Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A Home Brew 224 MHz Repeater Project. - Part 3 (The Exciter)

2009-05-23 Thread no6b
At 5/8/2009 21:26, you wrote:
A Home Brew 224 MHz Repeater Project.
May 2009
Part 3 ­ The exciter (transmitter)
First Post May 2, 2009, Second Post May 6, 2009 - This Post May 8, 2009

Moving right along...

(snip)

Let's talk about the coax connector being an RCA jack on the
exciter PC Board. Why bother with a box ­ chassis mount connector
added to the path

Why?  To maintain proper shielding.  Again, passing a wire/shield/any 
conductor through a hole in the box without bonding at that point will make 
the conductor act like a coupling probe.

Sure, it may work but I claim so would doing away with the box altogether, 
so you could simply bolt the exciter board to a plate.  Of course the 
harmonics generated by the exciter will radiate.  If there are any RXs at 
the site that are harmonically related to your 220 TX you'll probably find 
out about it.  I once had a similar problem in reverse (440 MVP hitting a 
co-located 220 RX exactly 1/2 the MVP TX freq.).  This is where I learned 
about effective shielding techniques,  why you can't do what you outline 
below.

  when in many cases it's more loss than it's
worth. So... I soldered an RCA connector on the end of a section
of quality small size (brown ­ tan) Teflon coax and routed it
through a hole made just large enough (to pass the RCA plug) with
a Unibit Step Drill (bit). A low cost clone set (three in one
package) of Unibit type step drill bits are almost a must have
expense of less than $15 at Harbor Freight.


(snip)

The disadvantage of leaving the oscillator on all the time is a
constant local low level signal that is sometimes a lot stronger
than you would expect. One of my 224 MHz Spectrum transmitter
oscillators can be heard  almost a half mile from the repeater
site (which is not really very professional or something to be
proud of).

In the case of this model exciter, one can key the entire module each
transmission knowing the synthesizer requires about 350 mS (Milli
seconds) to come on the air.

Yuk!  Wonder if there's some way of leaving the synth. powered up while 
disabling the rest of the exciter so you don't have to deal with this delay 
yet still not have the TX signal heard near the site.

Bob NO6B



Re: [Repeater-Builder] sleeping arrangements - Dayton Hamvention

2009-05-23 Thread no6b
At 5/17/2009 19:54, you wrote:


Do not stay in miamisburg.  You will be sorry.
We had 30 messages about drugs on our room voicemail.
Also when my other friend checked in someone said 'welcome to hell' to him.
This was at the studio 6 in miamisburg.  There also was when the 
miamisburg PD almost rear ended my friend who was driving..

I've stayed there 5 times  never had a problem.  At less than $30/night 
for a week w/fridge  microwave, I don't expect much else other than no 
bedbugs/loud neighbors/dirty rooms.

Bob NO6B



RE: [Repeater-Builder] sleeping arrangements - Dayton Hamvention

2009-05-23 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Dayton is no worse/better than any other location where you might find
sleeping arrangements maxed out.  Some rooms/locations are going to be
better than others and some hotel staff will be more helpful than others.
It's just a microcosm of society. 

 

Mike

WM4B

(Formerly from Dayton/Former DARA member)

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of n...@no6b.com
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:17 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] sleeping arrangements - Dayton Hamvention

 






At 5/17/2009 19:54, you wrote:

Do not stay in miamisburg. You will be sorry.
We had 30 messages about drugs on our room voicemail.
Also when my other friend checked in someone said 'welcome to hell' to him.
This was at the studio 6 in miamisburg. There also was when the 
miamisburg PD almost rear ended my friend who was driving..

I've stayed there 5 times  never had a problem. At less than $30/night 
for a week w/fridge  microwave, I don't expect much else other than no 
bedbugs/loud neighbors/dirty rooms.

Bob NO6B



image001.jpgimage002.jpg

Re: [Repeater-Builder] One way transmitting question

2009-05-23 Thread Kris Kirby
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Christopher Hodgdon wrote:
 Ok, I have a question that has been bothering me over the last few 
 days.  I had mentioned that we wanted to use our repeater to send out 
 a set of tones to activate fire style pager (this was some time ago) 
 and people said we should not do it for one reason or another.  One of 
 those reasons was that it might be considered a one way broadcast and 
 not legal under FCC rules for amateur radio.

 That being said, I know that some people have come on here and asked 
 about using a weather radio on their repeater system, etc.  Having it 
 setup to send out alerts over the repeater when they come in.  Would 
 this not also be considered a 1 way broadcast for reception by general 
 public, per-say.
 
Re-repeating NOAA's broadcast and/or tones, and generating your own 
alert tones is dodgy at best. If you did so, it would be a one-way 
transmission since there is no reason to respond, no incentive to pop 
up on the local repeater. However, if you transmitted a CAPCODE or a 
two-tone alert tone for Net Requested then, that meets the definition:

(2) Brief transmissions necessary to establishing two-way communications
with other stations;

I believe that if even one ham responded, you'd meet the requirement. 
(2) is satisfied (reach with me here) by the actions of a fire 
department dispatcher. There are very few occasions in fire departments 
where a page tone is not followed by radio traffic -- especially in 
rural volunteer departments. 
 
 How can you legally include a weather alert radio in a repeater setup 
 and have it function as required?

Why not just have a two-tone pager set to the same frequency and 
activation tone as the weather alerts? If all available tone slots a set 
matched to the incoming tone, you'll be able to hear the weather alerts, 
or unmute the reciever. Then you don't have to mess with FCC compliance, 
or modification of the repeater. Then you can enjoy the 1+kW EIRP of 
NOAA's transmitters.

Another poster commented:
 Tones for the activation of pagers are Telecommand and information 
 bulletins.

I strongly disagree with this. Telecommand involves the remote 
operation of equipment, i.e.: repeaters and spacecraft. Telecommand does 
not cover remotely managing people.

Remember, the intent of the amateur service is not to do those things 
which commercial radio does for profit. We can't build phone networks 
over radio and sell bandwidth or airtime to cover our costs. We can't 
operate for-profit or non-profit paging transmitters in the amateur 
bands. We can only serve our own needs. We have a great deal of 
technology available to us now for various forms of amateur 
experimentation and exploitation. We must keep in mind however that our 
purpose is to communicate. The FCC has limited us in the manner of 
what types of things we may share, when, and how we are allowed to 
communicate. 

Fundamentally, we're about communicating, not emergency service. There's 
other sections of radio for that: Part 90. 

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst


From the rules at ARRL.org:
(b) In addition to one-way transmissions specifically authorized 
elsewhere in this Part, an amateur station may transmit
the following types of one-way communications:

(1) Brief transmissions necessary to make adjustments to the station;
(2) Brief transmissions necessary to establishing two-way communications 
with other stations;

(3) Telecommand;
(4) Transmissions necessary to providing emergency communications;
(5) Transmissions necessary to assisting persons learning, or improving 
proficiency in, the international Morse code;

(6) Transmissions necessary to disseminate information bulletins;
(7) Transmissions of telemetry.
...




Re: [Repeater-Builder] One way transmitting question

2009-05-23 Thread mch
Telemetry is legal, so if it's alerting you as to the conditions at or near the 
site, it should be fine. Nowhere does it require the telemetry to be in 
data-only format.

Joe M.

 On Sat 23/05/09  4:28 PM , Kris Kirby k...@catonic.us sent:
 On Fri, 22 May 2009, Christopher Hodgdon wrote:
  Ok, I have a question that has been bothering me
 over the last few  days.  I had mentioned that we wanted to use our
 repeater to send out  a set of tones to activate fire style pager
 (this was some time ago)  and people said we should not do it for one
 reason or another.  One of  those reasons was that it might be considered a
 one way broadcast and  not legal under FCC rules for amateur
 radio.
  That being said, I know that some people have
 come on here and asked  about using a weather radio on their repeater
 system, etc.  Having it  setup to send out alerts over the repeater when
 they come in.  Would  this not also be considered a 1 way broadcast
 for reception by general  public, per-say.
 
 Re-repeating NOAA's broadcast and/or tones, and generating your own 
 alert tones is dodgy at best. If you did so, it would be a one-way 
 transmission since there is no reason to respond, no incentive to pop 
 up on the local repeater. However, if you transmitted a CAPCODE or a 
 two-tone alert tone for Net Requested then, that meets the
 definition:
 (2) Brief transmissions necessary to establishing two-way
 communicationswith other stations;
 
 I believe that if even one ham responded, you'd meet the requirement. 
 (2) is satisfied (reach with me here) by the actions of a fire 
 department dispatcher. There are very few occasions in fire departments
 where a page tone is not followed by radio traffic -- especially in 
 rural volunteer departments. 
 
  How can you legally include a weather alert
 radio in a repeater setup  and have it function as required?
 
 Why not just have a two-tone pager set to the same frequency and 
 activation tone as the weather alerts? If all available tone slots a set
 matched to the incoming tone, you'll be able to hear the weather alerts,
 or unmute the reciever. Then you don't have to mess with FCC compliance,
 or modification of the repeater. Then you can enjoy the 1+kW EIRP of 
 NOAA's transmitters.
 
 Another poster commented:
  Tones for the activation of pagers are
 Telecommand and information  bulletins.
 
 I strongly disagree with this. Telecommand involves the remote 
 operation of equipment, i.e.: repeaters and spacecraft. Telecommand does
 not cover remotely managing people.
 
 Remember, the intent of the amateur service is not to do those things 
 which commercial radio does for profit. We can't build phone networks 
 over radio and sell bandwidth or airtime to cover our costs. We can't 
 operate for-profit or non-profit paging transmitters in the amateur 
 bands. We can only serve our own needs. We have a great deal of 
 technology available to us now for various forms of amateur 
 experimentation and exploitation. We must keep in mind however that our
 purpose is to communicate. The FCC has limited us in the manner of 
 what types of things we may share, when, and how we are allowed to 
 communicate. 
 
 Fundamentally, we're about communicating, not emergency service. There's
 other sections of radio for that: Part 90. 
 
 --
 Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
 Disinformation Analyst
 
 
 From the rules at ARRL.org:
 (b) In addition to one-way transmissions specifically authorized 
 elsewhere in this Part, an amateur station may transmit
 the following types of one-way communications:
 
 (1) Brief transmissions necessary to make adjustments to the station;
 (2) Brief transmissions necessary to establishing two-way communications
 with other stations;
 
 (3) Telecommand;
 (4) Transmissions necessary to providing emergency communications;
 (5) Transmissions necessary to assisting persons learning, or improving
 proficiency in, the international Morse code;
 
 (6) Transmissions necessary to disseminate information bulletins;
 (7) Transmissions of telemetry.
 ...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
  Your email settings:
 Individual Email | Traditional
 
  To change settings online go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join(Yahoo! ID required)
 
  To change settings via email:
 repeater-builder-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
 repeater-builder-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 repeater-builder-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] One way transmitting question

2009-05-23 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sat, 23 May 2009 m...@nb.net wrote:
 Telemetry is legal, so if it's alerting you as to the conditions at or 
 near the site, it should be fine. Nowhere does it require the 
 telemetry to be in data-only format.

Yes, But...

You didn't clarify how in the world that matters in the current 
argument. I don't care if it's 150 MPH winds and gusting at the repeater 
site -- I'm going to find a hole in the ground to hide in!

Analog telemetry was used for the early rockets of the space program. 
However, repeating a tone generated by NOAA doesn't tell you anything 
about conditions at the repeater site. Nor should you care, since a 
properly engineered and installed repeater won't have any difficulties 
with high winds, rain, or hail.

Telemetry is not a catch-all for Hey, a weather radio at the repeater 
site went off. 

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst


Re: [Repeater-Builder] One way transmitting question

2009-05-23 Thread mch

I thought the original post was about alarms and paging, not weather alerts.

So, if the fan goes out on your amp, it's better to let it burn rather then 
send out an alert to notify a control op?

Oh, and last I knew weather DOES impact repeater sites the same as any other 
location, so if strong thunderstorms are coming, that may be something you 
would want to know to keep an ear on the repeater.

Joe M.

 On Sat 23/05/09  6:52 PM , Kris Kirby k...@catonic.us sent:
 On Sat, 23 May 2009 m...@nb.net
 wrote: Telemetry is legal, so if it's alerting you as
 to the conditions at or  near the site, it should be fine. Nowhere does
 it require the  telemetry to be in data-only format.
 
 Yes, But...
 
 You didn't clarify how in the world that matters in the current 
 argument. I don't care if it's 150 MPH winds and gusting at the repeater
 site -- I'm going to find a hole in the ground to hide in!
 
 Analog telemetry was used for the early rockets of the space program. 
 However, repeating a tone generated by NOAA doesn't tell you anything 
 about conditions at the repeater site. Nor should you care, since a 
 properly engineered and installed repeater won't have any difficulties 
 with high winds, rain, or hail.
 
 Telemetry is not a catch-all for Hey, a weather radio at the repeater
 site went off. 
 
 --
 Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
 Disinformation Analyst
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
  To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
  Your email settings:
 Individual Email | Traditional
 
  To change settings online go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join(Yahoo! ID required)
 
  To change settings via email:
 repeater-builder-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
 repeater-builder-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 repeater-builder-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 


[Repeater-Builder] Cable identity

2009-05-23 Thread cruising7388
Anybody know the nominal impedance of a coax cable labeled: Digital  
Microwave Corp LK 11?
 
It has a copper solid center conductor (looks like 22 gauge), 3/16 foam  
dialectic that fits into an F connector 
for RG-6U, an inner aluminum foil shield and an outer braid shield. It  
looks like video cable but I can't find any specs on it.
 
Thanks
 
Bruce
K7IJt
**A strong credit score is 700 or above. See Yours in Just 2 
Easy Steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585033x1201462753/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072hmpgID=115b
cd=Maystrongfooter52309NO115)


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Cable identity

2009-05-23 Thread Barry

I think it's 72-Ohm


 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 From: cruising7...@aol.com
 Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:21:23 -0400
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Cable identity





























 Anybody know the nominal impedance of a coax cable labeled: Digital
 Microwave Corp LK 11?



 It has a copper solid center conductor (looks like 22 gauge), 3/16 foam
 dialectic that fits into an F connector

 for RG-6U, an inner aluminum foil shield and an outer braid shield. It
 looks like video cable but I can't find any specs on it.



 Thanks



 Bruce

 K7IJt

 
 A strong credit score is 700 or above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!







 












_
Looking to move somewhere new this winter? Let ninemsn property help
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Edomain%2Ecom%2Eau%2F%3Fs%5Fcid%3DFDMedia%3ANineMSN%5FHotmail%5FTagline_t=774152450_r=Domain_tagline_m=EXT