Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
Hi, ext Paul Bloch wrote: One thing that comes to mind in terms of augmenting Maemo and making it a more robust system is whether it's possible to consolidate efforts being made by other groups such as the Ubuntu mobile project (I can't recall the name of this effort), and perhaps the efforts of openmoko and Android. My feeling is to benefit from the work we're all doing and share the prosperity and accomplishments in whatever way possible. Ultimately the open mobile OS, which Maemo is a fantastic example of, could be a project that could help strengthen the open source community as a whole through cross-pollination of ideas and work. Good principles. Can you provide examples? When it comes to open source, our current guideline is to collaborate as much as possible with the upstream projects that produce the open source code Nokia and others deploy in their platforms. Still, picking your examples is easy to see that collaboration is not always that easy - not even under the flag of open source and the best intentions: Hildon/GTK+, Enlightment, Qtopia, Dalvik... all they are very different beasts not easy to put in a same basket for a common effort. There are not many issues collaborating on what is underneath (Linux Kernel and some other low/middle layers) but the stack sitting on top of of that is very thick, and is actually where most of the new stuff, commercial pressure and willingness to differentiate comes from. Paul aka openartist So, where are your mockups? ;) -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
maemo-mapper query
Hi, I am struggling , how tiles are indexed in maemo-mapper(exellent application ). Can someone please tell me how map tiles are downloaded,and indexed in database Thanks in advance ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Memory card recognization issue in OS2008
Hi, ext Dr. Nicholas Shaw wrote: A quick follow-up. The issue with x-term and mail is also happening now with application manager. I uninstalled a program and then tried installing the camera. Application manager just stopped working and I'm going to have to restart the device to get rid of it. This sounds very peculiar, I've never heard of something like it (I'm not particularly following application manager issues though). What extra applications and packages you have installed on your device? Also, on occasion (usually when x-term hangs), the Nokia splash screen still displays so I have to remove the battery. I don't understand this last thing. The Nokia splash screen goes away on bootup when the Desktop appears. As it's on top of everything, you cannot use the device while it's visible? I still need to research bugs and submit these if they haven't been done already. - Eero ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: policy: maemo packaging policy -draft
ext Guillem Jover wrote: Porting software should not be needed most of the time, and maemo would be better off pulling directly from the Debian armel archives. This is a separate discussion, but it would be good to go through specific cases of different packages in Debian and Ubuntu and see why the diff. If there is no good reason then it's a bug. If there is a good reason then perhaps Debian would be interested of getting the diff. Again, the whole exercise doesn't fall only in Nokia's responsibility and the community could help if there is really an interest. And honestly the packaging I've seen in general in Maemo is not that good, not only the stuff from extras and similar, this also applies to the one from Nokia. At least now there is a reference. If someone doesn't follow it there is a measure to file a bug, no matter who is this someone. About the rest, thanks Guillem for helping out with the packaging policy! -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
Hi. Marius Gedminas schrieb: If you attended the first talk I was the guy asking to raise your hand if you want to see the Nokia IT devices being freed of all proprietary software in one way (install a different OS) or another (make IT OS 100% free itself). I was one of those who raised their hands. :) 1) Users should be able to install any compatible OSes on their Nokia IT devices they wish like one can do on their desktop computers. Please add and have all the hardware working properly, because you can already install Debian or Poky on a Nokia IT. Good catch! While this is what I had in my mind it was not spoken out explicitly. I'll add this in the final text. 2) It should be possible to port and put Maemo on other non-Nokia devices like it is possible to e.g. port Fedora to any machine. If I'm not confused about the terms, Maemo already consists of only the open-source parts. The software that comes on a Nokia IT is called the Internet Tablet Operating System, and it is based on Maemo with a lot of non-free parts added at various levels of the software stack. Perhaps what you want is to make Maemo complete -- by adding the missing closed parts such as the virtual keyboard/handwriting input plugins, status bar applets, etc. My knowledge of maemo seems to be incomplete. Well, I thought all this stuff belongs to Maemo already. Too bad it does not ... Regards Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Where did the name Maemo come from?
Paul Bloch wrote: Today I was wondering, what is a maemo? Just wondering what the origins of the name are, anyone know what a Maemo is? Maemo is a name from a name generator. -- Tuomas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Where did the name Maemo come from?
Today I was wondering, what is a maemo? Just wondering what the origins of the name are, anyone know what a Maemo is? Cheers, Paul ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
Hi. Quim Gil schrieb: The campaign proposal is interesting. I wonder if Nokia is the main target, though. Sure, Nokia is one of the targets but perhaps it's the own community of developers who could make a change. Or did the Linux open source communities wait for IBM, Intel, HP and so on to come up with the desired support while campaigning? Coding has been the best campaign of Linux and open source. Who is stopping you on what from coding to increase the freedom of the maemo platform? If I would start coding to 'correct' every free software avoiding business decision I certainly need more than one life. Additionally I am already spending time to create a 100% free software platform. Its called GNU and I am part of a small subproject called Classpath. ;) Now the funny thing: Recently people found out that building something on top of what GNU provides can make up a successful business. But instead of following the idea that brought GNU into existance they add proprietary software again. So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. In the FAQ[2] it is said that Maemo doesn't mean anything. I think that with Nokia's continued non-focus on free software people will associate the term with half-open and non-freeness. See also the comment someone added to the Wiki[3]: I think the simple, and widely publicized, answer here is No. ;) —generalantilles 16:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Benefits: I am not a lawyer, marketing expert, economist or else. Ask them if you want advice. However a commodization of portable devices like the ITs is likely. Lawyers, marketing experts and economists will tell you that companies like Nokia make their profits on differentiation rather than commoditation. There are parts of the platform where commoditation is preferred i.e. the L:inux kernel, but keeping a leading position in a market with 100% commoditized products is almost a mission impossible, specially when starting a new family product like these lovely Internet centric devices with touch screen and etc. I wonder what customers want and who is listening to them. I am not a customer because there is no company making me a suitable offer. Yes, wiki please. There are already ideas on your direction there. If the community has a concrete plan, then it's easier for Nokia to deal with it. I added Get official statement about Nokia's stance towards software freedom for this. Regards Robert [0] - others are free to do whatever they want [1] - as in dedicate time to it [2] - http://test.maemo.org/faq/faq.html#general [3] - https://wiki.maemo.org/Increasing_transparency signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
ext Robert Schuster wrote: If I'm not confused about the terms, Maemo already consists of only the open-source parts. The software that comes on a Nokia IT is called the Internet Tablet Operating System, and it is based on Maemo with a lot of non-free parts added at various levels of the software stack. Perhaps what you want is to make Maemo complete -- by adding the missing closed parts such as the virtual keyboard/handwriting input plugins, status bar applets, etc. My knowledge of maemo seems to be incomplete. Well, I thought all this stuff belongs to Maemo already. Too bad it does not ... Not your fault, since the definition is really unclear as for today. Another task to do in less than 100 Days. In order to address https://wiki.maemo.org/Increasing_transparency properly we will need to define the set of packages that make the maemo platform. It's not only the open source packages, since this is not enough to run a device. If wer talk about the platform it's probably neither the whole software stack preinstalled in an image, including i.e. games, utilities and other apps. Open to discussion with the final goal of having *the* list of packages that define the maemo platform today. In the wiki, please. -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Where did the name Maemo come from?
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:49:57PM +0300, Tuomas Kulve wrote: Paul Bloch wrote: Today I was wondering, what is a maemo? Just wondering what the origins of the name are, anyone know what a Maemo is? Maemo is a name from a name generator. IIRC the generator was 'pwgen'. Marius Gedminas -- niemeyer I'm wondering why we have defineChecker() defined twice with exactly the same implementation under zope.security.checker... niemeyer Is it some kind of high-availability system? :-) -- #zope3-dev signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
ext Robert Schuster wrote: Now the funny thing: Recently people found out that building something on top of what GNU provides can make up a successful business. But instead of following the idea that brought GNU into existance they add proprietary software again. This is a binary analysis. Nokia has added proprietary software as well as a whole bunch of open source code released, contributed back and/or commissioned to third parties related to upstream project. Besides, the fact of having a company like Nokia developing products based on Linux and open source helps _what GNU provides_ and more free software components getting more credibility and attention in the corporate and commercial world. So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. Until now maemo also has shown some capacity attracting new developers and users to the open source arena, in part thanks to its focus building consumer products where open source is a tool and not an end. As you say, it is possible that the prize of that is loosing some of the guys having 100% freedom software as first and last priority. Well, nobody champions in all sports. In the FAQ[2] it is said that Maemo doesn't mean anything. I think that with Nokia's continued non-focus on free software people will associate the term with half-open and non-freeness. Two things to consider: 1. As for today the maemo compatible devices are the most open devices sold in shops and fitting in your pocket. 2. How long did it get to have 100% free systems for desktops and laptops. Still nowadays there are some rough corners. Who polished those corners? Wasn't a combination of community and corporate effort? Isn't understandable that a new category of devices needs also some time to get a similar degree of openness through (again) a mixture of community and corporate work? -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:23:15PM +0200, Robert Schuster wrote: So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. This is what I had in mind in my LinuxTag maemo.org presentation: there are people who will not want to contribute to Maemo just because Nokia does not completely adhere to the free software principles. By that I did not mean to imply that Nokia should put free software above their bottom line. My point was that Nokia should evaluate the extra value received from free software zealots (this word is probably too strong, but I don't have the time right now to pick a better one) with value lost from opening their proprietary components. Unfortunately I'm no economist and I cannot evaluate either. Looking at the increasing popularity of free software in the IT sector it seems to me that free software benefits outweigh proprietary benefits, but this is not a choice I can make for Nokia; it's one Nokia has to make for themselves. Marius Gedminas -- As of 2.91, these bugs have all been fixed. We look forward to new ones, well, not exactly... -- libstdc++-v3 FAQ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
RE: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. This is what I had in mind in my LinuxTag maemo.org presentation: there are people who will not want to contribute to Maemo just because Nokia does not completely adhere to the free software principles. By that I did not mean to imply that Nokia should put free software above their bottom line. My point was that Nokia should evaluate the extra value received from free software zealots (this word is probably too strong, but I don't have the time right now to pick a better one) with value lost from opening their proprietary components. Is zealotry that wide-spread and that much of a stumbling block for some people? I'd prefer it to be open, but if it is possible to work within the constraints that Nokia impose (due to IP/NDA/etc. restrictions), as long as they are helpful in providing ways to use the functionality of the closed components, then I can accept that there are real reasons for the limitations and still be happy to use and develop for the device. Unfortunately I'm no economist and I cannot evaluate either. Looking at the increasing popularity of free software in the IT sector it seems to me that free software benefits outweigh proprietary benefits, but this is not a choice I can make for Nokia; it's one Nokia has to make for themselves. Perhaps, but we are quite often talking about interfacing with hardware from a company which makes lots of mobile devices, rather than software only service providers. My feeling/understanding is that closed components such as BME will stay closed as the IP is too valuable to release to competitors; the best we can hope for is some sort of API to communicate with the hardware via a closed component. This is not a problem for me as long as it is available. Likewise the wifi driver will not be open sourced as it belongs to someone else. We won't see the source for this released either, but perhaps we will see a more open source friendly version in a later tablet as long as it is cost-effective (same goes for the charging hw). Closed software-only (as in they don't talk to hardware) components are something we have more chance with; quite a few of the closed components don't seem to contain anything very hi-tech, but are just closed. This might just be because no-one has thought to open them; or to avoid competitors copying the whole interface/os in one go (though it wouldn't be beyond a company to just re-write these parts I'd guess); or perhaps to avoid developers screwing up the Nokia UI spec. and then releasing images which reflect badly on Nokia. Lots of perhapses of course :) Cheers, Simon ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
Hi, ext Robert Schuster wrote: Now the funny thing: Recently people found out that building something on top of what GNU provides can make up a successful business. But instead of following the idea that brought GNU into existance they add proprietary software again. Nokia has contributed to many open source projects during the years (starting at least from 90s). There are many companies that have both proprietary and open source components (Ubuntu (is Launchpad finally open?), Novell, IBM etc), it's not either or. As long as the trend in general is towards more open (when counting contributions both inside and outside the devices), at least I'm happy. So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. 1) I don't see why maemo goal could not be being 100% free. 2) It's not a goal for ITOS (which shares components with maemo) nor for Nokia (which does consumer mobile devices which by necessity currently require proprietary components for different reasons). If maemo is defined just as a subset of ITOS and something that should utilize all of specific Nokia devices hardware features, then 1) conflicts with 2). However, nothing says that maemo needs to be tied like that: The goal could be that: - There are free replacements (sometimes better, sometimes worse) for specific software functionalities that are proprietary in (certain versions of) ITOS. - Whether replacement means that the APIs/ABIs should be standard or compatible (enough) is another question - certain specified HW functionalities can be used with free software, for others it's not (as much of) an issue This would require that people actually prioritize what is important to them instead of giving less useful blanket statements that everything should be open, RIGHT NOW. :-) - Eero Even with majority of current Linux laptops, either they have binary drivers (bad) or some functionality is missing (to me, more acceptable). Trend is improving though. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
Robert Schuster wrote: So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it There is difference between Nokia and Maemo here. It may not be be goal for Nokia as a company (no matter what is our opinion on this) but it can be goal for Maemo and community around it. And I believe some work is slowly done towards this goal. Both at community side via replacing few closed bits or running alternative distributions, and some work is done on Nokia side too (with glacial speed) so we may have less roadblocks in future. and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. Yes. I also hope the future is bright and have no problem switching to something more open with same qualities in future. Today (or maybe at least yesterday? ;-) Maemo is the best choice for me. It makes more sense (to me) to collaborate with them and try to push it towards openness than trying to start yet another tiny 100% open platform from scratch :-) Frantisek ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:23:15PM +0200, Robert Schuster wrote: So the answer is no. As long as Maemo's goal is not 'providing a 100% free platform' as well I[0] will not contribute[1] to it and I expect that with more and more freedom respecting projects/products you will have a hard time finding people who do. This is what I had in mind in my LinuxTag maemo.org presentation: there are people who will not want to contribute to Maemo just because Nokia does not completely adhere to the free software principles. By that I did not mean to imply that Nokia should put free software above their bottom line. My point was that Nokia should evaluate the extra value received from free software zealots (this word is probably too strong, but I don't have the time right now to pick a better one) with value lost from opening their proprietary components. Nokia will not be able to estimate the value of contributions by outsiders. However they can estimate the value lost from opening up. They won't bet a known against an unknown. What they have done instead is to run an experiment. That experiment is the n800 and family. I say all this as an outsider. I don't speak for Nokia. Rather I am describing the general attitudes I have experienced from within a different large corporation. Unfortunately I'm no economist and I cannot evaluate either. Looking at the increasing popularity of free software in the IT sector it seems to me that free software benefits outweigh proprietary benefits, but this is not a choice I can make for Nokia; it's one Nokia has to make for themselves. Marius Gedminas Nokia is not likely to see it the same way. Not until they see proof. -- Allen Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/ One person, one vote (Except in Ohio or Florida.) ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Hello Maemo - CFSONID 2008
proprietary and open source components (Ubuntu (is Launchpad finally open?), Novell, IBM etc), it's not either or. It is in the In Progress queue apparently https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/50699/comments/10 and likely to be released Affero licensed. To me launchpad.net is kind of like maemo.org...you are not forced to use it if you just want to use the OS. At least when you do install the Ubuntu system you get a pop up telling you are installing proprietary software and you have the choice to back out. No such choice exists when you install chinook yet both are marketed as open source. Ian -- http://ianlawrence.info ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
GStreamer and ogg on N800
I followed the directions at http://ogg.garage.maemo.org/ to install ogg support for GStreamer. Success. Thanks for the very helpful package! One problem, though: Although my application now runs on the N800 and produces sound, the loudness of the sound is low. When I play the same soundfile using Media player, it is louder. I tried multiplying the volume parameter. When I multiply by 8.0, the volume is about right, but then the sound is distorted (overloading). Evidently, the gain is wrong somewhere else. I am using a playbin. Its packaging eliminates most places where I could have made a mistake. Has anyone used a playbin successfully on maemo with an ogg? Does anyone know whether Media player uses playbin? Any suggestions where the gain error could be? -- Jeffrey Barish ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
maemo Bug Jar #7
A Quick Look at maemo Bugzilla 2008.05.29 through 2008.06.04 As of 2008.06.04 maemo Bugzilla contains 3166 (+22 this week) items, including 1152 open issues (-40 this week): * 783 open bugs (-43 this week) * 9 critical/blocker (-3 this week) * 22 moreinfo (+4 this week) * 25 crash (-2 this week) * 21 patch (-2 this week) * 293 unconfirmed (+1 this week) * 369 open enhancements (+3 this week) * 7 moreinfo (+1 this week) * 5 patch (no change this week) * 104 unconfirmed (no change this week) 17 new bugs were opened: * [3197] No feedback when upload to extras fails https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3197 * [3200] yahoo IM won't go through FW (rtcomm / telepathy) https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3200 * [3202] Unable to send and receive voice packets using RTP on Ubu... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202 * [3203] planet.maemo.org timing out https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3203 * [3204] Wrong usage of osso_initialize() in Maemo 4.0 Tutorial https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3204 * [3205] Important sentence missing in description of osso_initial... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3205 * [3206] 2 left-handed UI suggestions https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3206 * [3207] Bad HTML title in the Downloads application list pages https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3207 * [3208] Repository timeout is unintelligent and too long https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3208 * [3209] BUG: at drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c:307 tusb_omap_dm... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3209 * [3211] Implicite usage of com.nokia.app_name dbus service name https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3211 * [3212] Maemo.org 404 Page vulnerable to XSS https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3212 * [3213] Fail to upload package update to chinook-extras https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3213 * [3214] Timezone switches require me to manually set the correct ... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 * [3215] sqlite3 command-line application is not available https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3215 * [3216] Mediawiki RSS feeds not working https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3216 * [3218] Unknown property 'pading-right' https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3218 Of these, 2 were critical/blockers: * [3202] Unable to send and receive voice packets using RTP on Ubu... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202 * [3212] Maemo.org 404 Page vulnerable to XSS https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3212 5 new enhancements were opened: * [3198] Time stretch capability for podcasts https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3198 * [3199] Display applet source should be open https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3199 * [3201] add Lotus Sametime support to RTCOMM https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3201 * [3210] Add configurable schedule for automatic email checking https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3210 * [3217] Change the Info button's dialog to allow editing of the s... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3217 5 bugs were confirmed: * [2782] Inverted '' '' hardware key on french keyboard https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2782 * [3125] Whitespace in .desktop file X-Osso-Service line causes db... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3125 * [3197] No feedback when upload to extras fails https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3197 * [3207] Bad HTML title in the Downloads application list pages https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3207 * [3212] Maemo.org 404 Page vulnerable to XSS https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3212 3 enhancements were confirmed: * [3142] User defined settings for the look 'n feel of the RSS applet https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142 * [3199] Display applet source should be open https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3199 * [3210] Add configurable schedule for automatic email checking https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3210 61 bugs were closed: * [349] Browser does not use user certificates from certman (cont... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349 * [493] WLAN signal strength meter does not correctly reflect abi... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493 * [533] Crashes upon opening of Feeds through Applet https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533 * [572] Certificates do not work in the web browser https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572 * [579] link with target=_blank are handled twice when using ha... https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 * [605] Downloaded files are 0 bytes https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605 * [635] Cannot browse files on bluetooth phone https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635 * [640] Google Reader does not
