RE: PEOW: Great Blue Heron Portrait - Smaller Version Re-posted

2006-07-07 Thread Jay Taylor
Sorry,
I forget that everyone is not on broadband everywhere. Here is the  
smaller version:
http://i.pbase.com/o4/87/63987/1/63102287.xVSnM975.GBHPortraitSmall.jpg

I hear you guys on the DOF, but I wonder if one can still maintain a  
nice background bokeh while increasing the depth of field?
What would be nice is if our cameras had an auto bracketing feature  
for DOF. I guess when making these images it might be worth taking  
several shots at different f-stops.

JayT

 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 04:40:40 -0700
 From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: PEOW: Great Blue Heron Portrait
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

 Hello, Jay ...

 I almost stopped the download of your file, but I was into it quite  
 a bit
 and decided to wait until it loaded completely.  There's no reason  
 or need
 to post an 825K file fore a web image.  Many viewers are on slow,  
 dial-up
 connections, and the wait to see a file of so great a size can be  
 quite
 long.  Had I tried to download this during a time when Internet  
 traffic was
 heavier, I would have stopped the download.

 When I first saw the bird's eyes I was thinking that this was going  
 to be
 something special, and really worth the wait.  But, alas, it turns  
 out that
 DOF is too shallow, and apart from the eyes and an area around the  
 top of
 the beak, much of the bird is not in sharp focus.  The tip of the  
 beak is
 not sharp, nor is the neck and feathers, both areas which seem  
 important
 (at least to me) in a shot such as this.

 I really like your subtle sig in the lower right corner.

 Jay, for the most part I really like your work, but you continually  
 post
 very large-sized images that sometimes make it too time consuming  
 for me -
 and I know others - to enjoy viewing.

 Shel


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: PEOW: Great Blue Heron Portrait - Smaller Version Re-posted

2006-07-07 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Jay Taylor wrote:
 
 Sorry,
 I forget that everyone is not on broadband everywhere. Here is the
 smaller version:
 http://i.pbase.com/o4/87/63987/1/63102287.xVSnM975.GBHPortraitSmall.jpg

Thanks, Jay! 


 
 I hear you guys on the DOF, but I wonder if one can still maintain a
 nice background bokeh while increasing the depth of field?

It's a pretty sweet shot - I wouldn't worry about that extra
sharpness...
I like the bokeh - I don't care if the tip of his beak is
soft...
But I think you might have had a bit of camera shake - and
that, and not
soft focus is what is just a tad off about it. 

Did he catch the fish? :)

BEst,
ann



Bird may not cooperate if you bracketed focal point :) :) 

 What would be nice is if our cameras had an auto bracketing feature
 for DOF. I guess when making these images it might be worth taking
 several shots at different f-stops.
 
 JayT
 
  Message: 1
  Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 04:40:40 -0700
  From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: PEOW: Great Blue Heron Portrait
  To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
  Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
 
  Hello, Jay ...
 
  I almost stopped the download of your file, but I was into it quite
  a bit
  and decided to wait until it loaded completely.  There's no reason
  or need
  to post an 825K file fore a web image.  Many viewers are on slow,
  dial-up
  connections, and the wait to see a file of so great a size can be
  quite
  long.  Had I tried to download this during a time when Internet
  traffic was
  heavier, I would have stopped the download.
 
  When I first saw the bird's eyes I was thinking that this was going
  to be
  something special, and really worth the wait.  But, alas, it turns
  out that
  DOF is too shallow, and apart from the eyes and an area around the
  top of
  the beak, much of the bird is not in sharp focus.  The tip of the
  beak is
  not sharp, nor is the neck and feathers, both areas which seem
  important
  (at least to me) in a shot such as this.
 
  I really like your subtle sig in the lower right corner.
 
  Jay, for the most part I really like your work, but you continually
  post
  very large-sized images that sometimes make it too time consuming
  for me -
  and I know others - to enjoy viewing.
 
  Shel
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net