Re: linux on the desktop making inroads...

2005-01-31 Thread Dale Anderson
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 08:48 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:

 
 There are a lot of computing needs which are definitely not met by
 Linux. Speech recognition is one, and don't start arguing that there
 isn't a *need* here unless you want to make a fool out of yourself.
 Engineering applications are next on my mind. Keeping your head in the
 sand and proudly proclaiming my needs are met by free software doesn't
 address any of these problems. I was talking more in general, not about
 you, you're not representative.

same goes for CAD software (architectural or otherwise) , and speech
software isnt exactly fantastic on any platform as yet . 

Cheers
Dale.



Re: qemu WAS VMWARE LUG offer ......

2005-01-29 Thread Dale Anderson
As Nick said qemu is damn slow , but then again it is basically a fork
of bochs with a few extras added to aid initial setup and configuration.

Cheers
Dale.

On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 14:02 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 13:04 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
  have you tried it? I see it is in portage.
  
  hint you need softmmu in your USE variable.
  
  I'll report after lunch.
  
  On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 12:13 +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
   Greets,
   
 Folks who are interested in this thread may also be interested to read 
   about 
   another Free emulator which has been released.
   
   http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/52/QEMU_System_Emulation.pdf
   
   Take care, it's 334 kB but well worth the read imho.
   
 
 ok so the article is about 1/3 the size of the qemu source :-)
 
 I downloaded, compiled and installed qemu, it took damn all time, its
 about 1M of source.
 
 hint for gentoo users set the softmmu USE flag:
 
 USE=softmmu emerge --ask qemu
 
 I then tried it out with qemu -cdrom KNOPPIX_V3.7-2004-12-08-EN.iso
 
 The emulation appears to be pretty complete, but r-a-t-h-e-r   s-l-o-w.
 I also have vmware-workstation which is light years faster.
 
 If I understand correctly qemu is an emulator, whereas vmware is a
 hardware virtualiser. The distinction is better explained by wikipedia
 than I can do:
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VMware
 
 Of course qemu can emulate arm, ppc and sparc on x86 hardware, so for
 some things an emulator can be useful. Maybe a chance to see a ppc
 distro working, or test something specific on another architecture.
 There is a distinct price differential too :-)
 
 On my Athlon 1133 with 512M RAM first impressions show that there is a
 not enough grunt to make this system very usable. Allocating 256 M RAM
 instead of the default 128M doesn't seem to change much. My system is
 getting a bit old now (Anyone wanna contribute to a contract on that
 fella Moore?). I'd be interested to know how someone with a 3G p4 with
 heaps of RAM copes.
 
 
 



Re: VMWARE LUG offer ......

2005-01-28 Thread Dale Anderson
No further correspondence thus far , have been on holiday this week ,
will follow up early next week and see what is happening . 

Cheers
Dale.

On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 22:29 +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
 On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:18, Dale Anderson wrote:
  Hi All
 
  Not sure if anyone is interested or not 
  http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
 What's happening about this?
 Are we anywhere in the running?
 



Re: VMWARE LUG offer ......

2005-01-25 Thread Dale Anderson
Works/ed fine for me , 4.0+ on debian,ubuntu, gentoo , self rolled ,
hell it even worked on SuSe ;) (oh SUSE since novell merge) iirc . 

Cheers 
Dale.

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 17:10 +1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:
 Dale Anderson wrote:
 
 Hi All 
 
 Not sure if anyone is interested or not 
 http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
 
 Cheers
 Dale.
 
   
 
 I don't know if this has been pointed out, but...
 
 It doesn't run properly on any up-to-date kernel. That's debian with 
 2.6.8 or 2.6.9, FC2 or FC3 with 2.6.10 ( That's 5 systems with these 3 
 oses I've tried ). This is the real 4.5 Workstation I'm talking about. 
 Falls over left and right, and I also had to install from an iso image 
 of the cdrom, as it was reporting errors on 2 perfectly ok sets of RH3 
 cds. That's all I've tested it on, but... I wasted a lot of time and 
 energy trying to get it to work.
 
 *not impressed* tm.
 
 Steve
 



Re: Configuring Helix Player

2005-01-22 Thread Dale Anderson
Helix is a standalone player with a plugin for web crud , all configuration
has to be done in the standalone app .

Cheers
Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Vik Olliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CLUG linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Configuring Helix Player


 I've installed helix-player under Debian. I think I need to change its
 proxy configurations and so forth, but can't find out how to get to its
 preferences dialog in either Mozilla or Firefox.

 Tantalisingly, I can find a link to screenshots of the dialogs:

 http://primates.ximian.com/~xkahn/helixplayer/

 but no way of getting to them! I tried looking for the resource file,
 but that doesn't seem to be written.

 Any pointers?

 Vik :v)
 -- 
 Vik Olliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 The Olliver Family






Re: Run process at startup

2005-01-21 Thread Dale Anderson
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.277


- Original Message - 
From: Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Run process at startup



 On Fri, January 21, 2005 1:57 pm, Andrew Errington said:
 [snip]
 
  I plan to migrate to Postgres, then I'll be able to store all the data
all
  the time and get graphs of any subset.  Right now I'm just getting all
the
  bits working.
 
  Andy
 
 If that's the case ( and an extremely sinsible one imho... given what
 mysql are doing atm ), then look out for release 8.Last time I looked it
 was at rc5, and that's available for M$, too. And for free. Could be
 useful in the real world (:

 Cheers,

 Steve

 -- 
 Artificial Intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.





Re: Apache 2

2005-01-20 Thread Dale Anderson



VirtualHost *:80ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]ServerName 
website01.domainA.comDocumentRoot 
"F:/websites/website01"/VirtualHost

I'd imagine this wouldnt be helping much 
.

try removing that entry as it is defined furthur 
down your config and changing 

#Use name-based virtual hosting.NameVirtualHost 
*:80NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.9:80NameVirtualHost 
192.168.1.9:80NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.9:80

to 

#Use name-based virtual hosting.NameVirtualHost 
192.168.1.9:80
Cheers
Dale.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rob 
  Wood 
  To: CLUG 
  Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 10:15 
  PM
  Subject: Apache 2
  
  Greetings,
  I have been having major problems with Apache, 
  running a main server and two virtual hosts.
  
  I have been through the Apache documentation with 
  a fine tooth comb and as far as I can see my cofiguration should work. It 
  works OK when accessingthe main server from outside, but when I try to 
  access the virtual hosts, theyall default to the main 
  server.
  
  The best I have managed so far is to run the main 
  server and 1 virtual host, using the _default_vhost directive on a separate 
  port. With this setup, I managed to access 2 of the sites, but then that 
  leaves 1 site out of the setup.
  
  Assuming that the first 2 sections of the 
  httpd.conf are correct, as it is as the default except that Ientered the 
  basic main server information, then the 3rd section, Virtual Hosts must be 
  causing the problem.
  
  I have therefore attached the VHost section of 
  the httpd.conf to keep the e-mail concise. If anyone can point me in the right 
  direction I would be grateful.
  
  I have unfortunately had to run my commercial 
  site on Win2000 and IIS to stay online for nowsonone of my3 
  sites can be accessed via Apache just now.
  
  Woodsey
  
  

  No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 
  19/01/2005


Re: Apache 2

2005-01-20 Thread Dale Anderson
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 23:27 +1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:

   
 
 Oy! Woodsey! No! Wot's this F: stuff? And the domain names should be 
 lower case.
 
Ah isnt he setting apache up on windows ? 

Dale.



Re: SOT: Car Inverter

2005-01-20 Thread Dale Anderson

- Original Message - 
From: Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: SOT: Car Inverter



 On Fri, January 21, 2005 2:27 pm, C. Falconer said:
  I now own a 300 Watt 12V to 240V inverter.
 
  If anyone has a desire to run their laptop in a car for long trips then
  email me for a loan.
 
  BTW SOT: Semi Off Topic - my laptop runs linux.
 
 
 
 
 ...mind you keep the engine running - that's a max 25A draw on the
battery!

not that thats an issue , most modern alternators charge at ~ 50+ amps and a
decent battery will output ~ 400+amps short duration.
(unless you drive a late model import with the factory battery , where youll
be unlikely to start the car after listening to the radio for 2 minutes with
the car off , let alone firing the invertor up ;) .)

Dale.

 Steve

 -- 
 Artificial Intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.





Re: OT: Which company for .co.nz?

2005-01-19 Thread Dale Anderson

- Original Message - 
From: Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Which company for .co.nz?



 Stay very well clear of domainz, they're dubious and have been breathed
 on by the commerce commission at least once.

Oh really  ? They are now owned by Domain Directors who I have found
extremely good to deal with .

Cheers
Dale.

 Volker



 -- 
 Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
 http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.





Re: VMWARE LUG offer ......

2005-01-16 Thread Dale Anderson
Hi all , since I hadn't heard any neg, feedback re pursuing this I have set
the ball rolling as from last night , awaiting further communication from
vmware at the moment .


Cheers
Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: VMWARE LUG offer ..


 here are the terms  conditions.

 http://www.vmware.com/pdf/lug_terms_conditions.pdf

 i posted the EULA a day or so ago.

 frankly i don't care who registers as president of our lug and receives
 a free license. however as there is a considerable benefit in terms of
 license fees, i suggest a consensus would be nice. we do not have a
 president, hands up who wants to register? Dale Anderson drew it to our
 attention, i say give him first option.

 don't forget the pres has to comply with this:

 In consideration of the license granted, VMware asks that each Linux
Group President inform his
 or her colleagues, associates and Linux user group members of the
 benefits that he or she receives from using VMware products.


 On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:33:44 +1300
 david merriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Dale Anderson wrote:
 
  Hi All
  
  Not sure if anyone is interested or not 
  http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
  
  Cheers
  Dale.
  
  
 
 
  I'd be interested in a copy too.
 
  David
 
  -- 
  The pen is mightier than the sword, but only if the sword is very small
and the pen is very sharp
 

 -- 
 Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: VMWARE LUG offer ......

2005-01-14 Thread Dale Anderson
I'm happy to go ahead and organise it ...I guess the main issue is am I
going to stand on somebodies toes if I do so ? 
Is there a 'president' of CLUG pursue ? 

Cheers
Dale. 

On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 20:27 +1300, Robert Himmelmann wrote:
 I would also be intrested in a copy. Then I could finally abandon my 
 windows partitions and try a second distro. I would also write some 
 comments.
 
 Happy Hacking,
 Robert
 
 +---+
 |If you don't know what 'Happy Hacking' means, read |
 |the book 'Free as in Freedom', published under |
 |http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/freedom/index.html |
 +---+
 |Use free software only. See|
 |http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html |
 +---+
 |Please avoid sending me Microsoft Word attachments.|
 |For more information, see: |
 |http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html |
 +---+
 



VMWARE LUG offer ......

2005-01-13 Thread Dale Anderson
Hi All 

Not sure if anyone is interested or not 
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp

Cheers
Dale.



Re: Reiser4, wish me luck...

2005-01-06 Thread Dale Anderson
IIRC Lindows(Linspire) has been using it for some time .

I gave up on it when it required a few nasty hacks within glibc source to
get a bootstrap to build nice .
Must get around to having a play with it again .

Cheers
Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: Reiser4, wish me luck...


 You're a good keen man! ;)

 SuSE reckons reiser4 is not yet ripe for production use, which is why
 they're not shipping it by default, but it's shipped as an installable
 option. I guess someone has to start using it, but it seems to be user
 beware.

  #%$#%$!! Reiser4 is working just fine. But somehow I missed the error
  message from a 2GB file size limit.

 Is this a specific reiser4 limit which exists for some temporary reason
 (because the reiser3 limit is in the terrabytes), or something
 configurable which you forgot to turn on? (Btw check /proc/config.gz for
 where your kernel config might have come from.)

 Volker

 -- 
 Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
 http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.





Re: Judy Lindsay questions

2004-12-27 Thread Dale Anderson
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 11:03 +1300, Andrew Errington wrote:


No you cant they wont send more than 3 (iirc) keys for 'evaluation'
purposes.(unless of course you want to reregister all the time) 

Cheers
Dale. 
 
 Andy
 
 PS VMWare is free, but you need a licence key.  A 30-day trial key is free, 
 and I suppose you could keep getting a new one every 30 days.
 



Re: Settled on ubuntu (great) - postfix question?

2004-12-26 Thread Dale Anderson
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 20:29 +1300, Daryn Hanright wrote:

  
 
 You'd think that would work wouldn't you? Ha! Tried above  email still
 kept being sent as [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

I take it the host/domainname is setup correctly in main.cf ? 


 Ended up giving up  got
 sendmail working with procmail. I sent this email with the working
 config so I think its working properly! Thanks for your help Chris.
 
 cheers
 Daryn
 
 ==
 The PalmHeads
 http://www.planetnz.com/palmheads
 
 

Cheers
Dale.



Re: Settled on ubuntu (great) - postfix question?

2004-12-26 Thread Dale Anderson
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 13:37 +1300, Daryn Hanright wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 10:06:27PM +1300, Dale Anderson wrote:
  On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 20:29 +1300, Daryn Hanright wrote:
  

   
   You'd think that would work wouldn't you? Ha! Tried above  email still
   kept being sent as [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  I take it the host/domainname is setup correctly in main.cf ? 
  
  
 
 I think so (am not completely sure!). I had this set-up...
 
 myhostname = localhost.localdomain
 mydomain = localdomain

There goes your problem :) , yes you need to set them to whatever is
relevant to your setup . 

Cheers
Dale.
 
 They should represent exactly what your machine hostname  domain are
 huh?
 
 cheers
 Daryn
 



Re: Cheap way to get into embedded linux

2004-12-26 Thread Dale Anderson
The EPIA MII is fantastic value for money for a incar type setup , 
onboard firewire (great if you want to add in a removable harddrive dock 
for mp3's etc) CF reader, usb, svideo out, 5.1 audio etc etc etc , and 
easy to wire up a filter and run 12volt line direct to the board .

I take it the router in the link is using the ARM development kit style 
board  ? 80mhz ARM is more than enough HP to play mp3's etc 

Cheers
Dale.
Andrew Errington wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:52, you wrote:
 

Interesting - what do you intend to use it for?
Whats the PSU?
Does it have audio?
How powerful is the CPU in effective terms?
   

According to the DSE site the PSU is 7.5V 1A, so you could step-down from a 
car battery easily.  For audio I would suggest a USB audio solution (I 
don't expect there to be any audio hardware on this board).  Something like 
XH1938 or XH7870 might work because the board has a USB *host* port on it.

For a car computer I think a mini-ITX fanless motherboard with a mini-box 
(www.mini-box.com) car PSU would be better.

Andy
 




Re: Make your desktop snow!!!!

2004-12-23 Thread Dale Anderson
Theres a module in e17 also for those using it 

Dale.

On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 17:37 +1300, Caleb Sawtell wrote:
 Hi
 I found this cool app while searching though the gentoo forums and can
 be downloaded from http://www.euronet.nl/~rja/Xsnow/
 
 and it is in portage for you fellow gentooers :



Potentially the best 404 ever .....

2004-12-15 Thread Dale Anderson
Hi All 

Thought some might find this amusing ;)
http://www.digikitten.com/k.txt
Cheers
Dale.


Re: Xtra jetstream new plans....

2004-12-15 Thread Dale Anderson
Paradise cable , static IP ,  and plug-in-play (modem is just a bridge 
with IP allocated to box on the other side ) , and national traffic is 
charged at a very small percent of actual MB .

Dale.
John Carter wrote:
Xtra is badgering me to move to a new plan.
One curiousity is all local traffic is now part of your allocation.
I wonder how long it would take if we start ignoring local mirrors and 
just go to the international sources before they will change that?

Since they are forcing me to re-read all the fine print again, I don't 
see why I should stop at reading their fine print...

Any suggestions for Linux friendly ISP's.
My dream ISP will have a plan that doesn't bankrupt me if I get hit by 
a DDOS, will provide a static IP and allow me to serve up my home 
machine for convenience and to friendly traffic, and have a free 
Debian mirror.


John Carter Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
Tait ElectronicsFax   : (64)(3) 359 4632
PO Box 1645 ChristchurchEmail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Zealand
The universe is absolutely plastered with the dashed lines exactly one
space long.


Re: It's that time of year again

2004-12-13 Thread Dale Anderson
LMAO , thanks yuri :)
Dale.
yuri wrote:
better !pout !cry
better watchout
lpr why
santaclaus northpole town
cat /etc/passwd  list
ncheck list
ncheck list
cat list | grep naughty  nogiftlist
cat list | grep nice  giftlist
santaclaus northpole town
who | grep sleeping
who | grep awake
who | grep bad || good
for (goodness sake) {
be good }
 



Re: OT Can someone explain please

2004-12-12 Thread Dale Anderson
Well obviously if the language used/implied  is against the law itself 
in one way or another , how do you think radio/TV personalities get 
around sharing their personal views on air ?

Dale.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
As far as I recall it is legal to state your personal views re someone 
else publically as long as you truely believe your statement 
regardless of the content .
   

So I could call you all sorts rude and offensive things in public and be
legally safe? And nobody say I don't believe them to be true! I find
that hard to believe.
I have however heard that the opposite is true: saying things about
someone else, even if true (eg company XYZ on the West Coast is
destroying the environmetn by ...), can get you successfully
prosecuted.
Volker
 




Re: Can someone explain please

2004-12-12 Thread Dale Anderson
As far as I recall it is legal to state your personal views re someone 
else publically as long as you truely believe your statement 
regardless of the content .

Dale.
Nope, email is not new rules. The lawyers will tell you that email can 
be regarded as a legally binding document.

Derek.
=
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Andrew Errington wrote:
 

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:48, you wrote:
   

 The answer is no no no. My conclusion is that it is never never never
 ok to flame newbies. Never.
 

I agree.
It's okay to flame idiots though.
Andy

   

 



Re: Can someone explain please

2004-12-12 Thread Dale Anderson
Yes sorry Nick see my 'adjustment' in the next post  , I wasnt directly 
refering to joe bloggs has done something , more I believe this person 
is X because ...and rightly the 'regardless of content' is a bit loose .

Dale.
Nick Rout wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:27:38 +1300
Dale Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

As far as I recall it is legal to state your personal views re someone 
else publically as long as you truely believe your statement 
...regardless of the content .
   

regardless of the content goes too far. there are a number of things
relevant here:
1. it is defamation to say something that lowers the target in the eyes
of right thinking people generally:
X is a thief, X is into bestaility,  Doctor X couldn't diagnose the
common cold, X the sysadmin couldn't secure a linux box if it was in a
locked shipping container with no connection to the outside world. Just
think what it would mean to your personal or business lives if someone
said those things about you, and you will realise why.
2. it is a defence to defamation if the statement is true, but having
said it you must prove it, a notoriously difficult task.
3. it is a defence to defamation if you are expressing a genuinely held
opinion and express the reasons for the opinion  the latest record by
Band G is awful because they have abandoned their blues roots and
produced a poppy but shallow imitation of their glorious early albums.
However it is easy to  cross the line, as i imagine this might: Band G
have stooped to new depths with their loathsome new album. The lead
singer sings like a cat with asthma which is only fitting for the crap
played by her backing musicians. Clearly 'musicians' is not the right
word for these creatures, they are blood sucking leeches on today's
youth, selling out to corporate greed and their own ends.
4. there are also laws about how we behave in public, such as laws against
offensive behaviour and language in public places, and laws about
inciting racial hatred etc.
 

Dale.
   

 



Re: OT: IPCOP and too much spare time

2004-12-07 Thread Dale Anderson
Im glad im not the only geek ;) , current motd set the other week

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  $ cat /etc/motd
Welcome to the Adistro 1.0 Sample Implementation ...all your amin are 
belong to us
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  $

(long story)
;)
Dale.
Brendan Greer wrote:
hi people
This is off topic, suposed to be slightly funny
Edited one of the images on the ipcop main page the screen shots can be 
seen on the page below
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~bjgreernz/IPCOP/IPCOP.html

For background see http://www.planettribes.com/allyourbase/index.shtml
Brendan Greer


Re: DVD Playing on Linux - help for others??

2004-12-07 Thread Dale Anderson
Dont worry Chris the novelty will soon wear off.
Dale.
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:29, Jason Greenwood wrote:
Yes, I know, similar on Drake. That doesn't work too well on non-Gentoo
systems now does it?
True.
And if you don't want to compile?? 
Ah. But _you_ don't compile, your computer - directed by the Gentoo .ebuild 
script - does. You do not have to know one iota about what it's doing.
Compiling is nothing to be allergic to, honestly it's no big deal.


There's the rub.  
Different distros, er, strokes for different folks.
Indeed, vive la differance.

Compiling all that on a less than modern machine aint exactly going to
be quick now is it?
It all depends on how you define quick, it's going to be a _great deal_ 
faster - even on a 600MHz machine - than footling around until 03:00am 
looking for some weird rpm file to d/l.


Took me 5 minutes of downloading over 128K adsl and 
then 2 minutes of installing and I was done... =)
You conveniently forget the time taken to find the particular file you need, 
and then fighting all the demons living in rpm hell. Been there, done that, 
_never_ again. Remember that Linux is an Open _Source_ system. imho binary 
distributions of it are an anachronism from 10 years ago when the ordinary 
personal user was lucky to have a 33 Mhz '486 with 8 megs of ram. That sort 
of machine could not do very much compiling at all. The situation today is 
that memory and speed are about a 100 times bigger and faster than there were 
then. Building packages from source is quite practical now-a-days.
  

Statically linked RPMS 
are even better than Gentoo for most smallish programs IMHO. No
dependency hell, just download, install, use. Simple. With modern cheap
hard drives, WHO CARES about library duplication?? I certainly don't!!!
For a machine used by a single user I agree completely, but for a machine used 
concurrently by many users shared object libraries do save massive amounts of 
still somewhat precious memory.


Cheers
Jason
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:53, Jason Greenwood wrote:
The setup was straightforward and quick once I found the right info -
which took me until 3am (!)
3am Egads ( !!! )
emerge --sync ( approx 10 minutes, paradise cable is nice )
emerge vlc ( or xine, or mplayer, or ogle, or kaffeine )
Cook and eat dinner.
Watch film.
Do we need another Gentoo mini-InstallFest?



Re: OT: Monitor hardware fixing?

2004-12-06 Thread Dale Anderson
Just adding a note that VisTech had a couple of kick ass monitor techs 
working there (when I was working there) , the main issue these days is 
actually sourcing the components , most manufacturers these days buy 
from various sources during the run of even one model and alot of the 
'sources' are supplying X amount of the parts in one batch only , so 
getting them second hand is usually unlikely .

Cheers
Dale.
Jim Cheetham wrote:
Jim Cheetham wrote:
screen. I don't fancy opening the beast up myself, but if anyone knew 
of a decent repair business who might be prepared to have a go I'd 
like to hear about it ...

Thanks for the feedback. I spoke to Ascot and then Visual Tech, both 
said $50 to assess/quote, and by my description of the problem less 
than $100 to fix.

Now we await a wet day for someone to bring a car to work, so we can 
cart the tube off (probably to Ascot because of CLUG links).

-jim


OT sourgeforge

2004-11-26 Thread Dale Anderson
Hi All
Anyone else having issues with anon access to SF cvs ?
Developer access works fine , but a few projects I'm wanting to sync 
with I dont have developer access to :\ .

Just verifying wether I have b0rk'd something at my end or not  .
Cheers
Dale.


Re: Changing Desktop Size (Was: increasing text size [case changed])

2004-11-25 Thread Dale Anderson
Nick Rout wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:07:01 +1300
yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:33:42 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
   

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:30:57 +1300
yuri wrote:
 

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:21:17 +1300, Michael JasonSmith wrote:
   

On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 12:55 +1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:
 

[Snipped stuff about resizing with Ctrl+Alt+Plus, Ctrl+Alt+Minus]
   

That's the only thing that the windows gui does better than X11, IMHO.
Anyone heard anything about when this will change on linux?
If I was good enough to code X11 stuff it would be the first patch I'd
submit :-)
Yuri
   

KDE will do iterrr in the control panel thingy, peripherals i think.
 

On the fly?
Or does it take effect next time you log in?
Last time I checked I couldn't change on the fly.
Yuri
   

I can, may depend on X version and kde version.
 

~4.2.99+ and all x.org  xrandr supports it on the fly iirc .
there is a program in current versions of X called xrandr (X resize 
something), which will do it from the command line, ie in an xterm.
(XRANDR is also an extension to X, like RENDER and COMPOSE etc., you can
probably tell if it is going by grepping /var/log/Xorg.0.log

 

--
** WARNING to mailing list repliers **
Gmail over-rides Reply-To: field. Check your To: address before
sending reply to this post.
   

 




Re: OT: Anyone else fell the slow rolling earthquake?

2004-11-22 Thread Dale Anderson
Havent had enough coffee to notice small things like that as yet ;) 

Dale.

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:32, Carl Cerecke wrote:
 Lasted about a minute just now.

 Cheers,
 Carl.


Re: unlimited.school.nz RE: [Fwd: Re: ignorate priciple's]

2004-11-18 Thread Dale Anderson
Well if done right it should be , you can still have metadata within a flash 
site for google to find ...

Dale.

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:26, C. Falconer wrote:
 Their site will be completely invisible to google - because google doesn't
 search flash.
 Not a good way to help the customers find you.


 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, 19 November 2004 9:07 a.m.
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Fwd: Re: ignorate priciple's]


 I'm going to go out on a limb here and say from a designer's

 perspective, I actually think the site's quite cool.  Now before yall
 throw heavy objects to knock me off my limb, I did say 'design', not
 'content'.  Sometimes I worry all you geeks get too wrapped up in code
 and forget about those unfortunates among us who like pretty things d:-P

 Righto, now I'm sitting in a roasting disk on my limb, waiting for a
 rise in temperature.


 BTW, sorry Olwen, think I got caught by a reply to header, maybe...

 Olwen Williams wrote:
 I didn't contact Caleb's pincipal, but did look at their website, and
 submitted it to http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com Officially the website
 sucks, for it's Flash and guesswork approach.
 http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/
 
 
 On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:15:57 +1300, Caleb Sawtell
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is the priciple of my school ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) he
 thinks linux is a peice of shit. feel free to drop him a line.
 --
 Caleb Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Just a question about LFS.......

2004-11-16 Thread Dale Anderson
Damn Gmail , as I sent to Edwin ...

usual practice is to build in $LFS/sources and looks like the prefix
hasnt been passed to configure . 

Dale.


On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 22:44 +1300, Edwin F wrote:
 Okay, kinda bored so i'm trying out LFS. I'm just wondering about the
 'make install' bit of compiling. Here's what happens:
 /bin/sh /home/ed/Documents/LFS/binutils-2.14/install-sh -c -m 644
 libiberty.a /usr/local/lib/libiberty.an
 cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/local/lib/#inst.5353#': Permission denied
 make[1]: *** [install_to_libdir] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ed/Documents/LFS/binutils-2.14/libiberty'
 make: *** [install-libiberty] Error 2
 
 yes, i'm running as user lfs, but i have full write permissions for
 the LFS partition and shouldn't it be installed into $LFS/tools/ ? I
 dont want to install this on the host machine, at least i *think* i
 dont want to... I followed all the instructions... should i just
 install as root?
 



Re: SVG icons (Was: Initial Thoughts on Fedora Core 3)

2004-11-15 Thread Dale Anderson
Thats what dual head is for isnt it ?? ;) 

Dale.

On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 17:22 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
  It would be really cool to have a daemon or cron script that monitors
  the size of the trash directory and scales the trashcan icon
  proportionally.
 
 Oh n - you wouldn't have enough screen real-estate if you did that
 with the windoof partition too...
 
 Volker
 



Re: evolution-2 bits missing?

2004-11-13 Thread Dale Anderson
mm they were definitly there when I had it installed under freeBSD the 
other day , ill have a look when I get home tonight if you havent sorted 
the issue by then . (currently booted into gentoo)

Cheers
Dale.
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 18:17 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
 

I used to like the summary page in evolution 1.4, it saved me looking
out the window to see what the weather was doing, but more importantly
it had nice views of rss/rdf news feeds. I seems to have vanished in
version 2. Anyone knows if this has indeed disappeared, or whether I
have done something.
gentoo. but there don't seem to be any relevant USE flags.
   

Yeah, I miss those too :-( ... at this point I'm thinking of going back
to version 1.4 or maybe using Sylpheed instead.
 




Re: ATTN Gentoo users.

2004-11-12 Thread Dale Anderson
Thanks Col not sure what they are trying to achieve recently , a few 
portage updates recently have almost stuffed over the base system on my 
mail server  : \ .

Dale.
Col wrote:
I just updated my system, resulting in no modules autoloaded on bootup.
It took down my network i/f, alsa, vid capture, usb
It appears have changed the way hotplug works and now need coldplug to
auto load modules on boot.
#emerge coldplug
#rc-update add coldplug boot
Col.



Re: ATTN Gentoo users.

2004-11-12 Thread Dale Anderson
Nick Rout wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 09:01, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
 

#emerge coldplug
#rc-update add coldplug boot
 

Thanks for that, it saved me some trouble!
The main issue I have now is that the lastest emerge -Ud world I did has
screwed Gnome!
Gnome 2.8 has been installed but freezes at the splash screen and there
appear to be no way to exit it (have to ssh in and reboot).
I haver searched the forums and bug tracker but can find no solution to
this. I even even tried re-emerging gnome and gnome-session but this
hasn't fixed it.
Does anyone have any ideas?
   

emerge kde
 

Real handy Nick :) fire up x from a console as the user Jamie and 
see what gnome spits out to the console (if anything)  .

Cheers
Dale.
 

Cheers
Jamie
   


 




Re: About Basics on Linux

2004-11-12 Thread Dale Anderson
Derek Smithies wrote:
Hi,
and there is the spectemu for linux - zx spectrum emulator.
The ZX spectrum is a z80a based computer, which was (for the time) an 
incredibly cheap micro computer (or should that be nano computer?).

 

/me still recalls the fun of playing JetSet Willy ..
:)
Dale.


Re: ATTN Gentoo users.

2004-11-12 Thread Dale Anderson
Nick Rout wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 09:36, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
 

I noticed that KDE locked up after a while too, and it appeared to be
after a period of inactivity so the screensaver should have tried to have
kicked in.
I did an emerge xscreensaver and now both gnome and kde seem to work fine.
As an aside Nick, I prefer Gnome as to me its font rendering is better,
and it  seems faster as well.
   

sorry it wasn't a serious suggestion, and now I have probably started
another damn desktop war!
i am starting to use gnome a bit, some time with ubuntu increased my
appreciation of it. i think it has less background dross like arts
slowing the show down.
 

yeah cleaner default interface helps to , less to render etc (although 
some of the themes currently quickly turn it to custard)  , KDE has the 
interapp comunication beat atm though , although with gnome's goals for 
current cvs and furthur dbus migration I think things are going to be 
better in that regard under the Gnome next release .

Cheers
Dale.


Re: Opinions re choice of CPU; marginally on topic

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
So you spend good money to get a kick ass looking system , that sucks 
ass performance wise due to limited L2 cache and mhz ..been there 
done that , imnsho get the complete package or dont bother , all the 
internal components are equally important , if you already have a half 
decent monitor , keyboard etc better to get decent cpu/board/ram and 
build out from there , you can always update vid cards etc down the track .

Dale.
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
I recommend building the machine back *towards* the CPU rather than
*from* the CPU.
 * First, get a good monitor, as you will be staring at it a lot,
   so be kind to yourself.
 * Next, get a good keyboard and mouse because you will be
   interacting with those components more than any part of the
   system.
 * Decide on a video card to drive your monitor, and is suited to
   what you are doing on the system. Also take into account noise
   and heat (which is often, but not always, related) as video
   cards can be hot and noisy components.
 * The power-supply is an important component. There is no point
   buying flash components and frying them with poor power.
 * Motherboard next. All computers have a problem with moving  
   data around quickly, and a good motherboard will help a lot.
 * RAM. Get what you think you will need, and then get a bundle
   more :)
 * Disk storage. Neh, if you run out of space you can get new 
   hard disks to hold more holiday snaps. Speed is also 
   important if you skimped on RAM :)
 * Other odds and ends, like sound cards and networking come
   next.
 * Finally, with the dregs of your funds, get the fastest CPU you
   can afford. It will not be the flashiest number-cruncher on
   the block. But
 * All the DSP work is handled by dedicated sound, and
   networking hardware,
 * All the graphics work is handled by the dedicated GPU,
 * The large amount of RAM keeps the system sprightly as
   the OS employs large disk-caches, and
 * You can keep the CPU well-feed with data as the
   motherboard is quick.
My 2.

 




Re: Opinions re choice of CPU; marginally on topic

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
On that note mhz are largely over rated also .. :)
Dale.


Re: Opinions re choice of CPU; marginally on topic

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
I hardly think having just enough left to get a ok cpu for the fantastic 
board/ram/vid combo is a good idea either you still need X amount of 
processing power to handle the other kick ass hardware also , and 
remember most LAN/Audio/etc stuff doesnt have onboard HW to take all the 
load off the cpu these days unless purchasing mega dollar HW , most 
still requires some software handholding .

Dale.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Both extremes are to be avoided. I am cautioning people not to purchase
a CPU that is faster than they need while overlooking the other
hardware.
   

Yes. There is merit to buy all parts at the same time so they fit
together performance wise. Your steps are good ones to follow for
specing a system (which is what I understand you meant them to be).
Buying a part every month isn't a good strategy. Save up first.
Volker
 




Re: SUSE, YaST and dial-up failure

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
With dialup connections DNS is dynamic upon connection with the ISP , a 
static resolv.conf isnt nessessary in most senarios .

Cheers
Dale.
Carl Cerecke wrote:
Andy Leach wrote:
The only other error I have is that /etc/resolv.conf does not 
exist  but I don't know if this is relevant!

It's not relevant. I get the same error on my recently installed SuSE 
9.1. I haven't looked into it.

I found that SuSE set /dev/null to 644. It should be 666:
As root:
chmod 666 /dev/null
Also, I could not get Kinternet to work at all. Instead, I used kppp 
and made pppd setuid root, plus world write access to a couple of 
files I think.

Oh, and I've got an external modem. Thank goodness.
Cheers,
Carl.



Re: Computer names, was RE: Opinions re choice of CPU; marginally on topic

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
server - apterix
desktop - diomeda
test server (freebsd) - nada
lappy - cant remember :) (wife's so dont get to touch it often ;) )
Dale.
Jim Cheetham wrote:
Andrew Errington wrote:
PiscesMy laptop
SagittariusWife's laptop
GeminiRouter
LibraMP3 Player
VirgoServer
ScorpioCar MP3 player (currently not installed)
TaurusPlay machine (currently in pieces)
Don't forget to enlist Google Sets into your themes ...
http://labs.google.com/sets
http://labs.google.com/sets?hl=enq1=bushq2=clintonq3=reagan
http://labs.google.com/sets?hl=enq1=serverq2=laptopq3=desktop
-jim



Re: SUSE, YaST and dial-up failure

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
Worse case get the source from
http://ltmodem.heby.de/
and build against your new kernel , you will likely have to install the 
kernel source/headers for the new kernel .

I used the above against alot of heavily patched kernels without issues 
(2.5.*   ~2.6.0at that stage ,when on dialup in my gentoo days :) .

Cheers
Dale.
Andy Leach wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
(rpm -q kernel-default ltmodem)
this reports
kernel-default-2.6.5-7.111
ltmodem-2.6.2-38.8
  

Arrgh, you have the latest running, which means the problem is
elsewhere.
Post us the output of rpm -V kernel-default ltmodem
(there should be none)
 

.M..   /dev/ttyLT0
I assume you have rebooted since this trouble started and it didn't
change anything.
yes, rebooted several times now.
I also ssume you have configured your provider details
in yast as you should have.
 Provider as in ISP? in which case yes, it's fine, it's unchanged
Click on the kinternet icon in the panel to
start the dialup. Right-click on it and select view-log. Watch until it
has definitely finished. We want to see what the log says.
 

The log says:
SuSE Meta pppd ( smpppd-ifcfg), Version 1.16 on linux
Status is: disconnected
trying to connect yo smpppd
connect to smpppd
Status is: disconnected
Status is: lurking
pppd[0]: Plugin passwordfd.so loaded
pppd[0]: Using interface ppp0
Status is: lurking
pppd[0]:  local IP address 192.168.99.1
pppd[0]:  remote IP address 192.168.99.99
I waited a minute and nothing was added so I fired up firefox and 
tried to get to google, nothing was added to the log so I fired up 
konqueror and tried the same, again nothing was added to the log.

I clicked thekinternet icon again and it added
pppd[0]:  terminating on signal 15
Status is: disconnected
pppd[0] died: pppd received a signal (exit code 5)
I forgot to post the results from *lsmod* in my previous reply, sorry 
- I didn't see ltmodem but I did have ppp_generic when KInternet is 
ready to connect - is there a way of getting lsmod output to be 
alphabeticaly ordered?

Quickly google for those ltmodem versions, there's a theoretical chance
the latest combo of them doesn't work.
 

I found a suggestion to try
   modprobe ltserial
   modprobe ltmodem
they returned
   FATAL: Module ltserial not found
and
   FATAL: Module ltmodem not found
the thread then suggested that 
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/update/9.1/rpm/i586/ltmodem-2.6.2-38.5.i586.rpm 
be downloaded and used
but the one I have here is newer than that. Sadly there's no 
conclusion to the post so we'll never know if it worked or if he gave 
in and bought an external...

thanks
Andy
Volker
 





Re: SUSE, YaST and dial-up failure

2004-11-10 Thread Dale Anderson
Not it the PM/config  HAS got itself twisted and its trying to load the 
wrong modules .with both being present 

Dale.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
No, don't. These modules are part of package ltmodem, and the rpm -V
ltmodem didn't report them as missing, so unless the rpm database is
corrupted they must be there. A rpm -q ltmodem should list them.
As the dialup works it's moot though.
Volker
 




Re: nvidia graphcs driver 1.0.6629

2004-11-09 Thread Dale Anderson
Seen one instance of a backtrace revealing a potential memory leak but
aside that only good things about the new release of the nvidia drivers,
most seem to be getting good fps increase etc with GL apps .

Dale.

On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 14:05 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
 Gentoo is telling me that this updated version of the nvidia graphics drivers
 is available. Has anyone tried them?
 
 presently on nvidia 1.0.6111 and kernel 2.6.8, will probably go to 2.6.9
 when i get the time to sort it out.
 



Re: it's much quieter...

2004-11-08 Thread Dale Anderson
Use procmail or similar on the mail server , doesnt matter how clever 
your client is then .

Dale.
Steve Holdoway wrote:
... now my mailwasher server is in place. Unfortunately, I still get the
replies ):
Not perfect for cleaning up mail lists, although that's not really what
it's for.
And before you point out... due to the volumes of mail lately, I've had to
transfer the clug mail list to my personal mail server, and I keep up to
date using squirrelmail, which doesn't have any clever filtering ( you try
the mailing list over GPRS (: ). Interestingly, the mail filters that I
set up from mozilla fo redirect to subfolders work. All I have to do is to
leave mozilla up reading my mail at home!
Cheers,
Steve
 




Re: it's much quieter...

2004-11-08 Thread Dale Anderson
Maybe I have misread your post , but instead of having mozilla filtering 
the lists etc why not just setup procmail and access the mail server 
using imap, that way you can use mulitple clients and not have to worry 
about filtering at the client end.
Procmail can filter on list matchs/to from cc etc just as most clever 
clients these days.

Cheers
Dale.
Steve Holdoway wrote:
Dale,
How? filter out every occurrence of the offending email? I use procmail
for local delivery to courier, behind sendmail 8.13 with rbs (ordb and
spamhaus)/mailwasher spam filtering. It would be preferable ( as an
'academic' exercise ) to filter out everything before local delivery if
possible.
Cheers,
Steve
On Tue, November 9, 2004 12:11 pm, Dale Anderson said:
 

Use procmail or similar on the mail server , doesnt matter how clever
your client is then .
Dale.
Steve Holdoway wrote:
   

... now my mailwasher server is in place. Unfortunately, I still get the
replies ):
Not perfect for cleaning up mail lists, although that's not really what
it's for.
And before you point out... due to the volumes of mail lately, I've had
to
transfer the clug mail list to my personal mail server, and I keep up to
date using squirrelmail, which doesn't have any clever filtering ( you
try
the mailing list over GPRS (: ). Interestingly, the mail filters that I
set up from mozilla fo redirect to subfolders work. All I have to do is
to
leave mozilla up reading my mail at home!
Cheers,
Steve

 

   


 




Re: What's going on here?

2004-11-08 Thread Dale Anderson
eBhakta wrote:
   Wake up! The whole effort here is to NOT alienate anyone, least of all
those who are trying to oppose greedy/lusty corporate capitalists! This list
is, supposedly, dedicated to that, as Linux is dedicated to that, namely
opposing greedy Microtoss/soft, and their greedy intent on global
domination, etc. This is why the interest in going to using Linux, as
opposed to Microtoss/soft... :$ Simple.
 

I think you are wildly misjudging the lists goal , it is here (and the 
members there of ) to offer support for Linux/OS software problems
, nothing more politically/corp  orientated or otherwise (unless it is 
likely to impact our use of OSS) .
Linux (tm)  in its existance has NEVER had the goal to oppose MS and 
other corperate closed source operating systems, more to provide a platform
for OSS developers to use without legality issues..

Dale.


Re: A marginal topic

2004-11-08 Thread Dale Anderson
Especially when most have the recovery (tm) is in the first few GB of 
the drive these days.
Almost no manufacturers these days provide a copy of the OS and you ll 
more than likley find depending on the brand that HN wont perform the 
reinstall itll be sent to a 3rd party authorised service center if 
done as  a warrenty claim .

Cheers
Dale.
Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote:
Or if they simply re-image the hard disk.
Regards,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: 	Volker Kuhlmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:	Tuesday, 9 November 2004 1:31 p.m.
To:	[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:	Re: A marginal topic

And yes, a somewhat competetent techie should well be able to leave your
Linux partion(s) intact, unless the disk is replaced of course.
Volker
 




Re: OT: Xtra broadband

2004-11-07 Thread Dale Anderson
Not to mention if you trace the links furthur back down the chain you 
will more than likely find telecom/telstra are alot more related than 
shown in NZ business circles .

Dale.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
almost ridiculously naive but I reckon we would have more of a hope of 
controlling our own than Telstra or BT.
   

Well, except that Telecom is hardly a New Zealand owned company ever
since the GOTD [1] decided to sell out for $1, or so I've heard.
There's still much to be said for competition whenever possible.
Remember that toll prices are only affordable now because of Clear. Oh,
and what was that thing about controlling Telecom? Surely you're joking?
They seem to be very successful right now at making a long nose at
everyone else.
Volker
[1] government of the day
 




Re: Fix-up evening - call for volunteers

2004-10-22 Thread Dale Anderson
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
No.  Read what I wrote.  umount(8), the _command_
   

So running umount is safe then, as I initially said. Which Joe User
gives a *(@*# whether it's because of the umount program or the umount
system call?
 

How many Joe Users are on the list , and how does such learn inner 
workings if they desire when details as such arnt queried .

Dale.


Re: Stupid Damn Operating System

2004-10-20 Thread Dale Anderson
/me finishes installing DE and nods via his nice shiny fbsd install .
Dale. ;)
Andrew Turner wrote:
The nice think with FreeBSD is I can update the kernel with three 
commands:
make update
make kernel
shutdown -r now

Andrew



Re: Stupid Damn Operating System

2004-10-20 Thread Dale Anderson
modprobe hid  mousedev ?
Dale.
Steve Holdoway wrote:
Steve Holdoway wrote:
Matthew Gregan wrote:
At 2004-10-20T18:39:51+1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:
 

no, no, no! That's for a 2.4.x kernel.
  

True, but the old way still works just fine.
 

BTW... you don't use nVidia drivers, do you? I tried the 2.6.9-pre4
kernel with version 6111, and it wouldn't build.
  

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/245902
Cheers,
-mjg
 

Cheers... worked perfectly. But why was one line missed out of one 
file? Politics??? Probably.

up and running on 2.6.9 and slackware in a *real* windows envirnoment (:
Steve

Spoke too soon. Logged in... great. But no mouse, no response to 
anything but the power button. Back to 2.6.8.1

Steve



Re: [Fwd: Announcing Ubuntu 4.10 The Warty Warthog Release]

2004-10-20 Thread Dale Anderson
More like we havent had enough time to add the extra 
intergration/eyecandy as shipped with our gnome build

Dale.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Nowhere on that page does it state that KDE support in Ubuntu is beta.
   

  We don't at this stage have the resources to put the same level of
  post-freeze work into the KDE packages as we put into the Gnome
  packages.
I read that as beta, or not much tested.
Volker
 




Re: Stupid Damn Operating System

2004-10-19 Thread Dale Anderson
Being that you didnt give any info re what exactly you did to upgrade 
the kernel on the formentioned OS it is rather hard for anyone to give 
advise in correcting the issue .

Dale.
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
After a bugger of an afternoon I finally have the new 2.6.9 installed.
For some reason the sysfs lookups failed so the kernel did not find hda2
(the root partition) and the error-message
VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
resulted. Fantastic. The incantation
   root=0302
as an argument to the kernel got it up and running. What is 0302, you
may ask. It appears it is the *actual* partition number given to hda2 by
the IDE subsystem, c.f.
   # cat /sys/bus/ide/devices/0.0/block/hda2/dev
   3:2
   #
Why the *%%$#^*%$#@ kernel could not just find it  like it did with
the stock FC2 kernel  is beyond me for the moment. Still, it goes for
now
 




Re: Newbie

2004-10-18 Thread Dale Anderson
Depends entirely who you are talking to ...the community(tm) or RedHat
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Red Hat no longer exists, and I haven't heard much of Fedora lately.
 

Not quite, Volker :)
   

Depends on how nitpicky you want to be. We are discussing home use, and
I am correct in saying that Red Hat no longer exists. In fact, Red Hat
has done its level best to disown itself. Fedora is not Red Hat, just
ask Red Hat, or call it Red Hat and they'll send you the lawyers (just
like Redmond). Yes I know RHEL exists but who cares, the OP sure
doesn't, so you're not really helping the thread ;)
Volker
 




Re: asus my logo and wine

2004-10-17 Thread Dale Anderson
Anything that touchs the bios directly via the OS in that manner is a 
bad thing (tm) imho , I seriously would not recommend using wine to run 
such apps which are potentially dodgy even running under thier native 
platform .

Dale.
Caleb Sawtell wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 11:18, Caleb Sawtell wrote:
 

Nick Rout wrote:
  

On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 11:02, Caleb Sawtell wrote:


Hi
has anyone got asus mylogo2 to work under wine?
I want to change my boot up picture for my Mother Board but I 
ddon't want to screw my bios at the same time.
has anyone got it working because I REALLY don't want to have to 
get windows :

and yes I have done my google. :)
 
  
think laterally. stop rebooting



what are you on about I don't have windows and I don't want to have 
to get windows.
  

i mean don't reboot and you will not need to see the boot logo screen
:)

 

OH well you se I want to have a piccy of tux there so that the few 
times that I do reboot I can see tuxy and also so when I take my box 
out  of the house I can show my friends the 31337 linux box 8-)





Re: Newbie Advice

2004-10-17 Thread Dale Anderson

Depends where you are at and what you want to learn.
Linux From Scratch and Gentoo are jump in at the deep end approaches.
 

Probably not the most suitable to begin with on a machine of that spec, 
we are trying to promote interest , not scare them off with a 16 day 
install to a gui approach ..

Cheers
Dale.


Re: Blender 3D Modeller

2004-10-17 Thread Dale Anderson
ROCK ON !!
Matthew Gregan wrote:
DUDE!
At 2004-10-18T17:00:12+1300, Caleb Sawtell wrote:
 

Douglas Royds wrote:
   

 

I'm interested.
 

 

WOO
   

 

Christopher Sawtell wrote:
 

Hi Clugers
There was some discussion about Blender at last nights meeting. If 
anyone is interested I could do a small talk sometime about how to 
model a and colour a penguin in blender. :-)

   

===
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
===

 



 




Re: contradiction

2004-10-06 Thread Dale Anderson
http://www.dse.co.nz/cgi-bin/dse.storefront/416477030f4b46c02740c0a87f9906e3/Product/View/XH8181
First hit at www.dse.co.nz ...
Supported in 2.4.* kernels .
Dale.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
I'm having continuing problems with my DSE XH 8181.
   

Which is a television, soldering iron, ...?
 

Altho it mounts auto



Re: Suse 9.1 OpenOffice problem

2004-10-05 Thread Dale Anderson
Its always nice to start the morning with a bit of humor .
Dale.
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:10, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
 

See, Gentoo does it correctly.
 

Feel better now?
   

Not really, it's not of any real consequence. I'm merely stating a fact.
I'm fully aware that you can take a horse to water but cannot make it drink.
 




Re: Wine on Darwin

2004-10-05 Thread Dale Anderson
Steve Bell wrote:

So does that mean that if I have X11 installed on my mac that (if I 
installed darwine)

Just a note.. you dont need to install Darwin to get X and co to build 
from source etc , X comes bundled with most recent OSX versions and to 
get a toolchain /base for building from source etc all is required is 
Xcode and fink  .

Cheers
Dale.
Thanks all for your input so far - I'm tryna take it all in!
Steve



Re: Debian upgrade stable - unstable fails

2004-10-04 Thread Dale Anderson
As below , usually worthwhile syncing to testing prior to moving to 
unstable if you have anything aside a relatively minimum install , 
unstable is quite often in flux , that way you get things up to a 
currentish level prior to making the big step .

Cheers
Dale.
Rex Johnston wrote:
Roy Britten wrote:
$ sudo apt-get -f install

I'm afraid you've borked the installation with your apt-get remove.
The new dependencies mean that it's trying to install 'new' packages,
which it can't `cos you've got an 'old' kernel.
Either
1) Fix up your packages by pointing to unstable for a while.  Then 
point back to unstable  make a new kernel your first apt-get install.
2) Grab a vanilla kernel, install that, then continue below.

 I'm assuming that it's kernel-image that's required (kernel-doc,
 kernel-headers, kernel-patch, kernel-source and kernel-tree are also
 available). I seem to run into dependency issues whether or not I
 choose a 2.4 or 2.6 kernel:
Umm, no.  It's the actual kernel that you are running that is stopping 
the libc6 installation, it's not strictly a dependency (from the message
it reads that way anyhow).

Cheers, Rex



Re: Suse on a Packard Bell Laptop

2004-09-20 Thread Dale Anderson
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:26, Nick Rout wrote:
 

use mplayer
the codec collection is here.
ftp://linux.jetstreamgames.co.nz/dist/gentoo/distfiles/win32codecs-200407
03.tar.bz2
 

yes but can you locate the suse rpm for it?
   

By Jupiter, he's lucky today.
http://packman.links2linux.de/index.php4?action=128vn=2
Via http://www.mplayerhq.hu/ But please note that I have absolutely no idea 
whether that file has the codecs included. If not, he'll just have to d/l the 
file from jetstreamgames, 7176589 bytes, and extract the codec .dlls into the 
right place.  When mplayer starts it loads what it wants according to the 
file being played.

Isn't it so much simpler just to say: 'emerge mplayer', and then toddle off to 
bed to find that everything just works in the morning?
 

or apt-get mplayer and not worry about having to nap in between .



Re: Suse on a Packard Bell Laptop

2004-09-20 Thread Dale Anderson
Dale Anderson wrote:
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:26, Nick Rout wrote:
 

use mplayer
the codec collection is here.
ftp://linux.jetstreamgames.co.nz/dist/gentoo/distfiles/win32codecs-200407 

03.tar.bz2

yes but can you locate the suse rpm for it?
  
By Jupiter, he's lucky today.
http://packman.links2linux.de/index.php4?action=128vn=2
Via http://www.mplayerhq.hu/ But please note that I have absolutely 
no idea whether that file has the codecs included. If not, he'll just 
have to d/l the file from jetstreamgames, 7176589 bytes, and extract 
the codec .dlls into the right place.  When mplayer starts it loads 
what it wants according to the file being played.

Isn't it so much simpler just to say: 'emerge mplayer', and then 
toddle off to bed to find that everything just works in the morning?
 

or apt-get mplayer and not worry about having to nap in between .


mmm pays to check posts prior to sending , when half asleep . add an 
appropriate install 


Re: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-13 Thread Dale Anderson
Exactly atm gentoo is a huge mess, I used to be an avid fan as a few 
list members can probably recall , if your using debian might as well 
stick with it , it does the job and nicely once you get to know it , all 
distros (yes including SuSe ) have there flaws (alot (tm) in many 
cases), Debian imho still has the most reliable PM exisiting atm , and 
you usually have to do something really bad (tm) to blow an install up.

Dale.
Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote:
Right.  But that's no easier than, for example, Debian:
$ apt-get update
$ apt-get upgrade
 (or dist-upgrade)
...or any other distribution with an online updates mechanism.
 




Re: Mandrake Applications

2004-08-31 Thread Dale Anderson
Looks interesting , can you use povray etc as external renderers ? 

Cheers
Dale. 

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:18, Vik Olliver wrote:
 ArtOfIllusion


Re: DNS Servers

2004-08-11 Thread Dale Anderson
It does , just you wont have your domain resolved if the boxen dumps 
itself , most registras stipulate a primary/secondary ip .

Dale.
Andy George wrote:
Time to point out that per domain, two active and different DNS servers
on 2 different IPs are required. A single home IP isn't enough...
This is exactly what I mean.  Newbies LOVE this kind of thing!
OK...  Two DNS Servers, Two IPs...  Gotcha...  

Now, Why doesnt one work?
Andy George
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 1/09/2003
 




Re: Apple Airport cards

2004-08-09 Thread Dale Anderson
Yeah Steve Job's basically = NeXT , doesnt mean the entire code base was
used in OSX , Job's moved back to Apple late in the scene OSX was
already under development prior to Job's taking up the helm again(iirc),
and by that stage other 3rd parties had an IP interest in the *Step base
so wholesale flogging of the code base was unlikely.
Rapsody and other such things had been tried in the interim .

As previously stated OSX =! NeXTStep , while it may share some vaugue
traits/references and is helmed by the same guy in no way is OSX a
reborn (tm) NeXT .


Dale.

On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 02:23, Kim Robertson wrote:
 Hi,
 And where was it the Steve Jobs worked after leaving apple before 
 coming back?
 With the layoffs of 1985 Jobs lost a power struggle with John Sculley, 
 and after a short hiatus reappeared with new funding to create the NeXT 
 corporation.
 from http://ei.cs.vt.edu/~history/Jobs.html
 Hmmm interesting : )
  From Kim
 
 
 On 9/08/2004, at 4:21 PM, Dale Anderson wrote:
 
  Ah since when does iBook = NeXT ??
 
  Being that NexT =! an OS, NeXTSTEP was the OS , which moved to 
  OpenStep as a
  joint venture with Sun (iirc) for a very short period.
 
  OSX has some very LOOSE nexstep fundamentals ie some of the FSH and app
  bundle concepts etc , but that's where the similarities end , OSX has a
  different kernel/toolchain/FSH/GUI etc etc etc .
 
  Dale.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael JasonSmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: linux users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:55 PM
  Subject: Re: Apple Airport cards
 
 
  On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 13:15, Nick Rout wrote:
  thanks, not that i am sure i would convert an ibook to linux as it is
  already running Unix
  I would not bother putting Linux on an iBook, as NeXT is a really good
  version of Unix (unless you are concerned with freedom :)
  -- 
  Michael JasonSmith   
  http://www.ldots.org/
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: Apple Airport cards

2004-08-08 Thread Dale Anderson
Ah since when does iBook = NeXT ??

Being that NexT =! an OS, NeXTSTEP was the OS , which moved to OpenStep as a
joint venture with Sun (iirc) for a very short period.

OSX has some very LOOSE nexstep fundamentals ie some of the FSH and app
bundle concepts etc , but that's where the similarities end , OSX has a
different kernel/toolchain/FSH/GUI etc etc etc .

Dale.

- Original Message - 
From: Michael JasonSmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: Apple Airport cards


 On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 13:15, Nick Rout wrote:
  thanks, not that i am sure i would convert an ibook to linux as it is
  already running Unix
 I would not bother putting Linux on an iBook, as NeXT is a really good
 version of Unix (unless you are concerned with freedom :)
 -- 
 Michael JasonSmith   http://www.ldots.org/






Re: Apple Airport cards

2004-08-08 Thread Dale Anderson
So ?
So does GNUStep , how does that = NeXT ,? all that proves is they both 
use Obj-C , you will find similar references in GNUStep and a variety of 
other Obj-C projects, not to mention one of the main points of NeXTSTEP 
was the programming interface (ie obj-c ) which apple also splatter with 
a mixture of C++ hooks etc etc just to add to thier uniformity (tm)  .

OSX is incedentally based on Darwin NOT BSD , while Darwin maintains 
some of the underpinnings of BSD there are alot (tm) of differences .

Packaging incidentally ISNT the same as NeXT , while Apple use the 
concept of app bundles in OSX they also have a crap load of horrible 
symlinks and other such crud to provide a *nix compat. FSH also , and 
the OS itself uses a variety of methods to keep things happy between the 
user experienced app bundles, the systems lib bundles and non bundled 
applications and libraries .

Dale.
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:21, Dale Anderson wrote:
 

OSX has some very LOOSE nexstep fundamentals ie some of the FSH and app
bundle concepts etc , but that's where the similarities end , OSX has a
different kernel/toolchain/FSH/GUI etc etc etc .
   

MacOS X has more in common with NeXT Step than any other operating
system, MacOS 9 included.  For example, look at the COCA Appliation Kit
API[1] NSBrowser, NSPICTImageRep, NSCursor, NSSlider, NSText What does
the NS stand for? It ain't Standford University Network :)
At a more fundamental level, MacOS X is a variant of BSD running on a
MACH microkernel, mich like NeXT. True, its GUI system uses PDF, rather
than Display PostScript, but the former is almost the same as the latter
except for the absence of some of the standard PostScipt control
structures and file-IO. As you nicely point out, the packaging system
are also the same :P
It is not unknown for computer companies to perform reverse takeovers.
Be Inc took over Palm in much the same way as NeXT took over Apple[2].
[1] http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Reference/ApplicationKit/Java/
[2] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/06/25/be_inc_completes_takeover/
 




Re: Jetstream games realm to be axed

2004-08-03 Thread Dale Anderson
Yeah well I guess they have to do something ...Telecom;s package prices
are no where near in the relm of TelstraClears .I can see them
loosing a large margin of users in the areas that are supoprted by cable
.

Dale.
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 00:03, Ross Drummond wrote:
 To increase profits, reduce services.
 
 Way to go Theresa.
 
 Read more at;
 [Line may wrap]
 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3581795thesection=businessthesubsection=telecommunicationsthesecondsubsection=general
 
 Cheers Ross Drummond
 
 On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:43, Nick Rout wrote:
  I read on the adsl list that Telecom are to axe the jetstreamgames realm
  as part of the current or pending changes to the way they sell and
  wholesale jetstream/bitstream.
 
  This will be a pity as it has been a fantastic way to download iso's and
  other linux stuff free of charge.
 



Re: Which file does a disk block belong to??

2004-07-31 Thread Dale Anderson
other_stuff
/other_stuff

important_bit
 
 Here the kernel log:
 
 Jul 30 22:35:43 ruru kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete 
 DataRequest Error }
 Jul 30 22:35:43 ruru kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }, 
 LBAsect=6815180, high=0, low=6815180, sector=6814976
 [3 more]
 Jul 30 22:35:47 ruru kernel: hda: DMA disabled
 Jul 30 22:35:47 ruru kernel: hdb: DMA disabled
 Jul 30 22:35:47 ruru kernel: ide0: reset: success
 
 This also shows the stupidity the Linux kernel exhibits when trying to
 be smart with hard disks which may not be capable of DMA: turn off DMA
 permanently and see if it works better. Fine during boot, plain stupid
 a few hours later. And gee thanks for turning DMA off on my dvdrom
 drive too. 2.6 is no better than 2.4 here. 

/important_bit

I think you will find this is purely distro specific , alot renable DMA
where possible once init has completed successfully (aka the gentoo that
many here seem to adore) , and personally id prefer to see it disabled
by default if dma isnt detected than it fsck' over the FS or whatever
else it decides is of little use at the time if the disk *doesnt*
support dma
I dont see a safe default as stupidity at all especially when alot
could potentially be at stake ...

(ie potentially the contents the forementioned joe user would like to
keep and probably shifted to linux to try and retain)

Whats the point in shifting to the stable alternative if it stupidly
defaults to a potentially unstable implementation.

Dale. 



Re: Disk Failures in General

2004-07-31 Thread Dale Anderson
Put it this way all of the major HDD manufacturers over the past 
612 months have reduced the warrenties on general consumer level drives 
..I think it is however more of a case of the user does the 
testing rather than inhouse prior to shipping .as with the case of 
most products these days .

Dale.
steve wrote:
Hi Folks,
The bad blocks thread seems to have been quite a timely one in my 
case, as the HDD in my workstation seems to have lost a platter at 
lunchtime yesterday ):

I was really after a more general idea about the quality of disks 
these days. When I were a lad, and hard disks were either 5 or 10 MB 
in size, the first thing you did was a low level scan and manually map 
all of the bad sectors. You expected to have to do this every few 
months to keep it all healthy. Things evolved to disks of the size of 
a GB or so, and apart from things being more or less automated, the 
biggest change was that you didn't expect to get any new bad blocks 
once the disk was up, formatted and running. The appearance of a bad 
block immediately made the disk suspect. The usual precursor to a 
failed disk was a bad block, then another one a month later, then a 
week, then an hour, then dead.

Now, with this 80GB that's just gone bang, there was no warning, It 
just looks like one sector in 8 is unreadable. Is it now the case that 
the disks of today are less robust than they used to be? If so, I'm 
going to start using soft mirroring as a first line of defence! And 
keep the receipts!

I'd be interested in other peoples experiences.
Cheers,
Steve





Re: IMAP/whatever/email + procmail

2004-07-30 Thread Dale Anderson
 im sure we can add in ipv6 support there somewhere too make a
neat mix ;-) 

Dale.

On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 23:16, Matthew Gregan wrote:
 At 2004-07-30T20:16:08+1200, Jim Cheetham wrote:
  Yes, sure. The list to request just what part of email (as long as it
  isn't qmail) they want, we can tie absolutely anything in with
  procmail :-)
 
 How about something on building advanced UUCP to BitNet gateways with
 Sendmail?  Alternatively, a demonstration on how to build extremely high
 volume commercial email delivery engines with Exim would be great too.
 
 ;-)
 
 Cheers,
 -mjg



Re: ncd explora X terminals

2004-07-29 Thread Dale Anderson
OMG my eyes my eyes ,.how can we be subjected to such blasphemous 
scenes 

;-)
Dale.
C. Falconer wrote:
I had an email about some bloody cheap hitachi 13 LCD monitors... But by
the time I got the email they were all gone :-\
I do have an 800x600 LCD to sell...
http://criggie.dyndns.org/trademe/lcd/
Anyone make an offer :)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Pearce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 30 July 2004 1:47 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ncd explora X terminals


Oh - to keep it relavent to topic - I intend to use the NCD X Term I have as
the one in the pantry - just need to get a cheap LCD pannel from somewhere.
Mike
 




Re: GNU-less linux distributions

2004-07-06 Thread Dale Anderson
Being that uname can and has been patched , has been broken in more ways 
than one in its existance and currently still requires patches in latest 
coreutils to return the expected output ...I dont quite see how this 
provides closure (tm) ...nor is it really worthwhile.

Dale.
InfoHelp wrote:
Interesting.. Thanks for that.
Carl Cerecke wrote:
Related to the discussions around GNU and Linux of late:
You don't need any GNU software to run linux:
perllinux.sourceforge.net
Cheers,
Carl. 

We appear to have touched a nerve.
Last week, when I simply asked anyone else was positive about GNU to 
please speak up (though not about changing CLUG's name), I truly had 
no idea what a can of worms was being opened. This is a necessary part 
of the Linux learning curve..

When a gory mess is unfurling before one's eyes, one has to make a 
choice:
recoil in horror, or don surgical gloves.

On the 60th anniversary of Monte Casino, I need not explain which is 
the Kiwi way.

As a means of progressing this issue towards useful closure, please go 
to a terminal console.
Issue these commands:

$ uname -s (--kernel-name) 
$ uname -o (--operating-system)
Let's treat this as a survey - please post results back to the list.
I can tell you for starters, that Fedora  RedHat return the same:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rik $ uname -s
Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rik $ uname -o
GNU/Linux
hth



Re: GNU-less linux distributions

2004-07-06 Thread Dale Anderson
Well I dont see how distros patching uname to display such proves 
anything ...SCO group is pretty much a ship with too smaller bailing 
buckets 

InfoHelp wrote:
Edit, less haste:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:04:51 +1200, InfoHelp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:40:20 +1200, Dale Anderson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Being that uname can and has been patched , has been broken in more 
ways than one in its existance and currently still requires patches 
in latest coreutils to return the expected output ...I dont quite 
see how this provides closure (tm) ...nor is it really 
worthwhile.

Dale.

Is it or is it not a statement by the Distro team of what type 
Operating System they are distributing?
Is a closure (tm) that helps get SCO off our backs in the 
marketplace not really worthwhile?

Rik
--
GNU/Linux Users - charting the course - prototype7:
Fedora/SuSE/Mandrake-Slackware/Gentoo/LFS-(Perl/Linux)-Debian/BSD- 
GNU/Hurd




Re: Gettin crafty with Wine

2004-07-06 Thread Dale Anderson
Yes ..check google there are various sites explaining how to do it
...requires a few other native dll's etc etc ...otherewise check out
www.codeweavers.com ..only question is why ? 

Dale.

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 07:40, Andy George wrote:
 I wonder...  if it's possible to run EXPLORER.EXE from windows 9*, in
 wine, and have it execute windows apps from there...
  
 Has anyone ever tried this?
  
 Andy George
 DJ for the Mr Whippy Van



Re: nvidia on slashdot

2004-07-05 Thread Dale Anderson
/me waits in baited anticipation of some of the opencores stuff to get
moving . ;p

Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: nvidia on slashdot


 On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:10:59 +1200
 Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   ethical philosophy lecture
   Open Source advocates say that the argument is about the quality of
the
   resultant code. (a consequentialist or utilitarian view)
   The Free Software Foundation say that it is morally wrong to buy,
write
   or sell proprietary software. (a deontological or Kantian approach)
   /ethical philosophy lecture
 
 
  this is where it gets difficult for me, are you also saying that an
  author of a book should not get royalties of be able to have copyright
  protection?  where is the difference? people train to become
  programmers, and some become good at it. they write software. why
  shouldn't they sell it if they want to? i don't see how it can be
  immoral, as long as people have an effective choice about whether to use
  it.
 
  choice about whether to use it probably means that it should stick to
  some standard, like an rfc or whatever, or publish its api.

 mmm tonite I must have time to spare ;)
 I'd stay away from moral and I'd rather talk about ethics, but it's not
necessary
 IMHO to invoke ethics either :) They sell hardware not a software product,
 so the whole book writer argument doesn't apply. A driver for a fast
evolving product like
 linux should not be binary, if they value their IP (laugh) more than the
cost of maintaining the binary driver
 minus revenues from linux user, well good for them... they will not have
meee ;)

 cheers
 --
 Delio





Re: A Complete Beginner

2004-06-26 Thread Dale Anderson
On the likes of xandros you might also find you have a horribly broken
OS to by going from a 2.4  2.6 kernel depending on how device
support/module loading etc is handled  ..is xandros currently
running 2.6.* ? 

Dale.
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:11, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
 On Saturday 26 June 2004 07:53, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
  I have just installed Xandros on my computer but cannot get a driver for
  my Winfast VC100 capture card.   Can some one help me because I would
  like to continue usinig Linux.   I have emailed the suppliers nut no
  luck.  They dont have one
 
 I'm not sure if all this is appropriate for a A Complete Beginner but we all 
 have to jump in somewhere. Note that I do not have either a copy of the 
 Xandros distribution nor a Winfast VC100 capture card.  However I think it is 
 very possible that the latest Linux kernel has the drivers ready for you.
 Xandros _might_ distribute the modules ready compiled. Find out with the 
 command:-
 find /lib -iname 'bttv*' -ls
 If you get a line of output then the driver is ready built, and you can 
 install it using the modprobe or insmod command, if not then you need to 
 build it.
 
 Get a copy of the latest kernel archive, linux-2.6.7.tar.bz2 and un-archive 
 it. Debian and derivatives have their particular ways of doing this.
 
 If you scan the file /usr/src/linux/Documentation/video4linux/CARDLIST.bttv
 you will see a line:-
 card=114 - Winfast VC100
 Now read the:-
 file:/usr/src/linux/Documentation/video4linux/bttv/README
 quote
 To use the driver I use the following options, the tuner and pll settings 
 might be different in your country
 
 insmod videodev
 insmod i2c scan=1 i2c_debug=0 verbose=0
 insmod tuner type=1 debug=0
 insmod bttv  pll=1 radio=1 card=17
 /quote
 Fairly obviously you will have to use the correct card number ( card=114 ) and 
 probably experiment with the other settings. See also the other files in that 
 directory.
 
 You might care to reference the home of video4linux
 http://linux.bytesex.org/
 in particular:-
 http://dl.bytesex.org/patches/2.6.7-1/
 It would almost certainly be a good idea to apply the appropriate patches.
 
 The new and horrendously comprehensive kernel Building HOWTO is also very 
 relevent:-
 http://www.digitalhermit.com/linux/
 
 With a lot of reading between the lines and a considerable amount of 
 experimenting, I think this card could be got to go.
 
 btw folks, is this sort of thing appropriate for the InstallFest?



Re: Question:Telstra cable connection Mandrake 10

2004-06-10 Thread Dale Anderson
I currently run a variety of linux/BSD servers behind my own Web/DNS/FW
server , the primary issue here is to get a new linux user connected to the
net is it not , hense why I had not mentioned firewalls etc in the initial
post .
My thinking re this situation is to get the new user up and running and
groking the basics before bombarding them with a whole heap of new info .
Is it not better to provide the easy (abit insecure)solution rather than
scare them off before getting started .
At the end of the day if it is a desktop box that isnt running 24x7 (ie only
powered up when required) and they are using for desktop use only I consider
spending $$ on extra boxes and the power to run them a waste of time .if
you are a advid user and have the box running 24x7 then yeah sure .
BTW you can setup a FW on your local machine also .

Dale.

- Original Message - 
From: G Chinnery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: Question:Telstra cable connection Mandrake 10


 As a telstra cable user, my advise is to go and build a cheap firewall
 like smoothwall or something and run it through that. a hub or switch
 would be good but you don't need one if your only running 1 computer.
 Its easy to set up and if you decide to go that way I will offer any
 help you need as I run 4 of these myself.

 G.Chinnery.


 Dale Anderson wrote:

 How are you using the modem ...via ethernet card or USB ?
 Via ethernet all you need to do is set your IP and plug it in .
 The driver it is refering to will be your networkcard driver not the
 external modem.
 
 Dale.
 
 On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 17:16, Ataif wrote:
 
 
 Hi,
 I'm new to this list, and to Linux, and I know b*gger all about
 computers, but I need to reconnect my PC now that I've installed Linux
 (Mandrake 10). I get to the point where I'm asked what network/driver
 to use and I haven't a clue. How do I find this out. I presume the
 modem (Motorola Surfboard hired from TelstraClear) is a standard one
 and that it should be easy, but Telstra's help deask say it isn't
 worth the company's time rtying to support Linux. There is a guy there
 called Bob who might ring me when he comes back from leave or
 something, but I wondered if anyone else could help me.
 Thanks,
 John Edmundson
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






Re: Question:Telstra cable connection Mandrake 10

2004-06-09 Thread Dale Anderson
How are you using the modem ...via ethernet card or USB ?
Via ethernet all you need to do is set your IP and plug it in .
The driver it is refering to will be your networkcard driver not the
external modem.

Dale.

On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 17:16, Ataif wrote:
 Hi,
 I'm new to this list, and to Linux, and I know b*gger all about
 computers, but I need to reconnect my PC now that I've installed Linux
 (Mandrake 10). I get to the point where I'm asked what network/driver
 to use and I haven't a clue. How do I find this out. I presume the
 modem (Motorola Surfboard hired from TelstraClear) is a standard one
 and that it should be easy, but Telstra's help deask say it isn't
 worth the company's time rtying to support Linux. There is a guy there
 called Bob who might ring me when he comes back from leave or
 something, but I wondered if anyone else could help me.
 Thanks,
 John Edmundson



Re: gnome desktop trouble

2004-06-07 Thread Dale Anderson
Is nautilus actually drawing the desktop ?

It 'd pay to go through gconf-editor and have a look to see how gnome is
currently setup in regards to the desktop 
 
Dale.

On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 19:27, Michael wrote:
 Hi,
 
 In an act of purist optimism I thought I'd resubmit a question I asked ages 
 ago.  I didn't get one response last time so I'm not expecting any better 
 this time.
 
 I cannot add or even see any icons on my gnome desktop.  I have a Desktop 
 directory in my /home but I am unable to change the blank desktop in any 
 way.  When I right-click on the desktop I don't even get a menu.  I have 
 checked file ownerships and privileges.  Any new user I create has this poblem.
 
 ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS?
 
 Also, what gnome based application is there for user/group management.  I 
 mean, to add/create users and alter their profiles NOT at a command-line 
 based level.
 
 Michael.
 
 



Re: Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158

2004-06-03 Thread Dale Anderson
n not again . /me sobs

;-)
- Original Message - 
From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


hope you all don´t mind much, thought this would be of interest to some
folks
here.


- --  Forwarded Message  --

Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158

- ---Original Message---
Subject: Bill - I don't want your $1,158
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bill,

As you were probably informed over the weekend, your legal team lost the
 latest court battle against Lindows, Inc. in the windows trademark case.
 This time we were in a Dutch courtroom, where the Judge ruled against
 Microsoft on all counts. Here's a link to the English translation of the
 ruling. The ruling states that we can continue to use Lindows as we are now
 using it, but most telling was the Judge's monetary finding. In a case that
 Microsoft initiated and asked the Judge to fine us 100,000 euros per day,
 the Judge ruled the opposite direction and told Microsoft to pay us $1,158.

But truth be told, I don't want Microsoft's money, I just want a chance to
 compete and grow my company. If you can think back to when you started
 Microsoft, sure there were big companies like IBM, but they didn't use the
 ruthless tactics that Microsoft now employs. How could you have built your
 company in that kind of environment?

No, I don't want your money, I just want to compete without Microsoft
 terrorizing us and everyone in the PC business who works with us. It's
tough
 building a business when hardware partners are told they will lose access
to
 Microsoft tier 1 support if they help us. Resellers get squeamish when they
 get lawsuit threats from Microsoft. Retailers are hesitant when there is
 veiled innuendo that they may not be eligible for the MDF market
 development funds that you provide to them, which are key to their
 profitability. And of course, Lindows is bothered by your legal strategy to
 bury us with lawsuits.

I understand that Lindows is the most obvious target of Microsoft's actions,
 since we challenge Microsoft's power base - the desktop. I think we'd have
a
 lot more than 350 OEMs if so many weren't intimidated by Microsoft. We'd
 probably have more stores carrying our computers with our one-click easy
 operating system if they didn't fear retaliation just for talking with us.

Of course, I'm keenly aware of how Microsoft has vanquished so many
 competitors in the past. To the portion of that success which can be
 attributed to healthy competition, you have my respect. But some portion
has
 been built on dirty tactics, and I'm asking you to rethink using that
 strategy with desktop Linux and my company, Lindows.

Occasionally we hear from Microsoft employees who follow Lindows, and their
 reaction surprises me. (Hundreds of Microsoft employees receive the weekly
 Michael's Minute.) The first thing they usually do is apologize for the
 corporate behavior of lawsuits, bogus reports, and other underhanded
 tactics. They know the corporate mantra is we like competition, but
behind
 the scenes try to kill it. But they TRULY do want competition. They believe
 they can compete. They know that having Netscape around made them build
 Internet Explorer, but since Netscape was wiped out, Internet Explorer has
 stagnated. Bill - I encourage you to poll your employees and ask them
 yourself. I'm confident that they'll say they want to compete head-to-head
 with Linux in an wholesome manner.

Do you believe that Microsoft can compete with Linux? Do you believe in your
 employees? Do you believe in your products? I encourage you to consider
 abandoning the litigation and terror strategy. No more backing of lawsuits
 for trademark, patent or copyright issues against Linux. No more
threatening
 of companies that add Linux to their product line-up. Just straight up
 competition against Linux. Your employees will thank you, and it will usher
 in an era of healthy competition in the PC business.

- -- Michael

- -- 
Dave Lilley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAvt73tAOVws1ghq0RAnGvAKCCjj2GbrW9DyugeuW5VAzpoXFvOQCeKj+n
UkM0WIMXzbre6rf+HjUdfbE=
=QJHG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-






Re: Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158

2004-06-03 Thread Dale Anderson
Yeah the court case's have been rather interesting .definitly up there
with the current SCO movement ;-)

the latest bit at groklaw is rather a laugh I really do wonder what the
SCO Group is smoking ..

Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Nick Elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158



Hi,
I found the email of interest as I have been following Linspire's fight with
M$ (the evil empire) for these past months. The website version has a few
other links: http://www.linspire.com/lindows_michaelsminutes.phpLinspire
was forced by the courts to change their name from Lindows in several
countries recently (incase you didn't already know this).
If you think the name Michael Robertson rings a bell with you then its
probably because he used to be in the news with his controversial company
some years back called mp3.com. Google just now found this about Michael:
http://history.acusd.edu/gen/recording/robertson.html

Nick Elder


On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 21:05, Dale Anderson wrote:
 n not again . /me sobs

 ;-)
 - Original Message -
 From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: clug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:18 PM
 Subject: Fwd: Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1


 hope you all don´t mind much, thought this would be of interest to some
 folks
 here.


 - --  Forwarded Message  --

 Michael's Minute: Bill - I don't want your $1,158

 - ---Original Message---
 Subject: Bill - I don't want your $1,158
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Bill,

 As you were probably informed over the weekend, your legal team lost the
  latest court battle against Lindows, Inc. in the windows trademark case.
  This time we were in a Dutch courtroom, where the Judge ruled against
  Microsoft on all counts. Here's a link to the English translation of the
  ruling. The ruling states that we can continue to use Lindows as we are
 now using it, but most telling was the Judge's monetary finding. In a case
 that Microsoft initiated and asked the Judge to fine us 100,000 euros per
 day, the Judge ruled the opposite direction and told Microsoft to pay us
 $1,158.

 But truth be told, I don't want Microsoft's money, I just want a chance to
  compete and grow my company. If you can think back to when you started
  Microsoft, sure there were big companies like IBM, but they didn't use
the
  ruthless tactics that Microsoft now employs. How could you have built
your
  company in that kind of environment?

 No, I don't want your money, I just want to compete without Microsoft
  terrorizing us and everyone in the PC business who works with us. It's
 tough
  building a business when hardware partners are told they will lose access
 to
  Microsoft tier 1 support if they help us. Resellers get squeamish when
 they get lawsuit threats from Microsoft. Retailers are hesitant when there
 is veiled innuendo that they may not be eligible for the MDF market
 development funds that you provide to them, which are key to their
 profitability. And of course, Lindows is bothered by your legal strategy
to
 bury us with lawsuits.

 I understand that Lindows is the most obvious target of Microsoft's
 actions, since we challenge Microsoft's power base - the desktop. I think
 we'd have a
  lot more than 350 OEMs if so many weren't intimidated by Microsoft. We'd
  probably have more stores carrying our computers with our one-click easy
  operating system if they didn't fear retaliation just for talking with
us.

 Of course, I'm keenly aware of how Microsoft has vanquished so many
  competitors in the past. To the portion of that success which can be
  attributed to healthy competition, you have my respect. But some portion
 has
  been built on dirty tactics, and I'm asking you to rethink using that
  strategy with desktop Linux and my company, Lindows.

 Occasionally we hear from Microsoft employees who follow Lindows, and
their
  reaction surprises me. (Hundreds of Microsoft employees receive the
weekly
  Michael's Minute.) The first thing they usually do is apologize for the
  corporate behavior of lawsuits, bogus reports, and other underhanded
  tactics. They know the corporate mantra is we like competition, but
 behind
  the scenes try to kill it. But they TRULY do want competition. They
 believe they can compete. They know that having Netscape around made them
 build Internet Explorer, but since Netscape was wiped out, Internet
 Explorer has stagnated. Bill - I encourage you to poll your employees and
 ask them yourself. I'm confident that they'll say they want to compete
 head-to-head with Linux in an wholesome manner.

 Do you believe that Microsoft can compete with Linux? Do you believe in
 your employees? Do you believe in your products? I encourage you to
 consider abandoning the litigation

Re: Which shell to use - Was: opening urls from evolution?

2004-06-02 Thread Dale Anderson
I take it you havent used BSD for a while ? 

Dale.

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:29, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:07:47 +1200

 Jim Cheetham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  steve wrote:
   To hijack the thread a bit ( well, it was pretty dead anyway... :), why
   is it that every distro that I know of uses bash as it's default shell?
  
   Before you jump down my throat, isn't there a real case for root to
   have a statically linked shell, just in case the shared libs get
   corrupted?
 
  Yes, but ...
 
  The problem always used to be that root should have a shell on / so that
  you could run your system up in single-user mode (i.e. without /usr and
  so on). Bash, being extra software would live in /usr/local or /opt,
  and therefore not be available, because these are commonly separate
  volumes.
 
  The static linking bit was related to the same case, with much stuff
  being in /usr/lib. One of the subtelties is the difference between /bin
  and /usr/bin (as well as /lib and /usr/lib), with the common case being
  that /(bin|lib) contained your single-user-mode programs, especially the
  programs that could mount other file-systems during startup.
 
  However, these days there seems to be much more reliance on an external
  boot mechanism, like CD or network, being used in an emergency. I think
  that's more true than the MS-like reinstall mantra.

 On my systems (2 gentoo, one redhat (aging)) bash is in /bin, and is
 linked to a small number of libraries in /lib, so there is nothing in
 /usr It would be unusual in the extreme to put /bin or /lib on anything
 other than the root partition.

 My experience with the BSD's (free/open) is that :

 1. they use the barest shell, /bin/sh IIRC by default.
 2. they have a more traditional file system with a lot more being in
 the /usr tree by default. bash is under /usr/local/bin/bash IIRC [1], so
 is probably not on the root filesystem.

 [1] I know this because I screwed up in a big way on freebsd once by
 changing root's shell in /etc/passwd to /bin/bash, which didn't exist
 and root could not log in, and i had logged out before i realised.
 bugger. now i might have the skills to fix it, then it was the MS
 solution we are presently decrying. I reinstalled, after first
 upskilling on chsh (change shell) and vi (which is invoked by chsh).
 luckily Ihad only just finished and no data was lost. If you think
 debian or gentoo are hard to install, try freebsd or openbsd.


Re: Which shell to use - Was: opening urls from evolution?

2004-06-02 Thread Dale Anderson
I personally found (admitadly the partitioning scheme is different to Linux ) 
it not much different to installing Debian ...(freeBSD 5.2-RELEASE) 

once installed the bsd setup gui has a binary package installer which makes 
installing a DE a breeze( /stand/sysinstall)  ...the nvidia binary driver 
install is insainely easy to compared to its linux counterpart .(ie dowlnload 
from nvidia.com , execute and restart X ..all done and no b0rk'd gl libs)

The default shell is csh iirc (which does most things bash will do if 
configured right ).

The only thing I disliked was the lack of SW raid support from install :\

but the install was a no brainer really ...the 2 main differences are the 
partitioning scheme and the module loader (which is similar to 
debians /etc/modules setup really ) 

The desktop latancy of freebsd 5.2 is on par with a patched 2.6 kernel imho , 
very nice OS .

Your quite right theres no eye-candy-to-the-max installer ...but the ncurses 
one is easy enough to navigate .

The one thing that put me off is the IRC channels ;-) (again similar to 
debian's ...not for the average newb unless kevlair equiped ;-) ) 

Dale.

 

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:24, Nick Rout wrote:
 No, tell me off if I am spreading fud, i haven't used either open or
 free for a while. whats changed?

 Its not so much the installation was too hard if you read the docs and
 especially if you could grok the partitioning system they use, it just
 required more work than boot-cd-and-click-on-icons. And not as well
 documented (IMHO) as something like gentoo, which holds your hand very
 tight. The problem with the BSD docs was that they seemed to assume a
 certain degree of knowledge, once you dig around and find the knowledge
 it was ok. Again, not a newbie experience.

 I'd like to give FreeBSD another go, especially if the experience has
 changed.

 On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:12:57 +1200

 Dale Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I take it you havent used BSD for a while ?
 
  Dale.
 
  On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:29, Nick Rout wrote:
   On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:07:47 +1200
  
   Jim Cheetham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
steve wrote:
 To hijack the thread a bit ( well, it was pretty dead anyway... :),
 why is it that every distro that I know of uses bash as it's
 default shell?

 Before you jump down my throat, isn't there a real case for root to
 have a statically linked shell, just in case the shared libs get
 corrupted?
   
Yes, but ...
   
The problem always used to be that root should have a shell on / so
that you could run your system up in single-user mode (i.e. without
/usr and so on). Bash, being extra software would live in
/usr/local or /opt, and therefore not be available, because these are
commonly separate volumes.
   
The static linking bit was related to the same case, with much stuff
being in /usr/lib. One of the subtelties is the difference between
/bin and /usr/bin (as well as /lib and /usr/lib), with the common
case being that /(bin|lib) contained your single-user-mode programs,
especially the programs that could mount other file-systems during
startup.
   
However, these days there seems to be much more reliance on an
external boot mechanism, like CD or network, being used in an
emergency. I think that's more true than the MS-like reinstall
mantra.
  
   On my systems (2 gentoo, one redhat (aging)) bash is in /bin, and is
   linked to a small number of libraries in /lib, so there is nothing in
   /usr It would be unusual in the extreme to put /bin or /lib on anything
   other than the root partition.
  
   My experience with the BSD's (free/open) is that :
  
   1. they use the barest shell, /bin/sh IIRC by default.
   2. they have a more traditional file system with a lot more being in
   the /usr tree by default. bash is under /usr/local/bin/bash IIRC [1],
   so is probably not on the root filesystem.
  
   [1] I know this because I screwed up in a big way on freebsd once by
   changing root's shell in /etc/passwd to /bin/bash, which didn't exist
   and root could not log in, and i had logged out before i realised.
   bugger. now i might have the skills to fix it, then it was the MS
   solution we are presently decrying. I reinstalled, after first
   upskilling on chsh (change shell) and vi (which is invoked by chsh).
   luckily Ihad only just finished and no data was lost. If you think
   debian or gentoo are hard to install, try freebsd or openbsd.


Re: Which shell to use - Was: opening urls from evolution?

2004-06-02 Thread Dale Anderson

 Maybe it'd be interesting to get few BSD mavhines into the demo part of
 the installfest? (I'd be interested to see if people who sat down to kde
 for a short play around could tell the difference!)
I doubt they would notice the difference ...apart from the better latancy than 
a 2.4 Linux kernel ;-) 


Dale.


Re: Gentoo Linux partition repair? - Reiserfs

2004-05-26 Thread Dale Anderson
Just backup the entire partion (remember to retain permissions, pax is good 
for such things ) mkfs.*foo* and then copy back 

Id go for XFS on a desktop boxen fast ,stable and plays nice with all 
current kernels .but thats only MOH im sure theres plenty of 
JFS/Reiser/EXT* advocates out there who would disagree .

Cheers
Dale.

On Thu, 27 May 2004 11:14, InfoHelp wrote:
 Hi folks,

 thanks Nick for looking at the fault yesterday.

 Out of my Drafts folder comes where the install left off last week..

 Nick Rout wrote:
 unmount the partition which you want to check
 run the fsck on the partition, not the mount point. (ie the parameter is
 /dev/hda6 not /mnt/hda6)

 ok - done successfully from SuSE install, but boot to Gentoo still says:

 Partition /dev/hda6 is mounted with write permissions, cannot check it
 * Fsck could not correct all errors, manual repair needed
  [!!]

 This is after boot process has:
 ...
 Adding swap
   [ok]
 * Remounting root filesystem read-only (if necessary)...[ok]
 * Checking root filesystem...
 [ok]
 * Remounting root filesystem read/write...
   [ok]

 add read-only to your kernel line in grub so that it boots readonly from
 nowe on, and fsck can check it.

 is that assuming I have a separate /boot partition - I have not. Seems
 to have been accepted from Grub ok though.


 Update:

 Nick checked the mount permissions, reran fsck, but the above error
 message remains.

 Looks like I've fscked (literally) Gentoo's partition whilst it was
 mounted. Foobar!!
 Gentoo boots  is ready to use, but it doesn't seem safe to continue
 with its filesystem in the above condition.

 Sooo, unless there's a Reiserfs user/expert who can suggest a repair,
 partition reformat will follow.

 Short of repeating the Gentoo install, I'd like to back it up to a spare
 partition, reformat ext3, then reinstate it.

 Is this practical? Are there any dirs such as /proc that I need not copy
 complete, or Reiserfs stuff to leave behind? Or should I simply copy
 everything across?

 Is mounting the Gentoo partition  spare partition from Suse, and using
 Midnight Commander to copy across the Gentoo dirs a good way to go? (I'm
 more confident with that than #cp /* -r /dev/newmountpoint etc.)

 Cheers

 Rik


Re: insanely large file! (was partition 100% full)

2004-05-25 Thread Dale Anderson

 ^^

 .xsession_errors is usually filled by Konqueror. Time to move over to
 gnome? It's much more mature than kde.

Care to explain furthur ? ...im a advid Gnome user (if I had to choose between 
KDE /Gnome ), I still dont agree .

Dale.

Still waiting for E 0.17 ..


 Steve

 Not necessarily, the command;-
 
 tail -f  .xsession-errors
 will allow you to watch the tail of the file as it grows. ( CTRL-S and
 CTRL-Q ) allow you to stop and start the flood of text.
 
 There will probably be a meaningful message or three in there.
 
 /usr/sbin/lsof | grep '.xsession-errors'
 will also tell you which programs have .xsession-errors open.


Re: MSI motherboards?

2004-05-22 Thread Dale Anderson
looks good to me

Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Caleb Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: MSI motherboards?


 On Sat, 22 May 2004 22:28, Nick Rout wrote:
  On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 21:41, Caleb Sawtell wrote:
   On Fri, 21 May 2004 21:48, Matthew Gregan wrote:
At 2004-05-22T081213+, Caleb Sawtell wrote:
 
   
 On Fri, 21 May 2004 10:09, Don Gould wrote:
  Why does the date on your mail message show up as Saturday?

 Dunno because it says sat now...
   
Your timezone is wrong.
  
   Its all ok here :/
 
  well here are your headers:
 
 
  Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:41:26 +
  From: Caleb Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: MSI motherboards?
 
  I know your father is from jolly mother england, but you shouldn't have
  your timezone set to + unless you live there :-)
 
  what is the result of the date command?

 Ok is it fixed now??? *sigh*

 
  what is the result of ls -l /etc/timezone (it should be pointing to
  /usr/share/zoneinfo/Pacific/Auckland)
 
  The other thing is, what email client are you using? evolution seems to
  want to be told separately where you are living (why it doesn't use your
  system settings is beyond me).
 
-mjg





Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-20 Thread Dale Anderson
Auto*foo* packages are worth installing as a matter of course if you are going 
to be building packages from source ...more and more projects are moving to 
autofoo , saves hassles in the long run .(note nothing in this post 
mentioning wether autofoo is better (tm) ;-) ) 

Dale.

On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:11, Michael JasonSmith wrote:
 On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:58, Derek Smithies wrote:
  My reasoning was that if the above tools are not required, why check for
  their presence/absence ?
 
  However, Michael has asserted they are not required, so fine. Not
  required.

 Cheeky thing questioning me. Often configure checks for things whether
 they are needed or not. You may be installing a program that does
 require the auto-tools, but this is unlikely.


Re: console via usb

2004-05-20 Thread Dale Anderson
Since it appeared it got missed earlier ill repost my earlier mail.

cutTheres a few kernel patches floating around for firewire (which is VERY
neat
for debugging) ..

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0203.3/0639.html for usb
/cut

Theres plenty of info via google etc re setting it up .

Firewire is nice for debugging due to the ability to access memory space
even if the kernel has completely dumped itself .

Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Bart Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CLUG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: console via usb



 On 18/05/2004, at 8:16 PM, Vik Olliver wrote:

  On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 18:52, Paul William wrote:
  Hey all,
 
  Anyone know if you can get a 'Serial' Console using usb instead of a
  serial port? I don't really care about having a console at boot up but
  it would be a bonus.
 
  The only documentation I can find is about using the serial port.
 
  USB Just doesn't work that way.

 I have a USB - Serial adaptor that doesn't appear to have any
 electronics or smarts, just a redirection of the wires.
 I too would like to know why USB can not function as a serial port
 controller. Anyone ?

 This is my first question to the list, I hope I can help someone else
 sometime although I'm a Unix baby.


 Bart Hanson

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-19 Thread Dale Anderson
gentoo's broken to start with a few root install's aint going to hurt ;p

/me adorns flame suit

Dale.

On Wed, 19 May 2004 19:20, Col wrote:
 Slosh wrote:
 On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 18:50, Col wrote:
 Christopher Sawtell wrote:
 On Wednesday 19 May 2004 17:35, Don Gould wrote:
 Why shouldn't I compile as root?
 
 Because one day, either directly, or indirectly using a Trojan of some
  kind, somebody is going to attempt to do something nasty to your
  machine. Indeed that person may, accidentally, be you. If you run their
  hidden program as root they will get root and have control of your
  machine. If they are nice they will only persuade you to run 'rm -rf /'
  ( Why don't you try it? :-) and all you will have to do is to reload
  the file-set, complete with the invisible trojan, from backup. On the
  other hand they may well have a much more insidious criminal intent,
  and you will end up attempting to explain to a very suspicious Mr. Plod
  that you did not do what you appear to have done. As a minimum, you'll
  end up having to find several thousand Reserve Bank purchasing tokens
  to pay for the excess ip traffic.
 
 On the other hand if you have only user privileges they can only damage
  that which is in your home directory. The Linux system itself is
  unharmed.
 
 For more comprehensive explanations see what Google has to say on the
  matter:-
 
 http://www.google.co.nz/linux?q=%22compile+as+root%22hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8
 start=0sa=N
 
 IOW: Just don't do it. EVER, or read mail, or do the IRC thing, as root.
 
 Is there a way to avoid this then?
 
 $ emerge -u world
 emerge: root access required.
 
 
 Cheers
 Col.
 
 This is something nifty someone showed me a while ago that most people
 here probably already know about, so I'll get here first :D.
 
 I usually just run as a normal user and then use
 
 $ su -c some command
 
 when I need to do something as root. It will run just the command inside
 the . Unfortunately it doesn't support auto-completion inside the
 quotation marks.

 True, but emerge is still going to compile the gentoo updates as root.

 Col.


Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-19 Thread Dale Anderson
Well after using it for ~ 18 months ..putting up with broken packages
stuffed dep chains on multiple occasions (and NO I wasnt running ~x86)
I gave up and started to run LFS ...and didnt suffer half the issues I had
on this supposide automagic from source distro after trying freebsd as a
comparison ..I dont think its is physically possible to stuff up a ports
based system more ...
The only things I enjoyed while using the fore mentioned distro were the
forums (great community) and the great kernel patches supplied by lovechild
and co  I think its timed the hacks upon hacks (tm) to keep portage and
co semi working where scrapped and this time they DESIGNED it before coding
...

Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: ./configure - what am I missing?


 On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 19:41, Dale Anderson wrote:
  gentoo's broken to start with a few root install's aint going to hurt ;p

 care to explain? then the flames may proceed...


 
  /me adorns flame suit
 
  Dale.
 
  On Wed, 19 May 2004 19:20, Col wrote:
   Slosh wrote:
   On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 18:50, Col wrote:
   Christopher Sawtell wrote:
   On Wednesday 19 May 2004 17:35, Don Gould wrote:
   Why shouldn't I compile as root?
   
   Because one day, either directly, or indirectly using a Trojan of
some
kind, somebody is going to attempt to do something nasty to your
machine. Indeed that person may, accidentally, be you. If you run
their
hidden program as root they will get root and have control of your
machine. If they are nice they will only persuade you to run
'rm -rf /'
( Why don't you try it? :-) and all you will have to do is to
reload
the file-set, complete with the invisible trojan, from backup. On
the
other hand they may well have a much more insidious criminal
intent,
and you will end up attempting to explain to a very suspicious Mr.
Plod
that you did not do what you appear to have done. As a minimum,
you'll
end up having to find several thousand Reserve Bank purchasing
tokens
to pay for the excess ip traffic.
   
   On the other hand if you have only user privileges they can only
damage
that which is in your home directory. The Linux system itself is
unharmed.
   
   For more comprehensive explanations see what Google has to say on
the
matter:-
   
  
http://www.google.co.nz/linux?q=%22compile+as+root%22hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8
   start=0sa=N
   
   IOW: Just don't do it. EVER, or read mail, or do the IRC thing, as
root.
   
   Is there a way to avoid this then?
   
   $ emerge -u world
   emerge: root access required.
   
   
   Cheers
   Col.
   
   This is something nifty someone showed me a while ago that most
people
   here probably already know about, so I'll get here first :D.
   
   I usually just run as a normal user and then use
   
   $ su -c some command
   
   when I need to do something as root. It will run just the command
inside
   the . Unfortunately it doesn't support auto-completion inside the
   quotation marks.
  
   True, but emerge is still going to compile the gentoo updates as root.
  
   Col.






Re: console via usb

2004-05-18 Thread Dale Anderson
Theres a few kernel patches floating around for firewire (which is VERY neat
for debugging) ..

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0203.3/0639.html for usb

Cheers
Dale.
- Original Message - 
From: Paul William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CLUG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: console via usb


 Hey all,

 Anyone know if you can get a 'Serial' Console using usb instead of a
 serial port? I don't really care about having a console at boot up but
 it would be a bonus.

 The only documentation I can find is about using the serial port.

 Cheers

 Paul





Re: In Action: The First True Desktop Alternative to Windows

2004-05-18 Thread Dale Anderson
Just a pity it is such a pos 

Dale.

On Wed, 19 May 2004 15:04, stringer wrote:
 Just got this email today. Thought the group might like to see how Sun is
 pushing its java desktop based on Linux

 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:27:48 -0500
 From: Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: In Action: The First True Desktop Alternative to Windows
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-to: Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 SNIP

 Sun Net Talk on Demand
 Secure and Affordable: Sun Java[TM] Desktop System in Action
 
 Dear David Stringer,
 
 Are security breaches and virus outbreaks affecting your business?

 Estimates of virus damages run as high as $13 billion for 2003 alone.
 Surprisingly, there is a way you can virtually eliminate these threats.
 Just get rid of your Windows desktops - it's a whole lot easier than you
 might think.

 Invest 30 minutes of your time to see for yourself how the Java Desktop

 System's combination of open source and open standards will lower costs,
 reduce complexity, increase productivity and virtually eliminate virus
 attacks.

 Sun Java[TM] Desktop System is a more affordable, secure desktop that is

 designed to thrive in a Windows-centric world.  It consists of a fully
 integrated client environment based on open source components, including
 the StarOffice[TM] Office Productivity Suite, and is the only environment
 with fully integrated Java technology.

 Through a series of demonstrations you'll see why the Sun Java Desktop

 System is truly the first viable Windows alternative for the enterprise.

 View Now:
 http://see.sun.com/Apps/DCS/mcp?r=70042YHZ49Jzh0120003dOH042YHZ0mfrJIfrSo
 
 To refer a friend to this Sun Net Talk event, use the link below:
 http://see.sun.com/Apps/DCS/mcp?r=70042YHZ49Jzh0120003dOF042YHZ0mfrJIfrSo
 
 If you have any questions or feedback, please send an e-mail to

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thank you,
 Sun Microsystems
 
 View Now:
 http://see.sun.com/Apps/DCS/mcp?r=70042YHZ49Jzh0120003dOJ042YHZ0mfrJIfrSo
 
 About Net Talk on Demand
 Informative.  On line.  On target.  Every Sun Net Talk event is unique,

 but they share certain characteristics.  Knowledgeable speakers.
 Compelling content.  Entertaining discussions.  The end result is better
 understanding of how your technology investment decisions can drive
 innovation, accelerate cost efficiencies, and capture ROI.

 The on demand format ensures that you are able to listen in anytime,

 anywhere, at your convenience.

 © 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Sun, Sun Microsystems,

 the Sun logo, StarOffice and Java are trademarks or registered trademarks
 of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries.

 To update your Sun subscription preferences or unsubscribe to Sun news

 services, click on this link:
 http://see.sun.com/Apps/DCS/mcp?r=70042YHZ49Jzh0120003dOG042YHZ0mfrJIfrSo.

 -
 annmn:[742YHZ042YHZ49Jzh012042YHZ0mfrJIfrSo]

 STRINGER  SON
 per:
 David J H Stringer

 STRINGER  SON, - For all your legal work;

 P O Box 1386
 CHRISTCHURCH
 NEW ZEALAND

 Phone 64 - 3 - 366 1152
 FAX   64 - 3 - 366 1151


  1   2   >