Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 03:12 +0200, Alberto wrote:
 Ok, because according to English native speakers there isn't a single word
 that indicates a facility where animals are kept and the staff feeds them
 and cares of them, I propose to change from amenity=kennel to
 amenity=animal_shelter.
 In Italy there are centers for dogs only, cats  only, dogs and cats, wild
 animals in general, wild sea animals only, wild birds only and so on. Any
 combination is potentially allowed, so adding a tag dog=yes, cat=yes,
 wild_animals=yes, wild_birds=yes and so on is useful.
 
 pet_keeping is not used according to taginfo and it is too restrictive:
 there are facilities that don't held pets but wild animals.
 
 building=asylum is not intuitive and it's not used according to taginfo.
 Moreover the key building is too restrictive for a center that can include
 buildings, meadows, courtyards.
 
 Amenity=animal_boarding is too restrictive: there are kennels that take
 stray dogs, catteries for stray cats, rescue centers for wounded wild
 animals.
 
 On the other hand amenity=animal_shelter is intuitive and already in use
 according to taginfo. Also animal=shelter is already in use: in the wiki
 animal page it's suggested to use it, but on what basis? There isn't any
 proposal page and it hasn't been voted.
 Ultimately I think we have to unify amenity=animal_shelter and
 animal=shelter in one tag, refine and officialize it. I think that with a
 feature page and with a preset in editors, one of these could become an
 universally used tag.
 Then we can refine it and add one or more additional tags for the purpose of
 the facility.
 I prefer amenity=animal_shelter to animal=shelter because according to
 wiki amenities are an assortment of community facilities and an animal
 shelter is one of them.
 On the other hand the key animal is not defined on the wiki and according
 to taginfo it's often used to indicate a species of animal or simply
 animal=yes.
 We have already amenity=veterinary and not animal=veterinary, so why not
 amenity=animal_shelter?
 Alberto

An animal shelter is a place where lost, or abandoned animals are taken.
Either to be cared for, or re-homed. UK examples are charities such as
the RSPCA, Dogs Trust, Battersea Dogs Home and numerous other smaller
places.

Animal shelter appropriate in those cases, but not in the case of
Boarding Kennels, or Boarding Catteries where you take your pet to be
cared for whilst you go on holiday. For these I would propose
amenity=boarding_kennel and amenity=boarding_cattery. 

A few do take cats and dogs, but in my experience this is extremely
unusual, few cat owners would want to leave their cat at a place where
they will hear dogs.

Small animal boarding is another amenity, however not very common. I
have never come across a place where small animals, cats and dogs are
cared for, other than animal shelters.

Phil;
 
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread teuxe
I also think that amenity=animal_shelter with other tags to indicate kinds of 
animals goes in the sense of OSM tagging. Things like animal=shelter are 
nonsense: a shelter is not an animal, whereas an animal_shelter is an amenity.

To set a general rule of thumb, for those tags that are not boolean properties 
(yes/no), the value (animal_shelter) shall be an item from the set 
represented by the key (amenity).

To remove ambiguities related to short tags like horse=yes, why not using 
another set of specific tags indicating whether a kind of animal is accepted in 
the shelter, like animal_shelter:dog=yes, animal_shelter:cat=yes, 
animal_shelter:horse=yes and so on, maybe refining the attribute yes by 
something more useful?

Teuxe

- Mail original -
De: Alberto albertoferra...@fastwebnet.it
À: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 14 Septembre 2012 03:12:48
Objet: [Tagging]  amenity=kennel

Ok, because according to English native speakers there isn't a single word
that indicates a facility where animals are kept and the staff feeds them
and cares of them, I propose to change from amenity=kennel to
amenity=animal_shelter.
In Italy there are centers for dogs only, cats  only, dogs and cats, wild
animals in general, wild sea animals only, wild birds only and so on. Any
combination is potentially allowed, so adding a tag dog=yes, cat=yes,
wild_animals=yes, wild_birds=yes and so on is useful.

pet_keeping is not used according to taginfo and it is too restrictive:
there are facilities that don't held pets but wild animals.

building=asylum is not intuitive and it's not used according to taginfo.
Moreover the key building is too restrictive for a center that can include
buildings, meadows, courtyards.

Amenity=animal_boarding is too restrictive: there are kennels that take
stray dogs, catteries for stray cats, rescue centers for wounded wild
animals.

On the other hand amenity=animal_shelter is intuitive and already in use
according to taginfo. Also animal=shelter is already in use: in the wiki
animal page it's suggested to use it, but on what basis? There isn't any
proposal page and it hasn't been voted.
Ultimately I think we have to unify amenity=animal_shelter and
animal=shelter in one tag, refine and officialize it. I think that with a
feature page and with a preset in editors, one of these could become an
universally used tag.
Then we can refine it and add one or more additional tags for the purpose of
the facility.
I prefer amenity=animal_shelter to animal=shelter because according to
wiki amenities are an assortment of community facilities and an animal
shelter is one of them.
On the other hand the key animal is not defined on the wiki and according
to taginfo it's often used to indicate a species of animal or simply
animal=yes.
We have already amenity=veterinary and not animal=veterinary, so why not
amenity=animal_shelter?
Alberto


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 19:10 +1000, Ross Scanlon wrote:
  Animal shelter appropriate in those cases, but not in the case of
  Boarding Kennels, or Boarding Catteries where you take your pet to be
  cared for whilst you go on holiday. For these I would propose
  amenity=boarding_kennel and amenity=boarding_cattery.
 
  A few do take cats and dogs, but in my experience this is extremely
  unusual, few cat owners would want to leave their cat at a place where
  they will hear dogs.
 
 May be the case in UK but in rural areas of Australia it's the opposite. 
   Most take cats and dogs.  Usually well separated as plenty of space.
 
 So I'd suggest amenity=pet_boarding or amenity=kennel and then dog=yes, 
 cat=yes, etc
 
+1
I would go along with that one. 

Kennel implies dogs.

Phil


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread John F. Eldredge
Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:

   Animal shelter appropriate in those cases, but not in the case of
  Boarding Kennels, or Boarding Catteries where you take your pet to
 be
  cared for whilst you go on holiday. For these I would propose
  amenity=boarding_kennel and amenity=boarding_cattery.
 
  A few do take cats and dogs, but in my experience this is extremely
  unusual, few cat owners would want to leave their cat at a place
 where
  they will hear dogs.
 
 May be the case in UK but in rural areas of Australia it's the
 opposite. 
   Most take cats and dogs.  Usually well separated as plenty of space.
 
 So I'd suggest amenity=pet_boarding or amenity=kennel and then
 dog=yes, 
 cat=yes, etc
 
 Cheers
 Ross
 

In the USA (at least in Nashville, Tennessee, where I live) veterinary offices 
often include boarding services for small animals.  Some only board one type of 
animals, but accepting more than one type is more common.

-- 
John F. Eldredge --  j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to 
think at all. -- Hypatia of Alexandria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread Janko Mihelić
2012/9/14 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com


 In the USA (at least in Nashville, Tennessee, where I live) veterinary
 offices often include boarding services for small animals.  Some only board
 one type of animals, but accepting more than one type is more common.


Services are tagged like service:bicycle:repair=yes for shops that will
repair your bike.
For animals it could be service:animal:grooming=yes  if the shop will
hairstyle your dog, or service:animal:boarding=yes and so on. If they take
only one type of animal, maybe it could be something like
service:animal:boarding=dog;cat

Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread SomeoneElse

Janko Mihelić wrote:
Services are tagged like service:bicycle:repair=yes for shops that 
will repair your bike.


Saying that implies that people actually use tags such as these. Taginfo 
suggests otherwise:

shop=bicycle: 13,425
service:bicycle:repair: 758

I'm guessing that it's a fair bet that more than 5% of all bike shops do 
some sort of repairs - unless the complexity of tags like this are 
hidden from users (e.g. by editor support) they won't get used enough to 
be useful.


Cheers,
Andy


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-14 Thread Janko Mihelić
Dana petak, 14. rujna 2012., korisnik SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk je napisao:
 Saying that implies that people actually use tags such as these. Taginfo
suggests otherwise:
 shop=bicycle: 13,425
 service:bicycle:repair: 758

 I'm guessing that it's a fair bet that more than 5% of all bike shops do
some sort of repairs - unless the complexity of tags like this are hidden
from users (e.g. by editor support) they won't get used enough to be useful.


There is a rule for tags; if you render it, they will use it. Look at this
map:

http://open.geof.hr/~dodobas/zgbikes.html

Shops with service:bicycle:retail=yes have a shoping cart, repair have a
little tool. Quite usefull, don't you think so?

Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-13 Thread John Sturdy
Martin wrote:
 Actually I just revived an old proposal for stables [1]. My first thought
 was to simply use stables=animal until someone with much better english
 language skills pointed out that stables usually only refer to horses. I
 would also like to see one common tag for some place where animals are kept
 and taken care of. Any suggestions from native speakers?

I'm a native speaker...

Only few types of animal have specific names for where they are kept;
the rest would come under farm, zoo, wildlife park, animal
rescue and perhaps nature reserve.  Also, some countries have
animal quarantine facilities.

The only ones that I can think of at short notice are:
 horse, donkey: stable
 dog: kennel
 cat: cattery
 birds: aviary, dovecote
 bees: apiary

There are several types of kennel, including boarding (for looking
after pet dogs while you are away) and hunt kennels for hounds; also
other working dogs e.g. police dogs, military dogs.  (Catteries are
for boarding.)

Historically, rabbits were kept in artificial warrens that people
built for them!  But now, commercial rearing of rabbits probably comes
under farm.  There's probably a special word for where working
ferrets are kept (English tends to have words like that), but I don't
know what it is, and it might vary between dialects anyway.

__John

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-13 Thread Sax-Barnett, Melelani
Native speaker here too. How about amenity=animal_boarding instead of kennel? 
Boarding typically refers to places you can pay to leave your dogs, cats, 
horses, etc. for a period and have them be cared for. One could also add 
additional tags like dogs=yes, cats=yes, etc., since these facilities sometimes 
do take more than one kind of animal.

Sanctuaries and humane societies, as well as training facilities, etc. would be 
different tags.

Just my two cents!
-Mele Sax-Barnett

-Original Message-
Martin wrote:
 Actually I just revived an old proposal for stables [1]. My first 
 thought was to simply use stables=animal until someone with much 
 better english language skills pointed out that stables usually only 
 refer to horses. I would also like to see one common tag for some 
 place where animals are kept and taken care of. Any suggestions from native 
 speakers?

I'm a native speaker...

Only few types of animal have specific names for where they are kept; the rest 
would come under farm, zoo, wildlife park, animal rescue and perhaps 
nature reserve.  Also, some countries have animal quarantine facilities.

The only ones that I can think of at short notice are:
 horse, donkey: stable
 dog: kennel
 cat: cattery
 birds: aviary, dovecote
 bees: apiary

There are several types of kennel, including boarding (for looking after pet 
dogs while you are away) and hunt kennels for hounds; also other working dogs 
e.g. police dogs, military dogs.  (Catteries are for boarding.)

Historically, rabbits were kept in artificial warrens that people built for 
them!  But now, commercial rearing of rabbits probably comes under farm.  
There's probably a special word for where working ferrets are kept (English 
tends to have words like that), but I don't know what it is, and it might vary 
between dialects anyway.

__John



--

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


End of Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 21
***

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

2012-09-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/9/13 Sax-Barnett, Melelani barne...@trimet.org:
add additional tags like dogs=yes, cats=yes, etc., since these
facilities sometimes do take more than one kind of animal.


+1, we should do this, and it is already done ;-), you will find this
documented in the wiki and there is also data:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=dog

One aspect we might talk about: will this better be tagged in the
singular (as suggested in the wiki = dog) or in the plural form (like
you suggested = dogs).

Looking at the above taginfo results it seems to be more popular to
use the singular form, but there is at least one big problem:  for
horse this doesn't work, as it is already in use for legal
access-restrictions (bridleways, ...).

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging