Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
El 31/12/19 a les 4:06, Keith Medcalf ha escrit: On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer wrote: As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the immediately preceding ten years. However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, you will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was the first day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December 31st 0011 AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic Gregorian calendar). https://xkcd.com/2249/ scnr Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es/ Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.3010) Fax +34 93 5883007 ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
On 2019-12-30 18:13, Richard Hipp wrote: That's the total elapse time from me checking in a bug (check-in https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/40d10e7aad5b8992) until Manuel Rigger's fuzzer had located the bug and issued a ticket against it: (ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/892575cdba4e1e36). Well, at least the bisect didn't take very long! Just for the curious, the over/under in Las Vegas was 19 minutes flat. So, depending on how you wagered, you can pick up your winnings or tear up your betting slip. -- Ned ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
Indeed! Thanks Dr. Hipp and the rest of the team for such a wonderful, and easy, and light, and robust, and... product. josé From: sqlite-users on behalf of Manuel Rigger Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 05:15 AM To: SQLite mailing list Subject: Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds Thanks for all your great work, Richard and Dan! Among all DBMS that we have been testing, we have put most of our effort and energy into testing SQLite. The reason for that is that you were by far the most responsive to our bug reports, and typically address bugs immediately after we find them! It's great that you take all bug reports seriously. In other widely-used DBMS that we have been testing, bugs take weeks, months, or longer until getting fixed. Looking forward to another fruitful year of cooperating in making SQLite even more robust! Best, Manuel On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 7:26 AM Michael Falconer < michael.j.falco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There is no "year 0" between 1 BC and 1 AD. This is perhaps the most > > common fencepost problem in existance. The "great renaming" of AD to CE > > and doing away with BC by replacing them with "off by one" numbers less > > than 1 does not change the fact that there was, in fact, no year 0. > > Obviously the character(s) responsible for dates etc were NOT C > programmers! > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 14:45, Richard Damon > wrote: > > > On 12/30/19 10:10 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:07 AM Keith Medcalf > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer < > > michael.j.falco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). > > >> Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the > > immediately preceding ten years. > > >> > > >> However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, > > you will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was > the > > first day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December > > 31st 0011 AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic > > Gregorian calendar). > > > Languages don't work like this. > > > > > > https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/decade > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Its a difference between ordinals and numerals. The 20th century was > > from the beginning of 1901 to the end of 2000. We also have the century > > called the 1900's which went from 1900 to the end of 1999. > > > > Decade would work the same way, the 202st decade goes from 2011 to end > > of 2020, but the 2010s go from 2010 to end of 2019. > > > > -- > > Richard Damon > > > > ___ > > sqlite-users mailing list > > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > > > -- > Regards, > Michael.j.Falconer. > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
Thanks for all your great work, Richard and Dan! Among all DBMS that we have been testing, we have put most of our effort and energy into testing SQLite. The reason for that is that you were by far the most responsive to our bug reports, and typically address bugs immediately after we find them! It's great that you take all bug reports seriously. In other widely-used DBMS that we have been testing, bugs take weeks, months, or longer until getting fixed. Looking forward to another fruitful year of cooperating in making SQLite even more robust! Best, Manuel On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 7:26 AM Michael Falconer < michael.j.falco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There is no "year 0" between 1 BC and 1 AD. This is perhaps the most > > common fencepost problem in existance. The "great renaming" of AD to CE > > and doing away with BC by replacing them with "off by one" numbers less > > than 1 does not change the fact that there was, in fact, no year 0. > > Obviously the character(s) responsible for dates etc were NOT C > programmers! > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 14:45, Richard Damon > wrote: > > > On 12/30/19 10:10 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:07 AM Keith Medcalf > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer < > > michael.j.falco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). > > >> Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the > > immediately preceding ten years. > > >> > > >> However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, > > you will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was > the > > first day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December > > 31st 0011 AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic > > Gregorian calendar). > > > Languages don't work like this. > > > > > > https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/decade > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Its a difference between ordinals and numerals. The 20th century was > > from the beginning of 1901 to the end of 2000. We also have the century > > called the 1900's which went from 1900 to the end of 1999. > > > > Decade would work the same way, the 202st decade goes from 2011 to end > > of 2020, but the 2010s go from 2010 to end of 2019. > > > > -- > > Richard Damon > > > > ___ > > sqlite-users mailing list > > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > > > -- > Regards, > Michael.j.Falconer. > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
> > There is no "year 0" between 1 BC and 1 AD. This is perhaps the most > common fencepost problem in existance. The "great renaming" of AD to CE > and doing away with BC by replacing them with "off by one" numbers less > than 1 does not change the fact that there was, in fact, no year 0. Obviously the character(s) responsible for dates etc were NOT C programmers! On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 14:45, Richard Damon wrote: > On 12/30/19 10:10 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:07 AM Keith Medcalf > wrote: > >> > >> On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer < > michael.j.falco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). > >> Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the > immediately preceding ten years. > >> > >> However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, > you will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was the > first day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December > 31st 0011 AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic > Gregorian calendar). > > Languages don't work like this. > > > > https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/decade > > > > Cheers > > Its a difference between ordinals and numerals. The 20th century was > from the beginning of 1901 to the end of 2000. We also have the century > called the 1900's which went from 1900 to the end of 1999. > > Decade would work the same way, the 202st decade goes from 2011 to end > of 2020, but the 2010s go from 2010 to end of 2019. > > -- > Richard Damon > > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Regards, Michael.j.Falconer. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
On 12/30/19 10:10 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:07 AM Keith Medcalf wrote: On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer wrote: As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the immediately preceding ten years. However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, you will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was the first day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December 31st 0011 AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic Gregorian calendar). Languages don't work like this. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/decade Cheers Its a difference between ordinals and numerals. The 20th century was from the beginning of 1901 to the end of 2000. We also have the century called the 1900's which went from 1900 to the end of 1999. Decade would work the same way, the 202st decade goes from 2011 to end of 2020, but the 2010s go from 2010 to end of 2019. -- Richard Damon ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:07 AM Keith Medcalf wrote: > > > On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer > wrote: > > > As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). > > Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the immediately > preceding ten years. > > However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, you > will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was the first > day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December 31st 0011 > AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic Gregorian > calendar). Languages don't work like this. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/decade Cheers ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer wrote: > As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the immediately preceding ten years. However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, you will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was the first day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December 31st 0011 AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic Gregorian calendar). The day before January 1st 0001 AD was December 31st 0001 BC. The first day of the 21st century was January 1st, 2001; it was also the first day of the first decade of the 21st century. The first day of the 2nd decade of the 21st century was January 1st, 2011. Next year is the last year of the 2nd decade of the 21st century. The 3rd decade of the 21st century will commence at midnight January 1st, 2021. There is no "year 0" between 1 BC and 1 AD. This is perhaps the most common fencepost problem in existance. The "great renaming" of AD to CE and doing away with BC by replacing them with "off by one" numbers less than 1 does not change the fact that there was, in fact, no year 0. -- The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
Great work but pretty much what we have come to expect from DRH and the SQLite team. As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ) can I indulge the list in a simple congratulations to all involved and to the outstanding support on offer when a member of this email list. SQLite is personally my favourite software release and IMHO right up there as the most useful and reliable software of all time! Thanks to all who have made it possible. On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 11:13, Richard Hipp wrote: > That's the total elapse time from me checking in a bug (check-in > https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/40d10e7aad5b8992) until Manuel > Rigger's fuzzer had located the bug and issued a ticket against it: > (ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/892575cdba4e1e36). > > Well, at least the bisect didn't take very long! > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Regards, Michael.j.Falconer. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
