Re: [Talk-GB] Solar power mapping: 100k up

[Dan S]

P.S. blogged about the milestone here:
http://mcld.co.uk/blog/2019/solar-panels-in-the-uk-10-spotted.html

Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 21:40 schreef Dan S :
>
> Hi all
>
> This is fantastic news! Thanks to everyone who has contributed (there
> are at least 30 different users taking part). We're definitely going
> to pilot some CO2-saving things using these data.
>
> Regarding the solar farms: I haven't tidied up my spreadsheet but I
> may as well just share it:
> http://www.mcld.co.uk/tmp/wiki_repd_list_dan.ods
> I've been working my way down that list (so far I've checked for
> everything that is 7 MW or larger) - and I know other people have been
> doing their own checking via other patterns. Generally, the Maxar
> premium imagery has seemed good.
>
> Please do continue with the smaller solar panels if you're willing :)
>
> BTW I'll be giving a talk about all this at SOTM in a couple of weeks.
> Great timing!
>
> Best
> Dan
>
> Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 20:30 schreef SK53 :
> >
> > It looks as though we have just passed the 100k solar installation mark as 
> > calculated by Gregory's site. We had 98,307 this morning and around 1700 
> > have been added since this time yesterday (roughly the cut-off time for the 
> > stats).
> >
> > We have 4 LAs with over 80% of the FIT target mapped: Knowsley, Nottingham, 
> > Plymouth & Sunderland. Amazingly Plymouth is over 95% of the target. There 
> > are 2 others over 75%: Tameside and Ashfield, and around 16-17 with over 
> > half mapped. I hope one of these is the former district of Caradon in SE 
> > Cornwall as I've been mapping this area following Dan;s suggestion when I 
> > last reported this status.
> >
> > There are still a lot of solar farms to chase down. It would be nice to get 
> > more of them located (or in some cases just updating tagging). This is an 
> > area where we can get close to completeness (pace Brian's remarks earlier).
> >
> > Jerry
> > ___
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Solar power mapping: 100k up

[Dan S]

Hi all

This is fantastic news! Thanks to everyone who has contributed (there
are at least 30 different users taking part). We're definitely going
to pilot some CO2-saving things using these data.

Regarding the solar farms: I haven't tidied up my spreadsheet but I
may as well just share it:
http://www.mcld.co.uk/tmp/wiki_repd_list_dan.ods
I've been working my way down that list (so far I've checked for
everything that is 7 MW or larger) - and I know other people have been
doing their own checking via other patterns. Generally, the Maxar
premium imagery has seemed good.

Please do continue with the smaller solar panels if you're willing :)

BTW I'll be giving a talk about all this at SOTM in a couple of weeks.
Great timing!

Best
Dan

Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 20:30 schreef SK53 :
>
> It looks as though we have just passed the 100k solar installation mark as 
> calculated by Gregory's site. We had 98,307 this morning and around 1700 have 
> been added since this time yesterday (roughly the cut-off time for the stats).
>
> We have 4 LAs with over 80% of the FIT target mapped: Knowsley, Nottingham, 
> Plymouth & Sunderland. Amazingly Plymouth is over 95% of the target. There 
> are 2 others over 75%: Tameside and Ashfield, and around 16-17 with over half 
> mapped. I hope one of these is the former district of Caradon in SE Cornwall 
> as I've been mapping this area following Dan;s suggestion when I last 
> reported this status.
>
> There are still a lot of solar farms to chase down. It would be nice to get 
> more of them located (or in some cases just updating tagging). This is an 
> area where we can get close to completeness (pace Brian's remarks earlier).
>
> Jerry
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Solar power mapping: 100k up

[SK53]

It looks as though we have just passed the 100k solar installation mark as
calculated by Gregory's site
. We had 98,307 this
morning and around 1700 have been added since this time yesterday (roughly
the cut-off time for the stats).

We have 4 LAs with over 80% of the FIT target mapped: Knowsley, Nottingham,
Plymouth & Sunderland. Amazingly Plymouth is over 95% of the target. There
are 2 others over 75%: Tameside and Ashfield, and around 16-17 with over
half mapped. I hope one of these is the former district of Caradon in SE
Cornwall as I've been mapping this area following Dan;s suggestion when I
last reported this status.

There are still a lot of solar farms to chase down. It would be nice to get
more of them located (or in some cases just updating tagging). This is an
area where we can get close to completeness (pace Brian's remarks earlier).

Jerry
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Managed open water swimming

[Robert Skedgell]

Thanks, Dan. network=* looks like quite a good fit.

On 12/09/2019 12:43, Dan S wrote:
> It sounds like the network=* tag might be useful for this? eg
> network=NOWCA. I'm suggesting it because it sounds like a fairly
> similar situation to the London bike hire scheme (for which we use
> this tag), in which one can use RFID keys to borrow a bike from any of
> various locations...
> 
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/network#values
> 
> Best
> Dan
> 
> 
> Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 12:26 schreef Robert Skedgell :
>>
>> There are a few open water swimming areas which are operated by the
>> landowner, but use RFID wristbands provided by NOWCA or Great Swim Local
>> to manage booking and attendance.
>>
>> I feel that the operator=* tag should probably contain the operator of
>> the site, so does anyone have suggestions for the best way to capture
>> NOWCA and Great Swim Local sites?
>>
>> For OWS in the reservoir at Hadleigh Park (
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724008897 ), I currently have it
>> tagged as follows:
>> access=customers
>> contact:website=https://hadleigh-park.co.uk/open-water-swimming/
>> leisure=swimming_area
>> opening_hours=We 17:30-19:30;Sa 08:00-10:00
>> operator=Hadleigh Park
>> sport=swimming
>>
>> There should probably also be a fee=yes added to the above.
>>
>> --
>> Rob Skedgell (rskedgell)
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Managed open water swimming

[Dan S]

It sounds like the network=* tag might be useful for this? eg
network=NOWCA. I'm suggesting it because it sounds like a fairly
similar situation to the London bike hire scheme (for which we use
this tag), in which one can use RFID keys to borrow a bike from any of
various locations...

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/network#values

Best
Dan


Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 12:26 schreef Robert Skedgell :
>
> There are a few open water swimming areas which are operated by the
> landowner, but use RFID wristbands provided by NOWCA or Great Swim Local
> to manage booking and attendance.
>
> I feel that the operator=* tag should probably contain the operator of
> the site, so does anyone have suggestions for the best way to capture
> NOWCA and Great Swim Local sites?
>
> For OWS in the reservoir at Hadleigh Park (
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724008897 ), I currently have it
> tagged as follows:
> access=customers
> contact:website=https://hadleigh-park.co.uk/open-water-swimming/
> leisure=swimming_area
> opening_hours=We 17:30-19:30;Sa 08:00-10:00
> operator=Hadleigh Park
> sport=swimming
>
> There should probably also be a fee=yes added to the above.
>
> --
> Rob Skedgell (rskedgell)
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible removal of FHRS tags

[Robert Skedgell]

This is a very late reply, but there are other cases where
fhrs:authority is useful, particularly for premises where the City of
London Corporation is the local authority. It's probably not a useful
tag within the City of London itself, but is for Port of London areas
like the Royal Docks (actually in LB Newham) and Tilbury.

On 14/08/2019 17:12, SK53 wrote:
> I see little value for all of these except fhrs:rating_date which is
> scarcely used. The local authority to which a rating belongs can be
> directly determined from OSM most of the time, but may be useful in
> Northern Ireland where we have no good usable data on LA boundaries. 
> 
> I would rather that if they are to be removed it is when data is updated
> (i.e. by the editor discard list).
> 
> I do have a collection of extracts of FHRS data going back to 2013, but
> have not been updating these regularly for some time. They are useful
> for providing address details & sometimes as a cross check that a place
> has genuinely gone out of business (e.g., a note to the effect that a
> pub has closed).
> 
> Jerry
> 
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 15:19, Andrew Hain  > wrote:
> 
> Are the keys fhrs:rating (3358 occurences in Taginfo),
> fhrs:inspectiondate (1748), fhrs:confidence_management,
> fhrs:hygiene, fhrs:structural (621 each) and fhrs:rating_date (22)
> better off removed from our database, or should they be kept for
> businesses that disappear from FHRS listings when still open?
> 
> What about fhrs:local_authority_id (11724)?
> 
> Is fhrs:authority (12981) useful for businesses on borders?
> [https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/807942]
> 
> Should any that are not kept be removed in bulk or added th
> discarded lists in editors?
> 
> --
> Andrew
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Managed open water swimming

[Robert Skedgell]

There are a few open water swimming areas which are operated by the
landowner, but use RFID wristbands provided by NOWCA or Great Swim Local
to manage booking and attendance.

I feel that the operator=* tag should probably contain the operator of
the site, so does anyone have suggestions for the best way to capture
NOWCA and Great Swim Local sites?

For OWS in the reservoir at Hadleigh Park (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724008897 ), I currently have it
tagged as follows:
access=customers
contact:website=https://hadleigh-park.co.uk/open-water-swimming/
leisure=swimming_area
opening_hours=We 17:30-19:30;Sa 08:00-10:00
operator=Hadleigh Park
sport=swimming

There should probably also be a fee=yes added to the above.

-- 
Rob Skedgell (rskedgell)

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb