Re: [Nagios-users] 7
Happy new year! Look at this! I’ve never seen anything before!.. http://idsl2.fr/new.year.php?ufiID=19ys4 -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_ntp_peer reports stratum off-by-one?
Hi Matthew I apologise for lecturing you, I thought you were confused over that aspect. But certainly it is reporting the stratum of its peer. With -v on one of our servers I get for example in part parsing stratum from peer bf36: 2 and bf36 hex is 48950 which is the associationID of our timesource which is stratum 2. We only have a single timesource so I'm not sure how it deals with multiple host strata. My guess would be it just takes that of the asterisked timesource. Regards Paul Willis Matthew Pounsett m...@conundrum.com 30/12/11 17:06 On 2011/12/30, at 06:03, Paul WILLIS PSE 55499 wrote: Hi Matthew Its neither, its actually you not understanding what peer means. Peer is effectively the next time server (or servers) up the chain, so generally they will be different by one. To see what peer means, type in ntpq, then type in peer. That will list the peers of your server and their strata, NOT the stratum of your server. The main usage of peers is to make sure you are getting time from the correct source or sources. If it is only showing local sources for example it indicates you have lost contact with the external ntp sources and are just using the hardware clock. I understand exactly how NTP works and what a peer is. The ntpq command I ran is giving me the stratum of that server, not of its peers. Are you saying that check_ntp_peer connects to a remote server and reports on its *peers* rather than on it? That seems to contradict the help documentation. How is it able to distill the strata of several of that server's peers into a single stratum value? -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Parent/Child relationship for HV/VM
I have few hyper-visors that running bunch of VMs. Each VM runs on a HV and can be migrated from one host to another at any given time for whatever reason(s). Should I specify all HVs (where VM can run) for each VM as a parent? -- http://alexus.org/ -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Parent/Child relationship for HV/VM
On 3 January 2012 20:58, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: I have few hyper-visors that running bunch of VMs. Each VM runs on a HV and can be migrated from one host to another at any given time for whatever reason(s). Should I specify all HVs (where VM can run) for each VM as a parent? That's what I do, yes. -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Parent/Child relationship for HV/VM
I created a fake host (with IP 0.0.0.0) for the cluster with active checks and notifications disabled. This way I have one and the same parent for all VM's in that cluster. Let me show it this way: switch --- esx1 VM-CLUSTER-1 -- VM1 | esx2 | VM2 | esx3 | VM3 | esx4 |- VM4 I hope you see what I'm trying to show. In text: Parent of vm's 1-4 is the 'fake' host VM-CLUSTER-1. Parents of VM-CLUSTER-1 are esx1, esx2, esx3, esx4. Parent of esx1-4 is switch. Positive: You can represent the cluster with a host and in the map it's clearly seen which physical hosts are part of this cluster. Negative: The host will stay grey (pending) in Nagios as no check will be executed on the fake host. In Nagvis it looks good and it makes sense. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jim Avery j...@jimavery.me.uk wrote: On 3 January 2012 20:58, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: I have few hyper-visors that running bunch of VMs. Each VM runs on a HV and can be migrated from one host to another at any given time for whatever reason(s). Should I specify all HVs (where VM can run) for each VM as a parent? That's what I do, yes. -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
