solution/
option/ set-up, and more often than not do that installation.

So, you want to be pleasing us! Well, I should say, _we_ want to be
pleasing ourselves by making our own lives easier - we should firstly
target ourselves.

And of course, such a simple 'advanced user' design, of course lends
itself to easy image creation for download, for those who find the
'advanced' configuration gui too, daunting shall we say :)

Good luck
Zenaan
-- 
Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.


[liberationtech] [SPAM:###] Toward a network commons: Building an Internet for and by the people.

2014-03-26 Thread Jenny Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings Libtech,

A coalition of free/libre community-owned networks around the world
has submitted an application for a Knight News Challenge grant aimed
at strengthening the Internet for free expression and innovation.

https://www.newschallenge.org/challenge/2014/submissions/toward-a-network-commons-building-an-internet-for-and-by-the-people

Please check it out, give us feedback in the form of Comments, and
some Applause if you dig the idea!

The goal of funding is trifold:
* To support the development of the Network Commons License[1] and an
organization to uphold it,
* To support an international Free Networks summit to gather together
representatives of free networks[2] in one place to share ideas and
resources toward creating the aforementioned organization,
* To support the creation of educational materials, workshops, and
guides for the construction and maintenance of free networks.

[1] There is currently an effort underway to develop a Network Commons
License - similar to a Creative Commons License - to enable legal
support for free networks. Two weeks ago, a group of folks
representing Sudo Mesh, wlan-slovenija, LA Meshnet, Kansas City
Freedom Network and Austin Freenet converged in Austin for the Free
Network Foundation's winter summit. It was an awesome, intensive
couple of days with remote participation from several other groups.
You can read notes from the summit here:
https://commons.thefnf.org/index.php/2014WinterSummitMondayNotes

* Draft of the Free Network Definition:
https://commons.thefnf.org/index.php/Free_network_definition
* Draft of the Network Commons License:
https://commons.thefnf.org/index.php/Network_Commons_License

[2] The following groups helped draft the Knight News Challenge
proposal, and we intend to reach out to many more in the coming weeks:

* Sudo Mesh, launching the People's Open Network in Oakland, CA
* Kansas City Freedom Network, in close alliance with the Free Network
Foundation in Kansas City, MO.
* wlan-slovenija across Slovenia and connecting Austria and Croatia!
* Altermundi in Argentina
* Guifi.net in Catalonia
* Freifunk in Germany
* Ninux in Italy
* MedellinLibre in Medellin, Columbia
* Village Telco in South Africa
* Fédération FDN in France

Please forward this along to other free network groups not currently
included on this roster!

Twitter Post (precisely 140 characters):
Support an international coalition of community #mesh networks:
Applaud our #newschallenge proposal for a net commons kng.ht/1dmIsCF

On Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/darknetplan/comments/20wm92/toward_a_network_commons_building_an_internet_for/

Many thanks for your support,
Jenny Ryan
http://jennyryan.net
http://sudomesh.org
http://thevirtualcampfire.org
http://technomadic.tumblr.com

`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories.
- -Laurie Anderson

Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining
it.
 -Hannah Arendt

To define is to kill. To suggest is to create.
- -Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
- -- 
Jenny
http://jennyryan.net
http://sudomesh.org
http://thevirtualcampfire.org
http://technomadic.tumblr.com

`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories.
- -Laurie Anderson

Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining
it.
 -Hannah Arendt

To define is to kill. To suggest is to create.
- -Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTM4GtAAoJEHTWWpBUSeDhJIYH/2ekAnlDbuAsEoGwLIwfwHhG
9BLh1sGQQ+Qq6WLHnCQ+qPRKLKqiIcxAYrqhy778exKIzgJycFUhzd9SwT9ZG2rF
L3QpDrAThRY/IP2IVbDVhu/WcjjIOuYC8ou6zsT7zoAU8R5Fnf0ZKGQMmBmuRwy5
QnwoyGX9dkBsQg0KdEP6z2KbC3/jikzsfUn7qXWftr3bEwXyLJNwj2ycon/OoHM4
8f8SZDGD126MzVwh0ufm/kyONLoh5+p+0M18fXPWLbrkFX0K2jJm49RBWUF0k/JR
Ib5lFnD13iwN2wAAadgMwo1iLPfbW5oS+mFM1V1FAXQbr+qyoiOC9n4HIHPMK5s=
=J3qi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.


[liberationtech] The National Security Agency at the Crossroads (Austin: Apr 3-4)

2014-03-26 Thread Gregory Foster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

The National Security Agency at the Crossroads (Austin: Apr 3-4)
https://strausscenter.org/details/279-privacy-surveillance-and-the-nsa.html

If you review the agenda and speaker list, you'll see this event is a
pretty big deal.


 The Intelligence Studies Project is a joint venture of the Strauss
 Center and Clements Center at the University of Texas at Austin,
 aiming to encourage policy-relevant academic inquiry into the past,
 present, and future of intelligence agencies and the legal, policy,
 and technological environments in which they operate. Nothing
 better illustrates the need for such inquiry than the events of the
 past year surrounding the National Security Agency. As part of a
 larger effort to improve public understanding of those events, the
 Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law and the
 William P. Clements Jr. Center for History, Strategy  Statecraft
 are hosting a major interdisciplinary conference focused on the NSA
 from April 3rd through 4th. It will cover topics including the
 history of the NSA, the role of the media in revealing classified
 information about its activities, the legal architecture in which
 it operates, the compliance and oversight mechanisms associated
 with the NSA, the diplomatic fallout from the recent revelations,
 and the prospects for reform.

Although open to the public, the event is already waitlisted.  I'm
aware of at least a few concerned citizens who signed up to attend and
plan to document the event through various channels.
http://www.eventbrite.com/e/privacy-surveillance-and-the-nsa-tickets-8953832153

If you have an interest in this event you'd like to discuss, please
contact me off list.

gf

- -- 
Gregory Foster || gfos...@entersection.org
@gregoryfoster  http://entersection.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTM62eAAoJEMaAACmjGtgj8NsP/AxHR2VOTHivwqv7MmnkZ9kS
l+kFi9RC9ZB0e80jAljc32FnIRWhhmry1/BOU9dgtWEzmcpfInAQdTHV01droXT1
XlxiEvVfv5Sh7Ln3gE4nv2UgUFTy8GXZAmRoVilr/SCietQd5nOFoWhzLPEsnfGw
PYAUE5FHu4Sh2tEcCJDSGPZOe/Rd7QvlU4qd3drTOwnC840X5x0CtylGXVWHxMcl
K/nAzuMkhB+Zd3tErka2yR7vw42Ch5PeT6qN3c5TtLywhAVSamqQjzWfeJdx6NMk
/F89Q8oJcJ1zLfpePhuj+m4FRCTq3/ONmk+d4NpwRAP5v+BeXk4EyHadibf5GJX2
7IUlR77p1cTi//QvwvkQq0iBnESBDRu+JaUI8fX2bluuIK9PZnS/AJG4A8KE9ujo
wciHmFk0uAuxw5GqHNF0VLo8JQjc2DDNcmsHheVXuzE9txMShdgonWPoxVfouXys
JetLGAZwFhbxfku5bXpqVYnNLQi5FfMaIEZ6saT8cEWdbuCpbuXKSAsEMSY/LIjK
DaITHHO+YiRD7qlM/TakpI934F925k4pQ3rA3Y32ObihacjQHysN2LkOhUPuITY7
RLbUCbww1Dcb0QGUgib7INSRTWnN+vt+fsN07jgTtXr60VfXdGF3pUHAxqZ9d/nX
esziR2DQx3s7u+15clcf
=Wdx1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
Liberationtech is public  archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.