Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Brian, On 18 dec. 2012, at 22:15, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Bas, No problem. I actually went through a dry run with svn2git yesterday. ;-) I'll take care of the initial import. That is nice The Plan: * Yes, we'll pull all of SystemImager into github. fine for me * How do you recommend that we incorporate SALI? It could be done as: - a branch - a fork (git style) - a branch with the intent to merge (would need more discussion on this one -- just want to maintain general applicability) SALI consists of: * SALI server -- could be an alternative for system imager server. Does a lot things automatically (rsync/bittorrent) * SALI kernel/initrd is more up to date then system imager kernel/initrd. The only problem for now is that the autoinstall scripts that are made by systemconfigurator does not work anymore because we removed some functions that are removed in SALI, we could be made available again and ported to the new SALI functions. so we are backwards compatible. Else we have to maintain two versions of kernel/initrd. That is a waste of time. regards Cheers, -Brian On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, I am a but swamped at the moment and the holiday season is nearby ;-). There are tools that convert from sourceforge to github: * https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git#readme What is the plan: * convert systemimager svn (all) to github. We have a lot of versions, tags and branches * Where will SALI fit in. There are a lot of changes in the SALI release. Do we replace the kernelinitrd build process? In SALI we also replaced the system imager server software. regards On 18 dec. 2012, at 00:45, Brian Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: You guys have been added! https://github.com/finley/systemimager If you can help by doing the initial import of SystemImager from SourceForge SVN, that would be great. Let me know if you need anything from me. Thanks, -Brian On 12/17/2012 03:42 AM, Bas van der Vlies wrote: Brian, My github account is: basvandervlies Dennis github account: dstam regards On 15 dec. 2012, at 18:52, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Dennis, That sounds like a good path forward. Please send me github account names for you and Bas, and I'll add you to the SystemImager project. Cheers, -Brian On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dennis Stam dennis.s...@sara.nl wrote: Hi Brian, Great news to make SALI into SystemImager. It's better for both teams to join forces because we want to accomplish the same goal. On 27 nov. 2012, at 18:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? Currently we started the development of version 1.6 and it's far from finished. So as initial import to the git we can use the branch 1.5. And probally the easiest way to migrate our source code to the SystemImager git repo is to fork your repo. From there we can import our branch 1.5 to the forked git repo. And finally send you a pull request? Regards, Dennis https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use the SystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com/http://github.comhttp://github.com/. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Brian, I am a but swamped at the moment and the holiday season is nearby ;-). There are tools that convert from sourceforge to github: * https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git#readme What is the plan: * convert systemimager svn (all) to github. We have a lot of versions, tags and branches * Where will SALI fit in. There are a lot of changes in the SALI release. Do we replace the kernelinitrd build process? In SALI we also replaced the system imager server software. regards On 18 dec. 2012, at 00:45, Brian Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: You guys have been added! https://github.com/finley/systemimager If you can help by doing the initial import of SystemImager from SourceForge SVN, that would be great. Let me know if you need anything from me. Thanks, -Brian On 12/17/2012 03:42 AM, Bas van der Vlies wrote: Brian, My github account is: basvandervlies Dennis github account: dstam regards On 15 dec. 2012, at 18:52, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Dennis, That sounds like a good path forward. Please send me github account names for you and Bas, and I'll add you to the SystemImager project. Cheers, -Brian On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dennis Stam dennis.s...@sara.nl wrote: Hi Brian, Great news to make SALI into SystemImager. It's better for both teams to join forces because we want to accomplish the same goal. On 27 nov. 2012, at 18:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? Currently we started the development of version 1.6 and it's far from finished. So as initial import to the git we can use the branch 1.5. And probally the easiest way to migrate our source code to the SystemImager git repo is to fork your repo. From there we can import our branch 1.5 to the forked git repo. And finally send you a pull request? Regards, Dennis https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use the SystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com/http://github.comhttp://github.com/. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure,
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Brian, My github account is: basvandervlies Dennis github account: dstam regards On 15 dec. 2012, at 18:52, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Dennis, That sounds like a good path forward. Please send me github account names for you and Bas, and I'll add you to the SystemImager project. Cheers, -Brian On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dennis Stam dennis.s...@sara.nl wrote: Hi Brian, Great news to make SALI into SystemImager. It's better for both teams to join forces because we want to accomplish the same goal. On 27 nov. 2012, at 18:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? Currently we started the development of version 1.6 and it's far from finished. So as initial import to the git we can use the branch 1.5. And probally the easiest way to migrate our source code to the SystemImager git repo is to fork your repo. From there we can import our branch 1.5 to the forked git repo. And finally send you a pull request? Regards, Dennis https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use the SystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com/http://github.comhttp://github.com/. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167tel:469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
You guys have been added! https://github.com/finley/systemimager If you can help by doing the initial import of SystemImager from SourceForge SVN, that would be great. Let me know if you need anything from me. Thanks, -Brian On 12/17/2012 03:42 AM, Bas van der Vlies wrote: Brian, My github account is: basvandervlies Dennis github account: dstam regards On 15 dec. 2012, at 18:52, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Dennis, That sounds like a good path forward. Please send me github account names for you and Bas, and I'll add you to the SystemImager project. Cheers, -Brian On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dennis Stam dennis.s...@sara.nl wrote: Hi Brian, Great news to make SALI into SystemImager. It's better for both teams to join forces because we want to accomplish the same goal. On 27 nov. 2012, at 18:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? Currently we started the development of version 1.6 and it's far from finished. So as initial import to the git we can use the branch 1.5. And probally the easiest way to migrate our source code to the SystemImager git repo is to fork your repo. From there we can import our branch 1.5 to the forked git repo. And finally send you a pull request? Regards, Dennis https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use the SystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com/http://github.comhttp://github.com/. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167tel:469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Dennis, That sounds like a good path forward. Please send me github account names for you and Bas, and I'll add you to the SystemImager project. Cheers, -Brian On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dennis Stam dennis.s...@sara.nl wrote: Hi Brian, Great news to make SALI into SystemImager. It's better for both teams to join forces because we want to accomplish the same goal. On 27 nov. 2012, at 18:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com mailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? Currently we started the development of version 1.6 and it's far from finished. So as initial import to the git we can use the branch 1.5. And probally the easiest way to migrate our source code to the SystemImager git repo is to fork your repo. From there we can import our branch 1.5 to the forked git repo. And finally send you a pull request? Regards, Dennis https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use the SystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto: b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com/http://github.com http://github.com/. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com mailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto: br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167tel:469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.commailto: sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
I would be happy to move the project to github. We've actually contemplated that before. Would you be interested in helping to move the code repository to github? On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:01 PM, E-Blokos in...@e-blokos.com wrote: ** Hi Brian, Maybe Git Hub would be better ? If you consider that systemconfigurator can be zapped for new versions so ok, would be happy to help in perl. username: madovsky Cheers Franck - Original Message - *From:* Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com *To:* sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Sent:* Friday, November 23, 2012 1:10 PM *Subject:* Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167 -- -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov -- ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167 -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use theSystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com mailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.commailto: sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167 -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Bas van der Vlies mail: b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl SARA - Academic Computing Services , Amsterdam, The Netherlands -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use theSystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.com mailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.commailto: sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167 -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-usershttp://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___sisuite-usersmailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Bas van der Vlies mail: b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl SARA - Academic Computing Services , Amsterdam, The Netherlands -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Hi Brian, Great news to make SALI into SystemImager. It's better for both teams to join forces because we want to accomplish the same goal. On 27 nov. 2012, at 18:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I've created the initial repo. Bas -- what do you need from me to move the code from SourceForce to github? Currently we started the development of version 1.6 and it's far from finished. So as initial import to the git we can use the branch 1.5. And probally the easiest way to migrate our source code to the SystemImager git repo is to fork your repo. From there we can import our branch 1.5 to the forked git repo. And finally send you a pull request? Regards, Dennis https://github.com/finley/systemimager Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: I think a move to github would be a fine idea. As for the SystemConfigurator functionality, I'd like to use the SystemImager post-script functionality. It will allow us to - include simple scripts upstream, that could be used as-is for simple and common cases - these simple scripts could be easily customized by site admins, without having to know SystemImager internals - a simple script could be used to invoke puppet, chef, or SSM (Simple State Manager - http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ssm/README) Cheers, -Brian On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl wrote: Brian, The SALI vork was nescessary to support modern hardware. Your are right you can better have one source. SALI has implemented a new kernel/initrd and some shell functions, e.g. one for easy disk partition. We also replaced the system imager-server software. Currently we do not have a tool like systemconfigurator or automatically generate installation scripts. So we can definitely benefit from co-operation. My thought for replacing systemconfigurator are with shell commands or a system maintenance tool like CFengine, puppet , chef ,…. Can we move the code to github.comhttp://github.com/http://github.comhttp://github.com/. I think it easier to contribute and better suited if more people are involved. regards On 23 nov. 2012, at 19:10, Brian Elliott Finley br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.commailto:br...@thefinleys.com wrote: Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167tel:469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167tel:469.444.0167 -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Hi, I got the console output as below during the rsync, then the console hung, it seems the image is not completely synced, but failed with no error. Have you ever seen this? xcatpost/rmcmon/scripts/errmsgque xcatpost/rmcmon/scripts/mkrmcresources xcatpost/rmcmon/scripts/monerrorlog sent 959338 bytes received 808895236 bytes 3325891.47 bytes/sec total size is 826180881 speedup is 1.02 receiving incremental file list ./ sent 34 bytes received 56 bytes 180.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 receiving incremental file list sent 4 bytes received 6 bytes 20.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 receiving incremental file list sent 4 bytes received 6 bytes 6.67 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 Best Regards, - Sun Jing(孙靖) IBM China Software Development Laboratory Tel: (86-10) 82453625 E-mail: sj...@cn.ibm.com Address: Building 28, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, No.8, Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing 100193, PRC 北京市海淀区东北旺西路8号中关村软件园28号楼 邮编: 100193 Jing CDL Sun/China/IBM 2012/11/23 11:18 To sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net., cc Subject Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS Thx Olivier! I did not try the postscripts yet, actually I did not realize them until you told me :) I found them in another mail thread, will try them and let you know if they work for me. BTW, I found the new initrd.img generated by SI 4.2.0 is much bigger than the one generated by SI 4.0.2, then is there any recommended ramdisk_size and tmpfs_size for the kernel parameters? where can I find the change lists or release notes so I can know what's actually updated from 4.0.2 to 4.2.0? I'm new for this project, what's SALI? is it another cloning tool? Thx. Jing. -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167 -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Hi Brian, Maybe Git Hub would be better ? If you consider that systemconfigurator can be zapped for new versions so ok, would be happy to help in perl. username: madovsky Cheers Franck - Original Message - From: Brian Elliott Finley To: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS Sun, Olivier, Please send me your SourceForge usernames. I appreciate your efforts, and would like to grant you both commit privileges to the SVN repository, so that you can commit your patches directly. Bas, Franck, the same goes for you two if you wish. Regarding a fork, that is generally necessary because one does not have the ability to modify the upstream original. I will happily grant you this access, as I think it would be better for the community to improve the main code stream rather than to have a fork. I know that SALI has special circumstances that made a fork appropriate for them, at least previously, but I would also be happy to allow that fork to merge into the mainstream if SALI considers that desirable. Lastly, with regard to SystemConfigurator, it is no longer being maintained, and we should work to eliminate our dependency on it. With modern Linuxes this should be very feasible through the use of SystemImager postscripts for setup of boot manager (Grub) and networking (if desirable). All -- feel free to call me if you have any questions. Just bear in mind that I'm generally somewhere in GMT-5 through GMT-7. ;-) If unsure, start with a text message, or leave a voice mail if I don't answer right away, but I'll be glad to discuss. My mobile is 469.444.0167. Cheers, -Brian On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Jing CDL Sun sj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Brian Elliott Finley Mobile: 469.444.0167 -- -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov -- ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
Thx Olivier! I did not try the postscripts yet, actually I did not realize them until you told me :) I found them in another mail thread, will try them and let you know if they work for me. BTW, I found the new initrd.img generated by SI 4.2.0 is much bigger than the one generated by SI 4.0.2, then is there any recommended ramdisk_size and tmpfs_size for the kernel parameters? where can I find the change lists or release notes so I can know what's actually updated from 4.0.2 to 4.2.0? I'm new for this project, what's SALI? is it another cloning tool? Thx. Jing.-- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
Re: [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS
That is good news. On 21 nov. 2012, at 15:42, E-Blokos in...@e-blokos.commailto:in...@e-blokos.com wrote: I planned to patch systemconfigurator but for now I'm too busy with other jobs... - Original Message - From: Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl To: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:29 AM Subject: Re: [sisuite-users] RE : new centos-6.3 RPMS The missing piece for SALI is systemconfigurator. we didn't port it and our perl knowledge is not that good. so an up to date systemconfigurator with SALI is an good combination. regards On 21 nov. 2012, at 15:17, E-Blokos in...@e-blokos.commailto:in...@e-blokos.commailto:in...@e-blokos.com wrote: Hi, I think the best would be to fork sisuite and create a new project, as SALI did. Regards Franck - Original Message - From: LAHAYE Oliviermailto:olivier.lah...@cea.fr To: sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:37 AM Subject: [sisuite-users] RE : new centos-6.3 RPMS Hi, I've successfully deployed my oscar images with those rpms. But I needed some post install scripts in order to have the grub bootloader installed. I've posted the postinstall script as well did you used them? Can you post a description of the problem you encountered? I must admit I feel a little bit alone and feedback is welcome. I'd also be very happy if a developper could revew my patches and if ok commit them to the svn. Cheers, Olivier. -- Olivier LAHAYE CEA DRT/LIST/DCSI/DIR De : Jing CDL Sun [sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.commailto:sj...@cn.ibm.com] Date d'envoi : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 08:16 À : sisuite-users Objet : [sisuite-users] new centos-6.3 RPMS Hi Olivier, Thanks for this sharing! Have you cloning Centos-6.3 with these rpms successfully? I tried to use them for redhat6.3 cloning, bug failed... -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Bas van der Vlies mail: b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl SARA - Academic Computing Services , Amsterdam, The Netherlands -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov ___ sisuite-users mailing list sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users -- Bas van der Vlies mail: b...@sara.nlmailto:b...@sara.nl SARA - Academic Computing Services , Amsterdam, The Netherlands -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
