Re: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God'
Does anyone know why his case is not moot? Quoting Joel Sogol jlsa...@wwisp.com: http://alm-editorial-us.msgfocus.com/c/1jdUyMEEiPtTMiYph Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' The National Law Journal Before every oral argument in the D.C. Circuit, a court clerk tells everyone to draw near and give their attention because the court is now sitting. The opening cry ends with the line God save the United States and this honorable court. Atheist lawyer and physician Michael Newdow filed a motion to block the clerk from referring to God next Tuesday when a panel takes up his case challenging the custom of concluding the presidential oath of office with the line So help me God. A panel rejected that request Wednesday. Joel L. Sogol Attorney at Law 811 21st Avenue Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 ph (205) 345-0966 fx (205) 345-0971 mailto:jlsa...@wwisp.com jlsa...@wwisp.com Ben Franklin observed that truth wins a fair fight -- which is why we have evidence rules in U.S. courts. Douglas Laycock Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law University of Michigan Law School 625 S. State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 734-647-9713___ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
RE: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God'
yes but there is no guarantee that future inaugurations will be the same as past ones. Marc Stern From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Friedman, Howard M. Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:03 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' The original complaint asked for a declaratory judgment that adding so help me God to the oath, and having clergy as part of the inaugural ceremony are unconstitutional. That would presumably apply to future inaugurations as well. Here is a link to the original complaint: http://www.humanistlegalcenter.org/cases/Invocation/Newdow_v_Roberts_D_D C_complaint_2008-12-29.pdf Howard Friedman From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Douglas Laycock Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 11:15 AM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' Does anyone know why his case is not moot? Quoting Joel Sogol jlsa...@wwisp.com: http://alm-editorial-us.msgfocus.com/c/1jdUyMEEiPtTMiYph Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' The National Law Journal Before every oral argument in the D.C. Circuit, a court clerk tells everyone to draw near and give their attention because the court is now sitting. The opening cry ends with the line God save the United States and this honorable court. Atheist lawyer and physician Michael Newdow filed a motion to block the clerk from referring to God next Tuesday when a panel takes up his case challenging the custom of concluding the presidential oath of office with the line So help me God. A panel rejected that request Wednesday. Joel L. Sogol Attorney at Law 811 21st Avenue Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 ph (205) 345-0966 fx (205) 345-0971 mailto:jlsa...@wwisp.com jlsa...@wwisp.com Ben Franklin observed that truth wins a fair fight -- which is why we have evidence rules in U.S. courts. Douglas Laycock Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law University of Michigan Law School 625 S. State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 734-647-9713 ___ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
RE: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God'
Capable of repetition yet evading review? But is it? Dan Conkle Daniel O. Conkle Robert H. McKinney Professor of Law Indiana University Maurer School of Law Bloomington, Indiana 47405 (812) 855-4331 fax (812) 855-0555 e-mail con...@indiana.edu From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marc Stern Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:14 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' yes but there is no guarantee that future inaugurations will be the same as past ones. Marc Stern From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Friedman, Howard M. Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:03 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' The original complaint asked for a declaratory judgment that adding so help me God to the oath, and having clergy as part of the inaugural ceremony are unconstitutional. That would presumably apply to future inaugurations as well. Here is a link to the original complaint: http://www.humanistlegalcenter.org/cases/Invocation/Newdow_v_Roberts_D_DC_complaint_2008-12-29.pdf Howard Friedman From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Douglas Laycock Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 11:15 AM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' Does anyone know why his case is not moot? Quoting Joel Sogol jlsa...@wwisp.com: http://alm-editorial-us.msgfocus.com/c/1jdUyMEEiPtTMiYph Federal Appeals Court Goes With 'God' The National Law Journal Before every oral argument in the D.C. Circuit, a court clerk tells everyone to draw near and give their attention because the court is now sitting. The opening cry ends with the line God save the United States and this honorable court. Atheist lawyer and physician Michael Newdow filed a motion to block the clerk from referring to God next Tuesday when a panel takes up his case challenging the custom of concluding the presidential oath of office with the line So help me God. A panel rejected that request Wednesday. Joel L. Sogol Attorney at Law 811 21st Avenue Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 ph (205) 345-0966 fx (205) 345-0971 mailto:jlsa...@wwisp.com jlsa...@wwisp.com Ben Franklin observed that truth wins a fair fight -- which is why we have evidence rules in U.S. courts. Douglas Laycock Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law University of Michigan Law School 625 S. State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 734-647-9713 ___ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
