Re: [Sugar-devel] Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting future of soas spin and sugar-desktop in fedora
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Gilliard satelli...@gmail.com wrote: Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting: Meeting ended Mon Jan 6 17:05:52 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.log.html Summary: Fedora is in the process of setting up a split into 3 distros: ( fedora.next) #fedora-base #fedora-server #fedora-workstation pushing to a gnome3 (workstation for administrators) There is a push to drop the DVD and only do lives. I am worried that the soas spin and sugar-desktop may get lost in the shuffle. We need to participate on #fedora-qa and lobby for our fedora future. While we should actually be actively participating in Fedora QA anyway because we derive a lot of value from the work Fedora QA does the point you make is completely incorrect and invalid. There is no threat to sugar from being dropped, in fact the only threat of it being dropped is the Sugar communities lack of general involvement other than a few people. Thomas please get your facts remotely close to being correct before posting something that is completely false and misleading. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting future of soas spin and sugar-desktop in fedora
On Sunday, 12 January 2014, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Gilliard satelli...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting: Meeting ended Mon Jan 6 17:05:52 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.log.html Summary: Fedora is in the process of setting up a split into 3 distros: ( fedora.next) #fedora-base #fedora-server #fedora-workstation pushing to a gnome3 (workstation for administrators) There is a push to drop the DVD and only do lives. I am worried that the soas spin and sugar-desktop may get lost in the shuffle. We need to participate on #fedora-qa and lobby for our fedora future. While we should actually be actively participating in Fedora QA anyway because we derive a lot of value from the work Fedora QA does the point you make is completely incorrect and invalid. There is no threat to sugar from being dropped, in fact the only threat of it being dropped is the Sugar communities lack of general involvement other than a few people. Thomas please get your facts remotely close to being correct before posting something that is completely false and misleading. From the little I've seen this seems actually something could favor Sugar rather than hurting. The Fedora rings talk was very interesting https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186323.html -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting future of soas spin and sugar-desktop in fedora
There is a push to drop the DVD and only do lives. I am worried that the soas spin and sugar-desktop may get lost in the shuffle. We need to participate on #fedora-qa and lobby for our fedora future. While we should actually be actively participating in Fedora QA anyway because we derive a lot of value from the work Fedora QA does the point you make is completely incorrect and invalid. There is no threat to sugar from being dropped, in fact the only threat of it being dropped is the Sugar communities lack of general involvement other than a few people. Thomas please get your facts remotely close to being correct before posting something that is completely false and misleading. From the little I've seen this seems actually something could favor Sugar rather than hurting. The Fedora rings talk was very interesting https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186323.html We need to keep an eye on it but in general I agree that it's primarily a positive move for Sugar on Fedora whether it be for general development, use of sugar on Fedora, XOs or SoaS. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting future of soas spin and sugar-desktop in fedora
Minutes of #fedora-qa meeting: Meeting ended Mon Jan 6 17:05:52 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-01-06-16.00.log.html Summary: Fedora is in the process of setting up a split into 3 distros: ( fedora.next) #fedora-base #fedora-server #fedora-workstation pushing to a gnome3 (workstation for administrators) There is a push to drop the DVD and only do lives. I am worried that the soas spin and sugar-desktop may get lost in the shuffle. We need to participate on #fedora-qa and lobby for our fedora future. Tom Gilliard satellit ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
