Re: [NTG-context] list not following "focus=standard"?

2023-01-31 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 1/30/23 12:18, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote:
> […]
> I‘m afraid this might be a regression from a recently fixed issue.

Hans,

I see there is a new strc-lst.lmt. So comparing it with strc-lst.lmt, I
saw what is missing:

-if cheat and references then
+local v  = usedviews[i]
+if cheat and cheats[v] and references then
 -- this permits runs=2 with interactivity
 local internal = references.internal
 usedinternals[internal] = true

Proper diff attached.

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo--- strc-lst.lmt	2023-01-31 12:23:12.240689092 +0100
+++ mkxl/strc-lst.lmt	2023-01-31 12:23:32.170871203 +0100
@@ -962,7 +962,8 @@
 local numberdata = listentry.numberdata
 local references = listentry.references
 local special= specials and numberdata and specials[zerostrippedconcat(numberdata.numbers,".")] or ""
-if cheat and references then
+local v  = usedviews[i]
+if cheat and cheats[v] and references then
 -- this permits runs=2 with interactivity
 local internal = references.internal
 usedinternals[internal] = true
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Wrong prefix in cross references to formulas in external document

2023-01-31 Thread Yaroslav Beltukov via ntg-context
Dear Hans,

Thank you for the nice and straightforward solution. I have tested it
locally and it works. I hope it will be in the next release (should I do
anything?).

By the way, I have a couple of other small issues. I will describe them in
detail in other threads of this mailing list if it is the right place to do
so.

Best regards,
Yaroslav


пн, 30 янв. 2023 г. в 12:52, Hans Hagen via ntg-context :

> On 1/29/2023 5:03 PM, Yaroslav Beltukov via ntg-context wrote:
> > Dear Hans and all contributors,
> >
> > I really appreciate ConTeXt for the right way to obtain high quality
> > documents. I'm a theoretical physicist and I'm going to write a book. I
> > think ConTeXt is the right choice to work with a number of formulas,
> > figures and cross-references. The visual quality of formulas is better
> > than in regular LaTeX. The new feature with formula autosplitting looks
> > also very promising. For me it is important to obtain the high quality
> > without a lot of manual tweaks of each formula for each given document
> > format and figure placement.
> >
> > However, I have found a problem with references if I compile one
> > component only. The references to formulas in other components have
> > wrong prefixes, e.g. (2.1) instead of (3.1). Needless to say, the right
> > formula references are very important.
> >
> > I started looking into this issue. The references to other components
> > are taken from the whole product as from an external document. It turned
> > out that this is a general problem with references with prefixes to
> > external documents. The prefix is stored in a tuc file as a reference to
> > a section as a sequential number of the header in the document. As a
> > result, the prefix from the external document is calculated using the
> > structure of the current document.
> >
> > Here is the MWE, which consists of two files:
> > foo.tex:
> >
> > \defineenumeration[remark][prefix=yes, prefixsegments=chapter:section]
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > Equations: \in[eq1], \in[eq2], \in[eq3], \in[eq4]
> >
> > Sections: \in[sec1], \in[sec2], \in[sec3], \in[sec4]
> >
> > Chapters: \in[chap1], \in[chap2], \in[chap3], \in[chap4]
> >
> > Remarks: \in[remark1], \in[remark2]
> >
> > \startbodymatter
> >
> > \chapter[chap1]{Chapter}
> > \placeformula[eq1]\startformula x = y\stopformula
> > \chapter[chap2]{Chapter}
> > \section[sec1]{Section}
> > \section[sec2]{Section}
> > \placeformula[eq1]\startformula x = y\stopformula
> > \placeformula[eq2]\startformula x = y\stopformula
> >
> > \stopbodymatter
> >
> > \startappendices
> >
> > \chapter[chap3]{Chapter}
> > \section[sec3]{Section}
> > \placeformula[eq3]\startformula x = y\stopformula
> > \section[sec4]{Section}
> > \startremark[remark1]\stopremark
> > \placeformula[eq4]\startformula x = y\stopformula
> > \startremark[remark2]\stopremark
> > \chapter[chap4]{Chapter}
> >
> > \stopappendices
> >
> > \stoptext
> >
> >
> > bar.tex:
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > Equations: \in[foo::eq1], \in[foo::eq2], \in[foo::eq3], \in[foo::eq4]
> >
> > Sections: \in[foo::sec1], \in[foo::sec2], \in[foo::sec3], \in[foo::sec4]
> >
> > Chapters: \in[foo::chap1], \in[foo::chap2], \in[foo::chap3],
> \in[foo::chap4]
> >
> > Remarks: \in[foo::remark1], \in[foo::remark2]
> >
> > % any chapters and sections here
> >
> > \stoptext
> >
> > It is expected to have the same first page on these documents:
> >
> > Equations: 1.1, 2.2, A.1, A.2
> > Sections: 2.1, 2.2, A.1, A.2
> > Chapters: 1, 2, A, B
> > Remarks: A.2.1, A.2.2
> >
> > However, the bar.tex produces wrong prefixes to formulas and remarks.
> > The output depends on the document structure of bar.tex, not foo.tex.
> >
> > I started looking into the source code. Thanks to lua, it is not a big
> > deal to track the problem. The prefixdata is complemented by the
> > sectiondata after the loading the tuc file. So, the question is: is it
> > possible to store the full prefixdata with all necessary prefix numbers
> > in the tuc file? Here is my proposal to change the source code:
> >
> > --- strc-lst-old.lmt2023-01-29 11:30:15.610309948 +0300
> > +++ strc-lst.lmt2023-01-29 12:10:08.864228923 +0300
> > @@ -266,6 +266,16 @@
> >   if r and not r.section then
> >   r.section = structures.sections.currentid()
> >   end
> > +-- store sectiondata in prefixdata (necessary for external files)
> > +if t.prefixdata and r.section then
> > +local sectiondata = structures.sections.collected[r.section]
> > +if sectiondata then
> > +for k, v in next, sectiondata do
> > +t.prefixdata[k] = v
> > +end
> > +end
> > +end
> > +--
> >   local b = r and t.block
> >   if r and not b then
> >   local s = r.section
> >
> > --- strc-ref-old.lmt2023-01-29 11:30:15.823643904 +0300
> > +++ strc-ref.lmt2023-01-29 12:07:45.697109862 +0300
> > @@ -2318,7 +2318,17 @@
> >   if data then
> >   numberdata = lists.reordered(data)