Re[3]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 4:38:41 AM, Pete wrote: PM On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 1:20:39 AM, ron wrote: rdc Hi folks, rdc I think I have ended up on some sort of private email list. Can you please rdc remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your mail list. PM I found and removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the Message Sniffer D'oh that was silly of me - forgot to change the return address. Sorry for the extra noise. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
[sniffer] Determine Version
Is there a easy way to determine the Sniffer version you are running (i.e. command line or the like)? Thanks for the aid. Keith winmail.dat
RE: [sniffer] Determine Version
Title: Message Yup, just type the executable's filename in a command window, and the version information is on the last couple of lines in the resulting help. Andrew 8) p.s. My version says build - v2-3.2 Nov 23 2004 01:21:33 -Original Message-From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith JohnsonSent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 8:20 AMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: Determine Version Is there a easy way to determine the Sniffer version you are running (i.e. command line or the like)? Thanks for the aid. Keith
Re: [sniffer] Determine Version
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 11:19:32 AM, Keith wrote: KJ Is there a easy way to determine the Sniffer version you are KJ running (i.e. command line or the like)? Thanks for the aid. If you run the SNF executable on the command line by itself it will tell you the version and build information at the bottom of it's message. This is relatively new. If it doesn't do this then it's an old version for sure. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re: [sniffer] Seperate Lists?
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 1:28:14 PM, Dave wrote: DK I am all in favor of a SUPPORT list to announce timely DK notifications of problems. solutions and/or changes to your DK product or services. However, the threads Ive been seeing here DK lately are 'iMail' specific or involve theoretical discussion of DK improving iMail performance via a Gateway product using IIS's SMTP DK engine. These discussions have absolutely nothing to do with the DK support of your product in it's current offerings, nor my server DK of choice. DK As a new customer Might I request that you setup a separate list for DK discussion, development, beta, theoretical or iMail issues? If not, then I DK too will also ask to be removed from this list. DK Thanks in advance for your consideration. On this list I hope to provide not only support and announcements but also to foster a community around all of the related issues - often there are things to be learned from other platforms or related discussions - even the theoretical ones. From my perspective the IIS SMTP engine discussion covers a wide range and is on topic. For example, this is how MS Exchange could be supported directly. It is my goal to see SNF available and used well on as many platforms as possible. That said, we do have many IMail users here so those topics are frequent as are Declude discussions. In the end though, there are a lot of people here - most of whom are dealing with problems and issues that are related to spam, email services, and related technologies such as DNS, server performance, networks security, etc. In my view, this community is invaluable and provides an enriched level of support on all issues by sharing experiences and additional perspectives. I would be sorry to see you go, but certainly I understand if this is not a forum you want to follow. Instructions for (un)subscribing to this list are on our help page as indicated in the tag line of these messages. http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html If you do decide to leave this list then please remember to check our web site regularly for any important announcements - we put them in our news section. Support is also available through our support@ address, of course, though I may refer back to this list if I get stumped ;-). Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re: [sniffer] Seperate Lists?
Pete, Being guilty of being 'chatty' myself, I still second this idea. I would much prefer to pick through an occasional message dealling with global announcements regarding the service than picking through both discussions as well as announcements. I'm not always up to date on this list and others that I follow and I probably will pay less attention to them over time as I get buried in other things as many of us do. Please consider a separate announcement-only list for this purpose. Alternatively, having both mixed will both overwhelm users not interested in the more general discussion and it may also cause those of us that are more 'chatty' to quiet down which stifles the discussion and the benefit that can be gleamed from it. Thanks, Matt Pete McNeil wrote: On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 1:28:14 PM, Dave wrote: DK I am all in favor of a SUPPORT list to announce timely DK notifications of problems. solutions and/or changes to your DK product or services. However, the threads Ive been seeing here DK lately are 'iMail' specific or involve theoretical discussion of DK improving iMail performance via a Gateway product using IIS's SMTP DK engine. These discussions have absolutely nothing to do with the DK support of your product in it's current offerings, nor my server DK of choice. DK As a new customer Might I request that you setup a separate list for DK discussion, development, beta, theoretical or iMail issues? If not, then I DK too will also ask to be removed from this list. DK Thanks in advance for your consideration. On this list I hope to provide not only support and announcements but also to foster a community around all of the related issues - often there are things to be learned from other platforms or related discussions - even the theoretical ones. From my perspective the IIS SMTP engine discussion covers a wide range and is on topic. For example, this is how MS Exchange could be supported directly. It is my goal to see SNF available and used well on as many platforms as possible. That said, we do have many IMail users here so those topics are frequent as are Declude discussions. In the end though, there are a lot of people here - most of whom are dealing with problems and issues that are related to spam, email services, and related technologies such as DNS, server performance, networks security, etc. In my view, this community is invaluable and provides an enriched level of support on all issues by sharing experiences and additional perspectives. I would be sorry to see you go, but certainly I understand if this is not a forum you want to follow. Instructions for (un)subscribing to this list are on our help page as indicated in the tag line of these messages. http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html If you do decide to leave this list then please remember to check our web site regularly for any important announcements - we put them in our news section. Support is also available through our support@ address, of course, though I may refer back to this list if I get stumped ;-). Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ = This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re[2]: [sniffer] Seperate Lists?
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 2:05:09 PM, Matt wrote: M Pete, M Being guilty of being 'chatty' myself, I still second this idea. I M would much prefer to pick through an occasional message dealling with M global announcements regarding the service than picking through both M discussions as well as announcements. I'm not always up to date on this M list and others that I follow and I probably will pay less attention to M them over time as I get buried in other things as many of us do. M Please consider a separate announcement-only list for this purpose. M Alternatively, having both mixed will both overwhelm users not M interested in the more general discussion and it may also cause those of M us that are more 'chatty' to quiet down which stifles the discussion and M the benefit that can be gleamed from it. Point taken. This seems to be a popular idea so I will look into it. This list, however, will remain chatty. The announcements only list will only be used for that purpose. I would hate to see the discussions on this list quieted. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Seperate Lists?
Thanks Matt for clarifying my point, and Pete for considering this. Oddly enough, I would likely subscribe to BOTH lists, but the seperation would allow me to filter, target and respond to more 'important' emails notices, and review discussions *IF* and/or when I have time. As an Email/Network Admin and IT Manager, I receive hundreds of emails per day, and so I must be able to automatically prioritize those messages via filters as they arrive so I can focus on Critical information. Thanks again for your consideration! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 2:25 PM To: Matt Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Seperate Lists? On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 2:05:09 PM, Matt wrote: M Pete, M Being guilty of being 'chatty' myself, I still second this idea. I M would much prefer to pick through an occasional message dealling with M global announcements regarding the service than picking through both M discussions as well as announcements. I'm not always up to date on M this list and others that I follow and I probably will pay less M attention to them over time as I get buried in other things as many of us do. M Please consider a separate announcement-only list for this purpose. M Alternatively, having both mixed will both overwhelm users not M interested in the more general discussion and it may also cause those M of us that are more 'chatty' to quiet down which stifles the M discussion and the benefit that can be gleamed from it. Point taken. This seems to be a popular idea so I will look into it. This list, however, will remain chatty. The announcements only list will only be used for that purpose. I would hate to see the discussions on this list quieted. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
