Re: TB does not print

2001-01-17 Thread Scott Guthrie

Greetings Peter,

  D!@#$! I fixed this on mine, but can't remember what I did
  to fix it.  Like you, my Epson wouldn't print from TB!, but
  would print from everything else.  The symptoms you describe
  are EXACTLY what happened to me, and as I recall, I posted a
  very similar message on the list where I failed to get an
  answer that could help (like this one grin).

  I beleive I eventually solved it by doing the following:

  1.  Delete all printers from the printer folder.

  2.  Reinstall from scratch the EPSON printer drivers and USB
  printer port (if appropriate).

  Incidentally, what OS are you using?

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: TB does not print

2001-01-17 Thread Scott Guthrie

Greetings Dieter,

  That seems consistent with my experience, as I had an Epson
  Actionlaser 1500 which worked perfectly, then when I moved
  to the Epson Stylus Color 860 I had the problem.  Took me
  awhile to figure out, simply reinstalling the driver failed
  to rectify the problem on '98, and it remained on ME until I
  completely removed all traces of the driver from
  the system, then installed from scratch.  However that may
  be due to ME and '98 while I am unsure what Peter is running.
  Of course Cees says he had no problems with Whistler...


Cheers,
Scott

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[3]: TB does not print

2001-01-17 Thread Scott Guthrie

Greetings -=/ Cees /=-,

  Hmmm, as I recall I downloaded the latest version as well,
  but simply reinstalling it over the other failed.  I was
  running 98SE at the time, and when I moved to ME (by doing
  an upgrade ---very bad Idea), the problem continued.

  I actually ended up removing all traces and reinstalling
  before it worked.  Whistler though uses the new NT based
  driver model correct?  ME can (insofar as I recall), but
  defalut ME drivers tend to be the 9X driver model so I'm not
  particularly surprised you aren't seeing the problems we
  are/were  Unless of course you are using an 9X driver...

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Poll: Is 154/49 an RC?

2002-03-16 Thread Scott Guthrie

Greetings Joseph,

  I normally stay pretty quiet on this list, but I thought I'd
  come out of LURK mode, and address your comments.

  I feel that 1.54 is the next obvious step.  There are still
  quite a few 1.53 and prior release bugs floating around,
  some of which make regular contributors to this list
  practically foam at the mouth when each new beta or release
  comes out and they aren't fixed. In order for this to be a
  2.0 release, IMHO the outstanding major and a vast majority
  of the minor bugs should be fixed.

  Having said that, and hoping to address the subject
  question, I think 1.49 should definitely be an RC.  In my
  somewhat eclectic reading of the list, a lot of the problems
  recently discussed seem somewhat esoteric, and I think given
  the improvements in the RTV and a few other features, that
  now is the time to distribute the whole program in a
  installable executable. (Just my .02 everyone...)

  As to your complex point on where The Bat! is targeted, I
  think you are absolutely correct in your thought that it is
  really only in use (for the most part) by a dedicated and
  somewhat vocal group of people who not only enjoy its' vast
  capabilities and virtual immunity to the plague of MS
  engendered Macro viruses, but actually LIKE its' somewhat
  dated interface appearance, its' often confusing menu
  options, and its' immensely capable but often hard to use
  Filtering system.

  Having said all that, I THINK RITLabs target market are
  the huge number of OE users out there, and they not only
  want, but expect a handholding experience coupled with a
  swank and sexy interface.  Unfortunately The Bat! has a
  slightly dated look. As well, the menu structure is often
  (as mentioned early) complex, and slightly counterintuitive.

  In order to go to 2.0, I think these will have to be
  addressed.  Personally, I think it looks fine, I just
  wish (like many others) that the menus were rationalized
  and simplified, after all of these months of development
  and feature additions.

  Anyway, I've rambled enough...back to LURK mode for me...

  Regards,

  Scott...
  
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 1.54 Beta/49
Supported by: An Abit KT7-RAID with a Thunderbird 900, and 512Megs of RAM.
Burdened by: Windows ME (V 4.90.3000)


-| The fact that there are some serious bugs remaining, e.g., HTML
-| rendering and import operations, and the sense among some (not
-| personally shared here btw) that the program needs a facelift, raise
-| this in my mind:  not whether B49 is a release candidate, but what
-| type of release candidate is it?  From 1.53 to 1.54 seems too small an
-| increase, but it doesn't yet seem like a ver. 2.0.  The reason I raise
-| this at all, which is not a Beta testing issue but a corporate
-| marketing issue, is that I think the new release of TB! should be well
-| tailored to the role that RITlabs wants the program to play in the
-| world.  If it should continue to be a well designed program for
-| general use by a small group, which is what it is now, then perhaps
-| neither a face lift nor any particular numbering scheme matter.  If,
-| on the other hand, its release is going to be part of a major
-| marketing push, then version numbers matter.  Facelift, too, I guess,
-| but I still don't see what's wrong with the current appearance; I'd
-| say it's more important for widespread acceptance to have the menu
-| redesigned than the graphics.  All of which brings it full circle:
-| perhaps it is now or soon will be ready to go as an officially
-| released 1.6, with the hopes that RITlabls has an interlocked
-| development and marketing plan for 2.0.

-| JN


-|  Dierk Haasis wrote on Saturday, March 16, 2002:

 Hello Avi!

 On Saturday, March 16, 2002 at 2:33:02 PM you wrote:

 Since TB Beta 39, I have not been able to use the Import Messages tool
 to import messages from Outlook Express 6. No matter how many major
 problems get solved, I don't think TB should be released with a faulty
 import tool.

 I take this as the starting point of my poll. Maybe we can collect the
 persistent bugs that counter my idea of 154/49 being a release
 candidate.

 For me, I still do find some bugs not being fixed. Most of them are
 merely cosmetic, elusive or special (that is, found in circumstances
 usually only encountered by power users). Even my pet bugs from the CC
 fall in these categories.

 Avi's bug is definitely more serious as it would affect new users but
 not old timers like me.

 I know that Thomas F. once had a list of bugs found in the CC. Let's
 make something else here.


-- 

Re: IncrediMail Xe and The Bat! - lack of compability

2002-05-01 Thread Scott Guthrie

Wow!  I am amazed at Konstantine's contribution!  I can't honestly say I know a single 
person who finds MSAgent anything other than annoying and a waste of resources.  At 
least until now.  

I really truly can't imagine upgrading Office solely for the improvements in the 
MSAgent Characters.  Perhaps I AM a middle aged stick in the mud.  I personally am 
glad that RITLabs has stuck with the traditional email format rather than HTML, FLASH 
etc. 

More power to you Konstantine that you like this stuff.  But I sincerely hope that 
TheBat! Steers clear of much of what you are looking for... I enjoy my (relatively) 
lean and mean mail client.
IM seems much more like what you are looking for, perhaps pushing IM to add features 
you like from TheBat! might be a better way forward?


Regards.
Scott

as  well...BTW,  I've tried to send a Flash letter with OE. OE handles
it  ok,  but TB...What's the sense in application that doesn't support
MS  agent?! The reason I'm upgrading my Office is constantly improving
characters(however  there  were  only minor improvements in XP:()And I
think  70-90%  of home users are upgrading because of the same reason.
The percent of business users is less, because many of them are trying
to keep secret of this fact. But (from reliable sources) I founded out
that  there  will  be  MS  agent  support  in OE 7


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




Re: IncrediMail Xe and The Bat! - lack of compability

2002-05-01 Thread Scott Guthrie

Oops, make that Konstantin everywhere it is appropriate.  Sorry Konstantin!

-- Original Message --
From: Scott Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Wed,  1 May 2002 08:40:00 -0600

Wow!  I am amazed at Konstantine's contribution!  I can't honestly say I know a 
single person who finds MSAgent anything other than annoying and a waste of 
resources.  At least until now.  

I really truly can't imagine upgrading Office solely for the improvements in the 
MSAgent Characters.  Perhaps I AM a middle aged stick in the mud.  I personally am 
glad that RITLabs has stuck with the traditional email format rather than HTML, FLASH 
etc. 

More power to you Konstantine that you like this stuff.  But I sincerely hope that 
TheBat! Steers clear of much of what you are looking for... I enjoy my (relatively) 
lean and mean mail client.
IM seems much more like what you are looking for, perhaps pushing IM to add features 
you like from TheBat! might be a better way forward?


Regards.
Scott

as  well...BTW,  I've tried to send a Flash letter with OE. OE handles
it  ok,  but TB...What's the sense in application that doesn't support
MS  agent?! The reason I'm upgrading my Office is constantly improving
characters(however  there  were  only minor improvements in XP:()And I
think  70-90%  of home users are upgrading because of the same reason.
The percent of business users is less, because many of them are trying
to keep secret of this fact. But (from reliable sources) I founded out
that  there  will  be  MS  agent  support  in OE 7


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/



_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




Re[4]: TheBat! Pro

2002-06-23 Thread Scott Guthrie

Greetings Joseph,

Sunday, June 23, 2002, 12:12:07 PM, you wrote:

JN What does that mean?  How are they different?

Unless I'm mistaken, he means that the software is using Russian
standard encryption Algorithms vice something like RSA, PGP or one
of the US Government algorithms or algorithms contolled by the US
(RSA, DES, etc).

The US does the same thing by denying an export license to products
containing a crypto system with more than an X bit encryption key.
As I recall for a long time that was 64 bits, but it may have been
less, and I don't know the current status of such Export laws.  I
think it may have been OBE because of strong easily available European
encryption systems (among others).

As I recall the US Government tried to make a case that Encryption was
effectively military hardware in the context of export laws.

Of course my knowledge of Crypto systems and export licenses and
whatnot is somewhat out of date, and I could be TOTALLY wrong grin.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 1.60c
On an Abit KT7-RAID with a Thunderbird 900, and 512Megs of RAM.
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)



_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re[2]: Let's Talk about the Next version [Re: Becky 2.05 V The Bat]

2002-06-27 Thread Scott Guthrie

Greetings Tony,

Thursday, June 27, 2002, 2:37:26 AM, you wrote:

-| I already do that with a Bat filter anyway. I have filters set up to
-| check text files for specific headers that TB downloads and if they match
-| the message gets deleted before it's downloaded.  It's pretty easy to do.

I'm glad you and Marck told me this.  I played with filtering for
awhile not long ago, and couldn't quite figure out how to do this.
Is it working via Mail Dispatcher?

-| However because TB downloads just the headers and then checks each one
-| against a list of know spam or porn originators it does slow the mail
-| session down quite considerably.

I can live with the performance issue if can kill a lot of the SPAM
and jokes on the server, or at least leave them so I can browse them
with the WebMail Interface...

-| If you want my text files and the filters to match your welcome to them.

Thanks Tony, lemme try and see if I can figure it out (I'll learn more
that way) first, and if I bump my head against the rock too many
times, I'll get back with you on this one!

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 1.60c
On an Abit KT7-RAID with a Thunderbird 900, and 512Megs of RAM.
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)



_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: Shorm Message Service (SMS) and TB! (request for 2 features)

2002-12-29 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Marcus,

Another good place would be the back of just about any good
Computer Language programming text, (eg C, C++, PERL, etc)
or Computer Science textbook.


Sunday, December 29, 2002, 10:23:00 AM, Marck wrote:
-| Hi Marcus,

-| @29-Dec-2002, 17:07 +0100 (16:07 UK time) Marcus Ohlström [MO] in
-| [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

MO ... I would of course like to know of other combinations as
MO well. Where can I find appropriate ANSI and ASCII tables?

-| One good place is the Character Map Windows Accessory tool. It will
-| show you the ASCII code for the various characters.


-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
On an Abit KT7-RAID with a Thunderbird 900, and 512Megs of RAM.
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)




 Current beta is 1.62b17 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Odd attachment behavior

2003-06-05 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Marck,

Thursday, June 5, 2003, 8:49:10 PM, you wrote:
-| Okay - I lied! The phenomenon is caused my the message having MIME
-| boundaries. The list server adds the footer outside of these and it
-| has no choice but to show up as an attachment.

Ah, I see it now (after looking all googly eyed at the RFC-822
headers).  What produces the difference?  Is it part of your signing
process?  I mean, I see the Content Type: multipart/mixed header,
but where does it come from?

Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 1.63 Beta/8
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 512Megs of Crucial DDR RAM (PC2100).
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)


avast! (VPS 6/5/2003): the message contains no virus


 Current beta is 1.63b8 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Bugs in v2.00 scheduler?

2003-09-05 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Peter,

Friday, September 5, 2003, 4:41:55 PM, you wrote:
-| confirmed. I use Win98SE and Alt+F6 just toggles between the windows
-| of TB!, if I have more than one window in TB! opened. Other than that
-| Alt+F6 does nothing. Re-mapping (View -- Edit shortcuts) the
-| scheduler to Alt+F11 solves my problem.

OK all, not to shoot the only Win9X theory in the foot, but on _my_ XP configuration,
Alt-F6 does absolutely nothing.

So far I haven't found any reason for this to be the case, but I tend
to run a lot of apps in the background including:

Avast!
K9
Zone Alarm Pro

And many more...

It must be a conflict though, as remapping it to Alt-UpArrow works
just fine!


-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 2.00
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 512Megs of Crucial DDR RAM (PC2100).
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)

---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 8/29/2003
Tested on: 9/5/2003 5:27:43 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





 Current beta is 2.00 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: winmail.dat ? what the heck is that?

2003-10-25 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Timothy,


Saturday, October 25, 2003, 8:23:19 AM, you wrote:

-| And the difference between Most US Government agencies and
-Large US Government Agencies is what?
-| lol

Ooops grin.   Thinking one thing and writing another

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
 TSgt In the USAF...an overly large Government Agency...grin
 
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 2.01.3
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 512Megs of Crucial DDR RAM (PC2100).
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)

---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 10/24/2003
Tested on: 10/25/2003 6:55:35 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





 Current beta is 2.01.7 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Avast

2004-01-25 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Stuart,

Sunday, January 25, 2004, 9:30:48 AM, you wrote:

-|   Is anyone out there using Avast anti-virus plug-in? I have recently
-| tried to test if it would scan outgoing mail and found that I could
-| send Eicar.com without Avast complaining. I'm sure it used to work
-| correctly.

I'm using it, I just tested it with EICAR.COM, will try a couple of
other variants e.g. eicar.com.zip and the like.  But Avast! Popped up
a dialog in the Edit Mail Message window right after I hit the send
button saying the attachment was infected.

Did you set the default behaviour of Anti-Virus plugin activity in the
Preferences-Protection-Anti-Virus-Defaults to check outgoing mail
for viruses  By default TB has that option disabled.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 2.03.47
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 512Megs of Crucial DDR RAM (PC2100).
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)



 Current beta is 2.03 Beta/47 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Avast

2004-01-25 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Stuart,

Sunday, January 25, 2004, 5:43:00 PM, you wrote:

-| Yes I have that checked. Again are you using the latest version of
-| Avast which included the plug-in with the program. I'm not sure, if
-| you are using the old plug-in, that the problem will be there.

Yep, I'm using the latest version, with the official plug-in which
is 4.1.335.

I did use the Old plugin awhile back, but installed the new one from
the official release.

It seems to work OK here.

I downloaded 4.1.335, then ran the Add/Remove Programs wizard,
selecting Remove/Change for Avast!  I then put a tick mark beside the
Plug-in, and Avast! installed it.

I then ran TB, selected the Plug-In, checked the boxes, and off we
went.  I monitored the log, and it is definitely checking the mail as
it comes in (and now as it goes out).

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott
Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 2.03.47
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 512Megs of Crucial DDR RAM (PC2100).
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)



 Current beta is 2.03 Beta/47 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: is rss2pop a Newsreader? (WAS: SOT: RSS in TB - rss2pop plugin)

2004-05-31 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Eddie,


Monday, May 31, 2004, 10:14:03 AM, you wrote:


 This is plugin-gate which allow you to read RSS newsfeed by The Bat!

-| Need a bit help about this rss2pop. Is this 'newsfeed' the same thing
-| as 'newsreader'? Example: I like to join a discussion but it is Web
-| based as a Forum.

No, not the same thing at all.  RSS stands for (variously) Rich Site
Summary, or RDF Site Summary, and (notwithstanding versions and
arguments) was/has been popularized by the Tech News Sites, SlashDot,
and hordes of Blogs and other sites.

Essentially it is a method of delivering Headlines and small bits of
content to a desktop Aggregator (in this case TB) such as SharpReader
or FeedDemon.

-| Can rss2pop be used to fetch this Information and also send my replys
-| resp. questions there?
-| Or do I speak here of total different things?

Definitely two totally different things.  A Newsreader would be
something like Agent or 40titude Dialog, which reads NNTP news
(USENET) servers, and is a bi-directional forum like system.

RSS is a subset of XML (er, RDF is the subset that is), and is served
up via a WebServer.  It is one-way only (server-aggregator)!

-| Would be nice if someone could enlighten me a bit.

To give you an idea of what's available, check this site out:
http://www.feedster.com/top100.php

Personally, before you install the rss2pop gateway, I'd suggest
downloading SharpReader or another aggregator and trying it out.  Get
an idea what content is out there, and decide if it is something you
want before messing with a Beta gateway in your current config.

Your Mileage May Vary of course!

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

I'm using The Bat! 2.11 Beta/9
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 1GB DDR RAM.
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)



 Current beta is 2.11 Beta/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: is rss2pop a Newsreader?

2004-05-31 Thread Scott Guthrie
Greetings Carsten,


Monday, May 31, 2004, 11:55:24 AM, you wrote:

 [...] downloading SharpReader [...]

 BTW - any URL at hands?

-| http://sharpreader.com/


Oops, meant to include that, Thanks Carsten!



-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

I'm using The Bat! 2.11 Beta/9
On an ECS K7S5A with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and 1GB DDR RAM.
Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600)



 Current beta is 2.11 Beta/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Gary,

Monday, September 6, 2004, 12:26:54 PM, you wrote:

G I cannot get into the site (access denied)... I have went through the
G procedure of having it send me my password, going on line, changing it,
G getting an acknowledgement, and I still cannot get in to the the beta...

Did you go to the second link in the list footer first?  I was just
there and downloaded the beta just fine.  However it is very common
for people to fall into the Beta Tester Registration Trap.  The second
link (http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/) must be followed
for proper registration as a beta tester.

Long standing web-site fault that gets discussed every few weeks!

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.0.0.7 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!: Jun2004 (4.1.418) with DB: 0436-4 (03.09.2004)  TB Plugin: 4.1.418



 Current beta is 3.00.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: SPAM filter not working

2004-09-13 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Paul,

Monday, September 13, 2004, 4:45:30 PM, you wrote:

M   Message field - X-Text-Classification - contains - spam

PC I'll set it up!

M When you add the new header in Preferences, enter it with the colon (:)
M in display as... and _without_ the colon in RFC name.

PC I have some that have colons in BOTH, should I change them all what
PC is the significance with/without??


FWIW Paul, I had bad luck with header when NFS first came on line,
and mine (which works) looks like this:

Message Source - contains - X-Text-Classification: spam

However, I may have been using the colon when I tested the header
option.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.0.0.11 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!: Jun2004 (4.1.418) with DB: 0437-1 (09.09.2004)  TB Plugin: 4.1.418



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Quick find in RC6

2004-10-10 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Mary,

Sunday, October 10, 2004, 2:30:05 PM, you wrote:
MB Okay, so that's a clue. But I was trying to type October and it balked
MB at the t. I wanted to search my sister Sue's folder to see if I'd
MB forgotten which weekend she was planning to make a trip--we have a
MB regularly scheduled Sunday afternoon phone date and she was 40 minutes
MB late calling. While I was fiddling with that search, she did
MB call--incredibly busy with what Texas loads on its teachers. :)

I think Richard has hit the nail on the head here.  I'm not sure if
its' a feature or a bug, but Quick Search (at least on RC6) only
matches up to two characters.._if_ it finds a match...if there is no
Oc it goes on to the next letter, otherwise it ignores all entries
beyond that.

In all honesty, its' an odd bug.  For example, type roelof Otten  it
works all the way, and no characters are deleted...not even spaces.
Neither does raymond  however re: exhibits the same behavior.
Its' got to be an odd REGEX problem with how Quick Search searches.

Weird.


MB I really think I'm going to be driven to an uninstall and a Registry
MB clean.

I don't think that will fix the Quick Search problem above, but it
might fix your odd Send Mail as a result of Quick Search problem...

MB I keep popping up all these idiosyncratic little defects in my copy of
MB RC6, beginning with refusal to overwrite the Help file.

LOL.  That's why we're Beta testers right? Just so we can be the
special people that find idiosyncratic defects!


-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.0.1 RC5 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!: Jun2004 (4.1.418) with DB: 0441-2 (08.10.2004)  TB Plugin: 4.1.418



 Current beta is 3.01 RC/6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Quick find in RC6

2004-10-10 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Stuart,

Sunday, October 10, 2004, 3:27:10 PM, you wrote:

SC Hello Scott,
SC Sunday, October 10, 2004, 3:04:32 PM, you wrote:

SG I think Richard has hit the nail on the head here.  I'm not sure if
SG its' a feature or a bug, but Quick Search (at least on RC6) only
SG matches up to two characters.._if_ it finds a match...if there is no
SG Oc it goes on to the next letter, otherwise it ignores all entries
SG beyond that.

SC Scott, I think this is happening because the words you type in
SC quick search must appear in the headers you see in the message list.
SC It does not search in the body of the message.

Stuart, I think you are dead on here, but its' strange that it won't
allow you to type the characters in regardless...wait...I understand
now...

OK, never mind, I figured it out. It only searches _some_ specific
header fields.   Which is why Oct doesn't match on anything, as
Received and Created are not searched...

So what header fields does Quick Search search...it appears to be
Subject:, From: and To: only?

The help file does specify this behavior, but it doesn't make clear
what fields in the Message List are searched.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.0.1 RC5 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!: Jun2004 (4.1.418) with DB: 0441-2 (08.10.2004)  TB Plugin: 4.1.418



 Current beta is 3.01 RC/6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Firefox and MSI Download...

2004-10-14 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello TBBeta,

Has anyone used Firefox 0.10.1 to download the latest MSI Release?

I tried yesterday and today, and always ended up with either a dead
Firefox, or a corrupted MSI.  I gave up and tried IE today, and it
downloaded perfectly the first time...

Anyone else with similar trouble?

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott  



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Firefox and MSI Download...

2004-10-14 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello hggdh,

Thursday, October 14, 2004, 5:58:16 PM, you wrote:

SG Anyone else with similar trouble?

h I only use Firefox, and it is 0.10.1. No problems at all here.



Thanks!  Must be either a. One of my plugins, or b. Windows.  Go
figure...

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.0.1.33 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!: Jun2004 (4.1.418) with DB: 0442-2 (14.10.2004)  TB Plugin: 4.1.418



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Lost Toolbar Customizations

2005-05-18 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Roelof  Kevin,

Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 2:23:02 AM, you wrote:

KC Now if I can just get my spam plugin to stay installed. :(

RO What plug-in do you use? BayesFilter 2.0.2? What if you use an older
RO version? Over here I can't get BayesFilter 2.0.2 get stuck in my
RO preferences, but when I try it with BayesFilter 1.5.6 everything is
RO okay.

I have been experiencing the same disappearing plugin problem with BF
2.0.2 and my Avast! Plugin.  While trying to solve it, I tried the
following:

I copied the BayesFilter.tbp to my TB directory (E:\The Bat\), and then edited
the file TBPlugin.ini which is located in E:\The Bat\MAIL\.

I changed it to look like the below by editing the lines: Plugin #1=
in both the [Plugins] and [Plugin Data] sections.

[Plugins]
Count=2
Plugin #1=e:\the bat\BayesFilter.tbp
Plugin #2=d:\Program Files\Alwil Software\Avast4\AvBatPlg.tbp

[Plugin Data]
Plugin #2= d:\Program Files\Alwil Software\Avast4\AvBatPlg.tbp
Plugin #1=e:\the bat\BayesFilter.tbp
Plugin #3=

After doing this for the BayesFilter, I tried it on my Avast Plugin,
and after restarting TB, I somehow ended up with the file looking like
this:
[Plugins]
Count=2
Plugin #1=%PROGRAMDIR%\BayesFilter.tbp
Plugin #2=d:\Program Files\Alwil Software\Avast4\AvBatPlg.tbp

[Plugin Data]
Plugin #2= d:\Program Files\Alwil Software\Avast4\AvBatPlg.tbp
Plugin #1=
Plugin #3=

After all of this, the BayesFilter Plugin and the AV Plugin both
appear to be sticking (and working! I think...grin)

I hope this helps...

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.5 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!:  with DB:   TB Plugin: 



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Bayes Filter Plugin

2005-05-28 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Sean,

Saturday, May 28, 2005, 5:52:52 AM, you wrote:

SR   I noticed this morning that the Bayes Filter plugin 2.02 was lost by
SR   TB!. For some reason the current beta just lost it out of the
SR   settings :(

And no matter what you do, it never sticks.  I had it sticking once
under the 3.5 Release version by editing the tbpluin.ini file, but
when I updated to a newer MSI it got nuked, and refuses to stay loaded
no matter what I do.

I've looked on Achims page, and haven't seen anything fresh posted in
awhile, but I haven't emailed him direct on this matter yet.  For the
time being, I'm using the BayseIt! Plug-in provided in the TB Distro.
It seems to be working pretty well, and was pretty easy to train.  I
liked some of the features and controls that Bayes Filter offered, but
it don't work, so there ya go!

Just wanted to let you know you weren't alone.  Wish I had a fix to
pass on! grin.

Note, my Avast! Plug-ins don't work either, so I suspect something has
changed on the TB side, but I wouldn't swear to it!

-- 
Best regards,
 Scott

Using TB: 3.5.21 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
And Avast!:  with DB:   TB Plugin: 



 Current beta is 3.5.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/