Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-27 Thread David Mann
On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Larry Colen wrote:

 I much prefer biking to running for the aforementioned reasons.  The current 
 thinking is to use minimal shoes, like the vibram 5-finger shoes because that 
 trains you to not pound so hard on your heels, and reduces injury to the rest 
 of your leg.

I'm starting to think about shoes like that, more for the lower heels that make 
you land further forward on the foot.  Mainly because one of my heels has been 
sore lately and running down a 10% gradient on tarseal will not be helping.

I've just entered another half marathon, a repeat of one I did last year.  I'm 
hoping for wind, rain, hail and snow this time :)

Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-27 Thread Pete McIntosh
That's because you're numb... :-)

Ciao,

Pete Mac in Melbourne


Sent from my iPad 2

On 27/04/2011, at 11:54, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:

 The discomfort goes away after 500-600 miles of riding.

 stan

 On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:

 I just can't cycle.  I have never found a seat I find even remotely
 comfortable. I have a hard enough time finding a comfy seat for the
 motorcycle.

 On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more.
 It's

 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

 And bad for knees.

 I ran for many years using the most cushioned shoes I could find  the
 'softest' surface I could find - definitely not concrete - yet I still wound
 up with knee pains so bad I had to give up running altogether and eventually
 have both knees replaced, admittedly I don't have the ideal runners
 physique.

 Biking is a very good exercise but not as 'efficient' as running because of
 the mechanical advantage among other things.

 Kenneth Waller
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

 - Original Message - From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
 Subject: RE: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)


 From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
 Drew

 [...]


 Well... kind of   I took up jogging as my primary method of
 (attempting) keep fit.  I find I can get far more knackered, far more
 quickly on foot :-) and with two kids demanding attention time is at a
 premium, also jogging is no fun so the kids don't want to come out with
 me. When they come cycling I cannot go fast enough to get a decent
 workout!..

 Do both. If you can find a circuit that takes about as long to cycle as the
 time you normally spend jogging, then you should be able to get a reasonable
 workout.

 My jogging routine takes about 35 minutes normally, which is also the time
 it takes me to cycle to work (and the same back again). So by
 cycle-commuting I have added over 6 hours extra exercise to my week - I do
 some extra miles on a Thursday - and reduced my expenditure on public
 transport by about £50/week - which I have added to my pension plan. There's
 no downside.

 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

 B




 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




 --
 Steve Desjardins

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-26 Thread Steven Desjardins
I just can't cycle.  I have never found a seat I find even remotely
comfortable. I have a hard enough time finding a comfy seat for the
motorcycle.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more.
 It's

 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

 And bad for knees.

 I ran for many years using the most cushioned shoes I could find  the
 'softest' surface I could find - definitely not concrete - yet I still wound
 up with knee pains so bad I had to give up running altogether and eventually
 have both knees replaced, admittedly I don't have the ideal runners
 physique.

 Biking is a very good exercise but not as 'efficient' as running because of
 the mechanical advantage among other things.

 Kenneth Waller
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

 - Original Message - From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
 Subject: RE: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)


 From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
 Drew

 [...]

 
 Well... kind of   I took up jogging as my primary method of
 (attempting) keep fit.  I find I can get far more knackered, far more
 quickly on foot :-) and with two kids demanding attention time is at a
 premium, also jogging is no fun so the kids don't want to come out with
 me. When they come cycling I cannot go fast enough to get a decent
 workout!..

 Do both. If you can find a circuit that takes about as long to cycle as the
 time you normally spend jogging, then you should be able to get a reasonable
 workout.

 My jogging routine takes about 35 minutes normally, which is also the time
 it takes me to cycle to work (and the same back again). So by
 cycle-commuting I have added over 6 hours extra exercise to my week - I do
 some extra miles on a Thursday - and reduced my expenditure on public
 transport by about £50/week - which I have added to my pension plan. There's
 no downside.

 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

 B




 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-26 Thread Larry Colen

On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Ken Waller wrote:

 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.
 
 And bad for knees.
 
 I ran for many years using the most cushioned shoes I could find  the 
 'softest' surface I could find - definitely not concrete - yet I still wound 
 up with knee pains so bad I had to give up running altogether and eventually 
 have both knees replaced, admittedly I don't have the ideal runners physique.
 
 Biking is a very good exercise but not as 'efficient' as running because of 
 the mechanical advantage among other things.

I much prefer biking to running for the aforementioned reasons.  The current 
thinking is to use minimal shoes, like the vibram 5-finger shoes because that 
trains you to not pound so hard on your heels, and reduces injury to the rest 
of your leg.

 

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-26 Thread Steven Desjardins
The problem I have is that general wisdom on exercise changes every
five years.  I try to run 3-4 times a week for about 5k distances.  I
use the other 4-3 days for weights.  I have little doubt that biking
is better on the joints, but I just hate it too much to do it
regularly.  In the winter I use the elliptical machine because I also
don't like running in the cold.  It takes some pounding off the legs
as well. I figure my diet is a far greater challenge to me than my
exercise program.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:

 On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Ken Waller wrote:

 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

 And bad for knees.

 I ran for many years using the most cushioned shoes I could find  the 
 'softest' surface I could find - definitely not concrete - yet I still wound 
 up with knee pains so bad I had to give up running altogether and eventually 
 have both knees replaced, admittedly I don't have the ideal runners physique.

 Biking is a very good exercise but not as 'efficient' as running because of 
 the mechanical advantage among other things.

 I much prefer biking to running for the aforementioned reasons.  The current 
 thinking is to use minimal shoes, like the vibram 5-finger shoes because that 
 trains you to not pound so hard on your heels, and reduces injury to the rest 
 of your leg.



 --
 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-26 Thread Mark Roberts
Steven Desjardins wrote:

The problem I have is that general wisdom on exercise changes every
five years.  I try to run 3-4 times a week for about 5k distances.  I
use the other 4-3 days for weights.  I have little doubt that biking
is better on the joints

Nope, that's an old wives' tale. The Arthritis Foundation and others
have done numerous long-term studies on runners and found absolutely
no connection between knee (or any other joint) problems and running.
My father never ran at all for sport or fitness and his knees were
shot by the time he was 50. I'm approaching that age with fine knees
even after 14 marathons and more shorter races than I can count.

 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-26 Thread drd1135
See what I mean about conventional thinking. Trainers have been telling me 
this for years.  I'm still not running in the cold, however ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:08:06 
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

Steven Desjardins wrote:

The problem I have is that general wisdom on exercise changes every
five years.  I try to run 3-4 times a week for about 5k distances.  I
use the other 4-3 days for weights.  I have little doubt that biking
is better on the joints

Nope, that's an old wives' tale. The Arthritis Foundation and others
have done numerous long-term studies on runners and found absolutely
no connection between knee (or any other joint) problems and running.
My father never ran at all for sport or fitness and his knees were
shot by the time he was 50. I'm approaching that age with fine knees
even after 14 marathons and more shorter races than I can count.

 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-26 Thread Stan Halpin
The discomfort goes away after 500-600 miles of riding. 

stan

On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:

 I just can't cycle.  I have never found a seat I find even remotely
 comfortable. I have a hard enough time finding a comfy seat for the
 motorcycle.
 
 On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more.
 It's
 
 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.
 
 And bad for knees.
 
 I ran for many years using the most cushioned shoes I could find  the
 'softest' surface I could find - definitely not concrete - yet I still wound
 up with knee pains so bad I had to give up running altogether and eventually
 have both knees replaced, admittedly I don't have the ideal runners
 physique.
 
 Biking is a very good exercise but not as 'efficient' as running because of
 the mechanical advantage among other things.
 
 Kenneth Waller
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
 
 - Original Message - From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
 Subject: RE: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)
 
 
 From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
 Drew
 
 [...]
 
 
 Well... kind of   I took up jogging as my primary method of
 (attempting) keep fit.  I find I can get far more knackered, far more
 quickly on foot :-) and with two kids demanding attention time is at a
 premium, also jogging is no fun so the kids don't want to come out with
 me. When they come cycling I cannot go fast enough to get a decent
 workout!..
 
 Do both. If you can find a circuit that takes about as long to cycle as the
 time you normally spend jogging, then you should be able to get a reasonable
 workout.
 
 My jogging routine takes about 35 minutes normally, which is also the time
 it takes me to cycle to work (and the same back again). So by
 cycle-commuting I have added over 6 hours extra exercise to my week - I do
 some extra miles on a Thursday - and reduced my expenditure on public
 transport by about £50/week - which I have added to my pension plan. There's
 no downside.
 
 I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
 also high impact, which is good for bone strength.
 
 B
 
 
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Steve Desjardins
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-25 Thread David Mann
On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Drew wrote:

 TBH I will probably just stick to my old wheels for now, I pretty much only 
 do a little light cruising with my kids these days (I took up jogging 
 instead) maybe I'll get some new rims built on the good hubs..

By instead I assume you really mean as well :D

Cheers,
Dave (and his glass of wine)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-25 Thread Drew

On 25/04/11 09:26, David Mann wrote:

On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Drew wrote:


TBH I will probably just stick to my old wheels for now, I pretty much only do 
a little light cruising with my kids these days (I took up jogging instead) 
maybe I'll get some new rims built on the good hubs..

By instead I assume you really mean as well :D

Cheers,
Dave (and his glass of wine)


Well... kind of   I took up jogging as my primary method of 
(attempting) keep fit.  I find I can get far more knackered, far more 
quickly on foot :-) and with two kids demanding attention time is at a 
premium, also jogging is no fun so the kids don't want to come out with 
me. When they come cycling I cannot go fast enough to get a decent 
workout!..


Cheers,
Drew.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-25 Thread Bob W
 From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
 Drew
[...]
 
 Well... kind of   I took up jogging as my primary method of
 (attempting) keep fit.  I find I can get far more knackered, far more
 quickly on foot :-) and with two kids demanding attention time is at a
 premium, also jogging is no fun so the kids don't want to come out with
 me. When they come cycling I cannot go fast enough to get a decent
 workout!..

Do both. If you can find a circuit that takes about as long to cycle as the
time you normally spend jogging, then you should be able to get a reasonable
workout. 

My jogging routine takes about 35 minutes normally, which is also the time
it takes me to cycle to work (and the same back again). So by
cycle-commuting I have added over 6 hours extra exercise to my week - I do
some extra miles on a Thursday - and reduced my expenditure on public
transport by about £50/week - which I have added to my pension plan. There's
no downside.

I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-25 Thread Ken Waller
I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. 
It's

also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

And bad for knees.

I ran for many years using the most cushioned shoes I could find  the 
'softest' surface I could find - definitely not concrete - yet I still wound 
up with knee pains so bad I had to give up running altogether and eventually 
have both knees replaced, admittedly I don't have the ideal runners 
physique.


Biking is a very good exercise but not as 'efficient' as running because of 
the mechanical advantage among other things.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com

Subject: RE: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)



From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Drew

[...]


Well... kind of   I took up jogging as my primary method of
(attempting) keep fit.  I find I can get far more knackered, far more
quickly on foot :-) and with two kids demanding attention time is at a
premium, also jogging is no fun so the kids don't want to come out with
me. When they come cycling I cannot go fast enough to get a decent
workout!..


Do both. If you can find a circuit that takes about as long to cycle as the
time you normally spend jogging, then you should be able to get a reasonable
workout.

My jogging routine takes about 35 minutes normally, which is also the time
it takes me to cycle to work (and the same back again). So by
cycle-commuting I have added over 6 hours extra exercise to my week - I do
some extra miles on a Thursday - and reduced my expenditure on public
transport by about £50/week - which I have added to my pension plan. There's
no downside.

I wouldn't give up jogging because I too find that it knackers me more. It's
also high impact, which is good for bone strength.

B




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-24 Thread Pete McIntosh
On 24/04/2011, at 15:57, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:

 On Apr 24, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Drew wrote:

 At home I attacked them with a bucket of soapy water and very pretty 
 they look too.  Except as I was cleaning them I though to myself 'blimey 
 these don't feel as light as I expected'   Out with the kitchen scales; yes 
 they are exactly 100g HEAVIER than the 'no-brand' STEEL wheels originally 
 fitted to my Peugeot back in the mid '80's.  So much for progress!!

 If they're built for time-trial or track use that's entirely possible.  In 
 those cases the aero advantage greatly outweighs the ability to accelerate 
 and climb.

 The wheels on my road bike are middle-of-the-range and weigh about 1,550 
 grams.  Zipp 808's are hellishly expensive and weigh 200g more.  But I know 
 which I'd rather have in a TT :)

 Cheers,
 Dave

 PS post a photo!



Agreed - photo please!

Ciao,

Pete Mac (cycling gear addict)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-24 Thread Drew

On 24/04/11 10:21, Pete McIntosh wrote:

On 24/04/2011, at 15:57, David Mannd...@multisport.net.nz  wrote:


On Apr 24, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Drew wrote:


At home I attacked them with a bucket of soapy water and very pretty they 
look too.  Except as I was cleaning them I though to myself 'blimey these don't 
feel as light as I expected'   Out with the kitchen scales; yes they are 
exactly 100g HEAVIER than the 'no-brand' STEEL wheels originally fitted to my 
Peugeot back in the mid '80's.  So much for progress!!

If they're built for time-trial or track use that's entirely possible.  In 
those cases the aero advantage greatly outweighs the ability to accelerate and 
climb.

The wheels on my road bike are middle-of-the-range and weigh about 1,550 grams. 
 Zipp 808's are hellishly expensive and weigh 200g more.  But I know which I'd 
rather have in a TT :)

Cheers,
Dave

PS post a photo!



Agreed - photo please!

Ciao,

Pete Mac (cycling gear addict)



Here's a quick snap...

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/x_1gcLaeeb2t7stqOQOvNpYbvVZjbKqgp_lbMQLpny8?feat=email

I'm note sure what sort of bike they were supplied with but the guy that 
gave them to me does quite a few miles with a club...


TBH I will probably just stick to my old wheels for now, I pretty much 
only do a little light cruising with my kids these days (I took up 
jogging instead) maybe I'll get some new rims built on the good hubs..


Thanks for your thoughts all...
Drew.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-23 Thread Drew

Greets...

A friend of mine just did a bike rebuild and gave me his previous set of 
'Aero' style wheels... they have Shimano Dura ace hubs, a Shimano block 
and these fancy looking aero style rims. Very nice I thought as I put 
them in the car.


At home I attacked them with a bucket of soapy water and very pretty 
they look too.  Except as I was cleaning them I though to myself 'blimey 
these don't feel as light as I expected'   Out with the kitchen scales; 
yes they are exactly 100g HEAVIER than the 'no-brand' STEEL wheels 
originally fitted to my Peugeot back in the mid '80's.  So much for 
progress!!


So should I use the set of 90's Ambrosio rims on Shimano 105 hubs I had 
built years ago put on these trick looking but heavy modern things?


Drew,


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-23 Thread Ecke PDML
nothing like low rotational weight!
I'm a pretty heavy guy so I have Mavic EX 721 downhill rims on my
daily rider and I can tell you there is a world of difference even
there between my old setup of Ritchey Speedmax 26x2 tires and standard
butyl tubes (approx. 2 lbs. of rubber per wheel), especially my winter
setup of Schwalbe Fat Albert 2.35s (3 lbs. with the same tubes) and my
new Schwalbe Kojak 26x2 tyres with ultralight tubes (just under a
pound of rotational rubber weight per wheel) - the bike is so much
more nimble and happy to accelerate now... I love it...
so my advice is to forget about the aero bit or offset it with the
lightest rubber you can get your hands on!
cheers
ecke

2011/4/23 Drew d...@rileyelf.free-online.co.uk:
 Greets...

 A friend of mine just did a bike rebuild and gave me his previous set of
 'Aero' style wheels... they have Shimano Dura ace hubs, a Shimano block and
 these fancy looking aero style rims. Very nice I thought as I put them in
 the car.

 At home I attacked them with a bucket of soapy water and very pretty
 they look too.  Except as I was cleaning them I though to myself 'blimey
 these don't feel as light as I expected'   Out with the kitchen scales; yes
 they are exactly 100g HEAVIER than the 'no-brand' STEEL wheels originally
 fitted to my Peugeot back in the mid '80's.  So much for progress!!

 So should I use the set of 90's Ambrosio rims on Shimano 105 hubs I had
 built years ago put on these trick looking but heavy modern things?

 Drew,


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Totally OT: Who'd have thought it? (bike related)

2011-04-23 Thread David Mann
On Apr 24, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Drew wrote:

 At home I attacked them with a bucket of soapy water and very pretty they 
 look too.  Except as I was cleaning them I though to myself 'blimey these 
 don't feel as light as I expected'   Out with the kitchen scales; yes they 
 are exactly 100g HEAVIER than the 'no-brand' STEEL wheels originally fitted 
 to my Peugeot back in the mid '80's.  So much for progress!!

If they're built for time-trial or track use that's entirely possible.  In 
those cases the aero advantage greatly outweighs the ability to accelerate and 
climb.

The wheels on my road bike are middle-of-the-range and weigh about 1,550 grams. 
 Zipp 808's are hellishly expensive and weigh 200g more.  But I know which I'd 
rather have in a TT :)

Cheers,
Dave

PS post a photo!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.