Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, actually functions are present in EXTRAS. Things like AND, OR, NOT (and, yes INSTR) are considered to be operators (like + or -), and thus will not show up with EXTRAS. These keywords (and variations thereof) are all included in the the Basic Keywords Index on the official SMSQ site and most are marked 'O' for operator, unless I was unsure about their use or syntax. Bob -- Deze e-mail is gecontroleerd op virussen door AVG. http://www.avg.com ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Op 8/05/2021 om 16:12 schreef Wolf via Ql-Users: Hi, actually functions are present in EXTRAS. Things like AND, OR, NOT (and, yes INSTR) are considered to be operators (like + or -), and thus will not show up with EXTRAS. HTH Wolfgang Le 08/05/2021 à 14:36, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users a écrit : Op 7/05/2021 om 17:55 schreef Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users: On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:35, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: Op 7/05/2021 om 14:10 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: INSTR gone? The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is that possible? It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way "AND" is not listet, or "TO". Marcel I wonder if you were thinking of the INSTR_CASE extension in SBASIC? That did, and still does, show up in the EXTRAS listing. Dilwyn ___ QL-Users Mailing List Hi Dilwyn, No, I meant 'INSTR' but I completely forgot fonctions are not present in 'EXTRAS':stupid of me, of course. 'WHERE' and 'EXISTS' can't detect function either. INSTR_CASE is present in 'EXTRAS' as it is an instruction. I never used INSTR_CASE as it didn't do its job in Qliberated Executables. ( many years ago). Isn't the fact that functions are difficult to detect a problem for utility 'Namecheck'? Sorry for my late reply, but yesterday end of the afternoon I had to go the the vaccination center to get my second 'shot'. Have a fine weekend, François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List Hi, You are right, even my own functions (qliberated qbasic) are visible in Extras. Thanks for correcting me. François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Hi, actually functions are present in EXTRAS. Things like AND, OR, NOT (and, yes INSTR) are considered to be operators (like + or -), and thus will not show up with EXTRAS. HTH Wolfgang Le 08/05/2021 à 14:36, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users a écrit : Op 7/05/2021 om 17:55 schreef Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users: On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:35, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: Op 7/05/2021 om 14:10 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: INSTR gone? The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is that possible? It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way "AND" is not listet, or "TO". Marcel I wonder if you were thinking of the INSTR_CASE extension in SBASIC? That did, and still does, show up in the EXTRAS listing. Dilwyn ___ QL-Users Mailing List Hi Dilwyn, No, I meant 'INSTR' but I completely forgot fonctions are not present in 'EXTRAS':stupid of me, of course. 'WHERE' and 'EXISTS' can't detect function either. INSTR_CASE is present in 'EXTRAS' as it is an instruction. I never used INSTR_CASE as it didn't do its job in Qliberated Executables. ( many years ago). Isn't the fact that functions are difficult to detect a problem for utility 'Namecheck'? Sorry for my late reply, but yesterday end of the afternoon I had to go the the vaccination center to get my second 'shot'. Have a fine weekend, François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Good point. There is code in my Basic Reporter program which finds the operator tokens. I'll try to look at whether I can adapt this for Namecheck. Dilwyn On Sat, 8 May 2021, 13:36 François Van Emelen via Ql-Users, < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > Op 7/05/2021 om 17:55 schreef Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users: > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:35, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users > > wrote: > >> Op 7/05/2021 om 14:10 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: > >>> François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: > INSTR gone? > > The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. > How is that possible? > >>> It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way > >>> "AND" is not listet, or "TO". > >>> > >>> Marcel > > I wonder if you were thinking of the INSTR_CASE extension in SBASIC? > > That did, and still does, show up in the EXTRAS listing. > > > > Dilwyn > > ___ > > QL-Users Mailing List > > Hi Dilwyn, > > No, I meant 'INSTR' but I completely forgot fonctions are not present in > 'EXTRAS':stupid of me, of course. > > 'WHERE' and 'EXISTS' can't detect function either. > > INSTR_CASE is present in 'EXTRAS' as it is an instruction. > > I never used INSTR_CASE as it didn't do its job in Qliberated > Executables. ( many years ago). > > Isn't the fact that functions are difficult to detect a problem for > utility 'Namecheck'? > > Sorry for my late reply, but yesterday end of the afternoon I had to go > the the vaccination center to get my second 'shot'. > > Have a fine weekend, > > François Van Emelen > > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Op 7/05/2021 om 17:55 schreef Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users: On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:35, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: Op 7/05/2021 om 14:10 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: INSTR gone? The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is that possible? It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way "AND" is not listet, or "TO". Marcel I wonder if you were thinking of the INSTR_CASE extension in SBASIC? That did, and still does, show up in the EXTRAS listing. Dilwyn ___ QL-Users Mailing List Hi Dilwyn, No, I meant 'INSTR' but I completely forgot fonctions are not present in 'EXTRAS':stupid of me, of course. 'WHERE' and 'EXISTS' can't detect function either. INSTR_CASE is present in 'EXTRAS' as it is an instruction. I never used INSTR_CASE as it didn't do its job in Qliberated Executables. ( many years ago). Isn't the fact that functions are difficult to detect a problem for utility 'Namecheck'? Sorry for my late reply, but yesterday end of the afternoon I had to go the the vaccination center to get my second 'shot'. Have a fine weekend, François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:35, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: > > Op 7/05/2021 om 14:10 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: > > François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: > >> INSTR gone? > >> > >> The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is > >> that possible? > > It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way > > "AND" is not listet, or "TO". > > > > Marcel I wonder if you were thinking of the INSTR_CASE extension in SBASIC? That did, and still does, show up in the EXTRAS listing. Dilwyn ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Op 7/05/2021 om 14:10 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: INSTR gone? The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is that possible? It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way "AND" is not listet, or "TO". Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List Hi Marcel, Thanks for the info. François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: > INSTR gone? > > The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is > that possible? It's not an instruction and was never listed in EXTRAS. The same way "AND" is not listet, or "TO". Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List
[Ql-Users] The INSTR function?
Hi all, INSTR gone? The function can still be used but is no longer present in 'EXTRAS. How is that possible? François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List
