Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread danger
Hello Darrin,

Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 2:34:45 PM, you wrote:

DR Hello,

DR   Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? Just curious about how it
DR   works with TB!. Good and bad experiences.
  
 

Works Fine for me on 4.1.7.5

-- 
Best regards,
 dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Darrin!

On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 1:34 PM, you wrote:

DR Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? ...

I used MailWasher Pro before I ever got The Bat! I still have it on my
machine, but it's only as a back-up in case anything (I hope nothing
and never) should cause me to have to go back to Outlook Express
temporarily.

I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. No problems. But I
don't do that any more. It's redundant, in my opinion--I can do
everything that MailWasher does using The Bat! all by itself.
 
-- 
Best regards,
Mary
:Mary:
The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi Mary,
On 8/3/2004 12:43 PM my time, Mary wrote:
MB I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. No problems. But I
MB don't do that any more. It's redundant, in my opinion--I can do
MB everything that MailWasher does using The Bat! all by itself.


Thanks for the input. I havent installed it myself, so Im unaware of
its features.
 
-- 
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00

Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking? 


pgpIoJsY17ZTu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Darrin!

On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 2:55 PM, you wrote:

MB I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. ...

DR Thanks for the input. I havent installed it myself, so Im unaware of
DR its features.
 
Basically MailWasher lets you manage your POP3 mail on the server. The
Bat! also has that capability.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
:Mary:
The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi Mary,
On 8/3/2004 1:06 PM my time, Mary wrote:
MB Basically MailWasher lets you manage your POP3 mail on the server. The
MB Bat! also has that capability.


Ok, I see. Thanks for clearing that up. Save me a download there :p
 
-- 
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00

Stack Overflow: Too many pancakes... 


pgpp8WLUtHz6i.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi Simon,
On 8/3/2004 2:48 PM my time, Simon wrote:
SF Mailwasher [4.1.7.5] not only checks the mail on the server [POP or
SF IMAP] but also has White/Blacklist, Bayesian Filtering/Learning,
SF Blacklist (e.g. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) checking and lastly their own
SF Spam Altert service titled First Alert which is a £3.50 (UK Pounds)a
SF year subscription service contianing details of known and identified
SF Spam.

Many features. I might have to download a trial version to see it. Can
Domains be deleted from server just using TB! by itself? I know I can
delete specific senders.

SF I've had superb 99.9% results with K9, but, I'm running Mailwasher
SF right now and can vouch for it's Spam detection abilities too
Ive also experimented with K9. Very pleased with the spam detection.



 
-- 
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00

Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow. 


pgpIzdmGOyYME.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Iain D. Brown
Darrin wrote:

DR Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? ...

Mary replied:

 I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. No problems. But I
 don't do that any more. It's redundant, in my opinion--I can do
 everything that MailWasher does using The Bat! all by itself.
 
I use MailWasher and The Bat, successfully, too. However, I find
Mary's comment interesting in that I use MW to look at my mail on
the server and delete it there: saves me having to download 100+
spam messages needlessly.

I take it, Mary, that you aren't bothered about downloading spam?
(Not that this is an implied criticism, note!)

Best wishes,

Iain.

-- 
Iain Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread malexander
Hello Simon,

SF Mailwasher [4.1.7.5] not only checks the mail on the server [POP
SF or IMAP] but also has White/Blacklist, Bayesian
SF Filtering/Learning, Blacklist (e.g. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) checking
SF and lastly their own Spam Altert service titled First Alert
SF which is a £3.50 (UK Pounds)a year subscription service contianing
SF details of known and identified Spam.

SF I've had superb 99.9% results with K9, but, I'm running Mailwasher
SF right now and can vouch for it's Spam detection abilities too


And I can second that.   It's worth the money for the First Alert
system alone where thousands of users are reporting spam back to a
central server. The upshot is that most of the spam I get is already
marked Known Spam and deleted before it even gets to the Bat. Using
Mailwasher, hardly any spam at all gets through and most of it is
marked deletion when it arrives in Mailwasher.  It's much more
effective, as far as I'm concerned, than filtering using the Bat.

-- 
Best regards,
 Mike



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Iain!

On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 4:58 PM, you wrote:

IDB I use MailWasher and The Bat, successfully, too. However, I find
IDB Mary's comment interesting in that I use MW to look at my mail on
IDB the server and delete it there: saves me having to download 100+
IDB spam messages needlessly.

That's what I do with The Bat!'s Dispatcher--I look at each mail's
headers and manually mark for download the ones I want. The rest are
deleted on the server.

IDB I take it, Mary, that you aren't bothered about downloading spam?

I never download Spam. Admittedly, I am lucky, I get offered, at most,
one or two Spams a day. This week Ive been offered three of those
lists of nonsense words, which I understand are an attempt at
propagating an e-mail virus.

The needs of business users and people who get more mail than I do may
be different.

On principle, I am against blacklists and bouncing mail. I think the
best course is to simply delete unwanted mail. I can't remember an
unwanted advertisement getting through to me since my latest change of
address (to go on broadband). And before that it was a rare occasion
to receive Spam here. (I like to get Amazon's announcements that
they've shipped my books or DVDS. :) )

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
:Mary:
The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi malexander,
On 8/3/2004 2:59 PM my time, malexander wrote:
m And I can second that.   It's worth the money for the First Alert
m system alone where thousands of users are reporting spam back to a
m central server. The upshot is that most of the spam I get is already
m marked Known Spam and deleted before it even gets to the Bat. Using
m Mailwasher, hardly any spam at all gets through and most of it is
m marked deletion when it arrives in Mailwasher.  It's much more
m effective, as far as I'm concerned, than filtering using the Bat.


Thanks. I have a better understanding of the first alert now. Im going
to read up on it a bit more at the website.
 
-- 
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00

If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the process of 
putting them in. 


pgpqBPg1PeF9H.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Plan9
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 5:59:50 PM, malexander wrote:

malexander And I can second that. It's worth the money for the First
malexander Alert system alone where thousands of users are reporting
malexander spam back to a central server. The upshot is that most of
malexander the spam I get is already marked Known Spam and deleted
malexander before it even gets to the Bat. Using Mailwasher, hardly
malexander any spam at all gets through and most of it is marked
malexander deletion when it arrives in Mailwasher. It's much more
malexander effective, as far as I'm concerned, than filtering using
malexander the Bat.

Bellsouth is my ISP and I use their mail servers and their MailGard
option. So far it has caught almost all of the spam that shows up in
my mailbox. Maybe one a day gets through. Out of 350 spam messages in
three days only one made it to TheBat!, knock on wood (as he raps
himself beside the head with his knuckles). The rest were dealt with
on the server by MailGard where I have the option of viewing them to
make sure none were really ham or letting the process delete
them automatically. I have no idea what MailGard is, but it works.

I tried BayesFilters and BayesIt out of curiosity for a while, but
they were much more work and no better than the filter provided by
Bellsouth.

-- 
Regards,
 Plan9
Two strings walk into a bar. The first string says to the bartender:
 Bartender, I'll have a beer. u.5n$x5t?*4ru!2[sACC~ErJ.
 The second string says: Pardon my friend, he isn't NULL terminated.



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Anna
Hi, Darrin,

DR   Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? Just curious about how it
DR   works with TB!. Good and bad experiences.
  
I'm using the earlier free Mailwasher with TB (I haven't upgraded
because the free version does all I want it to do). It worked
seamlessly until recently, when I started having the send-mail
problems I've been complaining about for days. It still works
well, but there are a couple of glitches I can't seem to get rid
of.

For me, being able to delete suspect messages from the server and
not even download them is a big plus. :)

--
Anna



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Anna!

On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 6:44 PM, you wrote:

A For me, being able to delete suspect messages from the server and
A not even download them is a big plus. :)

That is exactly what The Bat!'s Message Dispatcher lets me do. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
:Mary:
The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat

2004-08-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ian!

On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 7:55 PM, you wrote:

MB That is exactly what The Bat!'s Message Dispatcher lets me do. :)

IAW The problem with the Message Dispatcher is that it does not classify
IAW the messages based on the filters. Mailwasher does and by sorting on
IAW the status, the filtered messages are grouped ...

I see. As I wrote in an earlier post, my method will probably not suit
many people. I like to look at my messages chronologically. And I like
to examine the headers on each one.

Then I decide what to download and what to delete. Most of my mail is
from the three TB! lists I'm subscribed to, plus tbot, plus a
scattering of mail from family and personal friends.

It's rare for me to have more than 100 mails at a time to look
at--usually it's 20 to 50. It is rare for me to see a Spam or a
suspicious virus-trojan looking mail among them. I have the time and
the inclination to do it this way.

I'm most grateful that The Bat! affords me this capability.

When I get my mail filtered to its various folders, I still don't read
by threads. I read the mail in each folder chronologically, oldest to
latest.

But that's just me. Everyone else's mileage obviously varies.

And that's the beauty of The Bat!--it's so flexible, to meet a variety
of different needs, and it works well with so many other good
programs, like MailWasher.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
:Mary:
The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html