Re: Module Name Proposal - Text::Report

2007-06-29 Thread Johan Vromans
D. Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I have created a module that will allow you to create neatly
 formatted, text based reports that contain any number of tables of
 various dimensions replete with configurable  optional titles, column
 headings, decorations, sorting, column alignment and more.

 Output can be a formatted report suitable for formal presentation
 and/or you can produce comma delimited data either by individual
 tables or the entire report.

Looks pretty much like Data::Report on steroids.

When I made Data::Report (and not Text::Report) I choose for that name
since it can (in theory) handle arbitrary data, not just text.

Would it be possible to merge these two? I that case I can hand you the
name Data::Report.

-- Johan


Re: Name for EscapeCage

2007-06-29 Thread Matthew J. Kosmoski

Mark P Sullivan wrote:

Well, I have both meanings of escape in mind (hence the pun too good
to pass up).  I like the compound name that reflects the two services the
module provides:
- preventing the dangerous string from escaping (getting out), and
- forcing the string to be escaped (transformed).


After seeing your lightning talk, I would also have to agree 
that the name is slightly misleading as-is.  Perhaps 
something along the lines of String::AutoEscape or 
String::Protect?


--
Matthew J. Kosmoski [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Name for EscapeCage

2007-06-29 Thread David Nicol

String::Sandbox  ??


Re: Name for EscapeCage

2007-06-29 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* David Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 18:20]:
 String::Sandbox  ??

That's pretty good.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/


Re: Name for EscapeCage

2007-06-29 Thread Bill Ward

On 6/29/07, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

* David Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 18:20]:
 String::Sandbox  ??

That's pretty good.


No a sandbox is where you have a practice area where changes made have
no lasting impact.  For example ebay and paypal have sandbox areas
where you can experiment with applications that use those services
without actually buying anything.  This is more of a quarantine.


Re: Name for EscapeCage

2007-06-29 Thread David Nicol

On 6/29/07, Bill Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


No a sandbox is where you have a practice area where changes made have
no lasting impact.  For example ebay and paypal have sandbox areas
where you can experiment with applications that use those services
without actually buying anything.  This is more of a quarantine.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_%28disambiguation%29
lists both a computer_security and software_development variant.


Re: Name for EscapeCage

2007-06-29 Thread Bill Ward

On 6/29/07, David Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 6/29/07, Bill Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No a sandbox is where you have a practice area where changes made have
 no lasting impact.  For example ebay and paypal have sandbox areas
 where you can experiment with applications that use those services
 without actually buying anything.  This is more of a quarantine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_%28disambiguation%29
lists both a computer_security and software_development variant.


Yes but both cases are a virtual container for code to run in, which
is not the same thing as we're talking about here.


Re: Module Name Proposal - Text::Report

2007-06-29 Thread D. Huggins

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 04:38:57 -0400, Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Looks pretty much like Data::Report on steroids.

 When I made Data::Report (and not Text::Report) I choose for that name
 since it can (in theory) handle arbitrary data, not just text.


I do like the idea of Data:: as opposed to Text:: It does seem to fit
better.

When I look specifically at, say Text::Format or Text::SimpleTemplate,
I see more text manipulation processes while I see Report.pm (yours 
mine) as more of a data transformation process.


 Would it be possible to merge these two? In that case I can hand you
 the name Data::Report.

I like the framework of your Data::Report. I have considered adding
capabilities for html  xml output. A base class/plugin model would
fit the bill for these additions. At this moment my vision of *how*
the two products would merge is vague. Suggestions (from anyone) would
be welcome.

The only hesitation that I would have regarding a merge would be the
development time. I know that it might seem a little silly, but I have
been diligently working on soliciting some new customers for contract
coding projects and would really like to add at least one CPAN credit
to my CV sooner rather than later and none of my other libraries are
quite ready for PAUSE yet.

Just thinking out loud...




Sincerely,
-David

  

David J. Huggins
Chief Design Engineer
Full-Duplex Communications Corporation
www.full-duplex.com
www.in-brandon.com