Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-22 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Joel Rees wrote:
While we're playing around with Editor Wars...
there's no need for that sort of language...
Boy,, there's nothing like a good old-fashioned editor war!
But this one doesn't seem to have much punch to it. More like a dust 
devil than a cyclone.

Vim.
http://danconia.org


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-22 Thread Stephan Hochhaus
something. Won't be until I can afford panther (or tiger?) and some 
more RAM, though. That, or until I can find a proper download for the 
libraries for the old X11 beta. Couldn't find them last I looked.
Maybe this helps:
http://xonx.sourceforge.net/
Stephan


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-21 Thread John Delacour
At 9:34 pm -0800 20/1/05, Chris Nandor wrote:
I think the only thing it cannot do that BBEdit does -- from what I can tell
-- is that it doesn't talk directly to Affrus (the perl debugger for Mac OS
X), like BBEdit can.
There is an option in Preferences/UNIX scripting to use Affrus for 
debugging.
If you've always liked BBEdit for perl development, but didn't want to buy
it, then now's your chance.
I downloaded TW just over a week ago and have practically lived in it 
ever since.  I very rarely get hooked on a piece of software and I 
have found BBEdit over the years rather unsatisfactory and behind the 
times.  Now with BBE 8 and TextWrangler at last handling Unicode 
properly I am delighted with them.  TW 2.0 is brilliant.

At 11:44 pm -0800 20/1/05, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Oh, just like Carbonized Emacs? :-)
I think most of us sandal-wearing new-age Mac users would prefer a 
carbonized beefsteak :-)

JD


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-21 Thread Ken Williams
On Jan 21, 2005, at 4:45 AM, John Delacour wrote:
At 9:34 pm -0800 20/1/05, Chris Nandor wrote:
I think the only thing it cannot do that BBEdit does -- from what I 
can tell
-- is that it doesn't talk directly to Affrus (the perl debugger for 
Mac OS
X), like BBEdit can.
There is an option in Preferences/UNIX scripting to use Affrus for 
debugging.
See http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/threeway.shtml for a 3-way 
comparison between BBE, TW, and BBELite.

 -Ken


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-21 Thread William Ross
On 21 Jan 2005, at 06:17, Bruce Van Allen wrote:
On 2005-01-21 John Horner wrote:
At 9:34 PM -0800 20/1/05, Chris Nandor wrote:
it handles all the same Perl stuff as its bigger sibling: syntax
coloring, running scripts, filters, debugging, viewing POD, etc.
How does BBEdit view POD? I never knew about that.
Open a Perl script or module in BBE or TW, and check the #! menu.
...then open BBEdit  Set Menu Keys, assign 'command-/' to 'Find in 
Reference', highlight the function whose syntax you can't quite 
remember and hit the button...

will


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-21 Thread Jeff Lowrey
At 07:10 AM 1/21/2005, Ken Williams wrote:
See http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/threeway.shtml for a 3-way 
comparison between BBE, TW, and BBELite.
While we're playing around with Editor Wars...
Visual Slick Edit v9 from http://www.slickedit.com/mac/ will run on OS X.
-Jeff Lowrey 




Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-21 Thread William Ross
On 21 Jan 2005, at 12:35, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
At 07:10 AM 1/21/2005, Ken Williams wrote:
See http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/threeway.shtml for a 
3-way comparison between BBE, TW, and BBELite.
While we're playing around with Editor Wars...
there's no need for that sort of language...
Visual Slick Edit v9 from http://www.slickedit.com/mac/ will run on OS 
X.
aaargh! that was horrible. 50MB download (50MB! Quark 3.3! one floppy! 
etc!), only runs under X11 (so you can't even paste in the extremely 
long temporary license key unless you save it somewhere and open it in 
an xterm). its interface reminds me of Windows 1.0 and it keeps 
offering to bind my java.

actually, to come back to the topic, it looks like it might be a pretty 
good IDE for compiled and linked projects but it doesn't seem to have 
anything to do with perl, nor much with os x either.

will


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-21 Thread Joel Rees
On 2005.1.21, at 11:38 PM, William Ross wrote:
On 21 Jan 2005, at 12:35, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
At 07:10 AM 1/21/2005, Ken Williams wrote:
See http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/threeway.shtml for a 
3-way comparison between BBE, TW, and BBELite.
While we're playing around with Editor Wars...
there's no need for that sort of language...
Boy,, there's nothing like a good old-fashioned editor war!
But this one doesn't seem to have much punch to it. More like a dust 
devil than a cyclone.

Visual Slick Edit v9 from http://www.slickedit.com/mac/ will run on 
OS X.
aaargh! that was horrible. 50MB download (50MB! Quark 3.3! one floppy! 
etc!), only runs under X11 (so you can't even paste in the extremely 
long temporary license key unless you save it somewhere and open it in 
an xterm). its interface reminds me of Windows 1.0 and it keeps 
offering to bind my java.

actually, to come back to the topic, it looks like it might be a 
pretty good IDE for compiled and linked projects but it doesn't seem 
to have anything to do with perl, nor much with os x either.
I have to admit, I'm more likely to download that now than I would have 
been just from Jeff's comments. An rgh! has to rate something. 
Won't be until I can afford panther (or tiger?) and some more RAM, 
though. That, or until I can find a proper download for the libraries 
for the old X11 beta. Couldn't find them last I looked.

Oh, and thanks for letting us know about TW going free, Chris. I've 
always liked BBEdit, myself, almost as much as the CodeWarrior editor. 
(Talk about twisted tastes.)

--
Joel Rees
Opinions are like armpits.
We all have two, and they all smell,
but we really don't want the other guy to get rid of his.


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-20 Thread John Horner
At 9:34 PM -0800 20/1/05, Chris Nandor wrote:
it handles all the same Perl stuff as its bigger sibling: syntax
coloring, running scripts, filters, debugging, viewing POD, etc.
How does BBEdit view POD? I never knew about that.


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-20 Thread Bruce Van Allen
On 2005-01-21 John Horner wrote:

At 9:34 PM -0800 20/1/05, Chris Nandor wrote:
it handles all the same Perl stuff as its bigger sibling: syntax
coloring, running scripts, filters, debugging, viewing POD, etc.

How does BBEdit view POD? I never knew about that.

Open a Perl script or module in BBE or TW, and check the #! menu.

This might require that your settings recognize Perl files by .pl, .pm,
.plx, etc., under Preferences - Languages.

- Bruce

__bruce__van_allen__santa_cruz__ca__


Re: TextWrangler

2005-01-20 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Chris == Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Chris And it handles all the same Perl stuff as its bigger sibling: syntax 
Chris coloring, running scripts, filters, debugging, viewing POD, etc.

Oh, just like Carbonized Emacs?

:-)

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
merlyn@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!