Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-17 Thread nilesh patel
Sir,
At nose point in P-V curve using cpf, nbsp;Jacobian matrix becomes singular. 
i.e. determinant of Jacobian to be zero. I am getting very high negative value 
of determinant nbsp;of jacobian at nose point. My question is I doubt my 
jacobian is not correct. How to get correct jacobian at nose point. I have 
used following code:nbsp;
define_constants;nbsp;mpopt = 
mpoption('out.all',0,'verbose',2,'out.bus',1);nbsp;mpopt = 
mpoption(mpopt,'cpf.stop_at','nose','cpf.step',0.03);nbsp;mpopt = 
mpoption(mpopt,'cpf.plot.bus',7,'cpf.plot.level',2);nbsp;mpcb = 
loadcase('case39'); % load base casenbsp;mpct = mpcb; % set up target case 
withnbsp;mpct.gen(:,[PG QG]) = mpcb.gen(:,[PG QG])*1.35nbsp;mpct.bus(:,[PD 
QD]) = mpcb.bus(:,[PD QD])*1.35nbsp;results = runcpf(mpcb, mpct, 
mpopt);nbsp;J=makeJac(results)
%%% determinant of Jnbsp;det(J)
ans =
nbsp;-1.0471e+126
Thank you.

From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. lt;abhy...@anl.govgt;
Sent: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:28:21 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 


 

MATPOWER’s CPF, by default, uses a pseudo arclength parameterization that takes 
a step in the tangent space of the PV curve. As such, the ‘MW' increments 
depend on the steps taken along the tangent, and in turn on the slope of the 
curve. If you want a
 fixed ‘MW’ increase then you need to use natural parameterization instead. 
(mpoption(‘cpf.parameterization’,’NATURAL’). Natural parameterization directly 
uses the scaling parameter lambda and such has direct connection with MW 
increments. However, note that
 natural parameterization suffers from divergence near the fold point! I would 
not use natural parameterization unless there is a really strong need.



Note that the step size for CPF, for natural parameterization, is given in 
terms of increments of the scaling parameter lambda, where lambda = 0 
represents the base case and lambda = 1 is the target case. Going from 100 MW 
base case (lambda = 0) to 200
 MW target case (lambda = 1) in 10 continuation steps would need a stepsize of 
0.1. (mpoption(‘cpf.step’, 0.1).nbsp;



Shri





From: nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt;

Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Date: Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM

To: matpowe...@list.cornell.edu lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF









It mean my system base case_P is 100 MW and reaches to 200 MW at nose point in 
10 steps in cpf. so step size in this case is 10 MW. Is it correct?



Thanks.



From: Jose Luis Marin lt;mari...@gridquant.comgt;

Sent: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:05:07 

To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF





Lambda interpolates between the [P_base, Q_base]nbsp; andnbsp; [P_target, 
Q_target] vectors of your choice, so therefore the relationship between the 
lambda stepsize and the actual power increase on the buses depends on that.






-- 


Jose L. Marin


Gridquant España SL

Grupo AIA










On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, nilesh patel 
lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt; wrote:




Sir,
If i want to increase load in continuation power flow by step of 1 MW, What 
should be the step size of Lamda. My system base case load is 5000 MW. As CPF 
accuracy depends on step-size.



Thanks.






From: Jose Luis Marin lt;mari...@gridquant.comgt;

Sent: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:53:11 

To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF




Shruti is right, the value you obtain for lambda is valid for all the network, 
since voltage collapse is a global phenomenon (in other words, you';;ll see a 
nose point at the same value of lambda regardless of which bus you choose to 
plot).nbsp; Remember that lambda
 represents a fraction along the vector of injections linearly iterpolating 
[P_base, Q_base]nbsp; tonbsp; [P_target, Q_target].nbsp; The value of Lambda 
at the nose point is NOT the maximum loading point for that bus; rather, it is 
the maximum loading value along the path
 to the particular load/gen profile chosen as a target.



Of course, one may wonder about this other problem: for a given profile 
[P_base, Q_base], what is the target direction [P_target, Q_target] for which 
one would obtain the shortest value of critical lambda?nbsp; If this is what 
you';;re thinking about, then it is
 in general a hard problem.nbsp; I suggest these references by Ian Dobson, on 
the concept of shortest distance to voltage collapse:



http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.html#loading









-- 


Jose L. Marin


Gridquant España SL

Grupo AIA










On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, nilesh patel 
lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt; wrote:





Sir,
When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v curve for 
selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability Margin (in 
MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point lamda.
nbsp; nbsp

Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-13 Thread Jose Luis Marin
Lambda interpolates between the [P_base, Q_base]  and  [P_target, Q_target]
vectors of your choice, so therefore the relationship between the lambda
stepsize and the actual power increase on the buses depends on that.

-- 
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com
wrote:


 Sir,
 If i want to increase load in continuation power flow by step of 1 MW,
 What should be the step size of Lamda. My system base case load is 5000 MW.
 As CPF accuracy depends on step-size.

 Thanks.



 From: Jose Luis Marin mari...@gridquant.com
 Sent: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:53:11
 To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF

 Shruti is right, the value you obtain for lambda is valid for all the
 network, since voltage collapse is a global phenomenon (in other words,
 you';ll see a nose point at the same value of lambda regardless of which
 bus you choose to plot).  Remember that lambda represents a fraction along
 the vector of injections linearly iterpolating [P_base, Q_base]  to
 [P_target, Q_target].  The value of Lambda at the nose point is NOT the
 maximum loading point for that bus; rather, it is the maximum loading value
 along the path to the particular load/gen profile chosen as a target.

 Of course, one may wonder about this other problem: for a given profile
 [P_base, Q_base], what is the target direction [P_target, Q_target] for
 which one would obtain the shortest value of critical lambda?  If this is
 what you';re thinking about, then it is in general a hard problem.  I
 suggest these references by Ian Dobson, on the concept of shortest
 distance to voltage collapse:

- http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.html#loading
http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.htmlloading


 --
 Jose L. Marin
 Gridquant España SL
 Grupo AIA



 On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com
 wrote:


 Sir,
 When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v
 curve for selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability
 Margin (in MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point
 lamda.
   I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum loading value but
 that is for that bus only for which p-v curve is plotted.

 My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network
 using P-V curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using
  p-v curve?

 Thanks.

 From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. abhy...@anl.gov
 Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31
 To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.

 The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of
 how much power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So,
 lambda is also a measure of the nose point for the whole network.

 Shri

 From: nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com
 Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM
 To: matpower-l matpowe...@list.cornell.edu, MATPOWER-L 
 MATPOWER-L@cornell.edu
 Subject: PV curve using CPF

 Dear Sir,
 P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point
 (maximum loading point) for individual bus.

 My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses)
 using PV curve ?  I want to find network voltage stability margin rather
 than individual bus margin using CPF.

 Thanks.


 Nilesh Patel

 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 //www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?red=https%3A%2F%2Fsigads%2Erediff%2Ecom%2FRealMedia%2Fads%2Fclick%5Fnx%2Eads%2Fwww%2Erediffmail%2Ecom%2Fsignatureline%2Ehtm%40Middle%3FisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0rogue=86405da3ed8eb9005549e1536a8c08bb6cef0c3e
 *Know More *


 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 *Know More *
 http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___cmp=hostlnk=sign-1-10-13nsrv1=host
 https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?



 https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?
 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 *Know More *
 http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___cmp=hostlnk=sign-1-10-13nsrv1=host



Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-13 Thread nilesh patel

It mean my system base case_P is 100 MW and reaches to 200 MW at nose point in 
10 steps in cpf. so step size in this case is 10 MW. Is it correct?

Thanks.

From: Jose Luis Marin lt;mari...@gridquant.comgt;
Sent: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:05:07 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF

Lambda interpolates between the [P_base, Q_base]nbsp; andnbsp; [P_target, 
Q_target] vectors of your choice, so therefore the relationship between the 
lambda stepsize and the actual power increase on the buses depends on that.

-- 
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt; 
wrote:

Sir,If i want to increase load in continuation power flow by step of 1 MW, What 
should be the step size of Lamda. My system base case load is 5000 MW. As CPF 
accuracy depends on step-size.
Thanks.


From: Jose Luis Marin lt;mari...@gridquant.comgt;
Sent: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:53:11 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF

Shruti is right, the value you obtain for lambda is valid for all the network, 
since voltage collapse is a global phenomenon (in other words, you';;ll see a 
nose point at the same value of lambda regardless of which bus you choose to 
plot).nbsp; Remember that lambda represents a fraction along the vector of 
injections linearly iterpolating [P_base, Q_base]nbsp; tonbsp; [P_target, 
Q_target].nbsp; The value of Lambda at the nose point is NOT the maximum 
loading point for that bus; rather, it is the maximum loading value along the 
path to the particular load/gen profile chosen as a target.

Of course, one may wonder about this other problem: for a given profile 
[P_base, Q_base], what is the target direction [P_target, Q_target] for which 
one would obtain the shortest value of critical lambda?nbsp; If this is what 
you';;re thinking about, then it is in general a hard problem.nbsp; I suggest 
these references by Ian Dobson, on the concept of shortest distance to 
voltage collapse:
http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.html#loading

-- 
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt; 
wrote:

Sir,When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v curve 
for selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability Margin 
(in MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point lamda.nbsp; 
nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum 
loading value but that is for that bus only for which p-v curve is 
plotted.nbsp;
My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network using P-V 
curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using nbsp;p-v 
curve?
Thanks.
From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. lt;abhy...@anl.govgt;
Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 


 

I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.



The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of how much 
power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is also a 
measure of the nose point for the whole network.nbsp;



Shri





From: nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt;

Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM

To: matpower-l lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;, MATPOWER-L 
lt;MATPOWER-L@cornell.edugt;

Subject: PV curve using CPF







Dear Sir,
P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point (maximum 
loading point) for individual bus.



My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses) using PV 
curve ?nbsp; I want to find network voltage stability margin rather than 
individual bus margin using CPF.



Thanks.






Nilesh Patel


Get your own FREE website,  FREE domain amp; FREE mobile app with Company 
email. nbsp;Know More gt;




Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-13 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G.
MATPOWER’s CPF, by default, uses a pseudo arclength parameterization that takes 
a step in the tangent space of the PV curve. As such, the ‘MW' increments 
depend on the steps taken along the tangent, and in turn on the slope of the 
curve. If you want a fixed ‘MW’ increase then you need to use natural 
parameterization instead. (mpoption(‘cpf.parameterization’,’NATURAL’). Natural 
parameterization directly uses the scaling parameter lambda and such has direct 
connection with MW increments. However, note that natural parameterization 
suffers from divergence near the fold point! I would not use natural 
parameterization unless there is a really strong need.

Note that the step size for CPF, for natural parameterization, is given in 
terms of increments of the scaling parameter lambda, where lambda = 0 
represents the base case and lambda = 1 is the target case. Going from 100 MW 
base case (lambda = 0) to 200 MW target case (lambda = 1) in 10 continuation 
steps would need a stepsize of 0.1. (mpoption(‘cpf.step’, 0.1).

Shri

From: nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.commailto:nk2...@rediffmail.com
Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM
To: matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF


It mean my system base case_P is 100 MW and reaches to 200 MW at nose point in 
10 steps in cpf. so step size in this case is 10 MW. Is it correct?

Thanks.

From: Jose Luis Marin mari...@gridquant.commailto:mari...@gridquant.com
Sent: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:05:07
To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF

Lambda interpolates between the [P_base, Q_base]  and  [P_target, Q_target] 
vectors of your choice, so therefore the relationship between the lambda 
stepsize and the actual power increase on the buses depends on that.

--
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, nilesh patel 
nk2...@rediffmail.commailto:nk2...@rediffmail.com wrote:

Sir,
If i want to increase load in continuation power flow by step of 1 MW, What 
should be the step size of Lamda. My system base case load is 5000 MW. As CPF 
accuracy depends on step-size.

Thanks.



From: Jose Luis Marin mari...@gridquant.commailto:mari...@gridquant.com
Sent: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:53:11
To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF

Shruti is right, the value you obtain for lambda is valid for all the network, 
since voltage collapse is a global phenomenon (in other words, you';;ll see a 
nose point at the same value of lambda regardless of which bus you choose to 
plot).  Remember that lambda represents a fraction along the vector of 
injections linearly iterpolating [P_base, Q_base]  to  [P_target, Q_target].  
The value of Lambda at the nose point is NOT the maximum loading point for that 
bus; rather, it is the maximum loading value along the path to the particular 
load/gen profile chosen as a target.

Of course, one may wonder about this other problem: for a given profile 
[P_base, Q_base], what is the target direction [P_target, Q_target] for which 
one would obtain the shortest value of critical lambda?  If this is what 
you';;re thinking about, then it is in general a hard problem.  I suggest these 
references by Ian Dobson, on the concept of shortest distance to voltage 
collapse:

  *   
http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.html#loadinghttp://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.htmlloading

--
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, nilesh patel 
nk2...@rediffmail.commailto:nk2...@rediffmail.com wrote:

Sir,
When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v curve for 
selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability Margin (in 
MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point lamda.
  I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum loading value but that 
is for that bus only for which p-v curve is plotted.

My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network using P-V 
curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using  p-v curve?

Thanks.

From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. abhy...@anl.govmailto:abhy...@anl.gov
Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31
To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.

The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of how much 
power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is also a 
measure of the nose point for the whole network.

Shri

From: nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.commailto:nk2...@rediffmail.com

Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-12 Thread nilesh patel

Sir,If i want to increase load in continuation power flow by step of 1 MW, What 
should be the step size of Lamda. My system base case load is 5000 MW. As CPF 
accuracy depends on step-size.
Thanks.


From: Jose Luis Marin lt;mari...@gridquant.comgt;
Sent: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:53:11 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF

Shruti is right, the value you obtain for lambda is valid for all the network, 
since voltage collapse is a global phenomenon (in other words, you';ll see a 
nose point at the same value of lambda regardless of which bus you choose to 
plot).nbsp; Remember that lambda represents a fraction along the vector of 
injections linearly iterpolating [P_base, Q_base]nbsp; tonbsp; [P_target, 
Q_target].nbsp; The value of Lambda at the nose point is NOT the maximum 
loading point for that bus; rather, it is the maximum loading value along the 
path to the particular load/gen profile chosen as a target.

Of course, one may wonder about this other problem: for a given profile 
[P_base, Q_base], what is the target direction [P_target, Q_target] for which 
one would obtain the shortest value of critical lambda?nbsp; If this is what 
you';re thinking about, then it is in general a hard problem.nbsp; I suggest 
these references by Ian Dobson, on the concept of shortest distance to 
voltage collapse:
http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.html#loading

-- 
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt; 
wrote:

Sir,When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v curve 
for selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability Margin 
(in MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point lamda.nbsp; 
nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum 
loading value but that is for that bus only for which p-v curve is 
plotted.nbsp;
My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network using P-V 
curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using nbsp;p-v 
curve?
Thanks.
From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. lt;abhy...@anl.govgt;
Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 


 

I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.



The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of how much 
power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is also a 
measure of the nose point for the whole network.nbsp;



Shri





From: nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt;

Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM

To: matpower-l lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;, MATPOWER-L 
lt;MATPOWER-L@cornell.edugt;

Subject: PV curve using CPF







Dear Sir,
P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point (maximum 
loading point) for individual bus.



My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses) using PV 
curve ?nbsp; I want to find network voltage stability margin rather than 
individual bus margin using CPF.



Thanks.






Nilesh Patel


Get your own FREE website,  FREE domain amp; FREE mobile app with Company 
email. nbsp;Know More gt;



Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-10 Thread Jose Luis Marin
Shruti is right, the value you obtain for lambda is valid for all the
network, since voltage collapse is a global phenomenon (in other words,
you'll see a nose point at the same value of lambda regardless of which bus
you choose to plot).  Remember that lambda represents a fraction along the
vector of injections linearly iterpolating [P_base, Q_base]  to  [P_target,
Q_target].  The value of Lambda at the nose point is NOT the maximum
loading point for that bus; rather, it is the maximum loading value along
the path to the particular load/gen profile chosen as a target.

Of course, one may wonder about this other problem: for a given profile
[P_base, Q_base], what is the target direction [P_target, Q_target] for
which one would obtain the shortest value of critical lambda?  If this is
what you're thinking about, then it is in general a hard problem.  I
suggest these references by Ian Dobson, on the concept of shortest
distance to voltage collapse:

   - http://www.ece.wisc.edu/~dobson/PAPERS/publications.html#loading


-- 
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:23 AM, nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com wrote:


 Sir,
 When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v
 curve for selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability
 Margin (in MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point
 lamda.
   I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum loading value but
 that is for that bus only for which p-v curve is plotted.

 My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network
 using P-V curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using
  p-v curve?

 Thanks.

 From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. abhy...@anl.gov
 Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31
 To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.

 The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of how
 much power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is
 also a measure of the nose point for the whole network.

 Shri

 From: nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com
 Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM
 To: matpower-l matpowe...@list.cornell.edu, MATPOWER-L 
 MATPOWER-L@cornell.edu
 Subject: PV curve using CPF

 Dear Sir,
 P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point (maximum
 loading point) for individual bus.

 My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses) using
 PV curve ?  I want to find network voltage stability margin rather than
 individual bus margin using CPF.

 Thanks.


 Nilesh Patel

 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 *Know More *
 //www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?red=http%3A%2F%2Ftrack%2Erediff%2Ecom%2Fclick%3Furl%3D%5F%5F%5Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fbusinessemail%2Erediff%2Ecom%3Fsc%5Fcid%3Dsign%2D1%2D10%2D13%5F%5F%5F%26amp%3Bcmp%3Dhost%26amp%3Blnk%3Dsign%2D1%2D10%2D13%26amp%3Bnsrv1%3DhostisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0rogue=387537254f7eee557c3b17544bd037e8098bd82e
 https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?



 https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?
 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 *Know More *
 http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___cmp=hostlnk=sign-1-10-13nsrv1=host



Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-09 Thread nilesh patel

Sir,When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v curve 
for selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability Margin 
(in MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point lamda.nbsp; 
nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum 
loading value but that is for that bus only for which p-v curve is 
plotted.nbsp;
My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network using P-V 
curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using nbsp;p-v 
curve?
Thanks.
From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. lt;abhy...@anl.govgt;
Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31 
To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;
Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 


 

I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.



The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of how much 
power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is also a 
measure of the nose point for the whole network.nbsp;



Shri





From: nilesh patel lt;nk2...@rediffmail.comgt;

Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;

Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM

To: matpower-l lt;matpowe...@list.cornell.edugt;, MATPOWER-L 
lt;MATPOWER-L@cornell.edugt;

Subject: PV curve using CPF







Dear Sir,
P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point (maximum 
loading point) for individual bus.



My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses) using PV 
curve ? nbsp;I want to find network voltage stability margin rather than 
individual bus margin using CPF.



Thanks.






Nilesh Patel




Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-09 Thread Shruti Rao
Hi,

I think irrespective of for which bus the P-V curve is plotted, the maximum
lambda represents the voltage collapse point for the entire system.

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com wrote:


 Sir,
 When we run continuation power flow for particular system, we get p-v
 curve for selected bus. using this p-v curve, we can find Voltage stability
 Margin (in MW) on that bus by difference of operating point to nose point
 lamda.
   I agree lambda at nose point provides maximum loading value but
 that is for that bus only for which p-v curve is plotted.

 My question is How to find Voltage Stability Margin for whole Network
 using P-V curve ? I mean how to find maximum lamda for whole network using
  p-v curve?

 Thanks.

 From: Abhyankar, Shrirang G. abhy...@anl.gov
 Sent: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:31:31
 To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Subject: Re: PV curve using CPF
 I donⴠquite understand your question, can you please elaborate.

 The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ᬡmbda⠧ives a measure of how
 much power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is
 also a measure of the nose point for the whole network.

 Shri

 From: nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.com
 Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
 Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM
 To: matpower-l matpowe...@list.cornell.edu, MATPOWER-L 
 MATPOWER-L@cornell.edu
 Subject: PV curve using CPF

 Dear Sir,
 P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point (maximum
 loading point) for individual bus.

 My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses) using
 PV curve ?  I want to find network voltage stability margin rather than
 individual bus margin using CPF.

 Thanks.


 Nilesh Patel

 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 *Know More *
 //www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?red=http%3A%2F%2Ftrack%2Erediff%2Ecom%2Fclick%3Furl%3D%5F%5F%5Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fbusinessemail%2Erediff%2Ecom%3Fsc%5Fcid%3Dsign%2D1%2D10%2D13%5F%5F%5F%26amp%3Bcmp%3Dhost%26amp%3Blnk%3Dsign%2D1%2D10%2D13%26amp%3Bnsrv1%3DhostisImage=0BlockImage=0rediffng=0rogue=387537254f7eee557c3b17544bd037e8098bd82e
 https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?



 https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?
 Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain  *FREE* mobile app with
 Company email.
 *Know More *
 http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___cmp=hostlnk=sign-1-10-13nsrv1=host




-- 
Best Regards,
Shruti Dwarkanath Rao

Graduate Research Assistant
School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ, 85281
650 996 0116


Re: PV curve using CPF

2015-08-07 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G.
I don’t quite understand your question, can you please elaborate.

The maximum value of loading scaling parameter ‘lambda’ gives a measure of how 
much power can be transferred for a given transfer direction. So, lambda is 
also a measure of the nose point for the whole network.

Shri

From: nilesh patel nk2...@rediffmail.commailto:nk2...@rediffmail.com
Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Date: Friday, August 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM
To: matpower-l 
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu, MATPOWER-L 
MATPOWER-L@cornell.edumailto:MATPOWER-L@cornell.edu
Subject: PV curve using CPF

Dear Sir,
P-V curve solution using continuation power flow gives nose point (maximum 
loading point) for individual bus.

My question is - How to get nose point for whole network (all buses) using PV 
curve ?  I want to find network voltage stability margin rather than individual 
bus margin using CPF.

Thanks.


Nilesh Patel

[https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle]https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?
Get your own FREE website, FREE domain  FREE mobile app with Company email.
Know More 
http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___cmp=hostlnk=sign-1-10-13nsrv1=host