Re: Priorizing empty ACKs
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:13:55PM -0800, Ben Lovett wrote: All in all, I'm seeing a great improvement. My connection is ADSL 1.5M/384, and the sweet spot for my connection appears to be 330Kbit/s. I'll do some more playing around with it tomorrow to see if I can get better speeds, but even if I don't -- I'm happy with what I'm getting now :) Great, thanks for the feedback. Henning suggested using the priq scheduler instead of cbq, like altq on kue0 priq bandwidth 100Kb queue { q_pri, q_def } queue q_pri priority 7 queue q_def priority 1 priq(default) I get about the same results with this, but it's somewhat simpler. BTW, try pfctl -vsq or -vvsq to check the altq stats. Daniel
Re: Priorizing empty ACKs
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:21:55 +0100 Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:13:55PM -0800, Ben Lovett wrote: All in all, I'm seeing a great improvement. My connection is ADSL 1.5M/384, and the sweet spot for my connection appears to be 330Kbit/s. I'll do some more playing around with it tomorrow to see if I can get better speeds, but even if I don't -- I'm happy with what I'm getting now :) Great, thanks for the feedback. Henning suggested using the priq scheduler instead of cbq, like altq on kue0 priq bandwidth 100Kb queue { q_pri, q_def } queue q_pri priority 7 queue q_def priority 1 priq(default) I get about the same results with this, but it's somewhat simpler. BTW, try pfctl -vsq or -vvsq to check the altq stats. Daniel This is awesome :)) this way my girlfriend can use my connection while me and my friends are sharing data :) Is this patch going to be in 3.3 ?? I'm running 28/2/2003 3.2-current and this patch did the job. Would be nice to see it in 3.3 so I can roll out it easily on wrk servers. Michiel van Baak
Re: Priorizing empty ACKs
If this works I will be terribly happy, until now I thought there was no way arround it. THANKYOU I will try implementing it tonight! scott
Re: Priorizing empty ACKs
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:31:42AM +0100, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: Let me know if this works as well for you. :) I've been drooling over this ever since you mentioned it weeks/months ago. I tested this by grabbing a 26 meg file from kernel.org. Line saturation via someone scp'ing a file from my machine to theirs. altqsaturated speed n n 209k/s n y 11.2k/s y n 209k/s y y 103k/s Almost an order of magnitude faster... I'd say it works well :P - jolan