RE: April PUG is up

2020-04-04 Thread jcoyle
Great gallery again, no particular favourites (apart from my own, of
course!).

The standard in this group is just so high.


John in Brisbane



-Original Message-
From: PDML  On Behalf Of Brian W
Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2020 2:37 PM
To: PDML 
Subject: April PUG is up

G'day all

Hope everyone is well and maintaining social distancing. Fortunately, due to
a bad case of procrastination over recent months, I'm having no problems in
filling up my time at home :-)

View the April gallery here:

http://pug.komkon.org/

(you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery
there).

Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not
infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the
gallery, let me know.

+

Next up: 'Alleyways'.

Full Submissions Guidelines here:

http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html

You can submit here:

http://pug.komkon.org/submit/

Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
https://500px.com/supera1000

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


April PUG is up

2020-04-04 Thread Brian W
G'day all

Hope everyone is well and maintaining social distancing. Fortunately, due to a
bad case of procrastination over recent months, I'm having no problems in
filling up my time at home :-)

View the April gallery here:

http://pug.komkon.org/

(you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery there).

Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not
infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the gallery,
let me know.

+

Next up: 'Alleyways'.

Full Submissions Guidelines here:

http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html

You can submit here:

http://pug.komkon.org/submit/

Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
https://500px.com/supera1000

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso within a Seso - today's work

2020-04-04 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Great looking mask.  Where did you find the cute model?

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 8:31 PM ann sanfedele  wrote:

>
> https://annsan.smugmug.com/Misceandvids/Misc-annsan-scans/i-pqztCzm/A
>
> ann
>
> --
> ann sanfedele photography
> https://annsan.smugmug.com
> https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
> https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
> https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Peso within a Seso - today's work

2020-04-04 Thread ann sanfedele



https://annsan.smugmug.com/Misceandvids/Misc-annsan-scans/i-pqztCzm/A

ann

--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: More water.

2020-04-04 Thread ann sanfedele
But they are still older than the hills... if i were not so lazy I'd 
trace them back to the headwaters of that creek of yours


(I wasn't sure of the scale.)

ann

On 4/4/2020 8:12 PM, William R wrote:

On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, 4:46 pm ann sanfedele,  wrote:


The boulders in the center would make this  good for the April pug theme
:-)


Har!!!
Those ''boulders'' were about as big as my fist.

bill


ann

On 4/3/2020 1:26 AM, Bill wrote:

I shot this in Sept 2018 at my annual shoot Wilson Creek vacation.
This is with the A* 85/1.4 set to f/5.6 on the K1.
It's a 17 layer stack of 8 second pixel shifted images.
It's 10 minutes of my life that I will never get back.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson193.html

enjoy

bill


--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: More water.

2020-04-04 Thread William R
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, 4:46 pm ann sanfedele,  wrote:

>
> The boulders in the center would make this  good for the April pug theme
> :-)
>

Har!!!
Those ''boulders'' were about as big as my fist.

bill

>
> ann
>
> On 4/3/2020 1:26 AM, Bill wrote:
> > I shot this in Sept 2018 at my annual shoot Wilson Creek vacation.
> > This is with the A* 85/1.4 set to f/5.6 on the K1.
> > It's a 17 layer stack of 8 second pixel shifted images.
> > It's 10 minutes of my life that I will never get back.
> >
> > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson193.html
> >
> > enjoy
> >
> > bill
> >
>
> --
> ann sanfedele photography
> https://annsan.smugmug.com
> https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
> https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
> https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: More water.

2020-04-04 Thread ann sanfedele



The boulders in the center would make this  good for the April pug theme :-)

ann

On 4/3/2020 1:26 AM, Bill wrote:

I shot this in Sept 2018 at my annual shoot Wilson Creek vacation.
This is with the A* 85/1.4 set to f/5.6 on the K1.
It's a 17 layer stack of 8 second pixel shifted images.
It's 10 minutes of my life that I will never get back.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson193.html

enjoy

bill



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Stupid Adobe Question

2020-04-04 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I don't use LR on the iPad, but I do use various other tools there. The iPad 
Pro 11" (2018-2019 edition) I have is outfitted with 1T data storage and 6G RAM 
… It works well with the 50Mpixel raw image files out of the Hasselblad 
907x/CFVII 50c. A very fast and powerful little machine! Hasselblad's dedicated 
"Phocus Mobile 2" app is quite good, albeit with a bit of a learning curve. 
Leica CL, M-D, SL, etc files are handled nicely in various other editors on the 
iPad. 

I suspect that's the class of iPad Adobe has in mind as a "semi pro image 
processing environment" as opposed to any of the older, non-Pro models. 

It has been many years now since I had any need of Photoshop. When I need a 
pixel editor of a similar nature, I use Affinity Photo (which has versions on 
macOS, iOS, and iPadOS). It's both a lot cheaper and simpler than PS, and has 
no monthly tax attached. I'll move away from LR too when I find a substitute 
that does what it does and works well enough.

I've never found much need or value in the Cloud features of LR; they were 
around even in the LR 6 and prior time. If I want to show photos to the world, 
I use Flickr and Instagram, occasionally FaceBook. If I want to control the web 
display more specifically, I create a website of my own. It's not so automated, 
but gives me explicit control. 

Overall, that's my primary thrust: I want to be in control of my photo files so 
I don't use things that put them out of my control.

G


> On Apr 2, 2020, at 11:42 AM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
> 
> Yes, that's true, Godfrey. Adobe muddied the waters considerably by
> renaming "old" Lightroom to Lightroom Classic CC and added this
> multi-platform Lightroom CC app.
> 
> I had a quick look at it and determined it's a toy of no use to me. I
> never do quick edits on my iPad which is about its limit. Can't
> anyway: a single 645Z file would bring it entirely to its knees. They
> didn't think this idea through, is my conclusion.
> 
> I mainly use Lr Classic CC but when I need it, I use Photoshop CC
> intensely and deeply. It's a Swiss Army Knife, extremely useful,
> flexible, and sharp. But complicated. Thank goodness for Google and
> Youtube. :-)
> 
> BTW, Lr Classic CC leverages the cloud too. There are some features
> that sync out via the cloud, and you can sync images in your Portfolio
> space directly from Lr folders. There's a freebie storage space you
> can use to show friends and family too; I forget what that's called,
> but it's potentially useful for a social-media replacement (more
> private than Facebook or Instagram).
> 
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:46 PM Godfrey DiGiorgi  
> wrote:
>> 
>> There is a distinction to be made: Lightroom Classic is the "old way", 
>> desktop-based Lightroom with some Cloud service stuff added on that you can 
>> choose to use or not. Lightroom CC is the "new way" of cloud-based 
>> "operations from everywhere". Adobe wants to get people onto LRCC but it's 
>> not quite up to the feature and capability level of LR Classic as yet.
>> 
>> I use LR Classic. It works reasonably well, I'm reasonably happy, and I have 
>> nothing other than the monthly $10 subscription fee. I continue the search 
>> for what to replace it with when Adobe constrains what I can do to being 
>> their Cloud only products. I have no need for Photoshop or any of the other 
>> tools in their suite at this point.
>> 
>> G
>> 
>>> On Apr 2, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Alan, there are no Cloud operations unless you specifically perform
>>> them. All the software is installed on your workstation (or tablet).
>>> All your files are local to your workstation too.
>>> 
>>> The "cloud" thing is largely a Marketing hype buzzword. What Cloud
>>> gives you is the optional ability to sync your settings, previews, and
>>> various other data like fonts, brushes, tools and such to other
>>> places, like your laptop, a tablet, etc.
>>> 
>>> Really it's just a software subscription instead of a one time
>>> payment. You get periodic (quite regular, in fact) updates (features
>>> and fixes) with the ability to roll back or even run multiple versions
>>> at the same time if you want to.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:36 AM Alan C  wrote:
 
 What about data costs if you are operating in cloud?
 
 Alan C
 
 On 02-Apr-20 05:34 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> LR Classic has several additional additional Develop module niceties, 
> like the haze filter.
> 
> G
> 
>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 7:23 PM, Larry Colen  wrote:
>> 
>> What are the advances to lightroom?
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -bmw
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to 

Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread Alan C
Thanks, Henk. My feeling too but upgrading is so expensive in SA now. 
I'll see if I can find some bargain basement RAM. Hopefully 16G will be 
somewhat better.


Alan C

On 04-Apr-20 05:35 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Alan, the only solution in my opinion is to upgrade or replace 
hardware. For photo editing of RAW files 6G RAM is borderline and 
having an old system won't help as well.


Henk
Op 2020-04-04 om 16:48 schreef Alan C:
I've been following this thread with interest. I still use Elements 
13 which is quite good enough for my purposes but have noticed it is 
much slower with the larger K5 files than it was with the smaller 
K110D files. I've tweaked everything as best I can but find I can't 
really process more than half a dozen files at a time without 
paralysing the system. I have 6G RAM and 12G Virtual Memory but 
wonder if this is enough? Any helpful comments would be much 
appreciated. The computer is an oldish Acer Laptop with Intel Core i3 
processor running Win10.


Alan C

On 04-Apr-20 03:49 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

John, a few things to consider:

Since changing the app is easier than Windows, have you tried
downgrading to an earlier version of Photoshop?
Try adding more scratch space. You can configure multiple drives to
supply Ps swap.
Try playing with the GPU acceleration options. I'd first try disabling
it completely to see the effects.

BTW, it's working fine for me on a 5K iMac. Ps version 21.0.3.

Good luck!

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:16 PM  wrote:
Last few days PSCC has become unusable. I am currently working on a 
number

of old family photos, which I have scanned to TIFF files, usually at
anything from 400-1200 ppi, depending upon the original size of the 
print

(always from prints).
I can crop, spot fix, clone areas, adjust highlights/shadows etc. 
with no
problems, but even a minor resize causes the whole application to 
freeze.
Anyone else having this problem?  I am using an HP Pavilion laptop 
with a
decent specification, and have over 107GB available on my scratch 
disk, and
over 800Gb available on the source disk, so I don't think capacity 
is the
issue.  Processor is a Core-i7 at 1.80 GHz, 16GB RAM and 64-bit W10 
fully

updated.
A little research suggests perhaps it is not PS but Windows causing 
the
issue, but I don't want to roll back the last windows update 
unnecessarily.



John in Brisbane




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
and follow the directions.












--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Stupid Adobe Question

2020-04-04 Thread Bob Pdml

> On 4 Apr 2020, at 16:56, Stanley Halpin  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> You have all quite possibly seen some of  Bruce mentions as the how LR 
>> Classic “leverages the cloud.” If you have some/all of your photos synched 
>> to your portion of the cloud, then it is quick and easy to make a selection 
>> of 10-15 shots, call it a gallery, and generate the URL for others to link 
>> to. E.g., here is one of mine:  https://adobe.ly/308IbSp
> 
> Bob in London is doing similar with his occasional galleries though, IIRC, he 
> is using the newer LR CC rather than the LR Classic.
> 
> While I like this feature, it is great for on-the-road sharing to my travel 
> blog, the cloudy bits can also be a PITA. In particular I do NOT want to 
> willy nilly synch all of my images to the cloud when I am traveling, and 
> certainly when I am at home. Synch can be turned off, but I find it difficult 
> to selectively synch just those images that I want out there. But for a 
> professional, on the job site, sharing batches of images with a client, it 
> seems it could be very useful.
> 
> stan

I have both versions of LR but I’m using it exclusively on my iPhone and iPad 
at the moment as I ballsed up my Windows laptop and have completely erased 
Windows from it and replaced it with Linux Mint. I have an Apple SD card reader 
and import from that directly into LR on my iPhone, and sync everything to the 
cloud.

The laptop is over ten years old and although in good condition and top of the 
range in its day, it couldn’t cope with W10 and the various demands made on it 
for effective homeworking. I was cleaning it up to make space and appear to 
have deleted something important such that Windows went into an eternal ‘cannot 
recover’ BSOD loop. No data lost as it’s all in the cloud, and on a separate 
back-up disk.

If I ever get a Windows machine again I can reinstall LR Classic CC, but I 
wasn’t using it.

As for homeworking, I cycled into the office and brought my work laptop home.

Bob



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Stupid Adobe Question

2020-04-04 Thread Stanley Halpin


> On Apr 2, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
> 
> Yes, that's true, Godfrey. Adobe muddied the waters considerably by
> renaming "old" Lightroom to Lightroom Classic CC and added this
> multi-platform Lightroom CC app.
> 
> I had a quick look at it and determined it's a toy of no use to me. I
> never do quick edits on my iPad which is about its limit. Can't
> anyway: a single 645Z file would bring it entirely to its knees. They
> didn't think this idea through, is my conclusion.
> 
> I mainly use Lr Classic CC but when I need it, I use Photoshop CC
> intensely and deeply. It's a Swiss Army Knife, extremely useful,
> flexible, and sharp. But complicated. Thank goodness for Google and
> Youtube. :-)
> 
> BTW, Lr Classic CC leverages the cloud too. There are some features
> that sync out via the cloud, and you can sync images in your Portfolio
> space directly from Lr folders. There's a freebie storage space you
> can use to show friends and family too; I forget what that's called,
> but it's potentially useful for a social-media replacement (more
> private than Facebook or Instagram).

You have all quite possibly seen some of  Bruce mentions as the how LR Classic 
“leverages the cloud.” If you have some/all of your photos synched to your 
portion of the cloud, then it is quick and easy to make a selection of 10-15 
shots, call it a gallery, and generate the URL for others to link to. E.g., 
here is one of mine:  https://adobe.ly/308IbSp

Bob in London is doing similar with his occasional galleries though, IIRC, he 
is using the newer LR CC rather than the LR Classic.

While I like this feature, it is great for on-the-road sharing to my travel 
blog, the cloudy bits can also be a PITA. In particular I do NOT want to willy 
nilly synch all of my images to the cloud when I am traveling, and certainly 
when I am at home. Synch can be turned off, but I find it difficult to 
selectively synch just those images that I want out there. But for a 
professional, on the job site, sharing batches of images with a client, it 
seems it could be very useful.

stan


> 
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:46 PM Godfrey DiGiorgi  
> wrote:
>> 
>> There is a distinction to be made: Lightroom Classic is the "old way", 
>> desktop-based Lightroom with some Cloud service stuff added on that you can 
>> choose to use or not. Lightroom CC is the "new way" of cloud-based 
>> "operations from everywhere". Adobe wants to get people onto LRCC but it's 
>> not quite up to the feature and capability level of LR Classic as yet.
>> 
>> I use LR Classic. It works reasonably well, I'm reasonably happy, and I have 
>> nothing other than the monthly $10 subscription fee. I continue the search 
>> for what to replace it with when Adobe constrains what I can do to being 
>> their Cloud only products. I have no need for Photoshop or any of the other 
>> tools in their suite at this point.
>> 
>> G
>> 
>>> On Apr 2, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Alan, there are no Cloud operations unless you specifically perform
>>> them. All the software is installed on your workstation (or tablet).
>>> All your files are local to your workstation too.
>>> 
>>> The "cloud" thing is largely a Marketing hype buzzword. What Cloud
>>> gives you is the optional ability to sync your settings, previews, and
>>> various other data like fonts, brushes, tools and such to other
>>> places, like your laptop, a tablet, etc.
>>> 
>>> Really it's just a software subscription instead of a one time
>>> payment. You get periodic (quite regular, in fact) updates (features
>>> and fixes) with the ability to roll back or even run multiple versions
>>> at the same time if you want to.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:36 AM Alan C  wrote:
 
 What about data costs if you are operating in cloud?
 
 Alan C
 
 On 02-Apr-20 05:34 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> LR Classic has several additional additional Develop module niceties, 
> like the haze filter.
> 
> G
> 
>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 7:23 PM, Larry Colen  wrote:
>> 
>> What are the advances to lightroom?
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -bmw
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -bmw
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link 

Re: PESO: More water.

2020-04-04 Thread David J Brooks
Wonderful photo

Dave

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:26 AM Bill  wrote:

> I shot this in Sept 2018 at my annual shoot Wilson Creek vacation.
> This is with the A* 85/1.4 set to f/5.6 on the K1.
> It's a 17 layer stack of 8 second pixel shifted images.
> It's 10 minutes of my life that I will never get back.
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson193.html
>
> enjoy
>
> bill
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>


-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread Henk Terhell
Alan, the only solution in my opinion is to upgrade or replace hardware. 
For photo editing of RAW files 6G RAM is borderline and having an old 
system won't help as well.


Henk
Op 2020-04-04 om 16:48 schreef Alan C:
I've been following this thread with interest. I still use Elements 13 
which is quite good enough for my purposes but have noticed it is much 
slower with the larger K5 files than it was with the smaller K110D 
files. I've tweaked everything as best I can but find I can't really 
process more than half a dozen files at a time without paralysing the 
system. I have 6G RAM and 12G Virtual Memory but wonder if this is 
enough? Any helpful comments would be much appreciated. The computer 
is an oldish Acer Laptop with Intel Core i3 processor running Win10.


Alan C

On 04-Apr-20 03:49 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

John, a few things to consider:

Since changing the app is easier than Windows, have you tried
downgrading to an earlier version of Photoshop?
Try adding more scratch space. You can configure multiple drives to
supply Ps swap.
Try playing with the GPU acceleration options. I'd first try disabling
it completely to see the effects.

BTW, it's working fine for me on a 5K iMac. Ps version 21.0.3.

Good luck!

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:16 PM  wrote:
Last few days PSCC has become unusable. I am currently working on a 
number

of old family photos, which I have scanned to TIFF files, usually at
anything from 400-1200 ppi, depending upon the original size of the 
print

(always from prints).
I can crop, spot fix, clone areas, adjust highlights/shadows etc. 
with no
problems, but even a minor resize causes the whole application to 
freeze.
Anyone else having this problem?  I am using an HP Pavilion laptop 
with a
decent specification, and have over 107GB available on my scratch 
disk, and
over 800Gb available on the source disk, so I don't think capacity 
is the
issue.  Processor is a Core-i7 at 1.80 GHz, 16GB RAM and 64-bit W10 
fully

updated.
A little research suggests perhaps it is not PS but Windows causing the
issue, but I don't want to roll back the last windows update 
unnecessarily.



John in Brisbane




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
and follow the directions.









--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread Alan C
Yes, I originally had that & still wonder why I upgraded! I have an 
older (free) version of DXO too - contains some useful presets.


Alan C

On 04-Apr-20 05:02 PM, David J Brooks wrote:

On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:49 AM Alan C  wrote:


I've been following this thread with interest. I still use Elements 13


Im still on Elements 9.

Dave



which is quite good enough for my purposes but have noticed it is much
slower with the larger K5 files than it was with the smaller K110D
files. I've tweaked everything as best I can but find I can't really
process more than half a dozen files at a time without paralysing the
system. I have 6G RAM and 12G Virtual Memory but wonder if this is
enough? Any helpful comments would be much appreciated. The computer is
an oldish Acer Laptop with Intel Core i3 processor running Win10.

Alan C







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and

follow the directions.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread David J Brooks
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:49 AM Alan C  wrote:

> I've been following this thread with interest. I still use Elements 13
>

Im still on Elements 9.

Dave


> which is quite good enough for my purposes but have noticed it is much
> slower with the larger K5 files than it was with the smaller K110D
> files. I've tweaked everything as best I can but find I can't really
> process more than half a dozen files at a time without paralysing the
> system. I have 6G RAM and 12G Virtual Memory but wonder if this is
> enough? Any helpful comments would be much appreciated. The computer is
> an oldish Acer Laptop with Intel Core i3 processor running Win10.
>
> Alan C
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>


-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread Alan C
I've been following this thread with interest. I still use Elements 13 
which is quite good enough for my purposes but have noticed it is much 
slower with the larger K5 files than it was with the smaller K110D 
files. I've tweaked everything as best I can but find I can't really 
process more than half a dozen files at a time without paralysing the 
system. I have 6G RAM and 12G Virtual Memory but wonder if this is 
enough? Any helpful comments would be much appreciated. The computer is 
an oldish Acer Laptop with Intel Core i3 processor running Win10.


Alan C

On 04-Apr-20 03:49 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

John, a few things to consider:

Since changing the app is easier than Windows, have you tried
downgrading to an earlier version of Photoshop?
Try adding more scratch space. You can configure multiple drives to
supply Ps swap.
Try playing with the GPU acceleration options. I'd first try disabling
it completely to see the effects.

BTW, it's working fine for me on a 5K iMac. Ps version 21.0.3.

Good luck!

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:16 PM  wrote:

Last few days PSCC has become unusable.  I am currently working on a number
of old family photos, which I have scanned to TIFF files, usually at
anything from 400-1200 ppi, depending upon the original size of the print
(always from prints).
I can crop, spot fix, clone areas, adjust highlights/shadows etc. with no
problems, but even a minor resize causes the whole application to freeze.
Anyone else having this problem?  I am using an HP Pavilion laptop with a
decent specification, and have over 107GB available on my scratch disk, and
over 800Gb available on the source disk, so I don't think capacity is the
issue.  Processor is a Core-i7 at 1.80 GHz, 16GB RAM and 64-bit W10 fully
updated.
A little research suggests perhaps it is not PS but Windows causing the
issue, but I don't want to roll back the last windows update unnecessarily.


John in Brisbane




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: More water.

2020-04-04 Thread John

On 4/3/2020 01:26:13, Bill wrote:

I shot this in Sept 2018 at my annual shoot Wilson Creek vacation.
This is with the A* 85/1.4 set to f/5.6 on the K1.
It's a 17 layer stack of 8 second pixel shifted images.
It's 10 minutes of my life that I will never get back.

http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson193.html

enjoy

bill



I expect you spent longer than 10 minutes on the computer assembling the final 
image. Looks like time well spent to me.



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO -- Ancient.

2020-04-04 Thread John

On 4/3/2020 16:36:30, Steve Cottrell wrote:

On 3/4/20, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:



http://webster26.epizy.com/pdml/PESO%20--%20ancient_K5I8203.html

Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 28-70mm f4.0.

As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.




Absolutely no idea of what I am looking at. Not a clue. Looks like some sort of 
steampunk rejects pile from Doctor Who.

But..interesting none the less.





They're old gas pumps.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: P-TTL flash.

2020-04-04 Thread John

On 4/2/2020 19:08:36, P. J. Alling wrote:
I keep thinking of upgrading my flash capabilities, especially as my older 
flashes keep dying...


While doing my research I a flash that's flown completely under my radar.

The Godox TT 350p, also sold by Adorama under the Flashpoint brand.

It looks really good for the money, for about half of the cost of a AF201FG you 
get 75% greater output, (than a AT201FG), a claimed 1 - 2.2 second recycle time, 
full manual control, a built in radio controller for up to three groups of other 
Godox flashes, full Pentax P-TTL compatibility, and unlike the other third party 
flashes, at least according to the reviews I've read you don't sacrifice 
reliability, (I'm looking at your Yongnuo), or recycle times, (everybody else 
except Metz. and if you're buying Metz you might as well be buying Pentax as far 
as cost is concerned).


Has anyone else used one of these units, or will I be the first.

I know a number of pro (wedding, portrait & studio) photographers who have 
switched to Godox and are quite happy with them. But they're all CaNikon shooters.


http://www.godox.com/EN/Products_Mini_Camera_Flash_TT350P.html

According to the Godox web site it's compatible with 645Z, K-3II, K-1, KP, K-50, 
K-S2 & K70. I don't know if if it will work with the K-3 or the K-5, and I still 
use my K-3 ... hell, I still occasionally use the K10D & the K20D.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread Bruce Walker
John, a few things to consider:

Since changing the app is easier than Windows, have you tried
downgrading to an earlier version of Photoshop?
Try adding more scratch space. You can configure multiple drives to
supply Ps swap.
Try playing with the GPU acceleration options. I'd first try disabling
it completely to see the effects.

BTW, it's working fine for me on a 5K iMac. Ps version 21.0.3.

Good luck!

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:16 PM  wrote:
>
> Last few days PSCC has become unusable.  I am currently working on a number
> of old family photos, which I have scanned to TIFF files, usually at
> anything from 400-1200 ppi, depending upon the original size of the print
> (always from prints).
> I can crop, spot fix, clone areas, adjust highlights/shadows etc. with no
> problems, but even a minor resize causes the whole application to freeze.
> Anyone else having this problem?  I am using an HP Pavilion laptop with a
> decent specification, and have over 107GB available on my scratch disk, and
> over 800Gb available on the source disk, so I don't think capacity is the
> issue.  Processor is a Core-i7 at 1.80 GHz, 16GB RAM and 64-bit W10 fully
> updated.
> A little research suggests perhaps it is not PS but Windows causing the
> issue, but I don't want to roll back the last windows update unnecessarily.
>
>
> John in Brisbane
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Photoshop problems

2020-04-04 Thread Paul Stenquist
PSCC is working fine for me on my Mac. Adobe provided an update just the other 
day.

Paul

> On Apr 3, 2020, at 10:16 PM, jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
> 
> Last few days PSCC has become unusable.  I am currently working on a number
> of old family photos, which I have scanned to TIFF files, usually at
> anything from 400-1200 ppi, depending upon the original size of the print
> (always from prints).
> I can crop, spot fix, clone areas, adjust highlights/shadows etc. with no
> problems, but even a minor resize causes the whole application to freeze.
> Anyone else having this problem?  I am using an HP Pavilion laptop with a
> decent specification, and have over 107GB available on my scratch disk, and
> over 800Gb available on the source disk, so I don't think capacity is the
> issue.  Processor is a Core-i7 at 1.80 GHz, 16GB RAM and 64-bit W10 fully
> updated.
> A little research suggests perhaps it is not PS but Windows causing the
> issue, but I don't want to roll back the last windows update unnecessarily.
> 
> 
> John in Brisbane
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.