Thaddeus -
Why not go out and try to find some more pieces?
good hunting,
Ed
--- Mr EMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There isn't enough information to reach a
conclusion.
The original masses and how they were assembled
prior
to fragmentation are missing values and presently
beyond valid modeling.
However, interesting observation.
Eman
--- Thaddeus Besedin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polujamki and Markovka fell within kilometers of
each other and share all macroscopic petrographic
features except for two striking differences:
Polujamki, in photos I have found and in my
specimen, seems to have, almost without exception,
a
much higher frequency of 3mm pools of coalesced
Fe-Ni, as well as relatively more extensive shock
veining/brecciation. Is this simply an observation
made from a specific paired stone that became
available recently? Can the amount of elemental
metal dissemination in the original meteoroidal
body
have been bimodally segregated due to localized
shock, contributing to the differences in
trajectory
of individual fragments of the stone as a result
of
explosive aerial fragmentation?
___Total Iron
Content__
Polujamki: 25.69 %
http://www.crystalencounters.com.au/poluyamki.html
Markovka: 25.48%
http://www.minresco.com/meteor/meteor10.htm
-Thaddeus
__
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
