Re: [INTRO01] - I01 - Simple Java Class - Need the quickstart application !
Ilias Lazaridis wrote: Jakob Braeuchi wrote: Ilias Lazaridis schrieb: Ilias Lazaridis wrote: The series of simplified OJB Introduction applications that I like to contribute to the project, rely initially on the ojb-blank. but: ojb-blank does not provide the basic functionality needed: - ant-target run - ant-target deploy [or similar], resulting in an ready to start jar within an directory. Can I expect such an ojb-blank project from the team/community? [...] let's wait for the solution tom is working on. ok. I got the solution (an enhance obj-blank) via email: http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg12135.html But: I've problems with my time-budget. I currently need nothing more than an ant-target run (or the correction of the community-member provided ant-target run). May I ask on the ant mailing-list for help? [...] No need, the provided solution is very nice. I'll come back to this thread in a few days, hopefully wiht the first results. Once more, thank you for the support. . -- http://lazaridis.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [INTRO01] - I01 - Simple Java Class - Need the quickstart application !
Jakob Braeuchi wrote: Ilias Lazaridis schrieb: Ilias Lazaridis wrote: The series of simplified OJB Introduction applications that I like to contribute to the project, rely initially on the ojb-blank. but: ojb-blank does not provide the basic functionality needed: - ant-target run - ant-target deploy [or similar], resulting in an ready to start jar within an directory. Can I expect such an ojb-blank project from the team/community? I am wondering about one thing: I get no answers about my ant / ojb-blank related questions, which I would need to correct the ojb-blank myself. Why does the community answer to an quick-start incident immediately: http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg12053.html but does not provide me with the relevant answers / support to provide an professional grade solution which avoids exactly those incidents? Please provide me with the targets run and deploy [or similar] (which would be basicly the ojb-quickstart target, moved to the ojb-blank build.xml), thus I can help the current newcomer (and the future ones) in a professional manner. It's for the benefit of all. I depend on you. let's wait for the solution tom is working on. ok. - But: I've problems with my time-budget. I currently need nothing more than an ant-target run (or the correction of the community-member provided ant-target run). May I ask on the ant mailing-list for help? Please review the thread: [QUICKSTART] - A OJB quickstart similar to hibernate http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg11900.html . -- http://lazaridis.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [INTRO01] - I01 - Simple Java Class - Need the quickstart application !
Ilias Lazaridis wrote: The series of simplified OJB Introduction applications that I like to contribute to the project, rely initially on the ojb-blank. but: ojb-blank does not provide the basic functionality needed: - ant-target run - ant-target deploy [or similar], resulting in an ready to start jar within an directory. Can I expect such an ojb-blank project from the team/community? I am wondering about one thing: I get no answers about my ant / ojb-blank related questions, which I would need to correct the ojb-blank myself. Why does the community answer to an quick-start incident immediately: http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg12053.html but does not provide me with the relevant answers / support to provide an professional grade solution which avoids exactly those incidents? Please provide me with the targets run and deploy [or similar] (which would be basicly the ojb-quickstart target, moved to the ojb-blank build.xml), thus I can help the current newcomer (and the future ones) in a professional manner. It's for the benefit of all. I depend on you. Please review the thread: [QUICKSTART] - A OJB quickstart similar to hibernate http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg11900.html . -- http://lazaridis.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [INTRO01] - I01 - Simple Java Class - Need the quickstart application !
hi ilias, let's wait for the solution tom is working on. jakob Ilias Lazaridis schrieb: Ilias Lazaridis wrote: The series of simplified OJB Introduction applications that I like to contribute to the project, rely initially on the ojb-blank. but: ojb-blank does not provide the basic functionality needed: - ant-target run - ant-target deploy [or similar], resulting in an ready to start jar within an directory. Can I expect such an ojb-blank project from the team/community? I am wondering about one thing: I get no answers about my ant / ojb-blank related questions, which I would need to correct the ojb-blank myself. Why does the community answer to an quick-start incident immediately: http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg12053.html but does not provide me with the relevant answers / support to provide an professional grade solution which avoids exactly those incidents? Please provide me with the targets run and deploy [or similar] (which would be basicly the ojb-quickstart target, moved to the ojb-blank build.xml), thus I can help the current newcomer (and the future ones) in a professional manner. It's for the benefit of all. I depend on you. Please review the thread: [QUICKSTART] - A OJB quickstart similar to hibernate http://www.mail-archive.com/ojb-user%40db.apache.org/msg11900.html . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
