[pfSense Support] Error-Code 139 while installing to hard-disk?

2005-10-04 Thread Rainer Duffner

Hi,

I'm trying to install pfsense (0.86.2) to a hard-disk
When running the cpdup-part that supposedly writes dev, it exits with 
error-code 139.


What does that mean?

The hard-disk is 9 GB SCSI. Tthe machine has multiple IDE and SCSI-disks 
inside (test-machine), but I want to boot from da0.

Is this a problem?
FreeBSD6 boots from the disk.

When I set it to reboot, I can see something about disk full, before 
it resets completely...




cheers,
Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Dyndns and PPPoE version2

2005-10-04 Thread Damien Dupertuis
Okay,

I'll reinstall from scratch, do the mods you told me
and report but it will take time... the bug appears
only after one day... stay tuned... :-)

Damien




--- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

 Forgot one other minor detail.  Issue the following
 command before rebooting:
 
 chmod a+rx /usr/local/bin/ez-ipupdate
 
 Scott
 
 
 On 10/3/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  I have added a flag to use the older style dyndns
 so we can try and
  track down if this is a issue with our newer code.
  To enable, do the
  following from a shell:
 
  touch /usr/local/bin/ez-ipupdate
  update_file.sh /usr/local/bin/ez-ipupdate
  update_file.sh /etc/inc/rc.newwanip
  update_file.sh /etc/inc/services.inc
 
  edit /cf/conf/config.xml and add this tag:
  use_old_dyndns/ to the system tag area.
 
  Example would look like:
  system
use_old_dyndns/
 
  Reboot and see if the problems persist.
 
  Thanks!
 
  Scott
 
 
  On 10/3/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   On 10/3/05, Damien Dupertuis
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, What do we do now???
  
   Reinstall from scratch 0.86 and let us know if
 it continues.   Also
   dhclient information from system logs would be
 nice.
  
   Scott
  
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 







___ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] carp and backup to master switch

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
CARP is not compatible with PPPoE currently.   It currnently only
works correctly with static addresses.

Scott


On 10/4/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Running carp on two wrap boards on 0.86. when failing over from master to
 backup all works fine. (my test is a ptpp connection)

 But when the master comes back online the ptpp connection is lost everything
 is ok after this again though I can reconnect to ptpp immediately on master.



 Carp rules are like so.



 Master sync all options.

 Backup sync enabled and pre-emption enabled.



 Is this configuration correct or should I sync everything on backup as
 well??





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error-Code 139 while installing to hard-disk?

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
From the limited google searches I found:

1 SIGSEGV segmentation violation

Which may have been cpdup being killed during the file copy.   How
much ram is in the machine in question?

Scott


On 10/4/05, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm trying to install pfsense (0.86.2) to a hard-disk
 When running the cpdup-part that supposedly writes dev, it exits with
 error-code 139.

 What does that mean?

 The hard-disk is 9 GB SCSI. Tthe machine has multiple IDE and SCSI-disks
 inside (test-machine), but I want to boot from da0.
 Is this a problem?
 FreeBSD6 boots from the disk.

 When I set it to reboot, I can see something about disk full, before
 it resets completely...



 cheers,
 Rainer

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error-Code 139 while installing to hard-disk?

2005-10-04 Thread Rainer Duffner

Rainer Duffner wrote:


Scott Ullrich wrote:


From the limited google searches I found:

1 SIGSEGV segmentation violation

Which may have been cpdup being killed during the file copy.   How
much ram is in the machine in question?
 



Don't know. ;-)
One GB, I think.
(It's off currently, because it's loud as hell - and pfsense installed 
with no problems into VMware workstation 5.0 on SuSE9.2)


It's really some old test-machine I picked to get a feeling if pfsense 
can do what we want.





OK, I picked another machine and I can install it there, BUT instead of 
booting it says kernel not found.
This thing has a 120 GB IDE-harddrive and FreeBSD6 complains about 
illegal geometry, but installs fine.
The pfSense-bootloader also complains about illegal disklabel on that 
disk, if queried.


I'm pretty sure that if I'd find some old 20 GB HD it would install 
without problems.


Is there any hint what I could do?



cheers,
Rainer




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error-Code 139 while installing to hard-disk?

2005-10-04 Thread Rainer Duffner

Scott Ullrich wrote:


Did you try dmesg -a ?Also I believe the system makes a copy of
dmesg.log to /var/log

 



OK, that is where it was.
But the command itself didn't show anything.



See the ticket for updates.


Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error-Code 139 while installing to hard-disk?

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
Thanks!!

On 10/4/05, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott Ullrich wrote:

 Did you try dmesg -a ?Also I believe the system makes a copy of
 dmesg.log to /var/log
 
 
 

 OK, that is where it was.
 But the command itself didn't show anything.



 See the ticket for updates.


 Rainer

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] A little note about vlans and netgraph in FreeBSD.

2005-10-04 Thread Fleming, John \(ZeroChaos\)
Title: A little note about vlans and netgraph in FreeBSD.






http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=38062+0+current/freebsd-arch


I think I ran into the related problem. The vlan device calls

IFQ_HANDOFF directly versus the normal output bits so you can't

use netgraph etc. I broke up ether_output so that I could

call the stuff that ether_output does so it would go through

netgraph hooks if configured.

Doug A.




Re: [pfSense Support] NTOP in build 0.86 stiil don`t work at me

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
You should not be getting that error.  What version are you on?

Scott


On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hi, excuse me, but NTOP in build 0.86 stiil don`t work at me.

 After change password a I get

 Classical screen with text :

 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in

 /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code on line 1 Warning: Cannot
 modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at

 /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code:1) in
 /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php on line 183

 After then when I accessing to Ntop I get screen of ntop, but icons are
 empty and I am unable accessing into details ntop.





 And in System logs are messages:

 Oct 4 19:24:03 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** URL security:

 '/_vti_bin/owssvr.dll?UL=1ACT=4BUILD=6254STRMVER=4CAPREQ=0'
 rejected

 (code=5)(client=192.168.1.223)

 Oct 4 19:24:03 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** URL security:

 '/_vti_bin/owssvr.dll?UL=1ACT=4BUILD=6254STRMVER=4CAPREQ=0'
 rejected

 (code=5)(client=192.168.1.223)

 Oct 4 19:24:03 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** Rejected request from address

 192.168.1.223 (it previously sent ntop a bad request) Oct 4 19:24:03
 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** Rejected request from address

 192.168.1.223 (it previously sent ntop a bad request)

 Regards

 Robo.

 -Original Message-

 From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 4:40 AM

 To: support@pfsense.com

 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NTOP still don`t work in 0.85.6

 Try it again, there was a typo in the package file.

 I just installed it here and its working fine now.

 Scott



 On 9/30/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 

 

  After successful installing packages for NTOP, on page ntop Settings

  after entering password for access ntop I get following message on

  page http://192.168.1.1/pkg_edit.php after pressing change button. So

  ntop isn`t running and pressing Access ntop happens nothing.

 

  Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in

  /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code on line 1 Warning:

  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output

  started at

  /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code:1) in

  /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php on line 183

 

 

  This is accross severals builds of PFSENSE.

  Is it only my local problem?

  Installation is fresh from burned live cd.

 

  Thanx.

  Bop.




 --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005


 --
  * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
  * www.EuropskaDomena.sk - bezplatna predregistracia domen .EU
  * www.SlovakNET.sk - profesionalny webhosting, domena .SK ZADARMO


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Ntop on several interfaces

2005-10-04 Thread Chris Buechler
this isn't permitted (as of now) in the GUI, but you can run ntop on 
multiple interfaces by using multiple -i flags. 

Couple caveats - I wouldn't recommend running on WAN due to slightly 
increased risk of something happening (though just running it on 
internal networks doesn't make you completely safe from ntop issues that 
may be discovered in the future, it helps).  Also watch what interfaces 
you run on, as you could end up with wrong, strange, or misleading 
results if you do something like monitoring LAN and WAN at the same time 
and combining the results.  If you wanted to do LAN and WAN, you'd be 
better off running two instances of ntop, or I believe there's a flag to 
not combine interface data (don't recall offhand).  Regardless, none of 
this is accommodated by the GUI at this point, and packages aren't a 
major focus just yet. 




Audun Brekke wrote:

Hi. I have installed ntop. It works great. But only if I select only 
one interface in the config.


If I select two interfaces in the config the service won’t start. Is 
it possible to get ntop to log two interfaces simultaneously.


I can’t find the startup script.

It says it is started with the command

*Started as*



/usr/local/bin/ntop -i xl0 -u root -d --ipv4 -M -x 8102 -X 8192

-Audun-


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 - Release Date: 03.10.2005




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] NTOP in build 0.86 stiil don`t work at me

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
This is fixed now.   Thanks!

Scott

On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Pfsense is   0.86
 built on Sun Oct 2 17:56:04 UTC 2005 and NTOP is
 Generated by ntop v.3.1 MT (SSL) [i386-unknown-freebsd6.0]
 Build: Aug 5 2005 01:07:37. Version: the CURRENT stable version
 Listening on [xl0] without a kernel (libpcap) filtering expression
 Web report active on interface xl0

 -Original Message-
 From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 9:51 PM
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NTOP in build 0.86 stiil don`t work at me

 You should not be getting that error.  What version are you on?

 Scott


 On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  Hi, excuse me, but NTOP in build 0.86 stiil don`t work at me.
 
  After change password a I get
 
  Classical screen with text :
 
  Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
 
  /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code on line 1 Warning:
  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output
  started at
 
  /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code:1) in
  /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php on line 183
 
  After then when I accessing to Ntop I get screen of ntop, but icons
  are empty and I am unable accessing into details ntop.
 
 
 
 
 
  And in System logs are messages:
 
  Oct 4 19:24:03 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** URL security:
 
  '/_vti_bin/owssvr.dll?UL=1ACT=4BUILD=6254STRMVER=4CAPREQ=0'
  rejected
 
  (code=5)(client=192.168.1.223)
 
  Oct 4 19:24:03 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** URL security:
 
  '/_vti_bin/owssvr.dll?UL=1ACT=4BUILD=6254STRMVER=4CAPREQ=0'
  rejected
 
  (code=5)(client=192.168.1.223)
 
  Oct 4 19:24:03 ntop[1719]: **ERROR** Rejected request from address
 
  192.168.1.223 (it previously sent ntop a bad request) Oct 4 19:24:03
  ntop[1719]: **ERROR** Rejected request from address
 
  192.168.1.223 (it previously sent ntop a bad request)
 
  Regards
 
  Robo.
 
  -Original Message-
 
  From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 4:40 AM
 
  To: support@pfsense.com
 
  Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NTOP still don`t work in 0.85.6
 
  Try it again, there was a typo in the package file.
 
  I just installed it here and its working fine now.
 
  Scott
 
 
 
  On 9/30/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
 
  
 
   After successful installing packages for NTOP, on page ntop Settings
 
   after entering password for access ntop I get following message on
 
   page http://192.168.1.1/pkg_edit.php after pressing change button.
   So
 
   ntop isn`t running and pressing Access ntop happens nothing.
 
  
 
   Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
 
   /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code on line 1 Warning:
 
   Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output
 
   started at
 
   /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code:1) in
 
   /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php on line 183
 
  
 
  
 
   This is accross severals builds of PFSENSE.
 
   Is it only my local problem?
 
   Installation is fresh from burned live cd.
 
  
 
   Thanx.
 
   Bop.
 
 
 
 
  --
   No virus found in this outgoing message.
   Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
   Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date:
  30.9.2005
 
 
  --
   * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
   * www.EuropskaDomena.sk - bezplatna predregistracia domen .EU
   * www.SlovakNET.sk - profesionalny webhosting, domena .SK ZADARMO
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
 commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005


 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper-rules

2005-10-04 Thread Robo.K.



Hmm, it seems that my traffic from LAN to WAN is
untouched by traffic shaper.
There i have enabled traffic shaper and queues and
rules are crreated by ez shaper wizard.
If i change speed default queues, then happens nothing,
I will get still full speed of my link to internet.
What is wrong?
0.86 built on Sun Oct 2 17:56:04 UTC 2005 
Robo.


From: Robo.K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 11:54 PMTo:
support@pfsense.comSubject: [pfSense Support] Traffic
shaper-rules

Hi
Bill.
Can you please tell
me, which item manage speed to internet from LAN in traffic shaper after what i
executed es shaper wizard?
Because if I create
new queue with defined speed forexample 128kbit and as parent is LAN
default queue/1024kbit/sand new rule based on this queue and this new rule
i place on top of rules, my speed to internet is still max. as i specified into
parent default queue.
Thank you.
Robo.

--No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date:
30.9.2005--* www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely
zivot ZDARMA* www.ZonerPress.sk -
pocitacova literatura, zameranie na webdesign a grafiku* Zoner Photo Studio
7 - Spoznajte kuzlo digitalnej fotografie! http://www.zoner.cz/photo-studio
--No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date:
30.9.2005


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005
 
--
* www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
* www.SlovakNET.sk - profesionalny webhosting, domena .SK ZADARMO
* Zoner Photo Studio 7 - Spoznajte kuzlo digitalnej fotografie! http://www.zoner.cz/photo-studio



Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper-rules

2005-10-04 Thread Bill Marquette
Yeah, the bandwidth in the queue screen doesn't really work quite
right :-/  Try setting the upperlimit field.  It's kind of difficult
for me to test some of this stuff out any more - my home network is
under strict change control and I don't have all the equipment needed
to keep a test network for all the parts of pfSense that I work on up
at all times.

If anyones willing to help out, I need another wrap/soekris and an
atheros card w/ or w/out antenna (I have spare u.fl pigtails and
antenna already).  I've got a sick design that should allow me to test
out most if not all features I currently have a hand in supporting and
allow for some future development work w/out impacting my wife (and
thus me, which in turn means you ;-P !).

--Bill

On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Bill.
 Can you please tell me, which item manage speed to internet from LAN in
 traffic shaper after what i executed es shaper wizard?
 Because if I create new queue with defined speed forexample 128kbit and as
 parent is  LAN default queue/1024kbit/s and new rule based on this queue and
 this new rule i place on top of rules, my speed to internet is still max. as
 i specified into parent default queue.
 Thank you. Robo.



 --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005


 --
  * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
  * www.ZonerPress.sk - pocitacova literatura, zameranie na webdesign a
 grafiku
  * Zoner Photo Studio 7 - Spoznajte kuzlo digitalnej fotografie!
 http://www.zoner.cz/photo-studio


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FW: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper-rules

2005-10-04 Thread Bill Marquette
On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Sorry, i am crazy. Now its working. But I don`t know what
 happens. :-}}}

The shaper is stateful.  Changes to it will not impact in-flight
connections, only new.

--Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Error in traffic shaper in 0.86

2005-10-04 Thread Bill Marquette
Hmmm...was the queue128klienti,zhlt ???  I don't think comma's are
allowed in queue names, I'll have to fix (hrm, or create!) the input
validation on that field.

--Bill

On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 After running ezshaper wizard is all ok.
 When i create new queue 128kbit/s and choose as parent  qWANRoot or qLANRoot
  /don`t matter/ andd choose RED and ECN and save and apply, then i get in
 news and in system logs message:
 php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:32: syntax
 error /tmp/rules.debug:202: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:220: syntax error
 /tmp/rules.debug:249: syntax error pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf
 rules not loaded - The line in question reads [32]: queue 128klienti,zhlt
 bandwidth 128Kb priority 5 hfsc ( red ecn )

 System was upgraded from 0.85.6 to 0.86

 Regards
 Robo.




 --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005


 --
  * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
  * www.php5.sk - novy freehosting s php5 a MySQL, forum o php5
  * www.EuropskaDomena.sk - bezplatna predregistracia domen .EU


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Error in traffic shaper in 0.86

2005-10-04 Thread Robo.K.
Yes, you have right. A comma in  128klienti,zhlt is problem. If comma is
out, problem don`t occurs.
Hmmm, interesting.
Thank you.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:38 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Error in traffic shaper in 0.86

Hmmm...was the queue128klienti,zhlt ???  I don't think comma's are allowed
in queue names, I'll have to fix (hrm, or create!) the input validation on
that field.

--Bill

On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 After running ezshaper wizard is all ok.
 When i create new queue 128kbit/s and choose as parent  qWANRoot or 
 qLANRoot  /don`t matter/ andd choose RED and ECN and save and apply, 
 then i get in news and in system logs message:
 php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:32: 
 syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:202: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:220: 
 syntax error
 /tmp/rules.debug:249: syntax error pfctl: Syntax error in config file: 
 pf rules not loaded - The line in question reads [32]: queue 
 128klienti,zhlt bandwidth 128Kb priority 5 hfsc ( red ecn )

 System was upgraded from 0.85.6 to 0.86

 Regards
 Robo.




 --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 
 30.9.2005


 --
  * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
  * www.php5.sk - novy freehosting s php5 a MySQL, forum o php5
  * www.EuropskaDomena.sk - bezplatna predregistracia domen .EU


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Ntop on several interfaces

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/4/05, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Chris Buechler wrote:

  this isn't permitted (as of now) in the GUI, but you can run ntop on
  multiple interfaces by using multiple -i flags.


 oops, haven't updated my ntop since that change, sorry.  Rest of my
 comments still apply.

Yep.   We added a multiple interface widget to the package system so
you can hold down the left shift key to select multiple interfaces.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper-rules

2005-10-04 Thread Robo.K.
Thank you, but I don` understand.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:32 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper-rules

Yeah, the bandwidth in the queue screen doesn't really work quite right :-/
Try setting the upperlimit field.  It's kind of difficult for me to test
some of this stuff out any more - my home network is under strict change
control and I don't have all the equipment needed to keep a test network for
all the parts of pfSense that I work on up at all times.



If anyones willing to help out, I need another wrap/soekris and an atheros
card w/ or w/out antenna (I have spare u.fl pigtails and antenna already).
I've got a sick design that should allow me to test out most if not all
features I currently have a hand in supporting and allow for some future
development work w/out impacting my wife (and thus me, which in turn means
you ;-P !).

--Bill

On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Bill.
 Can you please tell me, which item manage speed to internet from LAN 
 in traffic shaper after what i executed es shaper wizard?
 Because if I create new queue with defined speed forexample 128kbit 
 and as parent is  LAN default queue/1024kbit/s and new rule based on 
 this queue and this new rule i place on top of rules, my speed to 
 internet is still max. as i specified into parent default queue.
 Thank you. Robo.



 --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 
 30.9.2005


 --
  * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA
  * www.ZonerPress.sk - pocitacova literatura, zameranie na webdesign a 
 grafiku
  * Zoner Photo Studio 7 - Spoznajte kuzlo digitalnej fotografie!
 http://www.zoner.cz/photo-studio


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 30.9.2005
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper-rules

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/4/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you, but I don` understand.

Any existing connections before activating the shaper will not be
shaped.   What Bill is describing is that only connections that you
initiate after the traffic shaper is enabled will actually be shaped. 
 Either way I think the problem was the , in the queue/rule name.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]