Re: I think we can just scrap CPAN Ratings altogether
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Adam Kennedy [2006-05-23 11:10:13] Data-Pageset (1.03) — 1 star: This is reciprocal karma for the author one-starring a competing module and advertising his own. Bad form. (not a commentary on how this works) This sort of thing is lunacy. What’s the point of MODULE REVIEWS if they’re going to be turned into crusade vehicles? Can't we just move the site to cpanrantings.org? That's the spelling I've always used :-) Sam.
Re: I think we can just scrap CPAN Ratings altogether
* Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-25 09:05]: Can't we just move the site to cpanrantings.org? That's the spelling I've always used :-) Works for me… Well, actually, I’d *like* to think it could be more useful than that… but I am wondering if there is any hope. :-/ Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
Re: I think we can just scrap CPAN Ratings altogether
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:25:46PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-25 09:05]: Can't we just move the site to cpanrantings.org? That's the spelling I've always used :-) Works for me??? Well, actually, I???d *like* to think it could be more useful than that??? but I am wondering if there is any hope. :-/ I already find CPAN ratings useful, and would find it even more useful if it was further integrated with search.cpan.org. For example, allowing to sort results by rating. I did this on Skatepark.org, and include the unrated items at the bottom. (Which encourages people to rate things they like!) Alternatively, it could be useful if cpanratings.perl.org allowed some way to browse modules by topic or keyword, with a sorting by rating. Mark
