[spamdyke-users] OT: Re-injecting bounces
Hi folks, even though this is Off Topic on this list, I thought I'd ask for your opinions. Setup is as follows: Spamdyke - qmail - Sieve - dovecot-lda This is problematic for bounces that are being forwarded, like: - Inbound email is from going to local user - local user has a rule which says redirect all mail externally - email being reinjected by Sieve using sendmail call and -f command line parameter - that results in an email sent which has @example.com in the Return-Path which is denied by the destination server So what I'm looking for is a way to re-inject a bounce without qmail-inject adding domain from plusdomain/messing with the Return-Path/From at all. Any thoughts? Thanks, J. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] OT: Re-injecting bounces
Btw, did anyone else notice it: If in an SMTP batch, one local user is over quota or undeliverable, none of the other recipients gets a copy of the mail? Even for a mailing list.. One local recipient was over quota, no one got a copy of postings until I cleared that user's quota.. -turgut ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] OT: Re-injecting bounces
The domain name is being added by qmail-send, which picks up messages from the queue and decides whether they're for local or remote delivery. If the recipient address doesn't have a domain name, it will append the contents of the ENVNOATHOST environment variable. If that variable isn't set, it will append the contents of /var/qmail/control/envnoathost. If that file doesn't exist, it will append the contents of /var/qmail/control/me. If that file doesn't exist, it will use the text envnoathost. You shouldn't mess with the contents of /var/qmail/control/me, since lots of pieces of qmail use that file. But maybe you could create a zero-byte file named /var/qmail/control/envnoathost. If there were nothing to append, hopefully qmail-send wouldn't tack on the unneeded @ symbol. It'd be worth a test. If that doesn't work, the only other way to fix it would probably be to patch qmail. :( -- Sam Clippinger On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:29 AM, J. Kendzorra wrote: Hi folks, even though this is Off Topic on this list, I thought I'd ask for your opinions. Setup is as follows: Spamdyke - qmail - Sieve - dovecot-lda This is problematic for bounces that are being forwarded, like: - Inbound email is from going to local user - local user has a rule which says redirect all mail externally - email being reinjected by Sieve using sendmail call and -f command line parameter - that results in an email sent which has @example.com in the Return-Path which is denied by the destination server So what I'm looking for is a way to re-inject a bounce without qmail-inject adding domain from plusdomain/messing with the Return-Path/From at all. Any thoughts? Thanks, J. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] Quota problems preventing delivery (WAS: Re: OT: Re-injecting bounces)
Are you talking about spamdyke here or some other package? If this is a spamdyke problem, could you provide some more details so I can reproduce the error? -- Sam Clippinger On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:59 AM, turgut kalfaoğlu wrote: Btw, did anyone else notice it: If in an SMTP batch, one local user is over quota or undeliverable, none of the other recipients gets a copy of the mail? Even for a mailing list.. One local recipient was over quota, no one got a copy of postings until I cleared that user's quota.. -turgut ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke-users Digest, Vol 62, Issue 6
How interesting. Well, whatever the reason I still only very occasionally get any spam, yet when I look at the maillog there are countless attempts to send me span each day. One in particular that is amusing is to one email address I used exactly ONE time 10 years ago. There are hundreds of attempts to send me email to that address, every day. So spamdyke is still tops in my mind and I look forward to Eric's findings. On 7/10/2012 11:00 AM, spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote: What does all that mean? I have no idea -- remember what Mark Twain said about statistics. I didn't do anything to match senders to recipients, check if the messages were actually spam, allow for frequent senders or mailing lists, check if the rejections came before or after the successes, etc. (For that matter, I'm not even completely sure my search commands were written correctly.) Also, since the DNS filters kick in before graylisting does, it's impossible to say how the graylisting percentage would change if I turned off all the DNS filters. Until those factors are accounted for, the numbers don't actually mean anything. Hopefully Eric's script will allow for all that (assuming he's writing one). :) ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
