[NTG-context] Rotating two lines in a table
There is a bug(?) with
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD[orientation=90]{first line\crlf second line}\eTD
\bTD{first line\crlf second line}\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
The second cell is partially written over the first cell.
How can I say: Don't do that :-) ?___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Rotating two lines in a table
Am 10.04.2014 um 12:10 schrieb jahei...@gmx.de:
There is a bug(?) with
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD[orientation=90]{first line\crlf second line}\eTD
\bTD{first line\crlf second line}\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
The second cell is partially written over the first cell.
How can I say: Don't do that :-)
?___
Unrelated to your problem but why do you add braces around the text in the
cells?
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Wrong pagenumber in index
Try 1:
\starttext
\section{Hello}\index{Hello}
\page
\index{world}world
\page
\completeindex
\stoptext
Result 1:
hello 2 - must be 1!
world 2
Try 2:
\starttext
\section{Hello}\index{Hello}
some text - putting some text here
\page
\index{world}world
\page
\completeindex
\stoptext
Result 2:
hello 1 - ok
world 2
It is ok but I didn't want to put text some text there.
Try 3:
Workaround: I put a tilde ~ instead of some text:
\starttext
\section{Hello}\index{Hello}
~ - putting the tilde here
\page
\index{world}world
\page
\completeindex
\stoptext
Result 3:
hello 1 - ok, with the tilde as a workaround
world 2
I don't like such tricks - is there a ConTeXt-way?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] another issue with PDF bookmarks
On 04/09/2014 09:33 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
One possibility is to add:
\appendtoks \let\footnote \gobbleoneargument \to \everysimplifycommands
to your style.
Perhaps this should be added to the definition of definenote.
Hmm... simplifycommands needs an overhaul:
From typo-del.mkiv:
\appendtoks
\def\quotation#1{#1}%
\def\quote#1{'#1'}%
\to \everysimplifycommands
and from buff-ver.mkiv:
\appendtoks
\def\type#1{\letterbackslash\checkedstrippedcsname#1}% or maybe
detokenize
\def\tex #1{\letterbackslash#1}%
\to \everysimplifycommands
The simplification of \type assumes that a user will always use
\type{\command} and gives the wrong result for \type{text} and fails for
\type{text\undefined}.
The simplification of \quote and \quotation should not be hardcoded, but
rather be a part of \definedelimitedtext.
Apart from notes and delimited text, are there other commands that need to
be simplified for bookmarks, etc?
Many thanks for your reply, Aditya.
If I don’t get it wrong, I guess all language and style commands should
be ignored. And all braces, when not explicitly invoked (such as in \{).
But this only would affect to PDF bookmarks.
Many thanks again,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
I just noticed that the gradient operator (\triangledown) ends up too low when using Palatino: \setupbodyfont[palatino] \starttext $\triangledown T$ \stoptext It seems about 3pt too low. Without the \setupbodyfont[palatino], the placement is fine. (tested with 2013.05.28 and 2014.03.27 betas) -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
I think you are using the wrong symbol. Or at least I would prefer \nabla as gradient operator. Jannik Am 10.04.2014 um 23:49 schrieb Sanjoy Mahajan san...@mit.edu: I just noticed that the gradient operator (\triangledown) ends up too low when using Palatino: \setupbodyfont[palatino] \starttext $\triangledown T$ \stoptext It seems about 3pt too low. Without the \setupbodyfont[palatino], the placement is fine. (tested with 2013.05.28 and 2014.03.27 betas) -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
Jannik,
You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I
still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.)
My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I
never tried the true \nabla until your suggestion.
Thank you.
-Sanjoy
Jannik Voges researchj...@icloud.com writes:
I think you are using the wrong symbol. Or at least I would prefer
\nabla as gradient operator.
Jannik
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Jannik,
You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I
still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.)
My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I
never tried the true \nabla until your suggestion.
In MkIV: \triangledown is mapped to 0x25BD while nabla is mapped to
0x2207. These are different glyphs.
IIUC, the difference in placement is because \triangledown is defined as a
mathop (and hence centered on the math-axis) while \nabla is defined as a
mathord. Compare:
\startformula
\nabla T
\quad
\triangledown T
\quad
\mathop{\nabla} T
\stopformula
From what I remember, I was the one who added the mappings for
triangledown as a mathop based on, I believe, unicode-math package in
LaTeX. I don't understand what all the triangle operators are supposed
to do. As such, I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the
wrong font metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the wrong font
metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt.
I tried '\triangle T' (often used as the Laplacian operator, instead of
writing it out as \nabla^2). That one comes out fine, even though
\triangledown does not. But they seem to have similar kinds of
defintions/mappings:
From luatex-math.tex :
\def\triangle {\Umathchar 25B3 }
\def\triangledown {\Umathchar 200025BD }
So it must be a wrong font metric?
-Sanjoy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the wrong font
metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt.
I tried '\triangle T' (often used as the Laplacian operator, instead of
writing it out as \nabla^2). That one comes out fine, even though
\triangledown does not. But they seem to have similar kinds of
defintions/mappings:
From luatex-math.tex :
\def\triangle {\Umathchar 25B3 }
\def\triangledown {\Umathchar 200025BD }
So it must be a wrong font metric?
AFAIU, ConTeXt does not use luatex-math.tex. The mappings are defined in
char-def.lua.
triangle is defined as a mathord (like nabla) while bigtriangleup is a
mathop (like triangledown).
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the wrong font
metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt.
I tried '\triangle T' (often used as the Laplacian operator, instead of
writing it out as \nabla^2). That one comes out fine, even though
\triangledown does not. But they seem to have similar kinds of
defintions/mappings:
From luatex-math.tex :
\def\triangle {\Umathchar 25B3 }
\def\triangledown {\Umathchar 200025BD }
So it must be a wrong font metric?
AFAIU, ConTeXt does not use luatex-math.tex. The mappings are defined in
char-def.lua.
triangle is defined as a mathord (like nabla) while bigtriangleup is a mathop
(like triangledown).
Sorry, bigtriangleup is a mathbin. (As I said, I don't understand how the
mathclass of different triangle operators is determined).
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
Instead of \triangle you should use \Delta for the laplacian (as you
should use \nabla for the gradient).
Mikael
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan san...@mit.edu wrote:
I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the wrong font
metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt.
I tried '\triangle T' (often used as the Laplacian operator, instead of
writing it out as \nabla^2). That one comes out fine, even though
\triangledown does not. But they seem to have similar kinds of
defintions/mappings:
From luatex-math.tex :
\def\triangle {\Umathchar 25B3 }
\def\triangledown {\Umathchar 200025BD }
So it must be a wrong font metric?
-Sanjoy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
