[pfSense Support] Multiple WANs on a Single Bridge

2009-06-25 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Hi Everyone,

I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a 
single bridge. 

For instance: 


111.111.111.111/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers
222.222.222.222/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers


I see a way to add a virtual IP in the Firewall section, but not to add 
a VIP to the em0 Interface.   I have em0 bridged with em1 and my bridge 
is setup with allowing certain ports through to internal servers, each 
server has an external IP so I have to use bridged mode, not NATing.


Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs on a Single Bridge

2009-06-25 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Joseph Hardemanjharde...@colocube.com wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a
 single bridge.
 For instance:
 111.111.111.111/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers
 222.222.222.222/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers


Nothing to it, if what you really need is a bridge. If the gateway IP
is outside the firewall, it's no different to use two subnets than it
is one. If the gateway IP isn't outside the firewall, you don't need
bridging, you need a routed public IP subnet on an OPT interface.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs on a Single Bridge

2009-06-25 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Chris,

Thanks for your reply, I found this out earlier today.  Yes, all of the 
gateways are outside of the firewall so when I changed the IP on my 
laptop after getting the firewall upgraded it was able to get out with 
no problem.


Again, thank you for your reply.  I appreciate it.

Joe

Chris Buechler wrote:

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Joseph Hardemanjharde...@colocube.com wrote:
  

Hi Everyone,

I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a
single bridge.
For instance:
111.111.111.111/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers
222.222.222.222/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers




Nothing to it, if what you really need is a bridge. If the gateway IP
is outside the firewall, it's no different to use two subnets than it
is one. If the gateway IP isn't outside the firewall, you don't need
bridging, you need a routed public IP subnet on an OPT interface.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org


  


--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner



[pfSense Support] Multiple WANs in same subnet

2007-11-19 Thread Chris Bagnall
Greetings list,

Another slightly unusual network setup I'd be really grateful for some advice 
with:

ISP has provided 2 DSL connections with the same routed subnet - but not bonded 
(routers on a.b.c.1 and a.b.c.2).

Is it possible to load balance between the 2 default gateways (.1 and .2) with 
only 2 interfaces, i.e. LAN and WAN ?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs

2007-07-08 Thread sai

You do not need Advanced Outbound NAT.

In your firewall rules , on the LAN interface change the default rule
so that the gateway is your pool. This will load balance your traffic.

Take a look at http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing
- this is a recently updated doc and will help.

sai

On 7/5/07, William Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,
I have 3 WANS. Each has a static ip assigned by the ISP based on login. I
have the router/modems set to login and give each of my WAN interfaces an
IP. 192.168.2.10, 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.0.10. (I also DMZed those IPs in
the router/modems so that I can do NAT with pfsense) I setup a pool in load
balancer to point to the ips of the router/modems, 192.168.2.1, 192.168.1.1
and 192.168.0.1. These show up as online in the load balace status. Now
this is where I am stuck. I enable advanced outbound nat, and at this point
I need some definitive instruction. I have read the load balace pdf but I
must be missing something. I know I need rules but I am totally confused.
Thanks in advance for any help or pointers. Oh, in addition my LAN is
10.20.100.0/24 and as long as I leave advanced outbound nat off, I get
traffic through one of the WANS. And by the way, we could never afford the
appliance to do this, pfsense is great for non profit orgs like our
library, keep up the EXCELLENT work. This thing is awsome.

Best Regards,
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Multiple WANs

2007-07-05 Thread William Smith

Hi,
I have 3 WANS. Each has a static ip assigned by the ISP based on login. I 
have the router/modems set to login and give each of my WAN interfaces an 
IP. 192.168.2.10, 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.0.10. (I also DMZed those IPs in 
the router/modems so that I can do NAT with pfsense) I setup a pool in load 
balancer to point to the ips of the router/modems, 192.168.2.1, 192.168.1.1 
and 192.168.0.1. These show up as online in the load balace status. Now 
this is where I am stuck. I enable advanced outbound nat, and at this point 
I need some definitive instruction. I have read the load balace pdf but I 
must be missing something. I know I need rules but I am totally confused. 
Thanks in advance for any help or pointers. Oh, in addition my LAN is 
10.20.100.0/24 and as long as I leave advanced outbound nat off, I get 
traffic through one of the WANS. And by the way, we could never afford the 
appliance to do this, pfsense is great for non profit orgs like our 
library, keep up the EXCELLENT work. This thing is awsome.


Best Regards,
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Multiple WANs, different routes but not fail over?

2006-01-31 Thread H I L T O N R A L P H S

Hi guys

Just recently subscribed (today).

I'm from South Africa and I have a situation where the local DSL is not 
that reliable so we need to install a diginet leased line as well.


The leased line will have a static IP address whilst the DSL will 
connect via PPPoE and have a dynamic IP address.


Question is, can I use the leased line (static IP) and create a route 
for all incoming and outgoing email and then redirect this traffic to an 
internal mail server (sendmail).


All other non critical traffic like 80, 443, 21, etc will be accessed 
via the DSL line.


Is this scenario possible and what would the default gateway be? I'm 
guessing the DSL link?


So not a fail over rather a multiple WAN link set-up.

Thanks in advance.

Cheers
Hilton
begin:vcard
fn:H I L T O N R A L P H S
n:Ralphs;Hilton
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+2711-326-0018
tel;fax:+2711-886-0882
tel;cell:+2782-572-9619
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs, different routes but not fail over?

2006-01-31 Thread Holger Bauer
You are talking about policy based routing. pfSense can do this kind of 
routing. Configure the WAN interface with the PPPoE-settings and one of your 
OPTx interfaces with the static settings of the other line. Don't forget to 
enter the gateway there.
Then check out your firewall rules at you LAN interface. Create pass rules 
adressing the traffic you were speaking about. At the bottom of each rule page 
you find a setting called gateway. Select the desired gateway for that kind 
of traffic and you are done.

Holger

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: H I L T O N R A L P H S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2006 14:49
 An: support@pfsense.com
 Betreff: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs, different routes 
 but not fail
 over?
 
 
 Hi guys
 
 Just recently subscribed (today).
 
 I'm from South Africa and I have a situation where the local 
 DSL is not 
 that reliable so we need to install a diginet leased line as well.
 
 The leased line will have a static IP address whilst the DSL will 
 connect via PPPoE and have a dynamic IP address.
 
 Question is, can I use the leased line (static IP) and create a route 
 for all incoming and outgoing email and then redirect this 
 traffic to an 
 internal mail server (sendmail).
 
 All other non critical traffic like 80, 443, 21, etc will be accessed 
 via the DSL line.
 
 Is this scenario possible and what would the default gateway be? I'm 
 guessing the DSL link?
 
 So not a fail over rather a multiple WAN link set-up.
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Cheers
 Hilton
 


Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AW: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs, different routes but not fail over?

2006-01-31 Thread H I L T O N R A L P H S

Holger Bauer wrote:

You are talking about policy based routing. pfSense can do this kind of 
routing. Configure the WAN interface with the PPPoE-settings and one of your 
OPTx interfaces with the static settings of the other line. Don't forget to 
enter the gateway there.
Then check out your firewall rules at you LAN interface. Create pass rules adressing the 
traffic you were speaking about. At the bottom of each rule page you find a setting 
called gateway. Select the desired gateway for that kind of traffic and you 
are done.

Holger


Wow, this sounds good to me.

Thanks for that Holger, I'll try it out.

Cheers
Hilton

begin:vcard
fn:H I L T O N R A L P H S
n:Ralphs;Hilton
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+2711-326-0018
tel;fax:+2711-886-0882
tel;cell:+2782-572-9619
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs

2005-09-08 Thread Dave Warren

Holger Bauer wrote:


using the same gateway for both wans won't work as you can't specify rules for 
this I think. the rules are applied to a gateway and with both gateways the 
same... :-/
you might have to come up with a workaround like having a nated router in front of one connection to use this as gateway on one wan and put the pfsense in the dmz of this router. 
 

I'm trying to avoid needing more then one router, if I go that route 
then I don't need multiple interfaces in pfSense at all :)


That being said, I might be able to force a different gateway -- I'll do 
a bit of experimenting.


Thanks!

--
There are two times when a man doesn't understand a woman
before marriage and after marriage. 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs

2005-09-06 Thread Bill Marquette
Technically, we do put the interface in the rule when it's
created. But I can guarantee we'll only snag the first one.
So, while you can enter the same IP multiple times in a pool
(artificially creating a ratio based round robin) I'd be willing to bet
that we don't correctly support this on one device.

--BillOn 9/5/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/05, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
using the same gateway for both wans won't work as you can't specify
rules for this I think. the rules are applied to a gateway and with
both gateways the same... :-/ you might have to come up with a
workaround like having a nated router in front of one connection to use
this as gateway on one wan and put the pfsense in the dmz of this
router.You *possibly* could create a load balancing pool with 1 device in it.Select this as your gateway from the rules. Again, haven't testedthis so I'm not sure if it will work or not.Scott
-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs

2005-09-05 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 9/5/05, Dave Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quick question -- I'm looking at pfSense, and wondering if it's possible
 to use two WAN interfaces which receive their IPs via DHCP, and also if
 it's a problem if they share default gateways?
 
 Long story short, I have two connections to the same ISP and would like to
 direct some traffic to one, and some traffic to the other.  Can I do this?

Yes, DHCP on multi-wan is supported.   

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs

2005-09-05 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 9/5/05, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 using the same gateway for both wans won't work as you can't specify rules 
 for this I think. the rules are applied to a gateway and with both gateways 
 the same... :-/
 you might have to come up with a workaround like having a nated router in 
 front of one connection to use this as gateway on one wan and put the pfsense 
 in the dmz of this router.

You *possibly* could create a load balancing pool with 1 device in it.
  Select this as your gateway from the rules.   Again, haven't tested
this so I'm not sure if it will work or not.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]