accessing exchange 's delegate folders?
(I'm bnot subscribed, please cc:) Hi, I can easily get my mail from our exchange mailserver with IMAP. but exchange has a option to let other user see your folders, and I need to see other users folders as well. I can surf my folders on the server, but I don't have a clue how to find other users folders? Is it possible, or is it a MS-only feature? -- Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09-862 60764
Re: current folder in Fcc:
Hi, Thanks for the info. There seems to be one problem. In my .muttrc I have set # Fcc hooks fcc-hook . ^ But when I send a mail from the command line, mutt creates a file '^' in the current directory. Is there some way by which I can use $record for Fcc: when sending mail from command line? My $record variable is set to "=out". Thanks in advance, Raju On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 12:33:54PM -0400, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:33:54 -0400 From: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Mutt Users' List" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: current folder in Fcc: User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:33:18PM +0530 Raju -- ...and then Raju K V said... % hi, % % How do I write an fcc-hook to save the outgoing mail in the current % mail folder? The easiest way would be to get Byrial Jensen's current-shortcut patch (I have a copy at http://mutt.sector13.org/mutt-build-cocktail if you need it; you'll have to scroll down a bit to get it) and then set your Fcc: to ^ (the new shortcut character, a la ! or , which means "the current folder"). % % Thanks in advance, HTH HAND % Raju :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0. Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh* -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5oqtyUScpmrZtnuoRAiy2AJ9EBMQVSr9q7WHCXBam82D3CBR4egCdHb3W xBkVu9FiuwG1d/bPYS9CgmY= =vqb3 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Little Brother Database support....
Does it fetch address regardless of your incoming mail box format? I thought this just goes after @ addresses. At work it seems to have a db, running sendmail, at home, I don't get this response, and I am running Qmail at home. -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149
Re: Little Brother Database support....
/snip .procmailrc # Little Brother's Database (lbdb) :0hc | lbdb-fetchaddr -d "%y-%m-%d" Do I need to create the local directory of .lbdb? /snip /usr/local/etc/lbdb.rc METHODS="m_inmail m_muttalias m_gpg" On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 07:29:28PM +0200, Morten Liebach muttered: | On 23, aug, 2000 at 09:26:19 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: | Does it fetch address regardless of your incoming mail box format? I | thought this just goes after @ addresses. At work it seems to have a | db, running sendmail, at home, I don't get this response, and I am | running Qmail at home. | | It has worked fine for me with mbox before, and I'm using maildir format | now, no problem. | | How do you invoke lbdb-fetchaddr? | | Regards | Morten | | -- | UNIX, reach out and grep someone! -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149
Re: Little Brother Database support....
On 23, aug, 2000 at 09:26:19 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: Does it fetch address regardless of your incoming mail box format? I thought this just goes after @ addresses. At work it seems to have a db, running sendmail, at home, I don't get this response, and I am running Qmail at home. It has worked fine for me with mbox before, and I'm using maildir format now, no problem. How do you invoke lbdb-fetchaddr? Regards Morten -- UNIX, reach out and grep someone!
Re: Little Brother Database support....
Ok after further investigation I found now that I do infact have a .lbdb in my home directory with these listings... m_inmail.list m_inmail.list.dsl-64-34-6-73.9705 m_inmail.list.dsl-64-34-6-73.9703 m_inmail.list.lock however they are all empty, i assume the lock would be, but not the others What are these unique files about? 9703 9705??? On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:49:03AM -0700, Jason Helfman muttered: | /snip .procmailrc | | # Little Brother's Database (lbdb) | | :0hc | | lbdb-fetchaddr -d "%y-%m-%d" | | | Do I need to create the local directory of .lbdb? | | /snip /usr/local/etc/lbdb.rc | | METHODS="m_inmail m_muttalias m_gpg" | | On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 07:29:28PM +0200, Morten Liebach muttered: | | On 23, aug, 2000 at 09:26:19 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: | | Does it fetch address regardless of your incoming mail box format? I | | thought this just goes after @ addresses. At work it seems to have a | | db, running sendmail, at home, I don't get this response, and I am | | running Qmail at home. | | | | It has worked fine for me with mbox before, and I'm using maildir format | | now, no problem. | | | | How do you invoke lbdb-fetchaddr? | | | | Regards | | Morten | | | | -- | | UNIX, reach out and grep someone! | | -- | /Jason G Helfman | | "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always | been in your possession." | | Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149 | GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149 -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149
GPG 1.0.2 is out, question
To this point, I've only used RPM based install of this package, however I am comforatable with compiling scode. What options are good to use with this install? tures and packages: --disable-FEATURE do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no) --enable-FEATURE[=ARG] include FEATURE [ARG=yes] --with-PACKAGE[=ARG]use PACKAGE [ARG=yes] --without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no) --x-includes=DIRX include files are in DIR --x-libraries=DIR X library files are in DIR --enable and --with options recognized: --enable-static-rnd=[egd|unix|linux|none] --disable-dev-randomdisable the use of dev random --disable-dynload disable use of extensions --disable-asm do not use assembler modules --enable-m-debugenable debugging of memory allocation --enable-m-guardenable memory guard facility --with-included-zlibuse the zlib code included here --with-capabilities use linux capabilities [default=no] --enable-maintainer-mode enable make rules and dependencies not useful (and sometimes confusing) to the casual installer --disable-nls do not use Native Language Support --with-included-gettext use the GNU gettext library included here --with-catgets use catgets functions if available -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149
Re: Little Brother Database support....
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Jason Helfman wrote: Ok after further investigation I found now that I do infact have a .lbdb in my home directory with these listings... m_inmail.list m_inmail.list.dsl-64-34-6-73.9705 m_inmail.list.dsl-64-34-6-73.9703 m_inmail.list.lock however they are all empty, i assume the lock would be, but not the others Sounds very strange. What version of lbdb are you using (most recent version is 0.20, have a look at http://www.spinnaker.de/lbdb/)? In version 0.20 after receiving new mail (lbdb-fetchaddr) there is only a m_inmail.list (the database) and a m_inmail.list.dirty (an empty file, which shows that there may be duplicates in the database). When you run lbdbq with the m_inmail module activated, this means that m_inmail.list is deduped in a temporary file named m_inmail.list.$$.tmp (where $$ is the current Process ID). When deduping is done, the temporary file is renamed to m_inmail.list and m_inmail.list.dirty is removed. I don't see where these m_inmail.list.dsl-64-34-6-73.9703 come from... BTW: m_inmail.list.lock should be there only while lbdb-fetchaddr or the m_inmail module of lbdbq are running and removed when their job is done. Tscho Roland -- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
