RE: Dynamics AX and SharePoint 2010
Please ignore this dumb question – late Friday not thinking From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Steve Taplin Sent: Friday, 20 January 2012 3:16 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Dynamics AX and SharePoint 2010 Thanks for the reply Paul. What if: 1.SP and Dynamics AX are on separate servers with a single server for SSRS? OR 2. Two SSRS servers with one reporting services instance on each for SP and Dynamics AX. Both Dynamics AX and SP on the same server. I guess I’m exploring the possibilities of separating the installations. Steve From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Friday, 20 January 2012 3:08 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Dynamics AX and SharePoint 2010 That is correct. It has to be Native Mode, same issue with CRM. Regards Paul Turner Practice Lead - SharePoint SMS Management Technology M 0412 748 168 paul.tur...@smsmt.commailto:paul.tur...@smsmt.com www.smsmt.comhttp://www.smsmt.com/ About SMS: Level 29, Westpac House, 91 King William Street, Adelaide SA 5095 SMS Management Technology (SMS) [ASX:SMX] is Australia's largest publicly listed Management Services company. We solve complex problems and transform business through Consulting, Technology and Systems Integration P please consider the environment before printing this email From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Steve Taplin Sent: Friday, 20 January 2012 12:53 PM To: 'ozmoss@ozmoss.com' Subject: Dynamics AX and SharePoint 2010 Good afternoon all There is apparently an issue in getting SQL Server reporting services Integrated Mode to coexist with Dynamics AX. Apparently the installation must be confined to Native mode. 1.Has anyone had experience with this issue? 2. If SharePoint and Dynamics AX are installed on separate servers, does this issue continue? Any suggestions or comments will be much appreciated. Steve Taplin Please consider the environment before printing this email. The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail, or telephone and delete all copies. ACH Group does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure; therefore ACH Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files. NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone SMS Management Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management Technology. Except as required by law, SMS Management Technology does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free from errors, virus, interception or interference. Please consider the environment before printing this email. The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail, or telephone and delete all copies. ACH Group does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure; therefore ACH Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files. Please consider the environment before printing this email. The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
RE: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations
Hi Nigel, Are you saying the RegistrationID is case-sensitive, or that it simply doesn't work when lower case letters are present? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Witherdin Sent: Friday, 20 January 2012 3:13 PM To: OzMoss Subject: RE: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations Sometimes working with SharePoint really makes you want to smash your face repeatedly against a wall! I finally figured out why my CustomAction was not binding to the content type being distributed from the hub. The resolution was to make sure that the RegistrationId proprty in the CustomAction element contained only upper case letters (not some lower ones, like the CreateGuid util produces). After I changed them to all upper, activating the feature on the subscribing site collection made the ribbon change for any library that used the content type. Roll on 5pm, Im ready for a bottle (or three) of red wine. From: nigel_wither...@hotmail.com To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:13:02 + Hi All, We have a number of content types which we are disseminating via the CT Hub component of SP 2010. Modifications bound to the content types stored in the SPContentType object get pushed out to subscribing site collections correctly (eg. event receivers, workflows etc.), however declarative modifications that are associated to the content type (eg. Ribbon mod, custom actions etc.) arent stored with the object and as such dont get pushed to the subscribers. As the ID of the content types is the same in the subscribing site colls, I assumed seperating these customizations into their own feature, and activating them on the subscribing site collections would resolve this, but I am not seeing my ribbon modifications appear in the subscribing site collections for the targeted content types. This may be because the CT is read-only, or because of some bug in the code etc. - going to look into it today. Anyway, wondered if anyone an opinion on the best way to implement and manage these sorts of CT modifications when using the hub. Many thanks Nigel ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
SharePoint online / Office 365 - Archiving Solutions
Hi All, Just wondering if any of you have come across any automated backup/archiving solution to local computer (on-premise) for SharePoint Online and Exchange (apart from going for Exchange Hybrid)? Regards, Shahram.___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: SharePoint online / Office 365 - Archiving Solutions
Shahram, I can help with SharePoint online - not exchange [Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.aumailto:is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.comhttp://www.sharepoint-tips.com/ | @ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Shahram Banihashem Sent: Monday, 23 January 2012 9:45 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: SharePoint online / Office 365 - Archiving Solutions Hi All, Just wondering if any of you have come across any automated backup/archiving solution to local computer (on-premise) for SharePoint Online and Exchange (apart from going for Exchange Hybrid)? Regards, Shahram. inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpg___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations
It doesnt work when there a lower-case letters present (at least for me). All of my GUIDs are mixed case (as CreateGuid or vis studio 2010 generates them), and I found after changeing it to all upper case in the RegistrationId attribute of the CustomAction element made it suddenly start working on the published content type. From: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:12:06 +1100 Subject: RE: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations Hi Nigel, Are you saying the RegistrationID is case-sensitive, or that it simply doesn’t work when lower case letters are present? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Witherdin Sent: Friday, 20 January 2012 3:13 PM To: OzMoss Subject: RE: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations Sometimes working with SharePoint really makes you want to smash your face repeatedly against a wall! I finally figured out why my CustomAction was not binding to the content type being distributed from the hub. The resolution was to make sure that the RegistrationId proprty in the CustomAction element contained only upper case letters (not some lower ones, like the CreateGuid util produces). After I changed them to all upper, activating the feature on the subscribing site collection made the ribbon change for any library that used the content type. Roll on 5pm, Im ready for a bottle (or three) of red wine. From: nigel_wither...@hotmail.com To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Content Type Hub - Ct Declarative Customizations Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:13:02 + Hi All, We have a number of content types which we are disseminating via the CT Hub component of SP 2010. Modifications bound to the content types stored in the SPContentType object get pushed out to subscribing site collections correctly (eg. event receivers, workflows etc.), however declarative modifications that are associated to the content type (eg. Ribbon mod, custom actions etc.) arent stored with the object and as such dont get pushed to the subscribers. As the ID of the content types is the same in the subscribing site colls, I assumed seperating these customizations into their own feature, and activating them on the subscribing site collections would resolve this, but I am not seeing my ribbon modifications appear in the subscribing site collections for the targeted content types. This may be because the CT is read-only, or because of some bug in the code etc. - going to look into it today. Anyway, wondered if anyone an opinion on the best way to implement and manage these sorts of CT modifications when using the hub. Many thanks Nigel ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Intranet taxonomy for document management
Guys, Got a little hot under my collar when a person who does Word Development for law firms said to me how would you know anything about Document Management Meta Tags in regards to setting up a SharePoint Intranet! Being a Database developer and having more of a data focus, I was floored by the ignorance, as I am always crunching and see the way things are classified, and how useless most of the methodologies are in appropriately tagging most data (and documents). e.g. Database guys know more about classification than any document management person would. But realistically, setting up a standard for document libraries in SharePoint should be simple and task based as far as I am aware. What I am after here is some stories and/or books / articles etc around planning for SharePoint Intranets in terms of site and document management structure and meta tags. The most useful comment I heard years ago at a SharePoint User Group, was to keep document library tags down to one or two categories that were general across the company, and setup the sits in a fairly flat but logical structure. p.s. Working on doing the SharePoint Administration Exam within the next month (although I would think most of you guys are also been there or doing it now)...so how hard is it for an experienced SharePoint 2010 guy? Regards, Tom Bizannes Microsoft SharePoint and Office Developer Specializing in turning Coffee into Code ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Intranet taxonomy for document management
For site planning you will have to create Info Architecture, we are currently using card sorting for the same http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide For taxonomy look at the below link http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ecm/archive/2011/03/06/taxonomy-the-challenge-of-starting-from-scratch.aspx On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Tom Bizannes tom.bizan...@macroview.com.au wrote: Guys, ** ** Got a little hot under my collar when a person who does Word Development for law firms said to me “how would you know anything about Document Management Meta Tags in regards to setting up a SharePoint Intranet!” ** ** Being a Database developer and having more of a data focus, I was floored by the ignorance, as I am always crunching and see the way things are classified, and how useless most of the methodologies are in appropriately tagging most data (and documents). e.g. Database guys know more about classification than any document management person would….. ** ** But realistically, setting up a standard for document libraries in SharePoint should be simple and task based as far as I am aware. ** ** What I am after here is some stories and/or books / articles etc around planning for SharePoint Intranets in terms of site and document management structure and meta tags. The most useful comment I heard years ago at a SharePoint User Group, was to keep document library tags down to one or two categories that were general across the company, and setup the sits in a fairly flat but logical structure. ** ** p.s. Working on doing the SharePoint Administration Exam within the next month (although I would think most of you guys are also been there or doing it now)…so how hard is it for an experienced SharePoint 2010 guy? ** ** Regards, Tom Bizannes Microsoft SharePoint and Office Developer Specializing in turning Coffee into Code ** ** ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
