Re: Fremantle UI Portrait Mode

2009-06-12 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 00:23 +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
 
  All in all I think that the Gtk-API should be used more, but that
  the rendering on the screen should just different from the rendering
  on the desktop.
 
 We try to do that where possible. Sometimes it's just a matter of
 theming the widget correctly, but other times it requires significant
 changes to Gtk, and the maemo-Gtk maintainers try to keep it as close
 to upstream as possible, because maintaining a big fork is a hard
 task, but they can tell you better than me :)

It's easier now that GTK+ (and hildon) uses git. And the changes could
go upstream within a year, reducing the differences in your fork. This
happened for previous Maemo GTK+ additions:
http://live.gnome.org/Maemo/GtkContributions

(I know it's too late.)

-- 
murr...@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: svn2git conversion testing at garage.maemo.org

2009-06-12 Thread Murray Cumming
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 23:15 +0200, Ferenc Szekely wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have finished the automated svn2git conversion support for garage
 projects that are currently using subversion for revision control.
 
 I am looking for project admins who would be willing to help me testing
 the whole procedure in the live environment.
 
 Please drop me an email if you are an administrator of a garage project
 which has a subversion repository and you would consider using git in
 the future.

We could use git for maemomm. git is rather annoying to me personally
day-to-day but we are used to it on git.gnome.org so we'd enjoy the
consistency.

-- 
murr...@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Fremantle UI Portrait Mode

2009-06-12 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:31:44AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:

   All in all I think that the Gtk-API should be used more, but
   that the rendering on the screen should just different from the
   rendering on the desktop.
  We try to do that where possible. Sometimes it's just a matter
  of theming the widget correctly, but other times it requires
  significant changes to Gtk, and the maemo-Gtk maintainers try to
  keep it as close to upstream as possible, because maintaining a
  big fork is a hard task, but they can tell you better than me :)
 It's easier now that GTK+ (and hildon) uses git. And the changes
 could go upstream within a year, reducing the differences in
 your fork. This happened for previous Maemo GTK+ additions:
 http://live.gnome.org/Maemo/GtkContributions

Moving these changes upstream is something that the maemo-gtk
maintainers are already doing AFAIK. We all try to add to maemo-gtk
all things that can go upstream.

However the modifications you're talking about (changing the
implementation of Gtk widgets so they look/behave differently while
maintaining the same API) can't, by definition, be moved upstream :)

Berto
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: calendar-backend

2009-06-12 Thread Sebastian 'CrashandDie' Lauwers
It is very easy to write C++ code that is usable by C compilers.
Considering there is apparently a notable demand for a C interface,
pushing for an enhancement request early in the project may be an
interesting thing to do. The code change is relatively minimal if
architectured correctly and would be beneficial to quite a few people
apparently.

I'm not teaching any experienced coder anything new here, and I don't
mean to preach to the choir, but for future reference:

#ifdef __cplusplus
  extern C
#endif
int foobar(int i);

http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/mixing.html#cpp_from_c


On 11/06/2009, Hubert Figuiere h...@figuiere.net wrote:
 On 06/11/2009 05:01 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
 Forgive my ignorance but is it 10x longer to compile or 10x increment
 in speed? Compilation speed is a matter of grabbing two coffee's
 instead of one, run time speed is a matter of giving up completely.

 C code compiled by g++ isn't slower or faster. It should be the same.
 (I'm talking runtime speed here)
 Just because there seems to be another myth being entertained.

 Hub
 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;
  -- Wm. Shakespeare
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers