Qwest Contivity VPN Client Behind PF

2003-01-31 Thread Todd Chandler








I have a user on my network that needs to use the Qwest
Contivity VPN Client to connect to a customers network. I am
having trouble getting the PF rules set up correctly to make this happen.
Does anyone have any experience getting the Contivity client to successfully
connect through PF? Any tips would be appreciated. I currently have
the following rules in pf.conf for this particular purpose:



pass in quick on $INTIF proto esp from any to x.x.x.x keep
state

pass in quick on $INTIF proto ah from any to x.x.x.x keep
state

pass in quick on $INTIF proto udp from any to x.x.x.x port =
500 keep state



When I attempt to connect from the client, it simply times
out. Any ideas what Im missing?



Thanks!



Todd Chandler








Re: Qwest Contivity VPN Client Behind PF

2003-01-31 Thread Bryan Irvine
Qwest Contivity?  hmm i know of the one from nortel networks.

It's basically a layer 4 switch.  Describe the setup a little more.

Use ASCII art if necessary

--Bryan

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 05:43, Todd Chandler wrote:
 I have a user on my network that needs to use the Qwest Contivity VPN
 Client to connect to a customers network.  I am having trouble
 getting the PF rules set up correctly to make this happen.  Does
 anyone have any experience getting the Contivity client to
 successfully connect through PF?  Any tips would be appreciated.  I
 currently have the following rules in pf.conf for this particular
 purpose:
 
  
 
 pass in quick on $INTIF proto esp from any to x.x.x.x keep state
 
 pass in quick on $INTIF proto ah from any to x.x.x.x keep state
 
 pass in quick on $INTIF proto udp from any to x.x.x.x port = 500 keep
 state
 
  
 
 When I attempt to connect from the client, it simply times out.  Any
 ideas what Im missing?
 
  
 
 Thanks!
 
  
 
 Todd Chandler
 
 




Re: NAT does not allow for 1-to-1 port ranges?

2003-01-31 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:43:50PM -0800, Cameron Lerch wrote:

 nat on ne0 proto udp from 10.0.0.3/32 port 6000 to any - ne0 port 6000
 nat on ne0 proto udp from 10.0.0.3/32 port 6001 to any - ne0 port 6001
 
 nat on ne0 proto udp from 10.0.0.3/32 port 6999 to any - ne0 port 6999

 Is this possible?

With -current, yes:

nat on ne0 proto udp from 10.0.0.3 port 59997000 to any \
- ne0 static-port

Daniel