Re: [PLUG] Interest in high availability clustering talk?

2024-01-29 Thread Ben Koenig
Sounds fun. Bonus points if it incorporates DRBD from the talk a few months ago.

-Ben
Sent from ProtonMail mobile

 Original Message 
On Jan 29, 2024, 10:53 PM, Russell Senior wrote:

> +1 vote from me. On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:47 PM Reid  wrote: > Would there 
> be any interest in a talk, demo, or workshop/troubleshooting > session on 
> high availability clustering? The format and content would be > flexible 
> depending on what people want and what's relevant to you all. I'm > a 
> maintainer of the open source Pacemaker cluster resource manager, and I > 
> worked in backline support for it for a few years prior. > > 
> https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/ > > Regards, > > Reid Wahl (he/him) > > 
> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

Re: [PLUG] February PLUG?

2024-01-29 Thread Kevin Williams
Sounds good. I'm looking forward to it.

On January 29, 2024 10:38:18 PM PST, Michael Dexter  wrote:
>On 1/29/24 5:14 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> Well it's a hack and a half and I'm sure if I show it I'll be sent to
>> Linux hell, but I could do a presentation on  "Bandwidth monitoring
>> OpenWRT and DD-WRT routers with MRTG"
>
>Having you Ted there would be great because you sent me down this path. :-)
>
>My first 15 minutes would be a tirade, then some mitigations... then you could 
>take it from there.
>
>What say y'all?
>
>Michael


Re: [PLUG] Interest in high availability clustering talk?

2024-01-29 Thread Russell Senior
+1 vote from me.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:47 PM Reid  wrote:

> Would there be any interest in a talk, demo, or workshop/troubleshooting
> session on high availability clustering? The format and content would be
> flexible depending on what people want and what's relevant to you all. I'm
> a maintainer of the open source Pacemaker cluster resource manager, and I
> worked in backline support for it for a few years prior.
>
> https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/
>
> Regards,
>
> Reid Wahl (he/him)
>
> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.


[PLUG] Interest in high availability clustering talk?

2024-01-29 Thread Reid
Would there be any interest in a talk, demo, or workshop/troubleshooting 
session on high availability clustering? The format and content would be 
flexible depending on what people want and what's relevant to you all. I'm a 
maintainer of the open source Pacemaker cluster resource manager, and I worked 
in backline support for it for a few years prior.

https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/

Regards,

Reid Wahl (he/him)

Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

Re: [PLUG] February PLUG?

2024-01-29 Thread Michael Dexter

On 1/29/24 5:14 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

Well it's a hack and a half and I'm sure if I show it I'll be sent to
Linux hell, but I could do a presentation on  "Bandwidth monitoring
OpenWRT and DD-WRT routers with MRTG"


Having you Ted there would be great because you sent me down this path. :-)

My first 15 minutes would be a tirade, then some mitigations... then you 
could take it from there.


What say y'all?

Michael


Re: [PLUG] February PLUG?

2024-01-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Well it's a hack and a half and I'm sure if I show it I'll be sent to Linux 
hell, but I could do a presentation on  "Bandwidth monitoring OpenWRT and 
DD-WRT routers with MRTG"

Ted

-Original Message-
From: PLUG  On Behalf Of Michael Dexter
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 3:25 PM
To: Portland Linux/Unix Group 
Subject: [PLUG] February PLUG?

Hey.

I had to slay some dragons in December and early January.

The Center is available Thursday if we want it.

I am happy to talk about managing/containing Windows on something other than 
Windows, but I also all ears for what you want to talk about.

Perhaps a show and tell session?

I'll check this mail. I swear.

Michael Dexter
Kinda Sorta PLUG and Stuff



[PLUG] February PLUG?

2024-01-29 Thread Michael Dexter

Hey.

I had to slay some dragons in December and early January.

The Center is available Thursday if we want it.

I am happy to talk about managing/containing Windows on something other 
than Windows, but I also all ears for what you want to talk about.


Perhaps a show and tell session?

I'll check this mail. I swear.

Michael Dexter
Kinda Sorta PLUG and Stuff


Re: [PLUG] SSL/TSL only for web sites?

2024-01-29 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Paul Heinlein wrote:


If you're sending via Postfix, no, you don't need them for SMTP stuff.

Postfix itself can be configured to use SSL/TLS, but that's completely 
separate from what you're trying to accomplish.


Paul,

Thank you. I just found that I don't need them when reading about the Python
modules.

Much appreciated,

Rich


Re: [PLUG] SSL/TSL only for web sites?

2024-01-29 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Rich Shepard wrote:


I'm developing a Python script to send email messages. Researching SSL/TLS
on the web suggests that these are used with web applications (along with
HTTPS).

Since I'm sending messages from the command line (or Python script) out
through my local Postfix MTA, are these security layers necessary or needed?


If you're sending via Postfix, no, you don't need them for SMTP stuff.

Postfix itself can be configured to use SSL/TLS, but that's completely 
separate from what you're trying to accomplish.


--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°22'48" N, 122°35'36" W


[PLUG] SSL/TSL only for web sites?

2024-01-29 Thread Rich Shepard

I'm developing a Python script to send email messages. Researching SSL/TLS
on the web suggests that these are used with web applications (along with
HTTPS).

Since I'm sending messages from the command line (or Python script) out
through my local Postfix MTA, are these security layers necessary or needed?

I've not seen an answer in my web searches.

TIA,

Rich



Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
It depends on what you are needing to do.

If you are installing new cabling then the cheap $50 from Ebay will work:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/145198295238

If you are working with old existing work then you need a TDR.  The reason is 
because IF the cable you are trying to find with a toner is shorted anywhere on 
it's length, then the tone generated from the toner will fall off very rapidly 
in intensity the further you get from the tone source.  So you will need to 
check for a short first.  Toners only work well for tracing wire if the end of 
the wire is not connected to anything.

I've used the cheapie to find wires buried in walls behind drywall.  The wire 
was not shorted.

The worst would be finding a wire in a wall that had had a nail driven into it. 
 Unless you have a wiring layout for the building, where the wires were run, a 
TDR will only tell you how far away the nail is, it won't tell you what 
direction.  You just have to get lucky and hope that 1 or 2 conductors are left 
in the wire that are not shorted.

Ted

-Original Message-
From: PLUG  On Behalf Of mo
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 9:21 AM
To: Portland Linux/Unix Group 
Subject: [PLUG] Cable tester

Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so many!
How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?

My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for future use 
with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other features to look for 
in such an item. I want to test for cable quality, connectivity, speed, etc as 
well as locating which cable terminates where (if all that's possible). 



Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Yeah, unless you are going to go the route of having the tool calibrated every 
6 months, the best you are ever going to get out of any electronic measuring 
device is "good enough for government work"  Don't fall for the "super 
accurate" snow job from the salesguys at Fluke.  The only difference the extra 
money buys you is that the Fluke CAN be calibrated.  At least I assume it can.  
For sure their expensive stuff can be, don't know about the "cheaper" field 
stuff.

All of the measuring devices on the market that measure the more advanced stuff 
also show the simpler stuff.  The Pentascanner does the same.

It's important to know that you can only measure a miswire if you have plugged 
the termination device into the other end of the cable, this is true for all of 
the models on the market

Another consideration I have also had when working on this stuff for customers 
is having the expensive stuff get stolen.  I've had toolbags stolen several 
times and more importantly I've accidentally forgotten tools at a job then 
remembered later and gone back for them only to find they had disappeared.  I 
learned only to carry the absolute cheapest crap tools that will barely work.  
(that's an old trick from a lot of tradespeople)  That's why I never carried 
the Pentascanner unless it was on a special job.  The Pentascanner when it was 
new, decades ago, was in the multi-thousand dollar range.  They still fetch a 
lot on Ebay maybe I should sell mine

Ted

Obviously if you have a large wiring

-Original Message-
From: PLUG  On Behalf Of Russell Senior
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 10:40 AM
To: Portland Linux/Unix Group 
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

The fluke ms2 also shows miswiring, whether you are plugged into a transceiver, 
or your remote, etc. We've been happy with it. I am sure you can find non-fluke 
for less, but when you are measuring things, it is nice, and an inferential leg 
up, to know you are probably measuring them correctly.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:34 AM Ted Mittelstaedt 
wrote:

> The problem with a TDR is it's only good if you shorted or opened a 
> cable.  My problem has always been pair reversals on building cables 
> and a TDR is useless for that.  I have a Pentascanner that I used to 
> use for this kind of thing and the only use I got out of it was 
> discovering a split pair one time at a customer site that was left 
> over from years earlier when someone had run voice on that cable.  But 
> keeping the battery packs working on the thing was a nuisance so I 
> switched over to the $20 chinese pair scanner thing years ago.
>
> It's also worth noting you can buy a TDR for $100 off Ebay.  Chinese 
> made of course.
>
> Ted
>
> -Original Message-
> From: PLUG  On Behalf Of Russell 
> Senior
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 10:16 AM
> To: Portland Linux/Unix Group 
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Cable tester
>
> For years, we got away with a cheapo $20 continuity tester for 
> checking Ethernet cables. The problem with them was that, yeah, sure, 
> they would tell you if you had shorts or opens, but they did not tell 
> you where. Cable itself tends to be pretty reliably connected end to 
> end, but when you have crimped both ends and you find a short or open 
> with a continuity tester, you have almost no idea which end you 
> screwed up. You look very closely at the crimped ends, decide which 
> one looks sketchier, cut it off and try again more carefully, then rinse and 
> repeat.
>
> A few years ago, after suffering this problem for over a decade, we 
> finally invested in a fluke microscanner2. It does time domain 
> reflectometry, and can tell you, pair-by-pair, whether it has 
> continuity and crucially, if it does not, how far down the wire the fault 
> occurs.
> Suddenly, we know which end has the fault! If we stabbed the cable to 
> death with hoop staples and there is a mid span fault, we know that. 
> It cost us $500. It wasn't their fanciest model, but it has been such 
> an improvement in reliability and visibility.
>
> --
> Russell Senior
> russ...@personaltelco.net
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 09:21 mo  wrote:
>
> > Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are 
> > so
> many!
> > How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?
> >
> > My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for 
> > future use with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other 
> > features to look for in such an item. I want to test for cable 
> > quality, connectivity, speed, etc as well as locating which cable 
> > terminates where (if all that's possible). 
> >
>
>



Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Russell Senior
The fluke ms2 also shows miswiring, whether you are plugged into a
transceiver, or your remote, etc. We've been happy with it. I am sure you
can find non-fluke for less, but when you are measuring things, it is nice,
and an inferential leg up, to know you are probably measuring them
correctly.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:34 AM Ted Mittelstaedt 
wrote:

> The problem with a TDR is it's only good if you shorted or opened a
> cable.  My problem has always been pair reversals on building cables and a
> TDR is useless for that.  I have a Pentascanner that I used to use for this
> kind of thing and the only use I got out of it was discovering a split pair
> one time at a customer site that was left over from years earlier when
> someone had run voice on that cable.  But keeping the battery packs working
> on the thing was a nuisance so I switched over to the $20 chinese pair
> scanner thing years ago.
>
> It's also worth noting you can buy a TDR for $100 off Ebay.  Chinese made
> of course.
>
> Ted
>
> -Original Message-
> From: PLUG  On Behalf Of Russell Senior
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 10:16 AM
> To: Portland Linux/Unix Group 
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Cable tester
>
> For years, we got away with a cheapo $20 continuity tester for checking
> Ethernet cables. The problem with them was that, yeah, sure, they would
> tell you if you had shorts or opens, but they did not tell you where. Cable
> itself tends to be pretty reliably connected end to end, but when you have
> crimped both ends and you find a short or open with a continuity tester,
> you have almost no idea which end you screwed up. You look very closely at
> the crimped ends, decide which one looks sketchier, cut it off and try
> again more carefully, then rinse and repeat.
>
> A few years ago, after suffering this problem for over a decade, we
> finally invested in a fluke microscanner2. It does time domain
> reflectometry, and can tell you, pair-by-pair, whether it has continuity
> and crucially, if it does not, how far down the wire the fault occurs.
> Suddenly, we know which end has the fault! If we stabbed the cable to death
> with hoop staples and there is a mid span fault, we know that. It cost us
> $500. It wasn't their fanciest model, but it has been such an improvement
> in reliability and visibility.
>
> --
> Russell Senior
> russ...@personaltelco.net
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 09:21 mo  wrote:
>
> > Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so
> many!
> > How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?
> >
> > My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for
> > future use with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other
> > features to look for in such an item. I want to test for cable
> > quality, connectivity, speed, etc as well as locating which cable
> > terminates where (if all that's possible). 
> >
>
>


Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
The problem with a TDR is it's only good if you shorted or opened a cable.  My 
problem has always been pair reversals on building cables and a TDR is useless 
for that.  I have a Pentascanner that I used to use for this kind of thing and 
the only use I got out of it was discovering a split pair one time at a 
customer site that was left over from years earlier when someone had run voice 
on that cable.  But keeping the battery packs working on the thing was a 
nuisance so I switched over to the $20 chinese pair scanner thing years ago.

It's also worth noting you can buy a TDR for $100 off Ebay.  Chinese made of 
course.  

Ted

-Original Message-
From: PLUG  On Behalf Of Russell Senior
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 10:16 AM
To: Portland Linux/Unix Group 
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

For years, we got away with a cheapo $20 continuity tester for checking 
Ethernet cables. The problem with them was that, yeah, sure, they would tell 
you if you had shorts or opens, but they did not tell you where. Cable itself 
tends to be pretty reliably connected end to end, but when you have crimped 
both ends and you find a short or open with a continuity tester, you have 
almost no idea which end you screwed up. You look very closely at the crimped 
ends, decide which one looks sketchier, cut it off and try again more 
carefully, then rinse and repeat.

A few years ago, after suffering this problem for over a decade, we finally 
invested in a fluke microscanner2. It does time domain reflectometry, and can 
tell you, pair-by-pair, whether it has continuity and crucially, if it does 
not, how far down the wire the fault occurs. Suddenly, we know which end has 
the fault! If we stabbed the cable to death with hoop staples and there is a 
mid span fault, we know that. It cost us $500. It wasn't their fanciest model, 
but it has been such an improvement in reliability and visibility.

--
Russell Senior
russ...@personaltelco.net

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 09:21 mo  wrote:

> Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so many!
> How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?
>
> My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for 
> future use with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other 
> features to look for in such an item. I want to test for cable 
> quality, connectivity, speed, etc as well as locating which cable 
> terminates where (if all that's possible). 
>



Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Russell Senior
For years, we got away with a cheapo $20 continuity tester for checking
Ethernet cables. The problem with them was that, yeah, sure, they would
tell you if you had shorts or opens, but they did not tell you where. Cable
itself tends to be pretty reliably connected end to end, but when you have
crimped both ends and you find a short or open with a continuity tester,
you have almost no idea which end you screwed up. You look very closely at
the crimped ends, decide which one looks sketchier, cut it off and try
again more carefully, then rinse and repeat.

A few years ago, after suffering this problem for over a decade, we finally
invested in a fluke microscanner2. It does time domain reflectometry, and
can tell you, pair-by-pair, whether it has continuity and crucially, if it
does not, how far down the wire the fault occurs. Suddenly, we know which
end has the fault! If we stabbed the cable to death with hoop staples and
there is a mid span fault, we know that. It cost us $500. It wasn't their
fanciest model, but it has been such an improvement in reliability and
visibility.

-- 
Russell Senior
russ...@personaltelco.net

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 09:21 mo  wrote:

> Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so many!
> How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?
>
> My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for future use
> with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other features to look
> for in such an item. I want to test for cable quality, connectivity, speed,
> etc as well as locating which cable terminates where (if all that's
> possible). 
>


Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, mo wrote:


Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so many!
How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?


mo,

I've used a fox & hound audio cable tester for phone lines with RJ-11 plugs
since I moved into this house 31 years ago. Without fetching it now I assume
it can work with computer data cables and RJ-45 plugs, perhaps needing an
adapter.

HTH,

Rich



Re: [PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread Michael Ewan
I do not have a specific recommendation, other than do not go cheap.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:21 AM mo  wrote:

> Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so many!
> How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?
>
> My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for future use
> with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other features to look
> for in such an item. I want to test for cable quality, connectivity, speed,
> etc as well as locating which cable terminates where (if all that's
> possible). 
>


[PLUG] Cable tester

2024-01-29 Thread mo
Hi. I need to buy a cat5 cable tester aka tone detector. There are so many!
How should I choose one? What features, brands, etc do you recommend?

My bldg has up to 100' of cat5e I think. I'd like one I keep for future use
with different wiring (RJ11, cat6 7, etc). Idk what other features to look
for in such an item. I want to test for cable quality, connectivity, speed,
etc as well as locating which cable terminates where (if all that's
possible). 


Re: [PLUG] Edit PDF

2024-01-29 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Charles Sliger wrote:


You basically have to do the layout and formatting manually. I use it
frequently to edit invoices and receipts that come in pdf form so that
they print on a single page. I change the page layout to landscape, use
snap lines, change font size, etc.


Charles,

Take a look at pdfjam. The man page begins with
pdfjam(1)   
 pdfjam(1)

NAME
   pdfjam - A shell script for manipulating PDF files

SYNOPSIS
   pdfjam [OPTION [OPTION] ...] [SRC [PAGESPEC] [SRC [PAGESPEC]] ...]

DESCRIPTION
   pdfjam  provides  a  front  end  to most capabilities of the "pdfpages" 
package (by
   Andreas Matthias) of pdflatex.  Detailed  information  can  be  found  via  
"pdfjam
   --help", and also in the web page mentioned below .

   A working installation of pdflatex, with the pdfpages package, is 
required.

   The  pdfjam  script  is  distributed as (the main) part of the pdfjam 
package.  The
   homepage of pdfjam is at https://github.com/rrthomas/pdfjam .

SETUP
   See https://github.com/rrthomas/pdfjam

I use it to resize PDF web page downloads to letter size, and a few other
things.

Regards,

Rich


Re: [PLUG] Edit PDF

2024-01-29 Thread mo
Yes masterpdf is way better then.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 08:40 Charles Sliger  wrote:

> Not really. :)
> You have to put newlines in.
> You basically have to do the layout and formatting manually.
> I use it frequently to edit invoices and receipts that come in pdf form
> so that they print on a single page.
> I change the page layout to landscape, use snap lines, change font
> size, etc.
> --
> -chaz
> Charles Sliger
> "No matter where you go... There you are... Buckaroo Banzai"
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 11:15 -0800, mo wrote:
> > Libreoffice draw can edit the text already on a PDF? Does it
> > automatically
> > adhere to text cell borders aka wrap the text as expected?
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024, 09:50 Charles Sliger 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > For quick, simple edits, I use LibreOffice Draw.
> > > You can open a pdf, move things around, edit text, etc.
> > > When you're done, just choose 'Export as PDF" from the "File" menu.
> > > --
> > > -chaz
> > > Charles Sliger
> > > "No matter where you go... There you are... Buckaroo Banzai"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 16:44 -0800, VY wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear All
> > > >
> > > > I am looking for some tools on Linux I can use to edit PDF
> > > > documents.
> > > > Any recommendation much appreciated!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > -Vincent
>


Re: [PLUG] Edit PDF

2024-01-29 Thread Charles Sliger
Not really. :)
You have to put newlines in.
You basically have to do the layout and formatting manually.
I use it frequently to edit invoices and receipts that come in pdf form
so that they print on a single page.
I change the page layout to landscape, use snap lines, change font
size, etc.
-- 
-chaz
Charles Sliger
"No matter where you go... There you are... Buckaroo Banzai"



On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 11:15 -0800, mo wrote:
> Libreoffice draw can edit the text already on a PDF? Does it
> automatically
> adhere to text cell borders aka wrap the text as expected?
> 
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024, 09:50 Charles Sliger 
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > For quick, simple edits, I use LibreOffice Draw.
> > You can open a pdf, move things around, edit text, etc.
> > When you're done, just choose 'Export as PDF" from the "File" menu.
> > --
> > -chaz
> > Charles Sliger
> > "No matter where you go... There you are... Buckaroo Banzai"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 16:44 -0800, VY wrote:
> > > 
> > > Dear All
> > > 
> > > I am looking for some tools on Linux I can use to edit PDF
> > > documents.
> > > Any recommendation much appreciated!
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > -Vincent