Re: [Ql-Users] Websites

2012-09-23 Thread Tony Firshman

Geoff Wicks wrote, on 23/Sep/12 20:10 | Sep23:

The bill for the current 12 months of my website came to £47.84. I use a 
commercial host that many small businesses and organisations use and I get a 
good service.

That website that, by universal acclaim, is the best QL website ever is run 
more cheaply than I run mine. The host is Tony Firshman and I understand the 
owner of the site gets a good service from him.

You missed out a line I think.
You are talking I am sure about Dilwyn's site.
I currently charge £18 per year plus VAT.


Last year Quanta spent £346 on its website, which is more than seven times what 
I am paying.

Could someone please explain to me what Quanta is getting for this money that I 
am not getting. And why, after spending so much members' money, the Quanta 
website, apart from the news section, appears to have been at a complete still 
stand for about 18 months,

Interesting question.  I understand they use a content management 
system, but if the site doesn't change, that seems superfluous!


Tony


--
   t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Websites

2012-09-23 Thread Timothy Swenson
I maintain a website for two different local non-profits.  Unless you 
make a concerted effort to make updates every month or so, it is fairly 
easy for sites to get stale (I'm guilty of that myself).


Who ever maintains the site needs to set a schedule (similar to a 
newsletter) and update the site with something.


If someone knows a fair bit about web programming, I'm sure update could 
be sent in via e-mail and automatically posted.  But this all takes 
knowledge or money to hire someone.


So, it really is just a matter of making the effort.  It also helps to 
have information to post on the website.


Tim Swenson
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Ql-Users Digest, Vol 103, Issue 10

2012-09-23 Thread paul

Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:10:33 +0100 From: Geoff
Wicksgtwi...@btinternet.com To: ql-usersql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] Websites



The bill for the current 12 months of my website came to ?47.84. I
use a commercial host that many small businesses and organisations
use and I get a good service.



That website that, by universal acclaim, is the best QL website ever
is run more cheaply than I run mine. The host is Tony Firshman and I
understand the owner of the site gets a good service from him.



Last year Quanta spent ?346 on its website, which is more than seven
times what I am paying.



Could someone please explain to me what Quanta is getting for this
money that I am not getting. And why, after spending so much members'
money, the Quanta website, apart from the news section, appears to
have been at a complete still stand for about 18 months,



Best wishes,



Geoff


1. Annual Cost = Fiscal responsibility
1.1 Are they by some reason avoiding a perceived conflict by Not Using 
his service?


2. Web Site maintenance = SOMEONE has to pay attention to it. Probably 
would be a GOOD place to visit if it had an 'Editor' type that saw to 
its timeliness of news and feature updating. NOT just checking to see 
that it still works.
2.1 There are free software programs that can aid in revising/editing a 
web page IF someone wished to learn how to use it AND had an interest in 
doing so. Ergo Degree of commitment??
2.2 Hay, this seems like a 'sit-down' job, how hard would it be to get 
someone to do it that is still associated with QUANTA??


(off mini-soapbox now)

--
Paul Holmgren
Mine: 2 57 300-C's in Indy
Hers: 05 PT GT R/T HO Stage 1
Hoosier Corps L#6
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] New game for the QL under development

2012-09-23 Thread Francois Lanciault
Hello QL community,

After many years of trying unsuccessfully to have fun writing software for 
other computers, I recently realized that I missed writing QL programs, 
especially 68000 assembly. I know that to maximize my motivation a project has 
to be challenging, as writing a chess program from scratch for the QL 
(Blackknight) was many years ago.

So here is my project: I am currently writing a game for the QL. The game will 
be a fast paced 3D wireframe of the type shoot everything you can as fast as 
possible or else you will crash onto it I decided the game has to be fast and 
challenging, the graphics smooth and colorful. I also wanted to include some 
nice presentation screens using high color modes and maybe some kind of film 
sequence between the different levels.

That was a month ago. I did not want to talk about it to soon because I was not 
sure it would be possible to achieve that kind performance on a QL. But now I 
think I can do it. As of today, the complete 3D engine is written and is 
performing well. It is a real 3D engine, not a pseudo 3D. You can navigate 
around in any direction, the object can have any shape and any movement, etc. 
It does take a lot of processing power from the QL, so I don't think a bare QL 
will be able to handle it but I am hoping that a GoldCard will be enough.

For the moment the engine can achieve between 20 and 30 frames per second, 
depending of the complexity of the scene, running on a SuperGoldCard.

The game will support the following system / graphics in its first iteration

Standard QL mode 4 : very little flickering, 4 colors only, good performance in 
fps
Standard QL mode 8 : very little flickering, 8 colors, fat ugly dots, best 
performance in fps

Minerva QL mode 4 : No flickering, 4 colors only, good performance in fps
Minerva QL mode 8 : No flickering, 8 colors, fat ugly dots, best performance in 
fps
Minerva QL mode 4 : Lots of flickering, 10 colors, bad performance in fps
Minerva QL mode 8 : Lots of flickering, 27 colors, fat ugly but colorful dots, 
bad performance in fps

Aurora QL mode 16 : little flickering, 16 colors, sharp graphics, worst 
performance in fps

I don't think I will do an Aurora 256 colors version. Not because it is 
difficult, but because it really gonna be too slow.

As I don't have a Q40 or QPCII, I am not doing anything to support their 
additional graphic modes, but maybe sometime in the future I will look into 
that too.

Feel free to ask any question, any word of encouragement is also welcome !

François Lanciault
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm