Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-29 Thread Gary MacLennan via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

No intention of trying to take anything apart, Ralph. Yours is a thoughtful
post, mercifully free from the CORRECT LINE. I think the referendum is
tactically correct,  even if poorly timed. Certainly it is no sham.

I am not sure why, but the clarity of the issues, compared with Syria or
the Ukraine is almost invigorating.  Capital has entered the field in a
very clear and easily discernible form. Lagarde and Schauble are plainly
what they are - nothing less than the enemies of humanity. They may well
 win and smash Greece into submission. They certainly seem stronger.  But
they will pay a price for their victory, and the coming struggle with
Podemos  will be masked by fewer illusions. Certainly it is plain  to see
that Capital has nothing to offer but blood sweat and tears. The European
project has been stripped of all the necessary  feel good cover and
idealism that marked its inception. The signs of decomposition everywhere
are ,  without wishing to be flippant, ddeeply threatening to the stus quo .

Whatever we think of Syriza, they did not fold as many on the Left believed
they would.  For that they deserve some credit. They have flushed out the
thugs. We must now hope they can prevail.

comradely

Gary
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-28 Thread Ralph Johansen via Marxism

  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Sure, but it'll take a day or three. I have to be in Grant's Pass 
tomorrow and then I go back there on the 1st. Sounds worthwhile, I'll 
read Lenin and Kevin.


On 6/28/2015 7:01 PM, Andrew Pollack wrote:
Ralph could you summarize your lengthy contribution above in 3 or 4 
bullet points (to give us incentive to read it after wading through 
Yves' offensive nonsense)?
Yves hasn't a clue about political dynamics. In contrast, Richard 
Seymour and Kevin Ovenden among others, who like us have no illusions in
Tsipras, are explaining how working class Greeks can use this 
referendum to advance the struggle, and how we can help them.


On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism 
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu mailto:marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote:



On 6/27/2015 12:39 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:


On 6/27/15 3:30 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham
Posted on June 27, 2015 by Yves Smith
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/06/tsipras-bailout-referendum-sham.html


Greek defiance of its creditors will make it more, not less
dependent on them in the next year.

So, it was more radical not to defy the creditors? Gosh, Naked
Capitalism is more dialectical than I could have imagined.



More like rock and hard place? The implication I get from that
statement is that Yves seems to agree with assessment that
referendum is too late in the day, a strategic error in the
context, quoting: 'As Costas Lapavitsas of Syriza’s central
committee pointed out in early March
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/03/lapavitsas-varoufakis-grexit-syriza/,
it was evident that the Troika and Eurogroup were not willing to
negotiate a new deal, in both senses of the word, with Greece.
Tsipras’ strategy had failed and it was time to change course',
because creditors could now [if not then] care less. And back then
Greece had more capital reserves with which to change course,
which are now largely gone. I have been following Yves Smith, and
from my reading he has been about as generally supportive of
Syriza as anyone (if sometimes critically so). But again, 'change
course' to Grexit? Well, yes, maybe, given the choices, but I'd
have to rely on those most affected to form an opinion.





---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-27 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*



On 6/27/15 3:30 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham
Posted on June 27, 2015 by Yves Smith
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/06/tsipras-bailout-referendum-sham.html



Greek defiance of its creditors will make it more, not less dependent 
on them in the next year.


So, it was more radical not to defy the creditors? Gosh, Naked 
Capitalism is more dialectical than I could have imagined.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-27 Thread Einde O'Callaghan via Marxism

  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 27.06.2015 21:39, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:


On 6/27/15 3:30 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham
Posted on June 27, 2015 by Yves Smith
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/06/tsipras-bailout-referendum-sham.html 





Greek defiance of its creditors will make it more, not less dependent 
on them in the next year.


That one sentence has made me decide that this article isn't worth 
reading. Obviously the election of Syriza and the struggles accompanying 
it were a complete waste of time and the best policy for the Greek 
working class would have been simply to accept any shit the Troika threw 
at them. Struggle is pointless - we might as well all give up - 
socialism is impossible.


Or have I somehow misinterpreted the ultimate conclusion of this type of 
argument?


So, it was more radical not to defy the creditors? Gosh, Naked 
Capitalism is more dialectical than I could have imagined.


Indeed!

Einde O'Callaghan
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-27 Thread Gary MacLennan via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Well Einde,

great minds think alike! I disliked t his article intensely.  Not to say
though, that I think Syriza has been a tad naive.  They should always have
borne in mind that  they were dealing with the enemy, even though they
could not say that publicly.

This was always a political crisis first and foremost and I wonder if
Tsirpas truly understood that (?).

Nonetheless, all criticism to one side, there can be doubt who the good
guys are here and that is the Greek people.  May they prevail.

comradely

Gary

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Einde O'Callaghan via Marxism 
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote:

   POSTING RULES  NOTES  
 #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
 #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
 #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
 *

 On 27.06.2015 21:39, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:


 On 6/27/15 3:30 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

 Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham
 Posted on June 27, 2015 by Yves Smith

 http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/06/tsipras-bailout-referendum-sham.html


 Greek defiance of its creditors will make it more, not less dependent on
 them in the next year.


 That one sentence has made me decide that this article isn't worth
 reading. Obviously the election of Syriza and the struggles accompanying it
 were a complete waste of time and the best policy for the Greek working
 class would have been simply to accept any shit the Troika threw at them.
 Struggle is pointless - we might as well all give up - socialism is
 impossible.

 Or have I somehow misinterpreted the ultimate conclusion of this type of
 argument?


 So, it was more radical not to defy the creditors? Gosh, Naked Capitalism
 is more dialectical than I could have imagined.


 Indeed!

 Einde O'Callaghan

 _
 Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
 Set your options at:
 http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/gary.maclennan1%40gmail.com

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-27 Thread Tristan Sloughter via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Ugh, and is the KKE calling for a boycott of the referendum?
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-27 Thread Tristan Sloughter via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Basing that on the translation of their statement:

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=autotl=enjs=yprev=_thl=enie=UTF-8u=http%3A%2F%2Fagkarra.com%2F%25CE%25BA%25CE%25BA%25CE%25B5-%25CE%25B4%25CE%25B7%25CE%25BC%25CE%25BF%25CF%2588%25CE%25AE%25CF%2586%25CE%25B9%25CF%2583%25CE%25BC%25CE%25B1%2Fedit-text=act=url
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham by Yves Smith

2015-06-27 Thread Dayne Goodwin via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Amen Gary,
and then Smith comes up with another great sentence to explain what's happening:
 So the only conceivable excuse for waiting this long is for Tsipras
to attempt to save himself.

but thanks to Ralph for sharing the article; it does bring together a
lot of information.
Dayne

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Gary MacLennan via Marxism
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote:
 Well Einde,
 great minds think alike! I disliked t his article intensely.  Not to say
 though, that I think Syriza has been a tad naive.  They should always have
 borne in mind that  they were dealing with the enemy, even though they
 could not say that publicly.

 This was always a political crisis first and foremost and I wonder if
 Tsirpas truly understood that (?).

 Nonetheless, all criticism to one side, there can be doubt who the good
 guys are here and that is the Greek people.  May they prevail.

 On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Einde O'Callaghan via Marxism 
 marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote:

 On 27.06.2015 21:39, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:

 On 6/27/15 3:30 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

 Tsipras’ Bailout Referendum Sham
 Posted on June 27, 2015 by Yves Smith

 http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/06/tsipras-bailout-referendum-sham.html


 Greek defiance of its creditors will make it more, not less dependent on
 them in the next year.


 That one sentence has made me decide that this article isn't worth
 reading. Obviously the election of Syriza and the struggles accompanying it
 were a complete waste of time and the best policy for the Greek working
 class would have been simply to accept any shit the Troika threw at them.
 Struggle is pointless - we might as well all give up - socialism is
 impossible.
 Or have I somehow misinterpreted the ultimate conclusion of this type of
 argument?

 So, it was more radical not to defy the creditors? Gosh, Naked Capitalism
 is more dialectical than I could have imagined.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com