[pfSense Support] beep on ready suggestion
I don't exactly remember which version i started out with but many burned .iso's later we arrive at 0.85 and finally pfsense installed the first time without much of a problem. I wish to say congrats to the development people and the people in this mailing list as i have poured over the lists trying to get things to work. i'm very impressed with how things are progressing and the level of support someone can get here. I wonder if i could make another small suggestion now, i remember using various firewall/router distros in the past and most all of them had a simple feature of beeping in some fashion to tell the user that the machine is up and ready for traffic. i never realized how much i liked that until i didn't have it with monowall. i was wondering if something like this could be added to pfsense. I think users with a completely headless machine would agree that this would be helpful. and I know I would appreicate it very much, thank you :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] beep on ready suggestion
I agree! That would be a great feature! Jonathan Woodard wrote: I don't exactly remember which version i started out with but many burned .iso's later we arrive at 0.85 and finally pfsense installed the first time without much of a problem. I wish to say congrats to the development people and the people in this mailing list as i have poured over the lists trying to get things to work. i'm very impressed with how things are progressing and the level of support someone can get here. I wonder if i could make another small suggestion now, i remember using various firewall/router distros in the past and most all of them had a simple feature of beeping in some fashion to tell the user that the machine is up and ready for traffic. i never realized how much i liked that until i didn't have it with monowall. i was wondering if something like this could be added to pfsense. I think users with a completely headless machine would agree that this would be helpful. and I know I would appreicate it very much, thank you :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] beep on ready suggestion
That would simply require that when the menu displays for the first time, you echo the ^G character? That menu is PHP, isn't it? So that should be simple enough Andrew On 30/09/2005, at 4:58 PM, Oscar Forsström wrote: I agree! That would be a great feature! Jonathan Woodard wrote: I don't exactly remember which version i started out with but many burned .iso's later we arrive at 0.85 and finally pfsense installed the first time without much of a problem. I wish to say congrats to the development people and the people in this mailing list as i have poured over the lists trying to get things to work. i'm very impressed with how things are progressing and the level of support someone can get here. I wonder if i could make another small suggestion now, i remember using various firewall/router distros in the past and most all of them had a simple feature of beeping in some fashion to tell the user that the machine is up and ready for traffic. i never realized how much i liked that until i didn't have it with monowall. i was wondering if something like this could be added to pfsense. I think users with a completely headless machine would agree that this would be helpful. and I know I would appreicate it very much, thank you :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] 802.11q vlans
-Original Message- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 September 2005 15:49 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11q vlans On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i assumed he had all that correct, since he said he could see the traffic going into the pfsense port. i was going to ask the same question, myself. this has to be a config problem, as i'm using this exact same setup. I agree, which is why I asked the obvious question :) Not everyone realizes that marking a port with multiple vlans doesn't mean that it's a tagged port, just that the machine on that port can see and talk to each of the vlans (untagged). That of course would require pfSesne to support real interface aliases - which we don't (and I'm not yet convinced is required) --Bill [alan walters] [alan walters] Just looking at this I can only tag to a specific vlan on each port. So port to is enabled for 802.11q on vlan 1-4 with vlan 1 as the tag but it allows untagged traffic to transit. Other ports have only onevlan on then and they are tagged. There is traffic flowing into pfsense. Example a http request to the pfsense box comes in but does not go back. Dhcp receives a response from the client and sends it back an ip but it does not get there.?? Switch or pfsense Does anyone use 3com 3300XM switches with vlans? Will forward my xml still if you think it's pfsense it is a test lab box so there is nothing important on it. Regards Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] CARP Master/Backup goes to INIT update
Now working. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 5:17 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Master/Backup goes to INIT update Ahh yes. The DISABLE/ENABLE button needs to be updated. Good catch. I'll fix in a bit. Scott On 9/29/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI I just did another update_file.sh .. and re-setup CARP. Doing a Reboot brings CARP up into Master as expected ;) ( I can't turn on the slave to test if it is 100%.. but the behavior seems better) So this part seems fixed. HOWEVER - It still insists on going back to INIT .. when pressing DISABLE/ENABLE button. Ifconfig carp0 up brings it back up. Something is not right in the DISIABLE / ENABLE button script on the CARP page. BTW : DynDns with PPPoE seems to be fixed over the last few releases. Tx Ivan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] LB and pre-emption on CARP?
So its one or the other. Not both. That clears things up a lot ! thanks! -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:35 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] LB and pre-emption on CARP? On 9/29/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] 1) What does the load balancing option in CARP page do? It's a poor way of load balancing based on the HASH AFAIK. From the manpage: net.inet.carp.arpbalance Balance local traffic using ARP. 2) If load balancing is enable on the CARP page do we still have to setup the LB service? I'm pretty sure you will want to go with our load balancing system that uses slbd. 3) In the LB service .. do I setup the virtual IP(124) into the LB pool ( LAN GW to WAN ? ) Or do I use the 2 physical GW IPS of the routers (125 and 126)? See http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=IncomingLoadBalancing and http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=OutgoingLoadBalancing for examples. 4) If I use pre-emption, one is master another is slave, does it still LB? It seems from the reading room .. only masters LB? i.e. to LB using CARP pre-emption needs to be off so you can have 2 masters? Not really sure. I've never really used the arp balancing feature as I hear that it doesn't do a good job.. But this may have changed recently. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Rpppoe
So how do I set it up to dial both pppoe connections? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] beep on ready suggestion
I remember being able to play mods through the pc speaker ;) From this thread : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2003-April/30.html mplayer -ao oss:/dev/pcaudio -vo aa .. but I suspect oss is not turn on in the kernel? -Original Message- From: Andrew Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:05 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] beep on ready suggestion That would simply require that when the menu displays for the first time, you echo the ^G character? That menu is PHP, isn't it? So that should be simple enough Andrew On 30/09/2005, at 4:58 PM, Oscar Forsström wrote: I agree! That would be a great feature! Jonathan Woodard wrote: I don't exactly remember which version i started out with but many burned .iso's later we arrive at 0.85 and finally pfsense installed the first time without much of a problem. I wish to say congrats to the development people and the people in this mailing list as i have poured over the lists trying to get things to work. i'm very impressed with how things are progressing and the level of support someone can get here. I wonder if i could make another small suggestion now, i remember using various firewall/router distros in the past and most all of them had a simple feature of beeping in some fashion to tell the user that the machine is up and ready for traffic. i never realized how much i liked that until i didn't have it with monowall. i was wondering if something like this could be added to pfsense. I think users with a completely headless machine would agree that this would be helpful. and I know I would appreicate it very much, thank you :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe
2 pppoe need 2 boxes with load balancing. You can't have 2 pppoes on one box. -Original Message- From: Marcin Jessa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:32 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:28:46 +0200 Mark Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how do I set it up to dial both pppoe connections? What both PPPoE connections? You mean two at the same time? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing
Title: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing Hi There, Well Bill already reply to the Wesley question. Anybody could help please with ftp helper and incoming via other interfaces like OPT1=WAN1and OPT2=WAN2? I follow the tips on PfSense blog without success. Thanks,Moacyr Leite da Silva AKADNYX | Segurança | Infraestrutura | Storage | VoIP+55 19 3241-5688+55 19 9730-1712[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.akadnyx.com.br - Original Message - From: Wesley K. Joyce To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:40 PM Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing Hey Moacry, do you notice if itappropriately distributes the load? I just had a thoughti, if I set the bandwith on the interface to the actual broadband service rate as oppposed to NIC connection speed, would that affect the load balancing? From: Moacyr Leite da Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 8:55 PMTo: support@pfsense.comSubject: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing Hi Wesley, I have one box with 3 WAN using load balancing. WAN ADSL 2MB WAN1 FR 1MB WAN2 FR 512K We even dont have this issue now. But we had hard time with ftp-helper, I cant connect with any site. I have issues with HTTPS and policy routing for outgoing connection forced via the WAN (default) interface solved it. Also Icould not have policy routing working for incoming connections using WAN1 or WAN2. my current version is 0.85.6 Any tip? Thanks, Moacyr Leite da Silva AKADNYX | Segurança | Infraestrutura | Storage | VoIP+55 19 3241-5688+55 19 9730-1712[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.akadnyx.com.br - Original Message - From: Wesley K. Joyce To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 8:41 PM Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing Hi Scott, is there a solution to this? Am I unique in that I have multiple WAN connections of different capacities? Anyone have another solution? Thanks From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 7:20 PMTo: support@pfsense.comSubject: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing Load balancing uses round robin.ScottOn 9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I have a Squid PROXY server that I want to use two DSL connections that I have with. However, one of them is a 1 megabit connection and the other is a 512kbps connections. Based on what I have read on the list, I am concerned that the load balancing algorithm will NOT distribute 2/3 and 1/3 of the combined 1.5mbps for the outgoing traffic over the two connections respectively. Am I incorrect in this? Will it maximize each connection if they are of difference capacities? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Dyndns is being banned
HI I am using Dyndns.. (dynamic) .. They have banned me for the 2nd time this week. I have been rebooting the router a lot lately (testing CARP).. would this do it? Regards, Ivan Frimmel. HP South Africa - Sales Specialist, Industry Standard Servers Mobile: +27 83 409 2077 Direct: +27 11 785 1052 E-Mail and MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] ftp helper using 0.85.6
I was unable to access any site with ftp using PfSense 0.85.6 Tested many configurations: just LAN and WAN no outgoing load balance add one rule (first) to allow ftp use just the default lan access Even reset to factory defaults and reconfiguration didnt work for me. Any tip or sugestion? Thanks Moacyr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe
Yes two lines at the same time, I have ADSL and iBurst wireless. The adsl keeps going down so I want to add some load balancing and redudency -Original Message- From: Marcin Jessa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2005 12:32 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:28:46 +0200 Mark Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how do I set it up to dial both pppoe connections? What both PPPoE connections? You mean two at the same time? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: [pfSense Support] ftp helper using 0.85.6
Try disabling the ftp-helper under systemadvanced. Also setting your ftp-client to passive mode might help. Holger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Moacyr Leite da Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2005 15:14 An: support@pfsense.com Betreff: [pfSense Support] ftp helper using 0.85.6 I was unable to access any site with ftp using PfSense 0.85.6 Tested many configurations: just LAN and WAN no outgoing load balance add one rule (first) to allow ftp use just the default lan access Even reset to factory defaults and reconfiguration didnt work for me. Any tip or sugestion? Thanks Moacyr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe
note that monitoring a wan for availability doesn't work at the moment, so if one wan goes down you'll have some of your connectionattempts go through, some time out under such a condition. The monitoring feature still has to be implemented. Holger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Mark Geary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2005 15:15 An: support@pfsense.com Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe Yes two lines at the same time, I have ADSL and iBurst wireless. The adsl keeps going down so I want to add some load balancing and redudency -Original Message- From: Marcin Jessa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2005 12:32 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Rpppoe On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:28:46 +0200 Mark Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how do I set it up to dial both pppoe connections? What both PPPoE connections? You mean two at the same time? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] 802.11q vlans
At 03:15 AM 9/30/2005, you wrote: [alan walters] [alan walters] Just looking at this I can only tag to a specific vlan on each port. So port to is enabled for 802.11q on vlan 1-4 with vlan 1 as the tag but it allows untagged traffic to transit. Other ports have only onevlan on then and they are tagged. There is traffic flowing into pfsense. Example a http request to the pfsense box comes in but does not go back. Dhcp receives a response from the client and sends it back an ip but it does not get there.?? Switch or pfsense Does anyone use 3com 3300XM switches with vlans? Will forward my xml still if you think it's pfsense it is a test lab box so there is nothing important on it. Well, this is weird. I've got to believe it's a configuration problem with your switch. If it weren't, I can't see how the packets would exit the switch at all. BTW, my switch is such that each port is associated with one and only one vlan, but I have to do this too: 1. put the pfsense port in both vlans (membership wise). don't know how your switch does that. 2. change the ingress filtering so it won't drop by default packets with a VID not matching the default one. Not doing both of the above would cause your symptoms. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] 802.11q vlans
Well, this is weird. I've got to believe it's a configuration problem with your switch. If it weren't, I can't see how the packets would exit the switch at all. BTW, my switch is such that each port is associated with one and only one vlan, but I have to do this too: 1. put the pfsense port in both vlans (membership wise). don't know how your switch does that. 2. change the ingress filtering so it won't drop by default packets with a VID not matching the default one. Not doing both of the above would cause your symptoms. [alan walters] I think I agree with u I will try to find some command line tools to make the port a member of both vlans. An look more at the filtering options thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] dhcpclient Invalid lease option - ignoring offer
Is it possible to edit the dhclient.conf and comment out the Domain Name request? I can't even read the file: # ls -al dhclient.conf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22 Sep 28 06:42 dhclient.conf - /var/etc/dhclient.conf # more /var/etc/dhclient.conf /var/etc/dhclient.conf: No such file or directory # ls -l /var/etc/dhclient.conf ls: /var/etc/dhclient.conf: No such file or directory # cd /var/etc # ls -l total 18 -rw--- 1 root wheel 1495 Sep 28 07:26 cert.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 15 Sep 28 06:42 defaultdomain.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 89 Sep 28 07:26 hosts drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 28 06:42 mpd-vpn -rw--- 1 root wheel 30 Sep 28 19:59 psk.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 568 Sep 28 19:59 racoon.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 70 Sep 28 07:26 resolv.conf -rw--- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 28 19:59 sasyncd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 28 07:26 slbd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 306 Sep 28 19:59 spd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 490 Sep 28 07:26 syslog.conf # On 9/29/05, Jeff Quinonez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, more info... Did a fresh install of 85.6 and I get the same DHCP error. Basically it barfs on a DHCP offer option 15: Option 15: Domain Name = domain_not_set.invalid (from Ethereal sniff) And in the pfsense system log: dhclient[3538]: Bogus domain search list 15: domain_not_set.invalid (domain_not_set.invalid) dhclient[3538]: Invalid lease option - ignoring offer dhclient[3538]: Invalid lease option - ignoring offer dhclient[3538]: packet_to_lease failed. dhclient[3538]: No DHCPOFFERS received. And if I try to add domain_not_set.invalid to the domain name in pfsense I get: The following input errors were detected: * The domain may only contain the characters a-z, 0-9, '-' and '.'. This is SBC/Yahoo DSL and XP handles the DHCP offer fine. Earlier versions of pfsense also handled it fine. Did the BSD crew rewrite dhcpclient? I did see some grumblings around the Internets. On 9/27/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/27/05, Jeff Quinonez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, I downgraded to 70.4 and all is well. Manual upgrade to 85.4 and I have the same issue of not getting a DHCP address and the same errors. Also, after the 85.4 update if I go to Manual Update I get Unable to Receive Version Info. I'll look into this DHCP error a little later, as I have seen this in some BSD forums. I have an extra box so I'll try to recreate the issue. Keep up the good work. :-)Thanks, that would be a _HUGE_ help!Scott-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- got root? -- got root?
[pfSense Support] Re: dhcpclient Invalid lease option - ignoring offer
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 06:58:54 -0700, Jeff Quinonez wrote: Here is what I am seeing in the logs, thanks: Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255http://255.255.255.255port 67 interval 13 Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: DHCPOFFER from 192.168.0.1http://192.168.0.1 Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: Bogus domain search list 15: domain_not_set.invalid (domain_not_set.invalid) Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: Bogus domain search list 15: domain_not_set.invalid (domain_not_set.invalid) Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: Invalid lease option - ignoring offer Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: Invalid lease option - ignoring offer Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: packet_to_lease failed. On 9/24/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get exactly the same errors whenever I attempt to use DHCP on the WAN. I am using SBC Yahoo DSL, with the 5100B DSL modem. I have the 5100B set to do the PPPOE, and it provides one IP address via DHCP. The address provided is always 192.168.0.64 (the 5100B itself is always at 192.168.0.1). What I did is to set the WAN to Static, and the Static IP configuration to 192.168.0.127/16 and the Gateway to 192.168.0.1. I also had to set the DNS servers IP address on the System: General Setup page. You can get those addresses on the main page for the 5100b modem. I have no idea why this does not work the way it should, it works fine for me under m0n0wall, but not pfSense. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] beep on ready suggestion
http://img.m0n0.ch/docbook-current/faq-hiddenopts.html I'm assuming beep is in our standard build (I don't have one in front of me). Just add: shellcmd/usr/local/bin/beep/shellcmd to the system tree in config.xml --Bill On 9/30/05, Jonathan Woodard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL, thanks bill. however, i'm about as dumb as a brick when it comes to bsd. i was just hoping that a particular start/stop sequence could be added to the pfsense .iso. i'd be happy to help accomplish this if someone would point me in the direction or add it and allow me to test it. also, i realize that there might be some people who don't like it, i would think there needed to be a simple way to disable it if desired. thank you very much again for your interest in my idea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
