Re: information required to replace Maemo5 wlan bits

2012-12-01 Thread Pali Rohár
On Friday 20 July 2012 04:13:05 Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/wlan_tx_power
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/type
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_security
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_ssid
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_wepdefkey
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_wepkey1
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_wepkey2
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_wepkey3
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_wepkey4
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/nai
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/temporary
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_hidden
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_wpa2_only_mode
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/powersave_after_scan
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_powersave
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/wlan_adhoc_channel
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_TLS_PEAP_client_certificat
> e_file
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_default_type
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_wpa_preshared_passphrase
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/PEAP_tunneled_eap_type
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_MSCHAPV2_username
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_MSCHAPV2_password
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_GTC_identity
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_wpa_preshared_key
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_SIMPLE_CONFIG_device_passw
> ord
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_MSCHAPV2_password_prompt
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_manual_username
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_use_manual_username
> /system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/TLS_server_authenticates_clien
> t_policy_in_client
>

If you want to specify password for EAP_GTC_identity store it to:

/system/osso/connectivity/IAP/%s/EAP_GTC_passcode

--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: information required to replace Maemo5 wlan bits

2012-07-25 Thread Jamie Thompson

Just to let you know, that IMHO the analysis and information you are
collecting are even more important than rewriting the proprietary
components. It helps both understanding the inner workings of the
system (what about writing a "Maemo 5 Internals" document for the
proprietary parts? :)) and help people interacting with these
components, customizing them (e.g. binary patching) or replacing them
when necessary.

Anyway, I appreciate reading these RE analysis, even though I'm not
actively using my N900 (now playing with N9). Maybe it could be added
to some wiki section as well?


Agreed, I am also immensely grateful for all the reverse-engineering 
that goes on. One day I'll finally get around to reimplementing the 
conversations and address books ;)


I also think the wiki is far more visible long-term than the mailing 
list archive (though it's good to have it in more than one place), so
putting things there would be great. The mailing list is obviously far 
better for drawing attention to it though (as is posting to TMO, as you

have been).


I'm not sure what would be the point of replacing the proprietary
WLAN bits.

1.Ability to support WiFi security mechanisms that the stock bits
dont support
2.Support for assigning higher priorities to different wireless
networks
(i.e. if you move into range of a higher-priority network than the
one you
are on, it will join to that)

Probably other things too.


The particular reason I briefly looked at this a while back was to be 
able to have WiFi and cellular active at the same time without having to
run a hotspot application (i.e. the WiFi as a client to my existing 
wireless network, not a new AP). In my case, I just wanted to be able to
SSH to my phone over WiFi whilst it was sharing it's cellular signal 
over PC-Suite/Unix-mode USB. In the end I set the N900 up as a router
and switched to Windows-mode USB networking, but it would be nice and 
much simpler to just use it as I originally intended (not to mention, I
can't seem to get PC-Suite mode to work again afterwards without a 
reboot).


- Jamie
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: information required to replace Maemo5 wlan bits

2012-07-23 Thread Jonathan Wilson

Timur Kristóf wrote:

I'm not sure what would be the point of replacing the proprietary WLAN bits.

1.Ability to support WiFi security mechanisms that the stock bits dont support
2.Support for assigning higher priorities to different wireless networks 
(i.e. if you move into range of a higher-priority network than the one you 
are on, it will join to that)


Probably other things too.

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: information required to replace Maemo5 wlan bits

2012-07-23 Thread Anderson Lizardo
Hi, Jonathan,

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jonathan Wilson  wrote:
> Here is the information on the things you need to know about/provide/use/etc
> in order to replace the Maemo5 ICD WLAN plugin with something better (e.g.
> based on wpa-supplicant) and have every other package on the stock install
> continue to work properly.
> [snip]

Just to let you know, that IMHO the analysis and information you are
collecting are even more important than rewriting the proprietary
components. It helps both understanding the inner workings of the
system (what about writing a "Maemo 5 Internals" document for the
proprietary parts? :)) and help people interacting with these
components, customizing them (e.g. binary patching) or replacing them
when necessary.

Anyway, I appreciate reading these RE analysis, even though I'm not
actively using my N900 (now playing with N9). Maybe it could be added
to some wiki section as well?

Best Regards,
-- 
Anderson Lizardo
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers