Re: ACLJ's Jay Sekulow Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor on church stateseparation

2009-05-08 Thread Don Byrd
All I have found is her dissent in Hankins v Lyght. Not much for  
Sekulow to hang his hat on there. I would think he would be glad for  
her clear embrace of the ministerial exception, even if she doesn't  
sound thrilled about the scope of RFRA as the majority framed it.  
Hardly supports his claim, in my opinion.


http://www.bjconline.org/index.php? 
option=com_contenttask=viewid=2398Itemid=134


On May 7, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Marc Stern wrote:

The unanimous 10 commandments case Sekulow refers to is obviously  
Summum--and that case by its very terms decided no Establishment  
Clause issue. Nothing like honest reporting. As to her opinions,is  
he possibly referring the Bronx Household of Prayer case (in either  
the Court of Appeals or the District Court) ?.I don't think she sat  
in the 2nd Circuits foray into Christmas observances in the public  
schools.

Marc Stern
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw- 
boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of aa...@aol.com

Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:50 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: ACLJ's Jay Sekulow Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor on church  
stateseparation


I thought members of this list might be interested in an interview  
of the ACLJ's Jay Sekulow that ran on Fox News last Friday  
discussing possible replacements for Justice Souter with much of  
the time spent discussing Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Although Sekulow  
never mentioned any specific opinion or statement from Judge  
Sotomayor, he claimed that she is much further to the left than  
Justice Ginsburg or Justice Souter. Sekulow also referred to  
winning a recent ten commandments case before the US Supreme Court  
with a 9-0 vote and said he thinks the vote would have been 8-1 if  
Judge Sotomayor were on the Court because she has a very, very  
strict view of church state separation.


You can find the full 7 minute interview on the Fox News website  
at: http://tinyurl/JudgeSlam


Or, if you forgive the self-promotion, you can see the relevant  
clips interspersed with critical commentary in my 4 minute 20  
second YouTube video titled Fox News Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor  
for Supreme Court? at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZXZAjtXJ5s


I thought it particularly appropriate to post my video to this list  
because I actually provide a link to one of my previous posts to  
this list in the video. See http://tinyurl.com/DishonestJay


My question for the members of this list:

Are there any specific opinions or statement from Judge Sotomayor  
that back up Jay Sekulow's characterization of her as much further  
to the left than Justice Ginsburg or Justice Souter or of her  
having a very, very strict view of church state separation?


Allen Asch

Big savings on Dell's most popular laptops. Now starting at $449!
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see  
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw


Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed  
as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages  
that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members  
can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.


___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


Re: ACLJ's Jay Sekulow Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor on church stateseparation

2009-05-07 Thread hamilton02
I just don't understand this.  Does Jay not understand that he just made the 
case for Sotomayer stronger?  With Specter (who is not hostile to the Est Cl) 
now among the Democrats and a 60th vote to avoid a filibuster, complaining she 
is strong on sep of church and state is playing to her strength. One of the 
most serious fears for a lot of groups about the post Rehnquist Court has been 
that the Establishment Clause would disappear.
Marci 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: aa...@aol.com

Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 15:49:37 
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: ACLJ's Jay Sekulow Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor on church state
separation


___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


RE: ACLJ's Jay Sekulow Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor on church stateseparation

2009-05-07 Thread Marc Stern
The unanimous 10 commandments case Sekulow refers to is obviously
Summum--and that case by its very terms decided no Establishment Clause
issue. Nothing like honest reporting. As to her opinions,is he possibly
referring the Bronx Household of Prayer case (in either the Court of
Appeals or the District Court) ?.I don't think she sat in the 2nd
Circuits foray into Christmas observances in the public schools.
Marc Stern


From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of aa...@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:50 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: ACLJ's Jay Sekulow Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor on church
stateseparation


I thought members of this list might be interested in an interview of
the ACLJ's Jay Sekulow that ran on Fox News last Friday discussing
possible replacements for Justice Souter with much of the time spent
discussing Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Although Sekulow never mentioned any
specific opinion or statement from Judge Sotomayor, he claimed that she
is much further to the left than Justice Ginsburg or Justice Souter.
Sekulow also referred to winning a recent ten commandments case before
the US Supreme Court with a 9-0 vote and said he thinks the vote would
have been 8-1 if Judge Sotomayor were on the Court because she has a
very, very strict view of church state separation.
 
You can find the full 7 minute interview on the Fox News website at:
http://tinyurl/JudgeSlam
 
Or, if you forgive the self-promotion, you can see the relevant clips
interspersed with critical commentary in my 4 minute 20 second YouTube
video titled Fox News Slams Judge Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court?
at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZXZAjtXJ5s
 
I thought it particularly appropriate to post my video to this list
because I actually provide a link to one of my previous posts to this
list in the video. See http://tinyurl.com/DishonestJay 
 
My question for the members of this list:
 
Are there any specific opinions or statement from Judge Sotomayor that
back up Jay Sekulow's characterization of her as much further to the
left than Justice Ginsburg or Justice Souter or of her having a very,
very strict view of church state separation?
 
Allen Asch



Big savings on Dell's most popular laptops. Now starting at $449!
http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222382499x1201454962/aol?redir
=http:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B214663472%3B36502367%3Bg  
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.