Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Michele

Hi all,

this is my first message in the ML, but I currently follow #maemo on irc...

I hope not to miss, but if Kalle comes from Nokia (.fi suffix is rather 
common on this mailinglist...), I'd like only to say that sometime Nokia 
People is too much easily offended. I'm speaking for myself, now, and I 
think that nobody (well, sometimes it happens, but I think it's rare...) 
wants to downplay the work done!



On 3/30/06, John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip memory rant and offensive remarks about the VKB]
 


So I whipped up a little X keyboard which uses a more reasonable tens of
k of RAM,
   



So you whipped up handwriting and word prediction too? How cool!

(hint: if you start dissing something, please at least look at its
features before calling it demeaning names)
 

I feel that sometimes we should try to stay much collaborative as 
possible. This is a great device, IMHO far the best portable MM device 
ever done, with some well guessed characteristics (dimensions, display, 
battery...) and a distinctive remark: most of the software is open source.
I personally some time to spend programming on it, and I wasn't enjoying 
myself so much since Commodore64/Spectrum time... Always IMHO, it could 
really be a killer device! But in order to let it be what it really 
deserves, we have to admit also its limits. And in this sense, the VKB 
is one of this limit, sorry to say.


I know that 770 born to be an Internet Tablet, but the truth is that it 
is a well done device ideal also for PIM. I am working with my installed 
GPE and it is a nice device to carry always around. The biggest lack is 
the absence of an alarm framework, and I followed the thread sometime 
ago about it with a lot of interest, and I am waiting for this 
implementation, that could lead to a big jump ahead!


So again, just my 2c:
the VKB has a HWR that really sucks. I tried many times to use it, but 
ever switched back to the on-screen keyboard, because recognition simple 
doesn't work well, and the capability to be trained is too little. The 
word completion, IMHO, is totally useless. For me it's more a disturb 
than something usefule, because it littles the spacebar, and often add 
some letters that I really didn't want to type instead of a space.
Another bigger limit is the amount of internal ram: so why not to have a 
simplified hildon-input method that free lot of ram for people who 
doesn't need the HWR (that I repeat, at the moment is totally useless 
for me), simply selectable via control panel?


I hope not to have offended anyone, Nokia guys you did a great work with 
this tablet, it's a revolutionary product that I like a lot and I 
personally already convinced 4 friends of mine to buy one simply showing 
it 10 mins showing what it was capable to do (any commission or reward 
for this?), just go ahead on this road... But please try also to hear we 
user when we complains, because sometime we don't complain for nothing, 
and I repeat I think that nobody wants to downplay your work.


I personally thank you for that!

Regards,

Michele

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] USB Headset for VOIP?

2006-03-30 Thread john.s.jiang
Title: [maemo-developers] USB Headset for VOIP?






HI,


My colleagues have tried logitech usb headset 350,it works very well.



-John



___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] jhbuild of maemo in scratchbox?

2006-03-30 Thread Murray Cumming
A few months ago I tried using jhbuild inside scratchbox, so I wouldn't
have to install all the right versions of the autotools, and play with
the environment variables for a separate prefix. I didn't get very far,
though I forget the exact errors. I'm trying it again now.

Has anyone got this working already? Does anyone already have a suitable
jhbuild .modules file?

-- 
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] OGG support

2006-03-30 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Juha Yrjölä wrote:
 On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 13:53 +0100, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
 
 
What's nokia's position on EABI[1]?
 
 
 At least this part of Nokia thinks that EABI is cool.

It seems you have company*:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2006/03/msg00058.html

regards,

Koen


*pun intended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEK58bMkyGM64RGpERAnW3AKCMnxmEEy7GlPASKqLXtKYicyrA4gCfTzI9
Kfh63qQkSTfhWn04DNxN1i4=
=3pxR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Kemal Hadimli
Great post Michele :)

 Another bigger limit is the amount of internal ram: so why not to have a
 simplified hildon-input method that free lot of ram for people who
 doesn't need the HWR (that I repeat, at the moment is totally useless
 for me), simply selectable via control panel?

I also wouldn't mind having this functionality. Or, how bad can it be
if we had some way to replace the vkb app with something else? I don't
care if it won't have HWR or even letters on the vkeys :P

 this tablet, it's a revolutionary product that I like a lot and I
 personally already convinced 4 friends of mine to buy one simply showing
 it 10 mins showing what it was capable to do (any commission or reward

I myself am one of three friends (one of us didn't even see the
device IRL) who got convinced by a friend, and he was using the
device mostly for ebooks.

--
Kemal
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Tapani Pälli
ext John Meacham wrote:
 I got my nokia 770 the other day and love it. I have already started
 porting stuff and am happy to say my jhc haskell compiler can cross
 compile to maemo just fine.

 In any case, looking at the memory usage, hildon-input-method takes up a
 whopping 6.3 megs of real ram along with a decent chunk of x resources
 as reported by xrestop. This seems like an absurd amount for the little
 pretty cruddy (no offense) onscreen keyboard. it is the second largest
 user of memory after the desktop itself!
   
It was optimized mainly for speed, nobody wants to write with a slow
one. It is hard to make a gtk-themable keyboard in that size without
using some memory and still be fast. What was your method of looking
memory usage? I have Massif graphs of IM taking ~3 MB at max.

 So I whipped up a little X keyboard which uses a more reasonable tens of
 k of RAM, and want to know the absolute shortest path to replacing the
 built in input method with it. I know I have to create a gtk-immodule,
 but can't find documentation anywhere about how to do that or how to get
 rid of hildon-input-method once I create my gtk-immodule. I am very
 familier with low level X11 programming, but not so much with gtk
 specifics.


 Also, what keeps respawning the hildon-input-method? I can kill it
 remotely and bask in the extra 6 megs of RAM for a few seconds before it
 restarts without me ever trying to actually use the input method.

 in any case, neat device. I hope to modify my 'emap' program
 http://repetae.net/john/computer/emap/ to provide support for the
 fullscreen and menu buttons for arbitrary non-hildonized apps along with
 keyboard support as I often use it as an X terminal to run remote
 applications. emap also can figure out what program is currently running
 so you can have a custom keyboard layout for each program. (xterm in
 particular could benefit from a custom layout with nice big ^C and ^D
 buttons :) )

 any pointers would be appreciated.

 John

   

// Tapani

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] WLAN and bluetooth modem on at the same time?

2006-03-30 Thread Kalle Valo
Teemu Harju [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Is it somehow possible to use the WLAN and bluetooth modem with my phone at
 the same time on Nokia 770? The UI doesn't seem to allow this, but are there
 some scripts that I could run from Xterm to achieve this? My idea would be
 to use the Nokia 770 as a gateway from ad-hoc WLAN to public Internet via
 3G. I'd probably need to make some changes to the routing tables also, but
 that I think I could figure those out if I got both connections up.

Yes, that's possible if you are willing to do some hacking. You could
first establish the 3G connection normally from the UI and then setup
the WLAN network manually:

ifconfig wlan0 up
iwconfig wlan0 mode Ad-Hoc essid mynetwork

After this you need to setup NAT and routing. You can find iwconfig
from the wireless-tools debian package.

-- 
Kalle Valo

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] WLAN and bluetooth modem on at the same time?

2006-03-30 Thread Teemu Harju
Thanks... that is probably the easier way. I was kind of trying to do it the hard way by establishing the 3G connection manually. How stupid of me.- Teemu2006/3/30, Kalle Valo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Teemu Harju 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it somehow possible to use the WLAN and bluetooth modem with my phone at the same time on Nokia 770? The UI doesn't seem to allow this, but are there
 some scripts that I could run from Xterm to achieve this? My idea would be to use the Nokia 770 as a gateway from ad-hoc WLAN to public Internet via 3G. I'd probably need to make some changes to the routing tables also, but
 that I think I could figure those out if I got both connections up.Yes, that's possible if you are willing to do some hacking. You couldfirst establish the 3G connection normally from the UI and then setup
the WLAN network manually:ifconfig wlan0 upiwconfig wlan0 mode Ad-Hoc essid mynetworkAfter this you need to setup NAT and routing. You can find iwconfigfrom the wireless-tools debian package.
--Kalle Valo-- Teemu Harjuhttp://www.teemuharju.net
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device (input method)

2006-03-30 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi,

ext John Meacham wrote:
 In any case, looking at the memory usage, hildon-input-method takes up
 a whopping 6.3 megs of real ram

That's just RSS.  Most of that is Gtk libraries and their dependencies
shared with all the other applications on the device.  VmData  VmStk 
values from /proc/IM PID/status file give a slightly more accurate 
value of what RAM is private to input method.

It's still a lot, but not even near 6Mb...


 along with a decent chunk of x resources as reported by xrestop.

Xrestop reports 314KB of Pixmaps for the input method, but once I
close it, only 96KB remains.  I think that is the Gtk scratchbuffer
(i.e. reserved by Gtk, not input method) as I can see it also in
/proc/sysvipc/shm file.


 I know I have to create a gtk-immodule, but can't find documentation
 anywhere about how to do that or how to get rid of hildon-input-method
 once I create my gtk-immodule. I am very familier with low level X11
 programming, but not so much with gtk specifics.

I don't think you need to do the Gtk IM-module, I think the IM module
communicates with the keyboard using X messages (i.e. your X11 expertise
will actually help :-)).

The target input method window seems to be told here:
# xprop -root|grep HILDON
_HILDON_IM_WINDOW(WINDOW): window id # 0xc3


 Also, what keeps respawning the hildon-input-method? I can kill it
 remotely and bask in the extra 6 megs of RAM for a few seconds before
 it restarts without me ever trying to actually use the input method.

See into: /etc/osso-af-init/keyboard.sh

It's started with a watchdog.


- Eero

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Apologies

2006-03-30 Thread Philippe Laporte

Hi,
My apologies for how things went yesterday.

It was at no time my intention to say anyone is lying. I have new roles 
here since just recently and sometimes I am trying different approach 
tactics. This one was a definite failure, especially in the middle of a 
release.


I am proud of the 770 and its team. Proud of Nokia. I would never want 
to hurt Maemo.


Best Regards,

--
Philippe Laporte
Software 


Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax:   +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Re: Measuring power consumption of 770

2006-03-30 Thread Igor Stoppa
Interesting ... frankly nothing new to me, but it is a good start point
that proves how it is possible to have good performances even with low
power devices.

Next week i probably won't be able to reply to anything, however soonish
Maemo designing/coding guidelines will be available, and i hope we'll
have some discussion about battery-friendly drivers/applications.

igor

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:40 -0500, ext Larry Battraw wrote:
   Ok Igor, you finally motivated me to do some measurements :-)   All
 measurements were done with a .1 ohm resistor (measured as .0924 ohms
 using the 4-wire method) and a HP 3456A 6.5 digit voltmeter.  The
 meter was set to the slowest (most accurate) sampling rate, performing
 the calculations on-the-fly for the Ohm's law derived current.  I did
 _not_ measure battery voltage, so wattage calculations are not
 possible.  This shouldn't be a big deal as the current will give a
 good indication of what the device is doing at the time.  I've
 attached a CSV file of the spreadsheet for results.  I tried to hit
 most of the use cases people might be interested in, and everything is
 pretty impressive except for leaving MP3 files paused in the media
 player, which consumes over 10 times the normal current while
 sleeping.
 
 Larry
 
 On 3/29/06, Igor Stoppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:31 -0500, ext Larry Battraw wrote:
 I would advocate building a dummy battery out of a piece of
   wood/plastic with a small piece of copper clad board (split into three
   pads) to act as the contacts of the battery.  You can then run wires
   from those to the real battery, passing it through whatever
   resistor/sensing equipment you want.  As soon as you try measuring
   what goes into the DC jack you're then including whatever losses
   incurred by the DC-DC conversion from 5V to whatever used internally,
   as well as issues around having it potentially trying to charge the
   battery at the same time you're measuring.  That, and Igor as much as
   said that things could behave differently based on whether it detects
   wall/DC power vs. battery power alone.  Honestly, at this point you
   probably could have built a couple rigs for measuring power from the
   battery in all the time that has been spent discussing it.  :-)
  
   Larry
  
   On 3/21/06, Frantisek Dufka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Well I was not thinking about measuring at the mains plug. I was
thinking about measuring at the n770 side (5V?) because it is a bit
easier then opening the device and messing with battery pins.
   
Frantisek
   ___
   maemo-developers mailing list
   maemo-developers@maemo.org
   https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
 
  did anybody produce anything?
 
  I was hoping that the discussion would bring some interest to the
  fabulous world of power management also amongst other developers ...
 
  --
  Cheers,
 Igor
 
  Igor Stoppa (Nokia M - OSSO / Tampere)
 
-- 
Cheers,
   Igor

Igor Stoppa (Nokia M - OSSO / Tampere)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Chris Bare
 On 3/30/06, John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [snip memory rant and offensive remarks about the VKB]
  So I whipped up a little X keyboard which uses a more reasonable tens of
  k of RAM,
 
 So you whipped up handwriting and word prediction too? How cool!
 
 (hint: if you start dissing something, please at least look at its
 features before calling it demeaning names)

I agree that the current keyboard has a lot of features, but personally I
never use the handwriting or word prediction, so I'd be interested in a
lighter-weight alternative.
-- 
Chris Bare
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Disconnect
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Chris Bare did have cause to say:

  On 3/30/06, John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  [snip memory rant and offensive remarks about the VKB]
   So I whipped up a little X keyboard which uses a more reasonable tens of
   k of RAM,
  
  So you whipped up handwriting and word prediction too? How cool!
  
  (hint: if you start dissing something, please at least look at its
  features before calling it demeaning names)
 
 I agree that the current keyboard has a lot of features, but personally I
 never use the handwriting or word prediction, so I'd be interested in a
 lighter-weight alternative.

Me too. (I had a fairly long response that I decided not to send, suffice 
it to say my use-case is VKB or bluetooth, with periodic out-of-mem crashes 
mixed in for fun. And I support our new open-source overlords :) .. 
seriously, it would be really nice to have multiple choices. I'd love, for 
example, to put the numbers and menus on the same side so that I could use 
it with minimal wrist movement. And I'd kill for an unshifted '-'.)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] New Software Version

2006-03-30 Thread Adam Uccello
Hi All,

Does anyone have a date on when Nokia expects to release the next
version of the software?  I've seen Q1 2006 a few places, but I'm
curious if anyone has any more concrete information.

Thanks,
-Adam
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ross Burton
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:58 -0500, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
 - Origami-style keyboard (radial from a corner, probably better under
   Fitt's law) - see the billion preview pics for a sample

Fitt's law only applies for mice, and the Origami keyboard appears to be
designed for use by thumbs.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www: http://www.burtonini.com./
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF



___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] New Software Version

2006-03-30 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Flegg wrote:
 On 3/30/06, Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
Does anyone have a date on when Nokia expects to release the next
version of the software?  I've seen Q1 2006 a few places, but I'm
curious if anyone has any more concrete information.

Nope. [...] Although it would be nice if they'd start releasing some
alphas of the corresponding Maemo release [...]
 
 
 Especially since there are API changes and the Application Installer is
 not going to be backwards compatible.

As well as a complete new ABI by the looks of it.


 End users who upgrade immediately are going to have zero third party
 software they can install if there's no early developer release.

That would be a pretty good way to poke the community in the eye

regards,

Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFELASnMkyGM64RGpERAjK3AJ9b0RMBic6VtJQB3cGjBcLwyuw/YQCcCdKf
4xwwN61V4Z0ijZxn9jnrrII=
=UmKJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Kemal Hadimli
Okay, disq's law:
As an online discussion about maemo grows longer, the probability of a
comparison/statement involving Origami approaches one.

(Greetings go to Mike Godwin for Godwin's Law)


On 3/30/06, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:58 -0500, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
  - Origami-style keyboard (radial from a corner, probably better under
Fitt's law) - see the billion preview pics for a sample

 Fitt's law only applies for mice, and the Origami keyboard appears to be
 designed for use by thumbs.

--
Kemal
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 3/30/06, Kemal Hadimli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Okay, disq's law:
 As an online discussion about maemo grows longer, the probability of a
 comparison/statement involving Origami approaches one.

:D

Almost as funny as the fact that the device is referenced as an origin
for good ideas when AFAIK nobody has even seen such a thing live not
to mention holding one ;)

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Jonathan Matthews-Levine
On 3/30/06, Disconnect [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Chris Bare did have cause to say:
  I agree that the current keyboard has a lot of features, but personally I
  never use the handwriting or word prediction, so I'd be interested in a
  lighter-weight alternative.

 Me too.

FTR, me 3.

Cheers,
Jonathan

--
Don't anthropomorphize computers. They don't like it.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:58 -0500, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
 - Origami-style keyboard (radial from a corner, probably better under
 Fitt's law) - see the billion preview pics for a sample

 Fitt's law only applies for mice, and the Origami keyboard appears to be
 designed for use by thumbs.

Actually Fitts' law has nothing to do with mice in particular:

http://www.asktog.com/basics/firstPrinciples.html#fitts'%20law

(it's spelled Fitts')

Please read the summary and you'll see what I mean about a radial
keyboard.

Thanks
Ted
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Okay, disq's law:
 As an online discussion about maemo grows longer, the probability of a
 comparison/statement involving Origami approaches one.

 (Greetings go to Mike Godwin for Godwin's Law)

I have to point out, I made neither a comparison nor a statement about
Origami.  I just suggested that a radial keyboard might be a nice
idea.  So the thread has not gone on long enough yet.

Ted
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Kemal Hadimli
I agree it didn't, I just couldn't pass up on such a good joke opportunity. :)

On 30 Mar 2006 12:57:37 -0500, Ted Zlatanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have to point out, I made neither a comparison nor a statement about
 Origami.  I just suggested that a radial keyboard might be a nice
 idea.  So the thread has not gone on long enough yet.


--
Kemal
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Almost as funny as the fact that the device is referenced as an origin
 for good ideas when AFAIK nobody has even seen such a thing live not
 to mention holding one ;)

I am not sure how that's relevant.  I went by this picture, which
could be a mock-up or not.

http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cebit-web-site-shows-origami-ui/

I am not aware of any previous attempts to do a radial on-screen
keyboard.  Perhaps the 770 should be the first, considering it's
already out, unless of course there are patent concerns or X window
shaping issues.

Anyhow, it's nice to see that people are interested in an alternative
to the default keyboard.  I hope something comes out of it.

Ted
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Disconnect
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Ted Zlatanov did have cause to say:

 Of course, full Bluetooth keyboard support would also be very nice
 (right now you need 3rd party status bar applet, and xterm has the
 Enter key issue).  Bluetooth mice are also something I would love to
 use on the 770.

FYI lots of apps show the enter key problem, and other dialog-related 
issues. Usually switching away and back (Fn-g alt-tab on the stowaway goes 
'home' and then alt-tabs back to the app) works. But yah. Definite 
agreement. 

If there was an open, modular input method I'm sure it wouldn'd take long to 
update it for the actual use cases. (How often do you switch from vkb to 
handwriting? I can see going the other way on occasion. And I could take or 
leave the completion - preferably leave, if it gains me some memory.)

How about large phone-style buttons, for one-handed thumb typing? There are 
lots of options. I'd love to see some of them implemented. (How about just 
going back to the good old days of xkb and unified input support from the 
kernel to the app?)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Odonata

2006-03-30 Thread S. Meslin-Weber
Hi Philippe,

(posting this on maemo, only just noticed you'd posted to both lists)

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:45:37PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:

[snip]

 How is Odonata doing? It doesn't have a mailing list. I've contacted the
 author, but can people share their experience with Odonata, whether the
 info on the page is current (especially, are TextComponents and
 keyboard working?), and lastly, whether anyone has successfully run it on
 the 770.

Odonata is a little dormant at the moment, the past month (and a bit)
have been particularly hectic for me and I haven't had much time to
devote to its development.

One thing you should bear in mind when thinking of Odonata is that it is
a set of AWT *peers*. This means that it can only be used within a fully
functional AWT implementation (such as that provided by GNU Classpath or
Sun's class library).

Odonata as it currently stands in my local svn tree is still far from
complete, although some work has been done towards text input, it's not
been a priority.

The latest addition to Odonata was a new Font rendering framework using
BDF 2.3 (1,2,4 and 8-bit bitmapped fonts) - the underlying parser is
being integrated into JNode for things like console font rendering, as
an alternative to TTF rendering.

Work will continue on the main Odonata once I settle down a little more
at my new workplace. Now if only I could find someplace that paid me to
work on Odonata :)

Best Regards,

Steph

-- 

Stephane Meslin-Weber Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer  Web: http://odonata.tangency.co.uk



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Michael Wiktowy
On 3/30/06, Michele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,So again, just my 2c:the VKB has a HWR that really sucks. I tried many times to use it, butever switched back to the on-screen keyboard, because recognition simpledoesn't work well, and the capability to be trained is too little.
I found that too and narrowed the problem down to a few elements:1) If you counter-intuitively give less time for character recognition (it is adjustable) it does a better job since it is trying to  interpret whatever you write it its recognition period as on character. So reducing that time period give a better probability of that being true :]
2) There are some flaws in the build in character stroke tables. It would be nice if some of the built in tables could be edited. For instance, it seems the 99% of my troubles now (after doing 1) above) are centered around writing i. It nearly always gets interpreted as a comma or a lower case L. There is no way, looking at the built in strokes for the comma, that it should be misinterpretting that unless the HWR completely ignores the starting position (relative to the guidelines drawn on the screen) of the stroke. The two part characters are always tricky to deal with though.
Just some thoughts that might make it much more useful./Mike
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Re: Measuring power consumption of 770

2006-03-30 Thread Larry Battraw
 On 3/30/06, Igor Stoppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting ... frankly nothing new to me, but it is a good start point
 that proves how it is possible to have good performances even with low
 power devices.

  Indeed :-)  I didn't really figure it would be news to you, although
I was hoping you'd say something if things looked completely off-base.
 Anyway, I was quite impressed with the wi-fi power usage, as it was
almost completely non-existent unless you were actively doing
something.  Given that the active current for the radio approaches
~500 mA vs 100 mA during normal operation, it's quite a feat.


 Next week i probably won't be able to reply to anything, however soonish
 Maemo designing/coding guidelines will be available, and i hope we'll
 have some discussion about battery-friendly drivers/applications.

 igor

  I look forward to it.  Aside from a few glitches here and there it
shouldn't be too much to worry about.

Larry

 On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:40 -0500, ext Larry Battraw wrote:
Ok Igor, you finally motivated me to do some measurements :-)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 30 Mar 2006 13:05:41 -0500, Ted Zlatanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Almost as funny as the fact that the device is referenced as an origin
  for good ideas when AFAIK nobody has even seen such a thing live not
  to mention holding one ;)

 I am not sure how that's relevant.  I went by this picture, which
 could be a mock-up or not.

My point was that if you look at a picture like that, how do you know
it's a good idea?
Although granted, looking again at you mail you don't really state
this or that about the goodness of it...

 http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cebit-web-site-shows-origami-ui/

Looks horribly painful to use, just take your keyboard in your hand
like that and try to move you thumb in an arc. It's doable, but only
after letting got the firm grip on the device. Now, given that
origamis are relatively huge, it probably would slip from your hands
if you try to use two thumbs. Also the keyboard is most likely useless
the moment you put it into a stand or on the table...

Not to mention the elevated risk of RSI.

Would be interesting to try though. Anyone up to hacking one of those
for maemo?-)

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


RE: [maemo-developers] Building maemo from cvs

2006-03-30 Thread Devesh.Kothari
Murray,
Such a page would be welcomed.

Few things to consider
1. Maemo 1.1 public release usually lag behind internal product development
2. what you see in SVN are realtime in sync (mostly) with product development
3. some of the time, these SVN projects like HAF (hildon application framework) 
move on to new components versions or new dependencies (due to new feature 
additions) which are not in Maemo X.X public releases

So to build from scratch (i am throwing things from my head now :)
1. get a empty scratchbox
2. get a basic developer rootstrap from public maemo release
3. set up the apt/sources.list to target the Maemo x.x repository
4. set up a local repository on host system(i prefer using a localhost 
webserver), something like maemo unstable [this is where all the new and 
updated components used by e.g HAF would go]
5. Look into e.g HAF SVN and find (thats the hard part), all the new 
dependencies introduced and updated components. If the project itself dont 
provide them , then grab them from mainstream and put them in local repo.
6. Give your local repo preference over the Maemo repo. [you can use tools like 
apt-ftparchive stuff to create you a Packages.gz/Sources.gz etc]
7. apt-get update, install etc
8. get the latest SVN source, and then I think you have possibility of some 
success :)
9. once you create and compiled you packages from SVN sources, upload them to 
you local repository.
9. To test : Grab developer rootfs from Maemo , and flash to device
10. setup USB networking and modify the apt/sources.list to also point to your 
local repo, and then the magic apt dist-upgrade (who knows, it might work, at 
least the theory sound reasonable, isnt it ?) 

Now here I am assuming when you say Maemo from scratch, you mean Hildon 
Application Framework, which is in my terminology just HAF, which sits on top 
of Maemo Core [which is all base system, X, gdk, gtk, gconf etc etc]

Hope that helps
Cheers

Devesh


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ext Murray
 Cumming
 Sent: 29 March, 2006 20:42
 To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
 Subject: [maemo-developers] Building maemo from cvs
 
 
 Is there any documentation anywhere about building (and using) maemo
 from svn, installed in a separate prefix, or should I start a new page
 on the maemo wiki?
 
 -- 
 Murray Cumming
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.murrayc.com
 www.openismus.com
 
 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
 
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers