Re: [libreoffice-marketing] thoughts on the marketing phone conferences

2011-08-04 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi Drew,

thanks for the feedback!

drew wrote on 2011-08-01 16:26:

One small idea and one amongst the steps that would be reasonably
attained would be, a monthly correspondence (let's call it a newsletter,
and think about some email/blog hybrid delivery, perhaps) and then
schedule this monthly publication to trail the meeting by a few days.

One of the functions of the meeting then is to allow anyone in the
community a well defined way to get community news, which may be very
local, in front of the broader community.


so, to rephrase it, you plan that we do a meeting once a month, where 
every local community could share what is going on in terms of marketing 
at their place? Some sort of update instead of discussion?


Sounds indeed attractive to me!

Shall we do it solely in terms of marketing, or maybe switch the 
marketing calls into general community work update calls?


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding 
terminology:


- Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also 
use free software.


- Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.

I am, as we have a saying in Germany, rather emotionless on this, but I 
do see that many people have concerns with solely using open source or 
leaving out the GNU prefix.


Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone 
has severe concerns on that?


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Ian Lynch
On 4 August 2011 20:57, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.orgwrote:

 Hello,

 I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
 terminology:

 - Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
 use free software.

 - Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.


I think it is a bit like acknowledging a trademark. Since a good part of any
Linux distro is software contributed by GNU it seems a simple courtesy to
acknowledge that. It's easy to forget to because the term Linux is in such
common use. However, I have come across people misusing the open source
label because they think it might be a marketing advantage. The Fronter VLE
is an example, trying to compete with Moodle.


 I am, as we have a saying in Germany, rather emotionless on this, but I do
 see that many people have concerns with solely using open source or
 leaving out the GNU prefix.


I'm not emotional about it, but I can see some practical reasons why we
should not ignore GNU or the freedoms specifically associated with FOSS
rather than just OSS.


 Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone has
 severe concerns on that?

 Florian

 --
 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org**
 Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
 Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.**
 libreoffice.org marketing%2bh...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
 unsubscribe/http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
 Netiquette http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: 
 http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/**marketing/http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted




-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
I'd say that when the FSF sits at our AB we should better comply :-) ...

Best,

Charles.
Le 4 août 2011 21:58, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
a écrit :
 Hello,

 I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
 terminology:

 - Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
 use free software.

 - Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.

 I am, as we have a saying in Germany, rather emotionless on this, but I
 do see that many people have concerns with solely using open source or
 leaving out the GNU prefix.

 Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone
 has severe concerns on that?

 Florian

 --
 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
 Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
 Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Cor Nouws

Hi Florian,

Florian Effenberger wrote (04-08-11 21:57)


I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
terminology:

- Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
use free software.

- Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.
[...]

Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone
has severe concerns on that?


Using 'free' along side 'open source' is good anyway, because it adds an 
extra dimension to our message, that is quite easy to understand.


The use of 'GNU' does not add anything that is easy to understand. It's 
more something that people 'in the know' like to see. It might look a 
bit more weird to people that are new. But the change that it hurts is 
so small, that I do not object the use of GNU/Linux.


Cheers,


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread C. Olofson

On 08/04/2011 01:36 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:

Hi Florian,

Florian Effenberger wrote (04-08-11 21:57)


I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
terminology:

- Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
use free software.

- Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.
[...]

Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone
has severe concerns on that?


Using 'free' along side 'open source' is good anyway, because it adds 
an extra dimension to our message, that is quite easy to understand.


The use of 'GNU' does not add anything that is easy to understand. 
It's more something that people 'in the know' like to see. It might 
look a bit more weird to people that are new. But the change that it 
hurts is so small, that I do not object the use of GNU/Linux.


Cheers,


I agree with Cor on both items.

-Craig

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Italo Vignoli
 On 08/04/2011 01:36 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:

 Using 'free' along side 'open source' is good anyway, because it adds
 an extra dimension to our message, that is quite easy to understand.

 The use of 'GNU' does not add anything that is easy to understand.
 It's more something that people 'in the know' like to see. It might
 look a bit more weird to people that are new. But the change that it
 hurts is so small, that I do not object the use of GNU/Linux.

I agree as well.

-- 
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
Mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
+1
Although i prefer it when Gnu is title case rather than shouting.  Also gnu is 
not divided by linux, they are added together.  So, i tend to prefer GnuLinux 
but i'm probably the only one that has thought about it like that.

Open Source is great.  Free Software is ok but Free/OpenSource is messy 
and makes people think of those Freeware utilities that clutter up systems and 
even cause problems or free trials.  The problem is trying to show that 
LibreOffice is not cheap crap.  Oddly people don't think of the word 
priceless.

In England there is a well known phrase You get what you pay for meaning that 
the more expensive something is the better it is and this attitude is deeply 
embedded in the English psyche.  

Regards from
Tom :)





From: C. Olofson c.olof...@gmail.com
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 21:57:42
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

On 08/04/2011 01:36 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
 Hi Florian,
 
 Florian Effenberger wrote (04-08-11 21:57)
 
 I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
 terminology:
 
 - Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
 use free software.
 
 - Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.
 [...]
 
 Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone
 has severe concerns on that?
 
 Using 'free' along side 'open source' is good anyway, because it adds an 
 extra 
dimension to our message, that is quite easy to understand.
 
 The use of 'GNU' does not add anything that is easy to understand. It's more 
something that people 'in the know' like to see. It might look a bit more 
weird 
to people that are new. But the change that it hurts is so small, that I do 
not 
object the use of GNU/Linux.
 
 Cheers,

I agree with Cor on both items.

-Craig

-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Lol !!! 
+1 !!
I like it :)   I worry that saying LO is free is blocking or at least severely 
hindering any marketing in the US or Uk.  

Regards from
Tom :)





From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 21:30:16
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

I'd say that when the FSF sits at our AB we should better comply :-) ...

Best,

Charles.
Le 4 août 2011 21:58, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
a écrit :
 Hello,

 I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
 terminology:

 - Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
 use free software.

 - Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.

 I am, as we have a saying in Germany, rather emotionless on this, but I
 do see that many people have concerns with solely using open source or
 leaving out the GNU prefix.

 Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone
 has severe concerns on that?

 Florian

 --
 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
 Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
 Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Warren Camilleri
i agree with tom, how ever i like the GNULinux as they are one for me, and 
FOSS - Free open source software is okay and great, libreoffice is a high 
quality product how ever it wont work in my primery job since one of our 
accounts develped and manipulted macros that not even the MS devs will 
invent in a dacade or too, all i know it had something to do with dimension 
formulas for calc (Exel)




--

Warren Camilleri war...@ossmalta.com
Founding Member of The Open Source Society Malta community
Mobile: +356 7991 2004
Skype: ossmalta | Twitter: @ossmalta
-Original Message- 
From: Tom Davies

Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:27 PM
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

Hi :)
+1
Although i prefer it when Gnu is title case rather than shouting.  Also gnu 
is
not divided by linux, they are added together.  So, i tend to prefer 
GnuLinux

but i'm probably the only one that has thought about it like that.

Open Source is great.  Free Software is ok but Free/OpenSource is 
messy
and makes people think of those Freeware utilities that clutter up systems 
and

even cause problems or free trials.  The problem is trying to show that
LibreOffice is not cheap crap.  Oddly people don't think of the word
priceless.

In England there is a well known phrase You get what you pay for meaning 
that

the more expensive something is the better it is and this attitude is deeply
embedded in the English psyche.

Regards from
Tom :)





From: C. Olofson c.olof...@gmail.com
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 21:57:42
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

On 08/04/2011 01:36 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:

Hi Florian,

Florian Effenberger wrote (04-08-11 21:57)


I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
terminology:

- Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
use free software.

- Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.
[...]

Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone
has severe concerns on that?


Using 'free' along side 'open source' is good anyway, because it adds an 
extra

dimension to our message, that is quite easy to understand.

The use of 'GNU' does not add anything that is easy to understand. It's 
more
something that people 'in the know' like to see. It might look a bit more 
weird
to people that are new. But the change that it hurts is so small, that I do 
not

object the use of GNU/Linux.

Cheers,


I agree with Cor on both items.

-Craig

-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted 



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Simon Phipps

On 4 Aug 2011, at 20:57, Florian Effenberger wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding 
 terminology:
 
 - Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also use 
 free software.

TL;DR summary:  FOSS is a reasonable term to use sparingly in English  (FOSS - 
Free, Open Source Software).  

Explanation: FLOSS is not a good term to use as it appears humourous to most 
people not educated to regard it otherwise. Over-use of Free distracts most 
native English speakers who rarely associate it with Liberty unless educated 
to do so and I don't think that's TDF's role. FOSS - Free, Open Source Software 
- works in many contexts as it does not have other common meanings and provokes 
curiosity, but should not be over-used as jargon and acronyms make text look 
complex. Open Source is a term widely recognised among computer users and is 
thus a good colloquial term in contexts where the message is about LibreOffice 
rather than about software freedom as a philosophy or ethical system.

So my recommendation would be to occasionally use the construct Free, Open 
Source software (say once per page) and otherwise stick with open source.

 
 - Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.

For most people it really doesn't matter, and it makes some people happy, so 
why not.  

 
 I am, as we have a saying in Germany, rather emotionless on this, but I do 
 see that many people have concerns with solely using open source or leaving 
 out the GNU prefix.
 
 Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone has 
 severe concerns on that?
 
 Florian


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] website terminology for free software

2011-08-04 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2011/8/4 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org

 Hello,


Hi Florian


 I've received a request to change two things on our website, regarding
 terminology:

 - Instead of solely using open source, I was asked that we should also
 use free software.

 - Linux should be referred to as GNU/Linux.

 I am, as we have a saying in Germany, rather emotionless on this, but I do
 see that many people have concerns with solely using open source or
 leaving out the GNU prefix.

 Shall we aim for achieving a good mixture of both terminologies? Anyone has
 severe concerns on that?

 I think the term FOSS, or FLOSS should be acceptable for most people.
Regarding to the terms Linux and GNU/Linux, I think there's a lot of emotion
and misunderstanding on this matter. Whatever the term we use, there will
always be someone unhappy.


 Florian


Cheers


 --
 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org**
 Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
 Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff


-- 
Paulo de Souza Lima
Técnico em Eletrônica e Administrador
http://www.pasl.net.br
http://almalivre.wordpress.com
Curitiba - PR
Linux User #432358
Ubuntu User #28729

Para que as pessoas conquistem a paz em suas relações, a paz espiritual e a
paz entre os povos, é preciso que antes se ganhe a batalha interna das
virtudes sobre os defeitos - Talal Husseini - Filósofo Acropolitano

For people to achieve peace in their relationships, spiritual peace and the
peace among people, it's necessary, earlier, to win the internal battle
between virtues and defects - Talal Husseini - Acropolitan Philosopher

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted