Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-27 Thread Thomas Kelly



Joe, 
 I've taken a while to 
respond toyour question becauseI have been tweaking my process. 
Ialso produced what seemed to be good BD, but invariably a very small 
residue would remain undissolved in the methanol. I wasn't sure that it was possible to make BD that passed the 
test.
 -I reduced my volume of 
oil to 20 gal (76L).(Iuse a 1" 
 clearwater 
pumpfor agitation).
 -Raised the temp to 150F 
(Ina sealed water heater w. 
 vented pressure 
relief valve.)
 -Increased the reaction 
time to 2.5 hrs.
 -Increased methanol from 4 
to 4.5 gal
 I also use oil that is dry and 
consistently gives titrations 
of 1 - 1.2 g/L
 With all of this I finally 
produced BD that passedJan's Methanol Test.
 I havesince made a 
few adjustments in the interest of energy, time,and $.
1. (Based on a response by Bob Allen) I add the 
methoxide when temp is about 130F. Pump and heater continue to operate until 
temp is 150F (about 1 hour). I then turn off 
heater andallow the pump to run for another 1.5 hours. Final temp is about 
140F.
BD still passed Jan's Methanol Test.
2. I then went back to 4 gal of methanol (20% of 
Vol of oil).
BD still passed Jan's test.

 
Tom

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Joe Street 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:47 
  PM
  Subject: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol 
  test
  Hi All;The other day I threw out a question but it was 
  an afterthought on another thread. Nobody has answered so here I am 
  trying again on a specific thread. I am interested to know how many on the list do Jan Warnqvist's methanol 
  test and how much precipitate do people get? How much is 
  ok? The description states that every 1 ml equals 4% contaminate and 
  indicates what 'causes washing problems' I have absolutely no washing 
  problems now with the way my reactor is running, my BD has a density of 0.88, 
  there is a dramatic lightening of color after the split, I get a reasonable 
  amount of glycerine (not that this means a hell of a lot) but as an example, 
  last batch was horrible oil I had to use 15.5 grams of KOH per liter oil and I 
  ended up with 23 liters of BD at the end out of 25 liters oil. The first 
  wash water was milky white and the 4th was almost like drinking water and the 
  PH was 7.3 vs 7.4 before washing. No detectable 3rd layer formed at any stage 
  of the process. By all accounts this should be good quality fuel but I will 
  still get a little fallout from the methanol test ( I haven't quantified 
  it yet because I didn't do in in a graduated cylinder but there is definitely 
  a clear amber liquid phase at the bottom on the tube after settling)So 
  my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it going for 
  you? Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from this test? 
  And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent contamination in my 
  fuel?I did search the mail archive twice using 'methanol test' and 
  also 'Jan Warnqvist' as keywords, but the returns were not so 
  informative. List members I need your wisdom!Jan perhaps you are 
  most qualified to answer but I would really like to get a sense of the 
  percentage of the list members who are running this test. So chime 
  in!Joe
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-27 Thread Joe Street




Great news Tom and congradulations. I am going through those
refinements myself. I have been raising the reactor temperature little
by little. I suppose I'll have to think about pressure when I get up
above 60 degrees C to avoid losing methanol to evaporation. The
thermostat turns off at 57 right now and on at 53. Also my feed stock
is pretty bad. Last couple of batches had to be reacted twice since a
single step was not enough. I should start thinking about acid-base I
guess.
You are lucky to have access to such good oil! Thanks for the
excellent information.

Joe

Thomas Kelly wrote:

  
  
  
  
  Joe, 
   I've taken a while to respond
toyour question becauseI have been tweaking my process. Ialso
produced what seemed to be good BD, but invariably a very small residue
would remain undissolved in the methanol. I wasn't sure that it was possible to make BD that passed the
test.
   -I reduced my volume of oil to
20 gal (76L).(Iuse a 1" 
   clearwater pumpfor
agitation).
   -Raised the temp to 150F (Ina
sealed water heater w. 
   vented pressure relief valve.)
   -Increased the reaction time to
2.5 hrs.
   -Increased methanol from 4 to
4.5 gal
   I also use oil that is dry and
consistently gives titrations 
  of 1 - 1.2 g/L
   With all of this I finally
produced BD that passedJan's Methanol Test.
   I havesince made a few
adjustments in the interest of energy, time,and $.
  1. (Based on a response by Bob
Allen) I add the methoxide when temp is about 130F. Pump and heater
continue to operate until temp is 150F (about 1 hour). I then turn off heater andallow the pump to run
for another 1.5 hours. Final temp is about 140F.
  BD still passed Jan's Methanol Test.
  2. I then went back to 4 gal of
methanol (20% of Vol of oil).
  BD still passed Jan's test.
  
  
Tom
  
-
Original Message - 
From:
Joe Street 
To:
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Sent:
Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:47 PM
Subject:
[Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test


Hi All;

The other day I threw out a question but it was an afterthought on
another thread. Nobody has answered so here I am trying again on a
specific thread. I am interested to know how many on the list do Jan Warnqvist's methanol
test and how much precipitate do people get? How much
is ok? The description states that every 1 ml equals 4% contaminate
and indicates what 'causes washing problems' I have absolutely no
washing problems now with the way my reactor is running, my BD has a
density of 0.88, there is a dramatic lightening of color after the
split, I get a reasonable amount of glycerine (not that this means a
hell of a lot) but as an example, last batch was horrible oil I had to
use 15.5 grams of KOH per liter oil and I ended up with 23 liters of BD
at the end out of 25 liters oil. The first wash water was milky white
and the 4th was almost like drinking water and the PH was 7.3 vs 7.4
before washing. No detectable 3rd layer formed at any stage of the
process. By all accounts this should be good quality fuel but I will
still get a little fallout from the methanol test ( I haven't
quantified it yet because I didn't do in in a graduated cylinder but
there is definitely a clear amber liquid phase at the bottom on the
tube after settling)

So my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it
going for you? Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from this
test? And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent
contamination in my fuel?

I did search the mail archive twice using 'methanol test' and also 'Jan
Warnqvist' as keywords, but the returns were not so informative. List
members I need your wisdom!

Jan perhaps you are most qualified to answer but I would really like to
get a sense of the percentage of the list members who are running this
test. So chime in!

Joe


 
 ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  
  

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):

Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-27 Thread Mark Kennedy



good 
info, Joe and Tom. ty

What 
are some good rules of thumb when looking for used veg oil? We have access 
to almost any kind of restaurant imaginable, here. Are some restaurants 
disposing of cleaner oil than others? Does it make a difference what has 
been cooked in the oil? For instance if a restaurant fries primarily fish 
products will that yield an oil with less fats? Is that a good thing for 
producing biodiesel?
-Mark

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joe 
  StreetSent: Friday, January 27, 2006 11:03 AMTo: 
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject: Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol 
  testGreat news Tom and congradulations. I am going 
  through those refinements myself. I have been raising the reactor 
  temperature little by little. I suppose I'll have to think about 
  pressure when I get up above 60 degrees C to avoid losing methanol to 
  evaporation. The thermostat turns off at 57 right now and on at 53. Also my 
  feed stock is pretty bad. Last couple of batches had to be reacted twice 
  since a single step was not enough. I should start thinking about acid-base I 
  guess.You are lucky to have access to such good oil! Thanks for the 
  excellent information.JoeThomas Kelly wrote:
  



Joe, 
 I've taken a while to 
respond toyour question becauseI have been tweaking my process. 
Ialso produced what seemed to be good BD, but invariably a very small 
residue would remain undissolved in the methanol. I wasn't sure that it was possible to make BD that passed the 
test.
 -I reduced my volume 
of oil to 20 gal (76L).(Iuse a 1" 
 clearwater 
pumpfor agitation).
 -Raised the temp to 
150F (Ina sealed water heater w. 
 vented pressure 
relief valve.)
 -Increased the 
reaction time to 2.5 hrs.
 -Increased methanol 
from 4 to 4.5 gal
 I also use oil that is dry and 
consistently gives titrations 
of 1 - 1.2 g/L
 With all of this I 
finally produced BD that passedJan's Methanol Test.
 I havesince made 
a few adjustments in the interest of energy, time,and $.
1. (Based on a response by Bob Allen) I add the 
methoxide when temp is about 130F. Pump and heater continue to operate until 
temp is 150F (about 1 hour). I then turn off 
heater andallow the pump to run for another 1.5 hours. Final temp is 
about 140F.
BD still passed Jan's Methanol 
Test.
2. I then went back to 4 gal of methanol (20% 
of Vol of oil).
BD still passed Jan's test.

 
Tom

  - 
  Original Message - 
  From: 
  Joe Street 
  To: 
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:47 PM
  Subject: 
  [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test
  Hi All;The other day I threw out a question but it 
  was an afterthought on another thread. Nobody has answered so here I 
  am trying again on a specific thread. I am interested to know how many on the list do Jan Warnqvist's methanol 
  test and how much precipitate do people get? How much 
  is ok? The description states that every 1 ml equals 4% contaminate 
  and indicates what 'causes washing problems' I have absolutely no 
  washing problems now with the way my reactor is running, my BD has a 
  density of 0.88, there is a dramatic lightening of color after the split, 
  I get a reasonable amount of glycerine (not that this means a hell of a 
  lot) but as an example, last batch was horrible oil I had to use 15.5 
  grams of KOH per liter oil and I ended up with 23 liters of BD at the end 
  out of 25 liters oil. The first wash water was milky white and the 
  4th was almost like drinking water and the PH was 7.3 vs 7.4 before 
  washing. No detectable 3rd layer formed at any stage of the process. By 
  all accounts this should be good quality fuel but I will still get a 
  little fallout from the methanol test ( I haven't quantified it yet 
  because I didn't do in in a graduated cylinder but there is definitely a 
  clear amber liquid phase at the bottom on the tube after 
  settling)So my question once again is who else uses this test and 
  how is it going for you? Does anyone get a perfect result (no 
  fallout) from this test? And finally should I be concerned by a 
  couple of percent contamination in my fuel?I did search the mail 
  archive twice using 'methanol test' and also 'Jan Warnqvist' as keywords, 
  but the returns were not so informative. List members I need your 
  wisdom!Jan perhaps you are most qualified to answer but I would 
  really like to get a sense of the percentage of the list members who are 
  running this test. So chime in!Joe
  
  
  ___Biofuel mailing 
  

Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-27 Thread Derick Giorchino








Hi Joe as I read this it seems that you
are using 4 to 4.5 gal of methanol per 20 gal of oil. Is that right ? I use
20% and with good titration have not had a problem yet 

I think I will try to reduce it bit by bit
so the usage can be reduced and washing maybe a little easier.

Derick











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Kelly
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006
8:01 AM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Jan's
Methanol test







Joe, 





 I've taken a while to
respond toyour question becauseI have been tweaking my process.
Ialso produced what seemed to be good BD, but invariably a very small
residue would remain undissolved in the methanol. I wasn't sure that it was
possible to make BD that passed the test.





 -I reduced my volume of oil
to 20 gal (76L).(Iuse a 1 





 clearwater pumpfor agitation).





 -Raised the temp to 150F
(Ina sealed water heater w. 





 vented pressure relief
valve.)





 -Increased the reaction time
to 2.5 hrs.





 -Increased methanol from 4
to 4.5 gal





 I also use oil that is dry and
consistently gives titrations 





of 1 - 1.2 g/L





 With all of this I finally
produced BD that passedJan's Methanol Test.





 I havesince made a few
adjustments in the interest of energy, time,and $.





1. (Based on a response by Bob Allen) I add the
methoxide when temp is about 130F. Pump and heater continue to operate until
temp is 150F (about 1 hour). I then turn off heater andallow the pump to
run for another 1.5 hours. Final temp is about 140F.





BD still passed Jan's Methanol Test.





2. I then went back to 4 gal of methanol (20% of Vol
of oil).





BD still passed Jan's test.












Tom







- Original Message - 





From: Joe
Street 





To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org






Sent: Wednesday,
January 11, 2006 4:47 PM





Subject: [Biofuel]
Jan's Methanol test









Hi All;

The other day I threw out a question but it was an afterthought on another
thread. Nobody has answered so here I am trying again on a specific
thread. I am interested to know how many on the
list do Jan Warnqvist's methanol test and how much
precipitate do people get? How much is ok? The description states
that every 1 ml equals 4% contaminate and indicates what 'causes washing
problems' I have absolutely no washing problems now with the way my
reactor is running, my BD has a density of 0.88, there is a dramatic lightening
of color after the split, I get a reasonable amount of glycerine (not that this
means a hell of a lot) but as an example, last batch was horrible oil I had to
use 15.5 grams of KOH per liter oil and I ended up with 23 liters of BD at the
end out of 25 liters oil. The first wash water was milky white and the
4th was almost like drinking water and the PH was 7.3 vs 7.4 before washing. No
detectable 3rd layer formed at any stage of the process. By all accounts this
should be good quality fuel but I will still get a little fallout from
the methanol test ( I haven't quantified it yet because I didn't do in in a
graduated cylinder but there is definitely a clear amber liquid phase at the
bottom on the tube after settling)

So my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it going for
you? Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from this test?
And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent contamination in my
fuel?

I did search the mail archive twice using 'methanol test' and also 'Jan
Warnqvist' as keywords, but the returns were not so informative. List
members I need your wisdom!

Jan perhaps you are most qualified to answer but I would really like to get a
sense of the percentage of the list members who are running this test. So chime
in!

Joe







___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/








___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Jan and all

Hello Golan and all,
from experience I can tell that the methanol test as described on 
the JtF homepage rather well corresponds to the result you will have 
from the test according to the EN 14214 regarding the ester content.

I agree, see below.

Just to be clear, Europe's EN 14214 standard specifies ester content 
at min. 96.5%, the French standard is the same, Italy and Sweden 
specify min. 98%, the US ASTM D-6751 standard doesn't specify ester 
content. EN 14214 is probably the de facto basic world standard.

However, if the methanol test shows e.g. 1 ml (4%) of undissolved 
oil in the measuring glass, you can expect an ester content of 
92-94% according to the EN norm. In order to meet the norm with an 
ester content of min 96,5%, the methanol test will have to show no 
undissolved oil at all.

I tried the methanol test several times and didn't get any result. So 
I tried it with some other fuel, some biodiesel made by a newbie 
brewer before we helped him to improve it, and some fuel from 
commercial producers here in Japan, and then I got results, very 
clear! Just as Jan described it in his original message.

Since then we've been working with a university lab that's tested our 
biodiesel with their gaskro (GC), using samples from standard 
production batches, not test-batch samples, just the usual stuff we 
make all the time, and the results show FAME content of 98.5%. Which 
is why we didn't get any result with the methanol test. I've also 
seen other lab tests which tend to confirm the results I got with the 
commercial fuel methanol tests.

Joe asked:

  So my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it
  going for you?  Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from
  this test?  And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent
  contamination in my fuel?

I think it's a very useful test. Should you be concerned, well, it's 
up to you. These might help, if you haven't already seen them:

The Fuel Injection Equipment (FIE) Manufacturers (Delphi, Stanadyne, 
Denso, Bosch) on biodiesel quality:
Summary -- html
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_FIEM.html
Full document -- Acrobat file, 104kb
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/FIEM.pdf

Determining the Influence of Contaminants on Biodiesel Properties, 
Jon H. Van Gerpen et al., Iowa State University, July 31, 1996 -- 
12,000-word report on contaminants and their effects. Acrobat file, 
2.1Mb
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/bdgerpen96.pdf

Best

Keith



pH measurements are difficult and the right conclusions from these 
measurements can be even harder to draw.
But, a neutral BD can have a pH value of anything between 4,5 -7, 
depending upon which other substances are present in the BD. It is 
also important to know that the pH scale is logarithmic when judging 
the results of the measurements.
If a WVO has a pH value above 7, it means that there are alkaline 
compounds present, probably  tenside remains. The way of succeeding 
with biodiesel production goes through an accurate raw material 
control, adjusting the recipe and process details according to that.
Good luck to you !
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Golan Shmuel
To: mailto:Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgBiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

hi joe
iuse the test and it still gives me hadeake .
at list half of the times are not as it should be
im at the begining of the way and it give me direction.
i just put abigger pump and it already looking better
i alsow parchesed a PH tester and i start to take test from old BD 
sampels (unwashed)resault 12.2-13.3 how doese that sound?
tested as well somewvo i got 8.4-8.5 i thought it should be acid? 
have u got any idea
all the best
golan



On 13/01/06, JJJN mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Joe,
I use every test on JtF to test my Bio and also the the Hanna
Instruments test for Glycol. I do this every single batch.  I have never
had any fallout in Jans test to date.(Knock Knock Knock on wood) ( I
measure it out precisely ) I have graduated to the base/base method and
have had absolutely great results. That said I got into a washing awhile
back that was not as good as I like so I investigated and found that I
am dealing with FFA's that are higher than I want.  I am moving to the
acid/base learning phase for that.  I did also learn that if I pour the
WVO that is liquid and on top at 28 deg F into a bucket and process the
stuff that gets clumpy (on bottom)  I greatly reduce the FFA's in the
oil. (14% or so lower) compairitably (tests of each done side by side
same temp same everything  except oil and very precise). So in the
future winter freeze cycles I will cut out the dark top stuff and save
for Acid processing. I have since adopted this and my bio stands up

Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-15 Thread Golan Shmuel
hi joe
iuse the test and it still gives me hadeake .
at list half of the times are not as it should be 
im at the begining of the way and it give me direction.
i just put abigger pump and it already looking better
i alsow parchesed a PH tester and i start to take test from old BD sampels (unwashed)resault 12.2-13.3 how doese that sound? 
tested as well somewvo i got 8.4-8.5 i thought it should be acid? have u got any idea 
all the best
golan
On 13/01/06, JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joe,I use every test on JtF to test my Bio and also the the HannaInstruments test for Glycol. I do this every single batch.I have never
had any fallout in Jans test to date.(Knock Knock Knock on wood) ( Imeasure it out precisely ) I have graduated to the base/base method andhave had absolutely great results. That said I got into a washing awhile
back that was not as good as I like so I investigated and found that Iam dealing with FFA's that are higher than I want.I am moving to theacid/base learning phase for that.I did also learn that if I pour the
WVO that is liquid and on top at 28 deg F into a bucket and process thestuff that gets clumpy (on bottom)I greatly reduce the FFA's in theoil. (14% or so lower) compairitably (tests of each done side by side
same temp same everythingexcept oil and very precise). So in thefuture winter freeze cycles I will cut out the dark top stuff and savefor Acid processing. I have since adopted this and my bio stands up to
intense stir washing each and every wash now.( I get clean and clear atthe third wash but I do go 4 just because)I might add that after Itake a grab sample from the batch and mix 50% water, then give it a 30
second shake, it separates into 2 phases in 1 minute or so.(thats at 50- 60 deg F water) That is my first clue I have a good thing going.Hope this helps.JimJoe Street wrote: Hi All;
 The other day I threw out a question but it was an afterthought on another thread.Nobody has answered so here I am trying again on a specific thread.I am interested to know *how many on the list do Jan
 Warnqvist's methanol test* http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html#quality and how much precipitate do people get?How much is ok?The description
 states that every 1 ml equals 4% contaminate and indicates what 'causes washing problems'I have absolutely no washing problems now with the way my reactor is running, my BD has a density of 0.88
, there is a dramatic lightening of color after the split, I get a reasonable amount of glycerine (not that this means a hell of a lot) but as an example, last batch was horrible oil I had to use 15.5
 grams of KOH per liter oil and I ended up with 23 liters of BD at the end out of 25 liters oil.The first wash water was milky white and the 4th was almost like drinking water and the PH was 7.3 vs 
7.4 before washing. No detectable 3rd layer formed at any stage of the process. By all accounts this should be good quality fuel but I will still get a littlefallout from the methanol test ( I haven't quantified it yet
 because I didn't do in in a graduated cylinder but there is definitely a clear amber liquid phase at the bottom on the tube after settling) So my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it
 going for you?Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from this test?And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent contamination in my fuel? I did search the mail archive twice using 'methanol test' and also
 'Jan Warnqvist' as keywords, but the returns were not so informative. List members I need your wisdom! Jan perhaps you are most qualified to answer but I would really like to get a sense of the percentage of the list members who are running
 this test. So chime in! Joe **___
Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/___Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-15 Thread Jan Warnqvist



Hello Golan and all,
from experience I can tell that the 
methanol test as described on the JtF homepage rather well corresponds to the 
result you will have from the test according to the EN 14214 regarding the ester 
content. However, if the methanol test shows e.g. 1 ml (4%) of undissolved oil 
in the measuring glass, you can expect an ester content of 92-94% according to 
the EN norm. In order to meet the norm with an ester content of min 96,5%, the 
methanol test will have to show no undissolved oil at all.
pH measurements are difficult and the 
right conclusions from these measurements can be even harder to 
draw.
But, a "neutral" BD can have a pH value of 
anything between 4,5 -7, depending upon which other substances are present in 
the BD. It is also important to know that the pH scale is logarithmic when 
judging the results of the measurements. 
If a WVO has a pH value above 7, it means 
that there are alkaline compounds present, probably tenside remains. The 
way of succeeding with biodiesel production goes through an accurate raw 
material control, adjusting the recipe and process details according to 
that.
Good luck to you !
Jan WarnqvistAGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89+46 70 499 38 45

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Golan 
  Shmuel 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:07 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol 
  test
  
  hi joe
  iuse the test and it still gives me hadeake .
  at list half of the times are not as it should be 
  im at the begining of the way and it give me direction.
  i just put abigger pump and it already looking better
  i alsow parchesed a PH tester and i start to take test from old BD 
  sampels (unwashed)resault 12.2-13.3 how doese that sound? 
  tested as well somewvo i got 8.4-8.5 i thought it should be acid? have u 
  got any idea 
  all the best
  golan
  On 13/01/06, JJJN 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote: 
  Hi 
Joe,I use every test on JtF to test my Bio and also the the 
HannaInstruments test for Glycol. I do this every single 
batch.I have never had any fallout in Jans test to 
date.(Knock Knock Knock on wood) ( Imeasure it out precisely ) I have 
graduated to the base/base method andhave had absolutely great results. 
That said I got into a washing awhile back that was not as good as I 
like so I investigated and found that Iam dealing with FFA's that are 
higher than I want.I am moving to theacid/base learning 
phase for that.I did also learn that if I pour the WVO that 
is liquid and on top at 28 deg F into a bucket and process thestuff that 
gets clumpy (on bottom)I greatly reduce the FFA's in theoil. 
(14% or so lower) compairitably (tests of each done side by side same 
temp same everythingexcept oil and very precise). So in 
thefuture winter freeze cycles I will cut out the dark top stuff and 
savefor Acid processing. I have since adopted this and my bio stands up 
tointense stir washing each and every wash now.( I get clean and clear 
atthe third wash but I do go 4 just because)I might add that 
after Itake a grab sample from the batch and mix 50% water, then give it 
a 30second shake, it separates into 2 phases in 1 minute or so.(thats at 
50- 60 deg F water) That is my first clue I have a good thing 
going.Hope this helps.JimJoe Street wrote: 
Hi All; The other day I threw out a question but it was an 
afterthought on another thread.Nobody has answered so 
here I am trying again on a specific thread.I am 
interested to know *how many on the list do Jan  Warnqvist's 
methanol test* http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html#quality 
and how much precipitate do people get?How much is 
ok?The description  states that every 1 ml equals 4% 
contaminate and indicates what 'causes washing 
problems'I have absolutely no washing problems now with 
the way my reactor is running, my BD has a density of 0.88 , there 
is a dramatic lightening of color after the split, I get a 
reasonable amount of glycerine (not that this means a hell of a lot) 
but as an example, last batch was horrible oil I had to use 15.5 
grams of KOH per liter oil and I ended up with 23 liters of BD at 
the end out of 25 liters oil.The first wash water was 
milky white and the 4th was almost like drinking water and the PH 
was 7.3 vs 7.4 before washing. No detectable 3rd layer formed at any 
stage of the process. By all accounts this should be good quality 
fuel but I will still get a littlefallout from the 
methanol test ( I haven't quantified it yet  because I didn't do in 
in a graduated cylinder but there is definitely a clear amber liquid 
phase at the bottom on the tube after settling) So my 
question once again is who else uses this test and how is it  going 
for you?Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout)

Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-12 Thread JJJN
Hi Joe,
I use every test on JtF to test my Bio and also the the Hanna 
Instruments test for Glycol. I do this every single batch.  I have never 
had any fallout in Jans test to date.(Knock Knock Knock on wood) ( I 
measure it out precisely ) I have graduated to the base/base method and 
have had absolutely great results. That said I got into a washing awhile 
back that was not as good as I like so I investigated and found that I 
am dealing with FFA's that are higher than I want.  I am moving to the 
acid/base learning phase for that.  I did also learn that if I pour the 
WVO that is liquid and on top at 28 deg F into a bucket and process the 
stuff that gets clumpy (on bottom)  I greatly reduce the FFA's in the 
oil. (14% or so lower) compairitably (tests of each done side by side 
same temp same everything  except oil and very precise). So in the 
future winter freeze cycles I will cut out the dark top stuff and save 
for Acid processing. I have since adopted this and my bio stands up to 
intense stir washing each and every wash now.( I get clean and clear at 
the third wash but I do go 4 just because)  I might add that after I 
take a grab sample from the batch and mix 50% water, then give it a 30 
second shake, it separates into 2 phases in 1 minute or so.(thats at 50 
- 60 deg F water) That is my first clue I have a good thing going.

Hope this helps.
Jim

Joe Street wrote:

 Hi All;

 The other day I threw out a question but it was an afterthought on 
 another thread.  Nobody has answered so here I am trying again on a 
 specific thread.  I am interested to know *how many on the list do Jan 
 Warnqvist's methanol test* 
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html#quality and how 
 much precipitate do people get?  How much is ok?  The description 
 states that every 1 ml equals 4% contaminate and indicates what 
 'causes washing problems'  I have absolutely no washing problems now 
 with the way my reactor is running, my BD has a density of 0.88, there 
 is a dramatic lightening of color after the split, I get a reasonable 
 amount of glycerine (not that this means a hell of a lot) but as an 
 example, last batch was horrible oil I had to use 15.5 grams of KOH 
 per liter oil and I ended up with 23 liters of BD at the end out of 25 
 liters oil.  The first wash water was milky white and the 4th was 
 almost like drinking water and the PH was 7.3 vs 7.4 before washing. 
 No detectable 3rd layer formed at any stage of the process. By all 
 accounts this should be good quality fuel but I will still get a 
 little  fallout from the methanol test ( I haven't quantified it yet 
 because I didn't do in in a graduated cylinder but there is definitely 
 a clear amber liquid phase at the bottom on the tube after settling)

 So my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it 
 going for you?  Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from 
 this test?  And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent 
 contamination in my fuel?

 I did search the mail archive twice using 'methanol test' and also 
 'Jan Warnqvist' as keywords, but the returns were not so informative.  
 List members I need your wisdom!

 Jan perhaps you are most qualified to answer but I would really like 
 to get a sense of the percentage of the list members who are running 
 this test. So chime in!

 Joe

 **



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/